[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #24 from Andrew Jenner --- Sorry for my lack of communication on this. Realistically, it doesn't look like I'm going to be able to get the powerpcspe port to the appropriate state by the GCC 8 rc1, so please feel free to deprecate or remove as you see fit. I will continue to work on it with the aim of re-adding it in stage 1. Thanks.
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 Andrew Jenner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43312|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #50 from Andrew Jenner --- Created attachment 44056 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44056&action=edit Patch in progress as of 2018/05/03 Hi John, Thanks for the offer of help. I already have hardware, but I need to get my test scripts in order. I'm attaching my current patch. If you could get some test results with and without this patch to make sure it doesn't break anything, that would be a tremendous help. Unfortunately I've been side-tracked onto other projects and haven't been able to give this the attention it deserves, but I hope to get back to it in the next couple of weeks. Thanks again!
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #52 from Andrew Jenner --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #51) > Absolutely. Where should I test the patch? Natively on powerpcspe? On > x86_64? Or anything else? We have a wide range of architectures available > for testing. The patch only changes the powerpcspe backend - there's no need to test it against any other targets.
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #58 from Andrew Jenner --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #57) > Andrew, could you refresh your patch for the current trunk branch? > > It doesn't fully apply for me. Acknowledged. I will try to get to that later this week.
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #61 from Andrew Jenner --- Sorry, once again I have been totally swamped by other work. It's now looking like I should have some time to work on this in early July.
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Jenner --- Sorry for the lack of comment from me - I only just saw this bug (I was not receiving email from bugzilla but hopefully I have fixed this now). I am part-way through the cleanup. I will commit what I have so far before the end of January if it is not finished - there may be more to come after that.
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Jenner --- I have been reading gcc-patches and keeping a list of the rs6000 changes that I will need to port. I will go through the svn log for rs6000 as well to make sure I haven't missed anything. Thanks!
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Jenner --- Created attachment 43312 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43312&action=edit Patch in progress so far
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 Andrew Jenner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |andrewjenner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14 from Andrew Jenner --- I've got most of the major chunks removed now as you can see from my work-in-progress patch, but I'm still working through a long list of little things I've noticed that need cleaning up. I'm not sure that the backend will build with the changes in their current state so I haven't committed them yet, but I expect to be able to do so by the end of the week. Thanks for your patience!
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Jenner --- I have committed a patch to the .opt files: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00114.html I have also submitted a patch to the documentation: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00115.html
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Jenner --- I have committed another small patch to the .opt files: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00247.html and updated my docs patch per Joseph's feedback: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00248.html
[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Jenner --- I'm still actively working on it. The patch is close to ready for commit now, I think - I'm going to try to get it committed by the end of the week.
[Bug fortran/110415] (Re)allocation on assignment to allocatable polymorphic variable from allocatable polymorphic function result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415 Andrew Jenner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC||andrewjenner at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Andrew Jenner --- Fixed on mainline and OG13. I will apply the commit to GCC 13 after the grace period.
[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 110415, which changed state. Bug 110415 Summary: (Re)allocation on assignment to allocatable polymorphic variable from allocatable polymorphic function result https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
