Re: updating bugzilla entry with an additional comment. not allowed
Christian BRUEL wrote: After loged in with my Bugzilla account, I'm trying to add a new Additional Comment to the bug #29845. I didn't modify any of the other fields. I keep getting the following error message: You're not the only one Christian. See bug #30584. Andrew
Re: gcc-3.4.6 and sh-unknown-linux-gnu build error
Motohisa Moriya wrote: -#if defined (__SH3E__) || defined (__SH4__) +#if defined (__SH4E__) || defined (__SH4__) There's no such thing as an SH4E. There is an SH3E and it shares the same single-precision support as SH4, thus there are some places where I would expect to see such an #if. I don't understand what your problem really is, but it isn't what you think it is. Andrew
Re: gcc-3.4.6 and sh-unknown-linux-gnu build error
Motohisa Moriya wrote: Andrew STUBBS wrote: There's no such thing as an SH4E. There is an SH3E and it shares the same single-precision support as SH4, thus there are some places where I would expect to see such an #if. It is said that the libgcc.a multi-library cannot be made because an impossible register is referred for SH3 if I say easily. It is said that it makes an error of making the multi library in sh-unknown-linux-gnu on the way so that the register definition of 2.4 factions Linux may refer to an impossible combination for this because define is done with SH4E and SH4. Therefore, if this patch is put away without recapitulating as -- target=sh-unknown-linux-gnu, it is sure to become an error. The header file was made here based on crosstools 0.84, and it succeeded in making of all libraries since it had it of seeing the header file. It ..said extent alone.. is not thought that the SH architecture can be basic in my understanding big endian and set little endian to the end. Endian is not seen on the linux side but the SH3 architecture or the SH4 architecture is not passed though the register for SH4 is referred when the header file on the linux side sees the register of SH4 ..seeing... At least, only refer to SH4E SH4 when you see the register added with SH4 on the linux side. Sorry, I find this very hard to read. I think you found it very hard to write. :) I do not say that the code is right. I say that changing SH3E to SH4E is wrong. It might be that completely removing SH3E is right. Perhaps the error is somewhere else. Kaz, I don't know if you have already seen this message. Perhaps you can help Motohisa, both with the compiler and the language barrier? Andrew
Re: gcc-3.4.6 and sh-unknown-linux-gnu build error
Motohisa Moriya wrote: I am wishing that all of SH2,SH2E, SH3, SH3E, SH4, and SH4E can be compiled with sh-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc. SH4E does not exist. Perhaps you mean SH4A?
Re: [Bug target/33431] New: [SH4] performance regression between 3.4.6 and 4.x
nbkolchin at gmail dot com wrote: Our target hardware has SH7750 processor running in little endian mode under RTEMS. Unfortunetaly there is no way to boot linux there. After lurking inside backend sources, I found that m4 has several variants in GCC 4.x: m4-100, m4-200, etc. I've tried to compile this tests with m4-200 switch, but it looks like m4-200 enforces big-endian. The 7750 has direct mapped caches and so is not the best platform for benchmarking. A slight code perturbation can give a large change in performance. :( The m4-200 option is NOT suitable for that target. The 7750 is a 100 series core (not that that was a nomenclature that existed when it came out). As far as I know, anybody that has a 200 series or above has an official ST toolset to go with it (GCC of course). Andrew
