[Bug libstdc++/41510] [C++0x] std::complex vs. initialization lists
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-22 08:07
---
Jason, can you have a look to the errors due to the ambiguous overloading
pointed out by Benjamin? Happen for this type of copy initialization:
std::complex z4 = {1.1, 2.2};
where value_type is either float, double or long double. I'm not at all sure we
are supposed to accept that in C++0x...
PS: as regards the patchlet to itself, I don't think is correct: in
C++0x too, as in C++03, explicit applies only to the constructors taking a
"wider" complex type to construct a "narrower" complex type, eg. constructing
complex from complex is explicit, from complex is
not.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41510
[Bug c++/44239] New: Spurious partial explicit specialization when taking the address of a template function.
Problem:
template
const T& max(const T& x, const T& y){
return x > y ? x : y;
}
template
const T& max(const T& x, const T& y, C comp){
return comp(x, y) ? y : x;
}
template
struct functor{
template
functor(F f) : f(f) {}
R (*f)(A0, A1);
};
int main(void){
functor func(&max);
return 0;
}
results in "error: no matching function for call to functor::functor()" Only
candidate constructor is the default copy constructor.
After removing the two parameter max template, compiles clean. The code is
boiled down from a problem using std::max with boost::function.
--
Summary: Spurious partial explicit specialization when taking the
address of a template function.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cjoldfield at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
[Bug fortran/44235] array temporary with high upper bound
-- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-05-22 08:20:04 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44235
[Bug c++/44239] Spurious partial explicit specialization when taking the address of a template function.
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-22 09:18 --- This works fine in 4_4-branch, 4_5-branch and mainline. I don't think it's a regression, and in any case, 4_3-branch is close to its end of life. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work||4.4.1 4.5.0 4.6.0 Resolution||WORKSFORME http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
[Bug fortran/44232] function result with pointer to strided component of argument
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-22 10:04 --- > I may end up doing that, but since part of my interest is in F2003 > functionality, moving backwards in terms of versions is not a win- > win. Unfortunately, I probably will have to work with 2 versions for > the time being. I am using fink to build the libs needed to build gcc: gmp, mpfr, ... . If you are interested by F2003 functionality and are building gcc, it will make sense to build trunk rather that 4.5. Note that while using x86_64-apple-darwin10, I get the same results than Steve Kargl. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44232
[Bug fortran/36928] array temporary for interleaving assignment
--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 10:11 --- I've gotten a bit further with this. For x(la:ua:sa) = x(lb,ub,sb), there can be no collision if abs(la-lb) mod gcd(sa, sb) == 0 where gcd is the greatest common divisor. This will at least fix the test case from comment #1, and also cases like a(2:x:2) = a(1:y:4). but will not work in the cases where there is partial overlap only. Also, it would be nice to have complete simplification so that cases like a(2*n**2+3*n+1:x:2) = a(2*n**2+3*n:x:2) can be caught. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36928
[Bug fortran/44213] ICE when extending abstract type
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 10:21 --- Subject: Bug 44213 Author: janus Date: Sat May 22 10:21:32 2010 New Revision: 159695 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159695 Log: 2010-05-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/44213 * resolve.c (ensure_not_abstract): Allow abstract types with non-abstract ancestors. 2010-05-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/44213 * gfortran.dg/abstract_type_7.f03: New. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/abstract_type_7.f03 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
[Bug fortran/44213] ICE when extending abstract type
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 10:25 --- Fixed with r159695. Closing. Thanks to Hans for the report! -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
[Bug fortran/36928] array temporary for interleaving assignment
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-22 10:50 --- > For x(la:ua:sa) = x(lb,ub,sb), there can be no collision > > if abs(la-lb) mod gcd(sa, sb) == 0 > > where gcd is the greatest common divisor. You probably mean "if abs(la-lb) mod gcd(sa, sb) != 0" (assuming x(lb:ub:sb);-). Note that if I am not mistaken, this result extends to multi-dimension arrays: a(1,:) never overlap a(2,:) if the extent of the first dimension is larger than 1 (or a(1:x:2,:) and a(2:y:2,:) if a(2*n,m)). > Also, it would be nice to have complete simplification so that cases like > > a(2*n**2+3*n+1:x:2) = a(2*n**2+3*n:x:2) > > can be caught. I think you assume that n is unknown at compile time, isn't it? In this case you need to find in gcc a simplifier for la-lb. Did you have a look to graphite or did you contact the guys? They may have some answer to this kind of problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36928
[Bug target/44037] builtin ffs vs. renamed ffs (vms-crtl.h)
--- Comment #2 from jay dot krell at cornell dot edu 2010-05-22 12:16
---
Thanks, good pointer. I found what you mean based on your recommendation. I
tried many things like it then. Nothing worked. I don't know why.
Notice that there is __builtin_foo and foo.
Darwin appears to only rename __builtin_foo.
I need to rename foo.
I didn't figure out what the "implicit" builtins are, but I don't think
figuring that out would help me.
This is a little bit lame but worked:
jbook2:gcc jay$ diff -u /src/orig/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/c-common.c c-common.c
--- /src/orig/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/c-common.c 2010-04-02 12:54:46.0 -0700
+++ c-common.c 2010-05-22 04:59:55.0 -0700
@@ -5181,6 +5181,7 @@
{
tree decl;
const char *libname;
+ const char *libname2;
if (fntype == error_mark_node)
return;
@@ -5190,11 +5191,16 @@
strlen ("__builtin_")));
libname = name + strlen ("__builtin_");
+ libname2 = libname;
+ if (TARGET_ABI_OPEN_VMS && strcmp(libname, "ffs") == 0)
+libname = "decc$ffs";
+
decl = add_builtin_function (name, fntype, fncode, fnclass,
(fallback_p ? libname : NULL),
fnattrs);
if (both_p
&& !flag_no_builtin && !builtin_function_disabled_p (libname)
+ && !builtin_function_disabled_p (libname2)
&& !(nonansi_p && flag_no_nonansi_builtin))
add_builtin_function (libname, libtype, fncode, fnclass,
NULL, fnattrs);
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44037
[Bug lto/44238] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 12:59 --- Just amend the existing dg-skip to also skip darwin. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44238
[Bug bootstrap/44229] [4.6 Regression] 1 new GCC h...@159608 regression
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-22 13:29 --- Confirmed and it is not fixed by the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44199#c6 . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44229
[Bug target/44199] ppc64 glibc miscompilation
--- Comment #17 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-22 13:31 --- > is : http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44229 > potentially a similar problem? It does not look like: the patch in comment #6 does not fix pr44229. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44199
[Bug middle-end/43866] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code with -fbounds-check -funswitch-loops
--- Comment #8 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-05-22 14:09 --- (In reply to comment #7) > 4.5.1, using '-O2 -funswitch-loops' obviously '-O2 -funswitch-loops -fbounds-check' -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43866
[Bug c++/44240] New: r159321 causes FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, the change... Author: hubicka Date: Wed May 12 13:49:34 2010 New Revision: 159321 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159321 Log: * cgraph.h (struct varpool_node): Add aux. * varasm.c (find_decl_and_mark_needed): Force output of varpool nodes. * varpool.c (varpool_remove_node): Do not remove initializer. (varpool_reset_queue): Export. (varpool_finalize_decl): Volatile vars are forced to be output. * lto-symtab.c (lto_varpool_replace_node): Clear out initializer of replaced decl. * ipa.c (enqueue_cgraph_node, enqueue_varpool_node, process_references, varpool_can_remove_if_no_refs): New functions. (cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes): Handle variables too. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cgraph.c trunk/gcc/cgraph.h trunk/gcc/ipa.c trunk/gcc/lto-symtab.c trunk/gcc/tree-inline.c trunk/gcc/tree-inline.h trunk/gcc/varasm.c trunk/gcc/varpool.c triggered the regression of... FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE At r159319, the assembly generated for anon6.s was... .const .align 2 __ZN12_GLOBAL__N_11BIiE1cE: .space 4 .constructor .destructor .align 1 .subsections_via_symbols ...while at r159321, the assembly becomes... .constructor .destructor .align 1 .subsections_via_symbols -- Summary: r159321 causes FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan- assembler 1BIiE1cE Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu GCC build triplet: x86_64-apple-darwin10 GCC host triplet: x86_64-apple-darwin10 GCC target triplet: x86_64-apple-darwin10 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44240
[Bug lto/44238] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
--- Comment #5 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 14:16 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Just amend the existing dg-skip to also skip darwin.
two different reasons.. is this better?
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c (revision 159693)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
/* { dg-lto-do run } */
/* { dg-skip-if "x86 only" { ! { x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } } { "*" } { "" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "no .type" { *-*-darwin* } { "*" } { "" } } */
/* Doesn't work without this dummy function with -fwhopr. */
int foo(void) { }
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44238
[Bug c/44241] New: vms-crtl.h, vms-crtl-64.h need many more symbols
There is a list of symbols in gcc to rename for VMS. In the files vms-crtl.h and vms-crtl-64.h. Maybe there is a better solution? Until it is found and implemented, these lists need a lot more entries. I have enough to build gcc and binutils. I had built cvs, but I lost that list. -- Summary: vms-crtl.h, vms-crtl-64.h need many more symbols Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jay dot krell at cornell dot edu GCC build triplet: i686-apple-darwin9 GCC target triplet: alpha-dec-vms http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44241
[Bug c/44242] New: vms-crt0*.c should compile with gcc
vms-crt0-64.c vms-crt0.c vms-psxcrt0-64.c vms-psxcrt0.c currently are slightly DEC C specific and they are set to not compiler, or maybe to compile with DEC C, it is unclear (the comments say one thing, the code appears different). It is easy to make this code compile with gcc (and still DEC C). The code is doing two things. Establishing a handler. Converting "short" char** to "long" char**. "Short" char** can be replaced by int* and casting. The strdup calls are not needed (and therefore not #include string.h). The "handler" stuff can have #ifdef __DECC around it. While at it, this is also a good place, in the 64bit version, for the global char** environ to be instantiated and assigned to. decc$ga_environ is an array of 32 bit pointers, can be handled in vms-crtl.h but not vms-crtl-64.h. -- Summary: vms-crt0*.c should compile with gcc Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jay dot krell at cornell dot edu GCC build triplet: i686-apple-darwin9 GCC host triplet: i686-apple-darwin9 GCC target triplet: alpha-dec-vms http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44242
[Bug c/44242] vms-crt0*.c should compile with gcc
--- Comment #1 from jay dot krell at cornell dot edu 2010-05-22 14:38 --- Created an attachment (id=20725) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20725&action=view) fix vms-crt0*.c to compile with gcc (surely these four files can be merged down to one, with #if, and possibly the t-* fragment belongs in config.gcc?) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44242
[Bug libstdc++/41510] [C++0x] std::complex vs. initialization lists
--- Comment #3 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2010-05-22 15:32 ---
Subject: Re: [C++0x] std::complex vs. initialization lists
"paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" writes:
| Jason, can you have a look to the errors due to the ambiguous overloading
| pointed out by Benjamin? Happen for this type of copy initialization:
|
| std::complex z4 = {1.1, 2.2};
|
| where value_type is either float, double or long double. I'm not at all sure
we
| are supposed to accept that in C++0x...
if this ambiguity has anything to do with the constructors for
_Complex T, I think we can remove them and instead define a
free-standing function that would do the conversion with reinterpret
casts.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41510
[Bug lto/44238] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 16:08 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Just amend the existing dg-skip to also skip darwin.
>
> two different reasons.. is this better?
If it works for you sure.
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c
> ===
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c (revision 159693)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c (working copy)
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> /* { dg-lto-do run } */
> /* { dg-skip-if "x86 only" { ! { x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } } { "*" } { "" } } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "no .type" { *-*-darwin* } { "*" } { "" } } */
>
> /* Doesn't work without this dummy function with -fwhopr. */
> int foo(void) { }
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44238
[Bug tree-optimization/43784] [4.6 Regression] -Os -fkeep-inline-functions causes FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/pr22237.c execution
--- Comment #2 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-05-22 17:11 --- Fails with -m32 too (as of r159696) -fno-ipa-profile doesn't help (that flag is new in r158969 compared to r158095) The problem is that temporary struct isn't created, and direct copy *q = *p is done. (rp is called with output parameter (rdi) == q, not a pointer to temporary data on stack) Furthermore, qp() isn't emitted in the object file (in neither r158095 or r158969), even though -fkeep-inline-functions was specified. (I am not sure this is a bug) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43784
[Bug other/25028] TImode-to-floating conversions broken
--- Comment #12 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:20 --- As far as I can tell, this (the bug originally described here) was fixed for all targets. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25028
[Bug other/31477] [libgcc] miscompiled trapping arithmetic routines
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:29 --- I believe I fixed this with: r132815 | jsm28 | 2008-03-02 13:11:19 + (Sun, 02 Mar 2008) | 4 lines * libgcc2.c (__addvSI3, __addvsi3, __addvDI3, __subvSI3, __subvsi3, __subvDI3, __negvSI2, __negvsi2, __negvDI2, __absvSI2, __absvsi2, __absvDI2): Use unsigned arithmetic. (whether or not -ftrapv actually works properly). -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31477
[Bug c++/44243] New: Spurious partial explicit specialization when taking the address of a template function.
Problem:
template
const T& max(const T& x, const T& y){
return x > y ? x : y;
}
template
const T& max(const T& x, const T& y, C comp){
return comp(x, y) ? y : x;
}
template
struct functor{
template
functor(F f) : f(f) {}
R (*f)(A0, A1);
};
int main(void){
functor func(&max);
return 0;
}
results in "error: no matching function for call to functor::functor()" Only
candidate constructor is the default copy constructor.
After removing the two parameter max template, compiles clean. The code is
boiled down from a problem using std::max with boost::function.
--
Summary: Spurious partial explicit specialization when taking the
address of a template function.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cjoldfield at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44243
[Bug tree-optimization/43784] [4.6 Regression] -Os -fkeep-inline-functions causes FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/pr22237.c execution
--- Comment #3 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-05-22 17:32 --- -fno-ipa-pure-const prevents the problem (the code is the same as when compiled by r158095) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43784
[Bug c++/44243] Spurious partial explicit specialization when taking the address of a template function.
--- Comment #1 from cjoldfield at gmail dot com 2010-05-22 17:33 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 44239 *** -- cjoldfield at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44243
[Bug c++/44239] Spurious partial explicit specialization when taking the address of a template function.
--- Comment #2 from cjoldfield at gmail dot com 2010-05-22 17:33 --- *** Bug 44243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
[Bug other/33357] collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:33 --- As discussed, not a GCC bug. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33357
[Bug other/33864] gcc 4.3 svn fails to compile glibc 2.7's crti.o
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:38 --- Not a GCC bug; glibc is manipulating .s output from GCC in ways that aren't expected to work with all possible options. FWIW, EGLIBC has a fix to allow it to build for x86 when unwind tables are enabled by default: 2009-06-25 Kazu Hirata * sysdeps/i386/Makefile (CFLAGS-initfini.s): Add -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables and -fno-unwind-tables. (CFLAGS-pt-initfini.s): New. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33864
[Bug other/35905] gcc 4.2.3 still contains many GPL v2 references
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:40 --- 4.2 branch is closed. All GPL files whose home is GCC rather than being shared with other projects were updated for 4.4 at the latest as far as I know. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35905
[Bug other/38363] Use of Unicode quotes depends on LC_CTYPE rather than LC_MESSAGES
--- Comment #2 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:42 --- As discussed, not a bug. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38363
[Bug other/38758] gcc ships with GPL-only library parts (longlong.h)
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:43 --- Was fixed for 4.2.3, 4.3.0. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.2.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38758
[Bug other/38983] GPL version 3 transition incomplete
--- Comment #2 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:46 --- Everything specific to GCC was converted for 4.4. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38983
[Bug driver/32117] Segfault with -b
--- Comment #2 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:53 --- -b and -V were removed: 2010-04-08 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR 42485 * doc/invoke.texi (-b,-V): Delete. * doc/tm.texi: Do not mention -b. * gcc.c (display_help): Delete -b and -V. (process_command): Delete -b and -V. * gcc.h (DEFAULT_SWITCH_TAKES_ARG): Delete -b and -V. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32117
[Bug driver/40251] Using the -V option makes the compiler to exit with 0 exit code on error
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:54 --- -b and -V were removed: 2010-04-08 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR 42485 * doc/invoke.texi (-b,-V): Delete. * doc/tm.texi: Do not mention -b. * gcc.c (display_help): Delete -b and -V. (process_command): Delete -b and -V. * gcc.h (DEFAULT_SWITCH_TAKES_ARG): Delete -b and -V. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40251
[Bug driver/10707] c++ linking impossible when -V specified
--- Comment #12 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:55 --- -b and -V were removed: 2010-04-08 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR 42485 * doc/invoke.texi (-b,-V): Delete. * doc/tm.texi: Do not mention -b. * gcc.c (display_help): Delete -b and -V. (process_command): Delete -b and -V. * gcc.h (DEFAULT_SWITCH_TAKES_ARG): Delete -b and -V. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10707
[Bug driver/11810] gcc -pipe -ox.o -c x.c writes erroneous x.o on compile error
--- Comment #12 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 17:57 --- Fixed by the indicated commit. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11810
[Bug middle-end/43656] "-fcompare-debug failure" with "-O2 -fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure -funroll-loops -fgraphite-identity"
--- Comment #4 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-05-22 18:00 --- This, nor the original (unreduced) testcase, no longer fails in r159387, r159511 and r159696. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43656
[Bug driver/38628] no 4.3.3 libraries for non-C languages if 4.3.3 and 4.4.0 in parallel
--- Comment #11 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:00 --- -V and -b have been removed, if anything is left here it's a duplicate of bug 346. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 346 *** -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38628
[Bug other/346] gcc install clobbers files that it shouldn't touch
--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:00 --- *** Bug 38628 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=346
[Bug c/41364] gcc exits with: internal compiler error: Abort
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:06 --- No feedback, appears not to be a GCC bug. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41364
[Bug tree-optimization/43650] "-fcompare-debug failure" with "-O2 -fpeel-loops -fgraphite-identity"
--- Comment #2 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-05-22 18:07 --- Similiar to PR43656, this also stopped failing between r158969 and r159387 for me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43650
[Bug lto/44238] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
--- Comment #7 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:08 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Just amend the existing dg-skip to also skip darwin.
> >
> > two different reasons.. is this better?
>
> If it works for you sure.
>
> > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c
> > ===
> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c (revision 159693)
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c (working copy)
> > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> > /* { dg-lto-do run } */
> > /* { dg-skip-if "x86 only" { ! { x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } } { "*" } { "" } }
> > */
> > +/* { dg-skip-if "no .type" { *-*-darwin* } { "*" } { "" } } */
> >
> > /* Doesn't work without this dummy function with -fwhopr. */
> > int foo(void) { }
> >
>
I committed this as r159700 but foolishly hit the key before pasting in the
change info.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44238
[Bug c/12245] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Uses lots of memory when compiling large initialized arrays
--- Comment #48 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:09 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12245
[Bug c++/14179] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
--- Comment #58 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:09 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
--- Comment #42 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:09 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
[Bug bootstrap/15212] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] bootstrap fails on interix3
--- Comment #41 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15212
[Bug driver/14435] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gnatchop cannot use the compiled compiler in Ada's testsuite because of changed GCC_EXEC_PREFIX semantics
--- Comment #31 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14435
[Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
[Bug target/18335] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/debug/debug-1.c and debug-2 xyzzy
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18335
[Bug target/15184] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Direct access to byte inside word not working with -march=pentiumpro
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
[Bug target/18346] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/trampoline-1.c
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18346
[Bug c++/17729] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Duplicate __attribute__((deprecated)) warning
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
--- Comment #39 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
[Bug target/15065] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] bootstrap fails during bulding libstdc++-v3 on Tru64 V5.0
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15065
[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4 Regression] bloats code by 31%
--- Comment #32 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
[Bug java/18190] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] primitive array optimization is gone
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18190
[Bug c++/19185] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in cp_expr_size with PCC_STATIC_STRUCT_RETURN
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19185
[Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] >200% compile time regression compared to gcc-3.4
--- Comment #51 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687
[Bug preprocessor/20285] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc -E - < . gives a misleading error message
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20285
[Bug libstdc++/21321] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/12790-3.cc execution test
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21321
[Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
--- Comment #26 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681
[Bug target/20617] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] shared SH libgcc is exporting too many symbols
--- Comment #30 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20617
[Bug target/20528] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20528
[Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
--- Comment #43 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
[Bug c/21343] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] incompatible internal linkage declarations in different scopes not diagnosed
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21343
[Bug c/21659] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] "weak declaration must precede definition" error missing at >= O1
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659
[Bug libgcj/21714] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] libjava bootstrap failure in java/lang/natConcreteProcess.cc
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21714
[Bug middle-end/21953] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Many tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21953
[Bug middle-end/21374] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] ICE with nested function
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21374
[Bug middle-end/22141] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing optimization when storing structures
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141
[Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
[Bug target/22553] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] ICE building libstdc++
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
[Bug c/23144] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] invalid parameter forward declarations not diagnosed
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23144
[Bug middle-end/23868] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] builtin_apply uses wrong mode for multi-hard-register return values
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868
[Bug objc/23709] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] error recovery is not smart enough
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23709
[Bug preprocessor/24024] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc -E -C processes "\" incorrectly inside C comments
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24024
[Bug inline-asm/23200] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] rejects "i"(&var + 1)
--- Comment #43 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200
[Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (builtin functions)
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
[Bug target/24012] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE breaks #include
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
[Bug tree-optimization/23835] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -O3 compile takes two times longer
--- Comment #32 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23835
[Bug rtl-optimization/24319] [4.3/4.4 regression] amd64 register spill error with -fschedule-insns
--- Comment #28 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24319
[Bug objc/24393] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] fatal error when missing closing paren in method argument type
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24393
[Bug target/24334] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure with SGI 7.4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6m ld: GOT overflow
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24334
[Bug java/24698] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] SIGABRT when using ResourceBundle.getBundle with a nonexistant key
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24698
[Bug preprocessor/24976] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] simple hexadecimal number and plus/minus and no space
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24976
[Bug middle-end/24434] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] get_varargs_alias_set returns 0 always
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24434
[Bug c/42960] segfault internal compiler error when trying to compile latest linux kernel
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- Closing as not for FSF GCC and probably a hardware problem. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42960
[Bug middle-end/24998] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Build failure: undefined symbol __floatunsitf
--- Comment #42 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24998
[Bug bootstrap/25672] [4.3 regression] cross build's libgcc picks up CFLAGS
--- Comment #26 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25672
[Bug driver/25208] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] two outputs and -MMD
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25208
[Bug bootstrap/25438] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] make: *** No rule to make target `bubblestrap'. Stop.
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438
[Bug c++/25973] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973
[Bug target/25343] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] [m68k] testsuite failures
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25343
[Bug objc/25965] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Allows duplicate member names in objc subclasses
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25965
[Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
[Bug middle-end/26241] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] None of the IPA passes are documented in passes.texi
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241
[Bug ada/25844] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] ICE on overloaded renames
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25844
[Bug bootstrap/25470] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] fixincludes/ subdirectory not cleaned by "make distclean"
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25470
