[Bug bootstrap/32272] make exit because build/genmodes.exe doesn't exist

2008-06-19 Thread Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de


--- Comment #10 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de  2008-06-19 07:22 
---
Subject: Re:  make exit because build/genmodes.exe
doesn't exist

* laurent at guerby dot net wrote on Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:29:14AM CEST:
> It happened to me but I found the source: if even once you did run configure 
> in
> the source dir then even if after that you configure in a clean build dir
> you'll get this error.
> 
> So the solution is to regenerate a clean source dir (either untar or svn co)
> and to absolutely avoid to configure in it, always configure in a build dir.

In what way does this description differ from mine that I overlook?

Maybe we should let toplevel configure check that, if a separate build
tree is used, then $srcdir/host-$host_noncanonical may not exist.

Cheers,
Ralf


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32272



[Bug bootstrap/32272] make exit because build/genmodes.exe doesn't exist

2008-06-19 Thread laurent at guerby dot net


--- Comment #11 from laurent at guerby dot net  2008-06-19 07:45 ---
No difference, just to confim.

I must admit I never understood why GCC configure does not fail immediately
when sourcedir=builddir since it doesn't work, but I guess your proposed check
would be a step in this direction.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32272



[Bug libgcj/32198] rmic fails if remote method throws superclass of RemoteException

2008-06-19 Thread jerico dot dev at gmail dot com


--- Comment #1 from jerico dot dev at gmail dot com  2008-06-19 07:55 
---
I have got the same problem when trying to produce stubs for JBoss AS. Works
fine with SUN, grmic throws the an exception however (see [2]). To reproduce
download JBoss AS 4.2.2-GA source tarball from [1], compile it from source
(using build/build.sh) and then try to generate stubs from
server/output/classes/org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server/JRMPInvoker.class

[1]
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866&package_id=16942&release_id=548923

[2] rmic -classpath $LOCALCLASSPATH:server/classes/ -d stubs/ -keepgenerated
-v1.2 -verbose -g org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPInvoker
[Processing class org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPInvoker.class]
[analyze class org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPInvoker]
[implements org.jboss.invocation.Invoker]
[implements java.rmi.Remote]
[Generating class org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPInvoker_Stub]
Package org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server, name JRMPInvoker impl JRMPInvoker
Exception in thread "main" gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.CompilationError: invoke,
defined in org.jboss.invocation.Invoker, does not throw
java.rmi.RemoteException
   at
gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.SourceGiopRmicCompiler.compile(libgcj-tools.so.81)
   at gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.SourceGiopRmicCompiler.run(libgcj-tools.so.81)
   at gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.Main.run(libgcj-tools.so.81)
   at gnu.classpath.tools.rmic.Main.main(libgcj-tools.so.81)


-- 

jerico dot dev at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jerico dot dev at gmail dot
   ||com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32198



[Bug c/21759] Implement warning for codes at the intersection of C and C++

2008-06-19 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 08:03 ---
Manuel - "quick and dirty" list got posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00412.html

I think #3 & #4 are implemented, #1 & #2 remain.  There might be others of
course.


-- 

ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
   Last reconfirmed|2005-12-18 20:03:32 |2008-06-19 08:03:11
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21759



[Bug c++/36576] New: gcc 4.3.1 doesn't build for me on openSUSE 10.3

2008-06-19 Thread karx11erx at hotmail dot com
gcc build terminates with an error on gcc 4.3.1.
Source is installed in /home//gcc-4.3.1 (gcc, g++, objc, java, fortran,
libstdc++)
Make is called in /home//gcc-4.3.1-bin after having called
../gcc-4.3.1/configure from that folder.

libtool: compile:  /home/schaeff/gcc-4.3.1-bin/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/home/schaeff/gcc-4.3.1-bin/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/home/schaeff/gcc-4.3.1-bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/home/schaeff/gcc-4.3.1-bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava -I./include -I./gcj -I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava
-Iinclude -I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/include
-I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/classpath/include -Iclasspath/include
-I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm
-I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/../boehm-gc/include -I../boehm-gc/include
-I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/libltdl -I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/libltdl
-I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/.././libjava/../gcc
-I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/../zlib
-I../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/../libffi/include -I../libffi/include -fno-rtti
-fnon-call-exceptions -fdollars-in-identifiers -Wswitch-enum
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wextra -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE
-DPREFIX=\"/usr/local\" -DTOOLEXECLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib/../lib64\"
-DJAVA_HOME=\"/usr/local\"
-DBOOT_CLASS_PATH=\"/usr/local/share/java/libgcj-4.3.1.jar\"
-DJAVA_EXT_DIRS=\"/usr/local/share/java/ext\"
-DGCJ_ENDORSED_DIRS=\"/usr/local/share/java/gcj-endorsed\"
-DGCJ_VERSIONED_LIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib/../lib64/gcj-4.3.1-9\"
-DPATH_SEPARATOR=\":\" -DECJ_JAR_FILE=\"\"
-DLIBGCJ_DEFAULT_DATABASE=\"/usr/local/lib/../lib64/gcj-4.3.1-9/classmap.db\"
-DLIBGCJ_DEFAULT_DATABASE_PATH_TAIL=\"gcj-4.3.1/classmap.db\" -g -O2
-D_GNU_SOURCE -MT posix-threads.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/posix-threads.Tpo -c
../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/posix-threads.cc -o posix-threads.o >/dev/null 2>&1
here=`pwd`; cd ../../../gcc-4.3.1/libjava/classpath/lib; \
find gnu java javax org sun -name .svn -prune -o -name '*.class' -print
| \
gjar -cfM@ $here/libgcj-4.3.1.jar
jar: internal error:
java.lang.NullPointerException: man
at java.util.jar.JarOutputStream.(JarOutputStream.java:43)
at
gnu.classpath.tools.jar.Creator.writeCommandLineEntries(Creator.java:225)
at gnu.classpath.tools.jar.Creator.run(Creator.java:246)
at gnu.classpath.tools.jar.Main.run(Main.java:276)
at gnu.classpath.tools.jar.Main.main(Main.java:284)
make[3]: *** [libgcj-4.3.1.jar] Fehler 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/schaeff/gcc-4.3.1-bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libjava'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/schaeff/gcc-4.3.1-bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libjava'
make[1]: *** [all-target-libjava] Fehler 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/schaeff/gcc-4.3.1-bin'
make: *** [all] Fehler 2


-- 
   Summary: gcc 4.3.1 doesn't build for me on openSUSE 10.3
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: karx11erx at hotmail dot com
 GCC build triplet: X86
  GCC host triplet: X86
GCC target triplet: X86


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36576



[Bug c/34800] Compile failure with --combine and a union with an anonymous struct

2008-06-19 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 10:54 ---
Works for me with
GNU C (Debian 4.3.1-2) version 4.3.1 (i486-linux-gnu)
and current trunk.


-- 

aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to work||4.3.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34800



[Bug fortran/36577] New: Segmentation fault from gfortran compilation

2008-06-19 Thread zhonghaij at yahoo dot com
I got an error message when compiling my code “coart.f” . Seems gfortran does
not like the block data. But I tried to separate the component with problem
(the attached junk.f), it was fine. Could you please tell me why?
Here is what happened:

[zjin:~/coart/spec] jin% gfortran -c coart.f
coart.f:12657: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.

[zjin:~/coart/spec] jin% gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-apple-darwin8.9.1
Configured with: ../gcc-4.3-20070518/configure --enable-languages=fortran,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.3.0 20070518 (experimental)

Thank you in advance.


-- 
   Summary: Segmentation fault from gfortran compilation
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zhonghaij at yahoo dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36577



[Bug fortran/36577] Segmentation fault from gfortran compilation

2008-06-19 Thread zhonghaij at yahoo dot com


--- Comment #1 from zhonghaij at yahoo dot com  2008-06-19 11:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=15787)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15787&action=view)
coart.f is the original source, junk.f is the part with problem.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36577



[Bug fortran/36577] Segmentation fault from gfortran compilation

2008-06-19 Thread zhonghaij at yahoo dot com


--- Comment #2 from zhonghaij at yahoo dot com  2008-06-19 11:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=15788)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15788&action=view)
junk.f is extracted from coart.f


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36577



[Bug java/35257] jar: internal error: java.lang.NullPointerException bootstrapping libjava

2008-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 12:09 ---
*** Bug 36576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||karx11erx at hotmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35257



[Bug c++/36576] gcc 4.3.1 doesn't build for me on openSUSE 10.3

2008-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 12:09 ---
This is a bug in opensuse's gjar.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35257 ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36576



[Bug fortran/36577] Segmentation fault from gfortran compilation

2008-06-19 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 12:20 ---
Can not reproduce this for now. Please make sure that you include all necessary
files ...

$ gfortran-4.3 -g -w pr36577.f
pr36577.f:13595.72:

  USE PMOM_aer
   1
Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'pmom_aer.mod' for reading at (1): No such
file or directory


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36577



[Bug fortran/36577] Segmentation fault from gfortran compilation

2008-06-19 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 12:23 ---
Removing the offending USE statement (commnet #3) only results in a load of
undefined references, i.e. compilation was (sort of) successfull - no problem
to be seen?!

$> gfortran-4.3
gcc version 4.3.2 20080618 (prerelease)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36577



[Bug c/34800] Compile failure with --combine and a union with an anonymous struct

2008-06-19 Thread alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com


--- Comment #2 from alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com  2008-06-19 13:21 
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Works for me with
> GNU C (Debian 4.3.1-2) version 4.3.1 (i486-linux-gnu)
> and current trunk.
> 

Yes, 4.3.x is not affected, even pre-releases of 4.3.0 worked fine for me.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34800



[Bug c/34800] Compile failure with --combine and a union with an anonymous struct

2008-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 13:23 ---
Fixed so closing as such.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34800



[Bug rtl-optimization/35604] Label references are not updated after edge insertion

2008-06-19 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 14:05 ---
Subject: Bug 35604

Author: uros
Date: Thu Jun 19 14:04:31 2008
New Revision: 136947

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136947
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/35604
* jump.c (redirect_exp_1): Skip the condition of an IF_THEN_ELSE. We
only want to change jump destinations, not eventual label comparisons.


Modified:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/jump.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35604



[Bug target/36527] gcc 4.2.x generates wrong code for ARM target

2008-06-19 Thread benny at ammitzboell-consult dot dk


--- Comment #8 from benny at ammitzboell-consult dot dk  2008-06-19 14:07 
---
Works on gcc 4.3.1


-- 

benny at ammitzboell-consult dot dk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to work|3.4.6   |3.4.6 4.3.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36527



[Bug rtl-optimization/35604] Label references are not updated after edge insertion

2008-06-19 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.3.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35604



[Bug c/28706] [4.1 Regression] Compile failure with --combine and explicitly aligned structures

2008-06-19 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #8 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 14:10 ---
works for me with 4.3.1 and current trunk


-- 

aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to work|4.0.0   |4.0.0 4.3.1 4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28706



[Bug middle-end/36578] New: cast to long double not taken into account when result stored to a double

2008-06-19 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org
The following program shows that the casts to long double are not taken into
account when the result to stored to a variable of type double. This bug occurs
with gcc from 3.4 to 4.3.1, but didn't occur with gcc 3.3.

The bug can be reproduced on a Linux/x86_64 machine (i.e. where the "double"
type corresponds to the IEEE-754 double precision and the "long double" type
corresponds to the traditional x86 extended precision) with the arguments:
  4294967219 4294967429

(these arguments allow the double rounding effect to be visible).

#include 
#include 

int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
  double a, b, c, d, e;
  long double al, bl, dl, el;

  if (argc != 3)
exit (1);

  a = atof (argv[1]);
  b = atof (argv[2]);
  al = a;
  bl = b;

  c = a * b;
  d = (long double) a * (long double) b;
  e = al * bl;
  dl = (long double) a * (long double) b;
  el = al * bl;

  printf ("a  =  %.0f\n", a);
  printf ("b  =  %.0f\n", b);
  printf ("c  =  %.0f\n", c);
  printf ("d  =  %.0f\n", d);
  printf ("e  =  %.0f\n", e);
  printf ("dl =  %.0Lf\n", dl);
  printf ("el =  %.0Lf\n", el);

  return 0;
}

Incorrect result (with gcc 3.4 to gcc 4.3.1):
a  =  4294967219
b  =  4294967429
c  =  18446744314227707904
d  =  18446744314227707904
e  =  18446744314227712000
dl =  18446744314227709952
el =  18446744314227709952

Correct result (as given by gcc 3.3) is the same except:
d  =  18446744314227712000

Note: I compiled with the options -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic.


-- 
   Summary: cast to long double not taken into account when result
stored to a double
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vincent at vinc17 dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36578



[Bug middle-end/36578] cast to long double not taken into account when result stored to a double

2008-06-19 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org


--- Comment #1 from vincent at vinc17 dot org  2008-06-19 14:37 ---
To make things clear, perhaps I should have added:

#if __STDC__ == 1 && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901 && defined(__STDC_IEC_559__)
#pragma STDC FP_CONTRACT OFF
  printf ("__STDC_IEC_559__ defined:\n"
  "The implementation shall conform to the IEEE-754 standard.\n"
  "FLT_EVAL_METHOD is %d (see ISO/IEC 9899, 5.2.4.2.2#7).\n\n",
  (int) FLT_EVAL_METHOD);
#endif

which outputs:

__STDC_IEC_559__ defined:
The implementation shall conform to the IEEE-754 standard.
FLT_EVAL_METHOD is 0 (see ISO/IEC 9899, 5.2.4.2.2#7).

So, one can't even say that the value of d is correct because it is the same as
the exact result rounded to double precision. The fact that the double rounding
doesn't occur is a bug here.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36578



[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule

2008-06-19 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #12 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 14:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=15789)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15789&action=view)
handle libdecnumber

libdecnumber/ChangeLog

  * configure.ac: Add option --enable-intermodule and adjust bid_OBJS.
  * Makefile.in: Handle onestep build.
  (COMPILE-m): New variable to build with --combine.
  * configure: Regenerate.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396



[Bug other/36579] New: gcc refuses to recognize libraries on the command line

2008-06-19 Thread c94wjpn at gmail dot com
It seems to me that the ordering of the libraries / object files given on the
command line is significant.

This fails:
g++ -lpthread -L. -lext minimal.o  -o go
minimal.o: In function `main':
minimal.cpp:(.text+0x1f): undefined reference to `ext_'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Whereas this succeeds:
g++ -lpthread minimal.o -L. -lmcf_ext -o go

here, libext.a is a c-library.


-- 
   Summary: gcc refuses to recognize libraries on the command line
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: c94wjpn at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36579



[Bug other/36579] gcc refuses to recognize libraries on the command line

2008-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 15:02 ---
Is libext.a an archive?
If so this is not a bug as archives are only looked at once by the most
linkers.
You can use -Wl,--start-group  -Wl,--end-group if you want to group
libraries/objects to be looked at more than once.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36579



[Bug libgcj/32198] rmic fails if remote method throws superclass of RemoteException

2008-06-19 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 15:27 ---
Confirmed; I think the analysis is correct here.


-- 

tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-06-19 15:27:55
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32198



[Bug target/36559] Softfloat library support absent for Coldfire

2008-06-19 Thread luigi dot mantellini at idf-hit dot com


--- Comment #7 from luigi dot mantellini at idf-hit dot com  2008-06-19 
15:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=15790)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15790&action=view)
Fix config.gcc in order to compile the correct libraries

I (think) resolved using the proposed patch.

Ciao

luigi


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36559



[Bug c++/36576] gcc 4.3.1 doesn't build for me on openSUSE 10.3

2008-06-19 Thread karx11erx at hotmail dot com


--- Comment #2 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com  2008-06-19 15:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is a bug in opensuse's gjar.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35257 ***
> 

How do I fix it?


-- 

karx11erx at hotmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36576



[Bug c++/36576] gcc 4.3.1 doesn't build for me on openSUSE 10.3

2008-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 16:02 ---
Update your system.  Report this bug to OpenSUSE.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35257 ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36576



[Bug java/35257] jar: internal error: java.lang.NullPointerException bootstrapping libjava

2008-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 16:02 ---
*** Bug 36576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35257



[Bug other/36579] gcc refuses to recognize libraries on the command line

2008-06-19 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-19 16:12 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> It seems to me that the ordering of the libraries / object files given on the
> command line is significant.

Yes, it is, has always been, also with shared libraries.
Not a bug.


-- 

rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36579



[Bug objc/36580] New: ICE at -O2 and above (with strict aliasing) with invalid Objective-C code.

2008-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Testcase:
struct objc_class { } ;
object_get_class(id object)
{
  (Class)object;
}
struct objc_class {};

--- CUT ---
We get:
IMP.mi:6: error: redefinition of 'struct objc_class'
IMP.mi:6: internal compiler error: in layout_type, at stor-layout.c:1878
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See  for instructions.

I don't know if this is a regression of not.  I found this while testing the
tuples branch which included the wrong include directories and messed up the
code.


-- 
   Summary: ICE at -O2 and above (with strict aliasing) with invalid
Objective-C code.
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: objc
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36580



[Bug c++/36576] gcc 4.3.1 doesn't build for me on openSUSE 10.3

2008-06-19 Thread karx11erx at hotmail dot com


--- Comment #4 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com  2008-06-19 20:01 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Update your system.  Report this bug to OpenSUSE.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35257 ***
> 

My system is up to date. It is automatically updated several times a week. Is
there an updated gjar somewhere I can install?


-- 

karx11erx at hotmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36576



[Bug ada/36562] gnatmake not processing shared library projects

2008-06-19 Thread chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com


--- Comment #1 from chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com  2008-06-19 21:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=15791)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15791&action=view)
patch to fix configuration for ada/36562

Attached is a patch which fixes configuration problem associated with the bug.
This has only been tested on x86_64-linux.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36562



[Bug c++/36523] OpenMP task construct fails to instantiate copy constructor

2008-06-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-20 02:18 ---
Subject: Bug 36523

Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 20 02:18:07 2008
New Revision: 136977

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136977
Log:
PR c++/36523
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph_process_new_functions): Don't clear
node->needed and node->reachable.
* cgraphbuild.c (record_reference): Handle OMP_PARALLEL and OMP_TASK.
* omp-low.c (delete_omp_context): Call finalize_task_copyfn.
(expand_task_call): Don't call expand_task_copyfn.
(expand_task_copyfn): Renamed to...
(finalize_task_copyfn): ... this.

* testsuite/libgomp.c++/task-7.C: New function.

Added:
trunk/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/task-7.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cgraphbuild.c
trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c
trunk/gcc/omp-low.c
trunk/libgomp/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36523



[Bug fortran/36577] Segmentation fault from gfortran compilation

2008-06-19 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-20 03:49 
---
junk.f compiles without error for me here.

Do you have the gmp and mpfr libraries installed?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36577



[Bug fortran/36540] libgfortran compile warnings

2008-06-19 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-20 03:53 
---
None of the proposed type casts fix this problem.  Requires some configury
repair work.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36540



[Bug ada/36573] s-intman.adb:232:50: "SA_ONSTACK" is undefined

2008-06-19 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-20 05:07 ---
Subject: Bug 36573

Author: danglin
Date: Fri Jun 20 05:06:24 2008
New Revision: 136981

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136981
Log:
PR ada/36573
* s-osinte-hpux-dce.ads (SA_ONSTACK): Define.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ada/s-osinte-hpux-dce.ads


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36573



[Bug ada/36573] s-intman.adb:232:50: "SA_ONSTACK" is undefined

2008-06-19 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-20 05:08 ---
Fixed.


-- 

danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36573