[Bug preprocessor/43642] FAIL: c-c++-common/raw-string-1.c

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 07:03 ---
Subject: Bug 43642

Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr  6 07:02:40 2010
New Revision: 157979

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157979
Log:
PR preprocessor/43642
* lex.c (lex_raw_string): Change type of TYPE variable to
unsigned char.

Modified:
trunk/libcpp/ChangeLog
trunk/libcpp/lex.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43642

[Bug preprocessor/43642] FAIL: c-c++-common/raw-string-1.c

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 07:47 ---
Fixed.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43642

[Bug c/43661] [4.5 Regression] ice in fold_comparison, at fold-const.c:9579

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 08:02 ---
Caused by r145254.  Shorter testcase:
int
func (int x)
{
  return 0 ? (unsigned short) (0 ? : 1 * (signed char) (x ^ x) >= 0) : 1;
}


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|ice in fold_comparison, at  |[4.5 Regression] ice in
   |fold-const.c:9579   |fold_comparison, at fold-
   ||const.c:9579
   Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43661

[Bug c/43662] New: ICE in insert_save, at caller-save.c:1303

[marcus at jet dot franken dot de]

during Wine 64bit build I get

gcc -c  -O2  acmstream.i
acmstream.c: In function ‘AVIFILE_OpenCompressor’:
acmstream.c:327:1: internal compiler error: in insert_save, at
caller-save.c:1303
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See  for instructions.

gcc version 4.5.0 20100331 (experimental) [trunk revision 157870] (SUSE Linux)


-- 
   Summary: ICE in insert_save, at caller-save.c:1303
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: marcus at jet dot franken dot de
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43662

[Bug c/43662] ICE in insert_save, at caller-save.c:1303

[marcus at jet dot franken dot de]

--- Comment #1 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de  2010-04-06 08:35 
---
Created an attachment (id=20322)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20322&action=view)
acmstream.i

gcc -c -O2 acmstream.i

started to reduce...  likely attribute(ms_abi) related I think.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43662

[Bug target/43638] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Internal compiler error with inline asm

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Component|middle-end  |target
   Last reconfirmed|2010-04-04 19:09:32 |2010-04-06 08:50:00
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43638

[Bug tree-optimization/43655] [4.5 Regression] -ftree-ter causes FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/temps5.C execution test

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43655

[Bug lto/43659] -flto doesn't remember -fPIC

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 08:57 ---
GCC has code to do exactly this.  Somebody needs to debug why it doesn't work.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43659

[Bug c/43661] [4.5 Regression] ice in fold_comparison, at fold-const.c:9579

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 09:00 ---
These kind of asserts are really bogus ...

Well.  We have an unfolded tree.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-06 09:00:32
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43661

[Bug c/43661] [4.5 Regression] ice in fold_comparison, at fold-const.c:9579

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 09:10 ---
I have a fix for the ICE.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2010-04-06 09:00:32 |2010-04-06 09:10:53
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43661

[Bug tree-optimization/43655] [4.5 Regression] -ftree-ter causes FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/temps5.C execution test

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 09:27 ---
IMHO the best is to remove the -ftree-ter flag.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||matz at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43655

[Bug target/43662] [4.5 Regression] ICE in insert_save, at caller-save.c:1303

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:03 ---
We use a caller-save slot of VOIDmode for a DImode mem.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
  Component|c   |target
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-06 10:03:20
   date||
Summary|ICE in insert_save, at  |[4.5 Regression] ICE in
   |caller-save.c:1303  |insert_save, at caller-
   ||save.c:1303
   Target Milestone|--- |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43662

[Bug rtl-optimization/43632] [4.5 Regression] -g option became very slow after r157834

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:07 ---
callgrind --inclusive=yes says on this:
  438,822,838,411 
/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/../../gcc/var-tracking.c:variable_tracking_main
  429,638,024,208 
/usr/src/gcc/obj/libiberty/../../libiberty/hashtab.c:htab_traverse_noresize
[/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1plus]
  428,305,658,767 
/usr/src/gcc/obj/libiberty/../../libiberty/hashtab.c:htab_traverse
[/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1plus]
  417,506,443,433  ../../gcc/var-tracking.c:vt_find_locations
[/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1plus]
  389,486,317,740  ../../gcc/var-tracking.c:dataflow_set_merge
[/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1plus]
  389,242,104,098 
/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/../../gcc/var-tracking.c:variable_merge_over_cur
  389,242,104,098  ../../gcc/var-tracking.c:variable_merge_over_cur
[/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1plus]
  345,572,722,020  ../../gcc/var-tracking.c:intersect_loc_chains
[/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1plus]
  292,844,158,243  ../../gcc/var-tracking.c:find_loc_in_1pdv
[/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1plus]
  117,800,020,698  /usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/../../gcc/rtl.c:rtx_equal_p
  117,800,020,698  ../../gcc/rtl.c:rtx_equal_p [/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1plus]
   78,786,470,332 
/usr/src/gcc/obj/libiberty/../../libiberty/hashtab.c:htab_find_with_hash
[/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/cc1plus]

so, as a micro-optimization what could work is use the spare bits in
location_chain_def (30 bits on 32-bit hosts, 32 + 30 bits on 64-bit hosts) for
something we could compare quickly in place of rtx_equal_p resp. loc_cmp.
Say, having two or 3 topmost bits of those 30 for code (0 for REG, 1 for MEM, 2
for VALUE, 3 for anything else) and for each code encode something in the other
bits (e.g. REGNO for REG, 2 bits REG/MEM/VALUE/other for MEM's address than the
rest of bits, saturating VALUE uid for VALUEs, something else for other codes).
Then we'd call rtx_equal_p or loc_cmp only if two values are equal.

Or better find a way how to do less work during dataflow merges.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43632

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

[matz at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #28 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:34 ---
I don't think we should fix the double-accounting bug for the 4.5 series,
when we tried it on SPEC it caused several regression, meaning we would need
much more fine-tuning.  We have time for that for 4.6.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436

[Bug c/43661] [4.5 Regression] ice in fold_comparison, at fold-const.c:9579

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:37 ---
Subject: Bug 43661

Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr  6 10:36:57 2010
New Revision: 157984

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157984
Log:
2010-04-06  Richard Guenther  

PR middle-end/43661
* fold-const.c (fold_comparison): Handle X * 0 CMP 0.

* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43661.c: New testcase.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43661.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43661

[Bug libstdc++/43660] range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing

[redi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:38 ---
n1933 is ancient history, the RNG pieces have changed significantly

In the current draft it says:
"A uniform_int_distribution random number distribution produces random integers
i, a <= i <= b"

So it is a closed interval [a,b] rather than [a,b)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43660

[Bug libstdc++/43660] range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing

[redi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:40 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> [Note that the same issue exists with other ways of invoking using the
> generator (e.g., a std::uniform_real_distribution with bounds of
> 0 and 1 will indeed return 1); but it's less clear its a bug in those
> cases (although, for instance, boost's random implementation never
> seems to return the upper bound).]

Again, referring to the latest draft:
"A uniform_real_distribution random number distribution produces random numbers
x, a <= x < b"

So that does appear to be a bug


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43660

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

--- Comment #29 from hubicka at ucw dot cz  2010-04-06 10:46 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
regression caused by r147852

> I don't think we should fix the double-accounting bug for the 4.5 series,
> when we tried it on SPEC it caused several regression, meaning we would need
> much more fine-tuning.  We have time for that for 4.6.

Well, we need to compensate for overall unit growth then, I will do so at
pretty-ipa so it will get some testing and see how much trouble it causes.
I am fine with this not being fixed in 4.5.x as long as we won't run into
real world testcase where double counting causes explosion of unit size.

Honza


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436

[Bug c/43661] [4.5 Regression] ice in fold_comparison, at fold-const.c:9579

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:47 ---
Fixed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43661

[Bug c++/43663] New: Can't take a const-ref to a bit field

[gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign dot com]

Given the code below, gcc emits the following error:

error: attempt to take address of bit-field structure member 'MyClass::field1'

This compiles fine with Sun's CC, IBM's xlC, and Comeau. The C++ 2003 standard
mentions in 9.6p2 that a non-const reference can't be bound to a bit field, but
that a const reference can be (although it's actually bound to a temporary
initialized with a copy of the bit field rather than the field itself) so I
expect the below code to work fine.

// Code
class MyClass
{
public:
  MyClass() { field1 = 0; };
  int field1 : 4;
};

int main()
{
  MyClass myClass;

  const int &fieldRef1 = myClass.field1;

  return 0;
}


-- 
   Summary: Can't take a const-ref to a bit field
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43663

[Bug libstdc++/43660] range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing

[redi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:53 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> 
> As best as I can tell, std::random_shuffle wants its random-number
> generating functor to return results in the range [0,N), where N is the
> parameter it passes to the functor; i.e., the upper-bound is exclusive
> (and the lower-bound inclusive).

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3056.pdf changes the
third random_shuffle overload to shuffle and changes the requirements


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43660

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #30 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:56 ---
I think it is a really, really bad signal if a bug like this, where the
revision that introduced the issue was identified >9 months ago, remains
unfixed for GCC 4.5.

I, for one, wouldn't care hunting down revisions that introduce regressions in
stage1 anymore, if component maintainers and release managers just postpone
fixing the issue until it is too late to fix for a release.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436

[Bug c++/43663] Can't take a const-ref to a bit field

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:57 ---
Confirmed.  Note that the frontend would need to make sure to unfold the
reference for the middle-end - the middle-end can't bear taking the address
of a bitfield.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||rejects-valid
  Known to fail||4.5.0
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-06 10:57:58
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43663

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

[rguenther at suse dot de]

--- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de  2010-04-06 11:00 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
 regression caused by r147852

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> --- Comment #30 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 10:56 
> ---
> I think it is a really, really bad signal if a bug like this, where the
> revision that introduced the issue was identified >9 months ago, remains
> unfixed for GCC 4.5.
> 
> I, for one, wouldn't care hunting down revisions that introduce regressions in
> stage1 anymore, if component maintainers and release managers just postpone
> fixing the issue until it is too late to fix for a release.

Well, the fix doesn't fix this bug.  There's no patch to fix this
bug (yet).  Also 0.5% code size increase doesn't look important
enough to me.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436

[Bug libstdc++/43660] range of random-number generator seems wrong/confusing

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-04-06 11:00 
---
Jon is right and recently I removed that old comment from random.h because
indeed was incorrect.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43660

[Bug c++/43663] [C++0x] Can't take a const-ref to a bit field

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:01 ---
Wow, taking the address of a bit field. That can only be C++. This should be
closed as a dup of bug 5...  Oh, well... :-)


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
Summary|Can't take a const-ref to a |[C++0x] Can't take a const-
   |bit field   |ref to a bit field


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43663

[Bug bootstrap/42347] [4.5 Regression] sched-deps.c:3840:1: internal compiler error: in fixup_reorder_chain, at cfglayout.c:796

[siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com]

--- Comment #7 from siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com  2010-04-06 
11:01 ---
Long story short. This bootstrap failure seems to be related to
--disable-checking configure option. Reproduced on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
and armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi. I'm re-running the tests now to be completely
sure.

Maybe it is caused by some bad assert with a side effect?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42347

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

--- Comment #32 from hubicka at ucw dot cz  2010-04-06 11:05 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
regression caused by r147852

> I think it is a really, really bad signal if a bug like this, where the
> revision that introduced the issue was identified >9 months ago, remains
> unfixed for GCC 4.5.

This particular bug should not affect -Os scores at all as discussed earlier.
Overall unit growth limits will never hit at -Os since we never enlarge unit
size. 

I spent fair amount of time tracking down the individual CSiBE code size
increases and fixed most of them.  At the moment, I believe, the only remaining
issue is bzip2 size growth.  The inlining decisions here are sane at the local
level as inliner sees them, just the resulting binary gets bigger. Inling is a
heuristic even at -Os and we can't expect it to work in all cases.  Here the
old inliner got lucky by simply not accounting any stores/loads as real
instructions allowing the functions to be inlined at letting later optimizers
to produce smaller code.

Honza


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436

[Bug target/43638] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Internal compiler error with inline asm

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:05 ---
Subject: Bug 43638

Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr  6 11:04:58 2010
New Revision: 157987

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157987
Log:
PR target/43638
* config/i386/i386.c (print_operand): Remove 'e' and 'E' code
handling.

* gcc.target/i386/pr43638.c: New test.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr43638.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43638

[Bug c++/43663] [C++0x] Can't take a const-ref to a bit field

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-04-06 11:05 
---
Why C++0x?!?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43663

[Bug bootstrap/42347] [4.5 Regression] sched-deps.c:3840:1: internal compiler error: in fixup_reorder_chain, at cfglayout.c:796

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:07 ---
It would be really helpful if someone can explain how to reproduce this with a
cross-compiler. I will analyze/fix this problem when this is reproducible with
a cross.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42347

[Bug target/43638] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Internal compiler error with inline asm

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:07 ---
Subject: Bug 43638

Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr  6 11:07:09 2010
New Revision: 157988

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157988
Log:
PR target/43638
* config/i386/i386.c (print_operand): Remove 'e' and 'E' code
handling.

* gcc.target/i386/pr43638.c: New test.

Added:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr43638.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43638

[Bug target/43638] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Internal compiler error with inline asm

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:08 ---
Fixed.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43638

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

[matz at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #33 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:09 ---
Steven, please note that this PR was proposed WONTFIX for 4.5 already in
comment #15.  The discussion after that was about something that is only
slightly related to this bug, something that wouldn't actually affect this
very bug.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436

[Bug preprocessor/28435] -MMD vs not found system header (included from a system header)

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28435

[Bug c/32455] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with modified va_list, allows declaration of __builtin_*

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32455

[Bug target/33120] Data not put in BSS section on Mac OS

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33120

[Bug target/36861] [4.5 Regression] boost's compressed avl confuses GCC

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #31 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861

[Bug tree-optimization/33562] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] aggregate DSE disabled

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562

[Bug c++/35112] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE and broken diagnostic with ambiguous class name

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35112

[Bug other/37515] [meta-bug] GCC 4.5 pending patches

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37515

[Bug fortran/38471] ICE with subreference pointer assignment

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38471

[Bug target/39723] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with long long shifts on v850

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723

[Bug target/39719] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] uses libcall instead of branch on m68hc11

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39719

[Bug target/39726] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] ColdFire pessimizations on QImode/HImode tests

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39726

[Bug target/39718] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] crash on crx in IRA

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39718

[Bug rtl-optimization/39871] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] Code size increase on ARM due to poor register allocation

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #23 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39871

[Bug target/39725] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] MIPS pessimizations on floating-point

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39725

[Bug target/39722] [4.5 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722

[Bug c/39959] [4.5 Regression] IMA is broken, gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c, gcc.dg/pr34668-2.c ICE

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:19 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39959

[Bug middle-end/39976] [4.5 Regression] Big sixtrack degradation on powerpc 32/64 after revision r146817

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #28 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976

[Bug bootstrap/39968] Should plugins use shared library?

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39968

[Bug target/40414] gcc 4.4.0 error at postreload.c:396

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #26 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40414

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #34 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436

[Bug middle-end/40060] [4.5 Regression] casts loose alignment info

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40060

[Bug rtl-optimization/40107] [4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memmove.c and gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memmove-chk.c fail at -O1 on spu-elf

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40107

[Bug tree-optimization/40464] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34099.C -O1 (internal compiler error) at -O1 and above

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40464

[Bug libffi/40701] [4.5 regression] Many libffi tests fail to compile on Tru64 UNIX

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40701

[Bug debug/40462] [4.5 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_begin_epilogue, at dwarf2out.c:2773 while compiling mlib-tgt.adb

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40462

[Bug testsuite/40625] [4.5 Regression] Errors in "make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=plugin.exp"

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40625

[Bug target/40722] [4.5 Regression] ia32intrin.h defines of _rotl, _rotr conflict with target stdlib.h decls

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722

[Bug rtl-optimization/40761] [4.4/4.5 Regression] IRA memory hog for insanely nested loops

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40761

[Bug libmudflap/40778] [4.5 Regression] Mudflap instrumentation missing in cloned function.

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40778

[Bug rtl-optimization/41085] [4.5 Regression]: cris-elf gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41085

[Bug rtl-optimization/40797] [4.5 Regression] ICE in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4361

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40797

[Bug middle-end/41082] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/where_2.f90 execution, -O3 -g with -m64

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #47 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082

[Bug tree-optimization/41087] [4.5 Regression]: cris-elf gfortran.dg/zero_sized_3.f90 -O3 -funroll-loops execution

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41087

[Bug ada/41493] [4.5 regression] ACATS c34006g fails on arm-linux and sparc-rtems

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41493

[Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] stdarg pass produces wrong code

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #45 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41089

[Bug testsuite/41166] contrib/test_summary should not depend upon config.status

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41166

[Bug libstdc++/41975] [C++0x] [DR579] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #24 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975

[Bug bootstrap/42347] [4.5 Regression] sched-deps.c:3840:1: internal compiler error: in fixup_reorder_chain, at cfglayout.c:796

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42347

[Bug debug/42648] [4.5 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41353-1.c FAILs at -On, n > 0

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42648

[Bug libstdc++/42460] man page errors for generated libstdc++ man pages

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #25 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460

[Bug target/42818] Static C++ linking breakage "undefined reference to ___real__Znwj" and others in libcygwin.a(_cygwin_crt0_common.o)

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42818

[Bug rtl-optimization/42839] [4.5 Regression] gcc.target/mips/octeon-bbit-2.c failing for -mabi=64

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42839

[Bug fortran/42769] ICE in resolve_typebound_procedure

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42769

[Bug rtl-optimization/42863] [4.5 Regression] with auto increments

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42863

[Bug debug/42767] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42767

[Bug tree-optimization/42906] [4.5 Regression] Empty loop not removed

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #27 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42906

[Bug target/42894] [4.5 Regression] Invalid rtl sharing in Thumb1.

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894

[Bug middle-end/42961] [4.5 regression] IRA register preferencing bug

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42961

[Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42963

[Bug middle-end/42973] [4.4 regression] IRA apparently systematically making reload too busy on 2 address instructions with 3 operands

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42973

[Bug target/43358] [4.5 Regression] IRA: internal compiler error: in pool_free, at alloc-pool.c:335

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43358

[Bug bootstrap/43531] [4.5 Regression] host files being used during cross compilation

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43531

[Bug libfortran/43572] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR19872.f execution test; formatted read - wrong numbers

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43572

[Bug target/43610] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in prepare_float_lib_cmp, at optabs.c:4392 with -fno-trapping-math and _Decimal64 comparison

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:20 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43610

[Bug tree-optimization/43611] [4.5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV with -fipa-cp-clone -fkeep-inline-functions

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:21 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43611

[Bug tree-optimization/43627] [4.5 Regression] slow compilation (tree canonical iv takes 75%)

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:21 
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43627

[Bug c++/43621] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in poplevel_class, at cp/name-lookup.c:2615 with invalid qualified name

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:21 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43621

[Bug target/43635] [4.5 Regression] ICE in s390_emit_call, at config/s390/s390.c:9484

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:21 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43635

[Bug target/43636] [4.5 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2103

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:21 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43636

[Bug c++/43648] [4.5 regression] ICE with explicit destructor call and typedef

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:21 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43648

[Bug rtl-optimization/43632] [4.5 Regression] -g option became very slow after r157834

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:21 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43632

[Bug tree-optimization/43655] [4.5 Regression] -ftree-ter causes FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/temps5.C execution test

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:21 ---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released.  Deferring to 4.5.1.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.5.0   |4.5.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43655

[Bug libstdc++/42460] man page errors for generated libstdc++ man pages

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

--- Comment #26 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-04-06 11:22 
---
Let's just close it as fixed.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|4.5.1   |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460

[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #35 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:32 ---
If your discussions are only slightly related to this bug and don't affect -Os,
then why are you having that discussion here?

Anyway. If this is WONTFIX for GCC 4.5, then it should be marked as such
(remove "4.5 regression" from subject, open new PR for other issue, whatever).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436

[Bug ada/37440] [4.4/4.5 Regression] GNAT Bug Box a-ngcefu.adb:397

[joel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:36 ---
Reconfirmed.

+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.5.0 20100402 (experimental) [trunk revision 157942] (arm-unknown-rtems4.10)
GCC error:|
| in find_valid_class, at reload.c:704 |
| Error detected around a-ngcefu.adb:115:8 |
| Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.|
| Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug.|
| Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report.   |
| Include the exact gcc or gnatmake command that you entered.  |
| Also include sources listed below in gnatchop format |
| (concatenated together with no headers between files).   |
+==+

Please include these source files with error report


-- 

joel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-06 11:36:16
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37440

[Bug c++/43663] Can't take a const-ref to a bit field

[redi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-06 11:38 ---
Noone's taking the address of a bitfield, the stnadard specifically says "The
address-of operator & shall not be applied to a bit-field, so there are no
pointers to bit-fields."

What happens is the same as:

double d = 0;
const int& i = d;

a temporary is created and the reference bound to it.

And this definitely isn't new in C++0x! The reference for C++03 should be 9.6p3
rather than p2


-- 

redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[C++0x] Can't take a const- |Can't take a const-ref to a
   |ref to a bit field  |bit field


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43663