[Bug java/6388] Integer.MIN_VALUE == 0x80000000 optimized to false on powerpc
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 07:07 --- Subject: Bug 6388 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-29 07:06:57 Modified files: gcc/java : ChangeLog decl.c java-tree.h lex.c lex.h Log message: 2002-11-05 Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix for PR java/6388. * lex.h (JAVA_INTEGRAL_RANGE_ERROR): Wrap in do...while. * java-tree.h (enum java_tree_index): New values JTI_DECIMAL_INT_MAX_NODE, JTI_DECIMAL_LONG_MAX_NODE. (decimal_int_max, decimal_long_max): New defines. * lex.c (yylex): Rewrote range checking. Sign extend literals. (error_if_numeric_overflow): Rewrote range checking. * decl.c (java_init_decl_processing): Initialize decimal_int_max, decimal_long_max. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/java/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.925.2.59.2.2.2.11&r2=1.925.2.59.2.2.2.12 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/java/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.117.2.2.8.1&r2=1.117.2.2.8.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/java/java-tree.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.136.2.3.4.1&r2=1.136.2.3.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/java/lex.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.80.8.4.8.1&r2=1.80.8.4.8.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/java/lex.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.26&r2=1.26.30.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6388
[Bug fortran/17590] Standard conformance should take intrinsics into account.
--- Additional Comments From jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2004-10-29 07:16 --- Here is the revised patch, which for some reason isn't flagged as belonging to the same thread as the original: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00829.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17590
[Bug c++/17695] [4.0 regression] ICE in add_abstract_origin_attribute
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 07:17 --- Subject: Bug 17695 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-29 07:16:50 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug: typedef2.C Log message: PR c++/17695 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Mark TYPE_DECLs as abstract when they appear in a constructor/destructor that will be cloned. PR c++/17695 * g++.dg/debug/typedef2.C: New test. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4462&r2=1.4463 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1321&r2=1.1322 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4517&r2=1.4518 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/typedef2.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17695
[Bug c/3581] large string causes Segmentation Fault in cc1
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 07:19 --- Subject: Bug 3581 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-29 07:19:00 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-common.c c-common.h c-parse.in c-typeck.c gcc/cp : ChangeLog parse.y rtti.c semantics.c spew.c gcc/objc : objc-act.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse: concat1.C gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: concat2.c Log message: 2002-04-26 Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR c/3581 * c-common.c (fix_string_type): Split out of ... (combine_strings): ... here. Take a varray, not a tree list. (c_expand_builtin_printf): Use fix_string_type. * c-common.h: Update decls. * c-parse.in (string): Remove. Update all uses to use STRING instead, and not call combine_strings. (yylexstring): New. (_yylex): Use it. * c-typeck.c (simple_asm_stmt): Don't call combine_strings. (build_asm_stmt): Likewise. * objc/objc-act.c (my_build_string): Use fix_string_type. (build_objc_string_object): Build varray for combine_strings. cp/ * parse.y (string): Remove. Update all uses to use STRING instead, and not call combine_strings. * rtti.c (tinfo_name): Use fix_string_type. * semantics.c (finish_asm_stmt): Don't call combine_strings. * spew.c (yylexstring): New. (read_token): Use it. testsuite/ * g++.dg/parse/concat1.C: New test. * gcc.dg/concat2.c: New test. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.13152.2.657.2.27.2.203&r2=1.13152.2.657.2.27.2.204 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-common.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.294.2.9.2.1.2.6&r2=1.294.2.9.2.1.2.7 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-common.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.115.2.3.4.1.2.3&r2=1.115.2.3.4.1.2.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-parse.in.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.127.2.2.4.1.2.5&r2=1.127.2.2.4.1.2.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-typeck.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.180.2.2.4.1.2.4&r2=1.180.2.2.4.1.2.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.2685.2.114.2.8.2.30&r2=1.2685.2.114.2.8.2.31 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/parse.y.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.248.2.5.4.1.2.5&r2=1.248.2.5.4.1.2.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/rtti.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.130.6.1.2.2&r2=1.130.6.1.2.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/semantics.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.252.2.6.8.3&r2=1.252.2.6.8.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/spew.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.61.10.2&r2=1.61.10.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/objc/objc-act.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.126.2.1.8.1&r2=1.126.2.1.8.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.1672.2.166.2.8.2.85&r2=1.1672.2.166.2.8.2.86 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/concat1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.106.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/concat2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.106.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
[Bug target/11591] [3.4 only] ICE in gcc.dg/altivec-5.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 07:27 --- Subject: Bug 11591 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-29 07:27:05 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000: rs6000.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: altivec-5.c Log message: 2004-03-30 Hartmut Penner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR 11591 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_legitimate_address): Allow any offset to argument pointer in no-strict case. 2002-04-16 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * gcc.dg/altivec-5.c: New test. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.13152.2.657.2.27.2.205&r2=1.13152.2.657.2.27.2.206 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.291.2.13.2.5.2.21&r2=1.291.2.13.2.5.2.22 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=1.1672.2.166.2.8.2.87&r2=1.1672.2.166.2.8.2.88 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/altivec-5.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.2.28.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11591
[Bug c++/17695] [4.0 regression] ICE in add_abstract_origin_attribute
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 07:27 --- Fixed in GCC 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17695
[Bug fortran/18108] [gfortran] overloading does not work for functions
--- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2004-10-29 08:13 --- Further reduced, same error: module foo implicit none interface bar module procedure bar_real end interface contains function bar_real (rarg) real rarg logical bar_real bar_real = (rarg==0.0) end function subroutine baz logical l l = bar (3.0) end subroutine end module foo -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18108
[Bug c++/18216] New: Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
The README files in the tarball, show that when an array is declared double V[N]; or double* V = new double[N]; computations with values stored in that array give different results! Should floating point calculations with values stored in an array depend on the way that array has been allocated? Both g++-3.4.2 and icc-8.1.022 exhibit similar behaviour with icc being both more accurate and much faster on a pentium4 Laptop. -- Summary: Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated Product: gcc Version: 3.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dkouroun at mailbox dot gr CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
[Bug c++/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
--- Additional Comments From dkouroun at mailbox dot gr 2004-10-29 10:25 --- Created an attachment (id=7427) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7427&action=view) source code and the results in README.1, README.2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
[Bug libgcj/14070] gij and -jar argument should set the manifest Class-path recursively
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to fail|4.0 3.3.3 3.0.4 3.3.1 3.2.3 |3.3.3 3.0.4 3.3.1 3.2.3 |3.2.2 3.4.0 |3.2.2 3.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14070
[Bug bootstrap/18208] error compiling gcc34 on freebsd 5.1
--- Additional Comments From micko_s at hotmail dot com 2004-10-29 10:41 --- (In reply to comment #1) > CFLAGS containing -mcpu= is your problem, this is listed on the instation instructions because it has > bitten some of other people already. > > `-mcpu=' is deprecated. Use `-mtune=' or '-march=' instead. > Sorry but i don't know how to write a make statemant with -mtune or -march! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18208
[Bug ada/18217] New: [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failures on powerpc-darwin with undefined symbol (__Unwind_fallback_frame_state_for)
../../xgcc -B../../ -c -DIN_GCC `echo -O2 -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common |sed -e 's/-pedantic//g' -e 's/-Wtraditional//g'` -O2 -g -O2 -I. -I.. -I../.. -I/Users/pinskia/src/local2/gcc/gcc/ada -I/Users/pinskia/src/local2/gcc/gcc/ada/../ config -I/Users/pinskia/src/local2/gcc/gcc/ada/../../include -I/Users/pinskia/src/local2/gcc/gcc/ada/ .. /Users/pinskia/src/local2/gcc/gcc/ada/link.c \ -o link.o ../../xgcc -B../../ -DIN_GCC `echo -O2 -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common |sed -e 's/-pedantic//g' -e 's/-Wtraditional//g'` -o ../../ gnatmake b_gnatm.o a-except.o ctrl_c.o ali.o ali-util.o s-casuti.o alloc.o atree.o binderr.o butil.o casing.o csets.o debug.o elists.o einfo.o erroutc.o errutil.o err_vars.o fmap.o fname.o fname-uf.o fname-sf.o gnatmake.o gnatvsn.o hostparm.o interfac.o i-c.o i-cstrin.o krunch.o lib.o make.o makeusg.o makeutl.o mlib.o mlib-fil.o mlib-prj.o mlib-tgt.o mlib-utl.o namet.o nlists.o opt.o osint.o osint-m.o output.o prj.o prj-attr.o prj-attr-pm.o prj-com.o prj-dect.o prj-env.o prj-err.o prj-ext.o prj-nmsc.o prj-pars.o prj-part.o prj-proc.o prj-strt.o prj-tree.o prj-util.o rident.o s-exctab.o s- secsta.o s-stalib.o s-stoele.o scans.o scng.o sdefault.o sfn_scan.o s-purexc.o s-htable.o sinfo.o sinput.o sinput-c.o sinput-p.o snames.o stand.o stringt.o styleg.o stylesw.o system.o validsw.o switch.o switch-m.o table.o targparm.o tempdir.o tree_io.o types.o uintp.o uname.o urealp.o usage.o widechar.o \ ../rts/libgnat.a ../../prefix.o ../../version.o link.o ../../../libiberty/libiberty.a /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: __Unwind_fallback_frame_state_for collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [../../gnatmake] Error 1 make[3]: *** [gnattools1] Error 2 make[2]: *** [gnattools-native] Error 2 make[1]: *** [all-target-libada] Error 2 make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 gcc_build: error: Could not bootstrap the compiler -- Summary: [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failures on powerpc-darwin with undefined symbol (__Unwind_fallback_frame_state_for) Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18217
[Bug ada/18217] [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failures on powerpc-darwin with undefined symbol (__Unwind_fallback_frame_state_for)
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18217
[Bug target/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 11:36 --- This might be related to PR 17990. -- What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
[Bug fortran/18218] New: Miscompare in sixtrack benchmark caused by loss of precision
I could reproduce this problem only on power4 hardware, running SUSE linux. % uname -a Linux regsuse01 2.6.5-7-pseries64 #1 SMP Thu Apr 8 15:55:41 UTC 2004 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux % ~/gcc/bin/gfortran --version GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.0 20041027 (experimental)) Running SIXTRACK spec benchmark results in a miscompare, even with all optimizations turned off. The miscompare is caused by the following place in file eig66.f do 40 i=1,ndim2 if(abs(reval(i)**2+aieval(i)**2 -one).gt.c1m10) then write(6,*) ' EIG6: EIGENVALUES OFF THE UNIT CIRCLE!' return endif This code checks that the distance from computed complex eigenvalues to the unit circle is no more than 10**-10. With g77, the distance is about 10**-14, and I get similar results on other platforms with gfortran. On power4+gfortran the distance is about 10**-8, which triggers the error message and causes miscompare. There is some possibility that this problem is related to 17927. -- Summary: Miscompare in sixtrack benchmark caused by loss of precision Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lei at il dot ibm dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18218
[Bug target/11739] i386 prefetch tests need to made smarter
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 12:37 --- Subject: Bug 11739 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-rhl-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-29 12:37:36 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/i386: i386.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests: i386-prefetch.exp Log message: 2004-07-09 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Backport from mainline: 2004-07-08 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * config/i386/i386.c (override_options): Enable SSE prefetches with -mtune, as long as we are compiling for i686 or higher. All i686 processors accept SSE prefetches as NOPS, some i586's don't. 2004-07-07 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * config/i386/i386.c (override_options): Don't set x86_prefetch_sse from -mtune= option. 2004-07-08 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * gcc.mist-tests/i386-prefetch.exp (PREFETCH_SSE): Change all -march=i386 into -march=i686. Add -march=i686 -mcpu=prescott and -march=prescott. (PREFETCH_3DNOW): Add -march=c3. 2003-08-04 Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR target/11739 * gcc.misc-tests/i386-prefetch.exp: Use -march=i386 when specifying a value for -mcpu. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.16114.2.523.2.112&r2=1.16114.2.523.2.113 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.495.2.20.4.24&r2=1.495.2.20.4.25 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.2261.2.170.2.61&r2=1.2261.2.170.2.62 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/i386-prefetch.exp.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.2&r2=1.2.52.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11739
[Bug c++/16276] [3.4 only] G++ generates local references to linkonce sections
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:00 --- Subject: Bug 16276 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-rhl-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-29 12:59:56 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog final.c output.h varasm.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other: comdat4-aux.cc comdat4.C Log message: PR c++/16276 * output.h (function_readonly_data_section): New prototype. * varasm.c (function_readonly_data_section): New function. * final.c (final_scan_insn): Call it instead of readonly_data_section. * g++.old-deja/g++.other/comdat4.C: New test. * g++.old-deja/g++.other/comdat4-aux.cc: New. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.16114.2.523.2.114&r2=1.16114.2.523.2.115 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/final.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.271.2.1.4.2&r2=1.271.2.1.4.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/output.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.116.6.1&r2=1.116.6.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/varasm.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.324.2.4.2.10&r2=1.324.2.4.2.11 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.2261.2.170.2.62&r2=1.2261.2.170.2.63 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/comdat4-aux.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.32.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/comdat4.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.32.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16276
[Bug c++/16276] [3.4 only] G++ generates local references to linkonce sections
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:04 --- Subject: Bug 16276 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-rhl-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-29 13:03:55 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/cp : rtti.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti: tinfo1.C Log message: 2004-07-07 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR c++/16276 * rtti.c (emit_tinfo_decl): Turn off DECL_ONE_ONLY if typeinfo is not public. PR c++/16276 * g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C: New file. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.16114.2.523.2.115&r2=1.16114.2.523.2.116 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/rtti.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.146.2.1.2.2&r2=1.146.2.1.2.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=1.2261.2.170.2.63&r2=1.2261.2.170.2.64 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_3-rhl-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.3.28.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16276
[Bug target/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:06 --- The source is not fully compilable. You missed the timing.h header. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
[Bug java/18212] nativ compilation with multiple jars fails / gives internal compiler error
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:08 --- This is most likely the same as PR 7. Could you attach all three jar files? -- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18212
[Bug c++/18207] misleading diagnostic for ill-formed implicitly-defined default constructor
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:10 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||diagnostic Known to fail||2.95 3.4.3 4.0.0 3.3.3 3.2.3 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 13:10:16 date|| Summary|wrong diagnostic for ill- |misleading diagnostic for |formed implicitly-defined |ill-formed implicitly- |default constructor |defined default constructor http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18207
[Bug target/18206] -dynamic-linker option seems to be badly named, broken and undocumented
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:14 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Known to fail||2.95.3 3.0.4 3.2.3 3.3.3 ||3.4.0 4.0.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 13:14:13 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18206
[Bug ada/18217] [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failures on powerpc-darwin with undefined symbol (__Unwind_fallback_frame_state_for)
-- What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18217
[Bug rtl-optimization/16088] [4.0 Regression] Generates wrong code
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:19 --- Can you try again, there was recently patch which might help, also can you attach a preprocessed source which you can link? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16088
[Bug ada/15799] Legal program rejected, using 'Base
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15799
[Bug ada/17666] Ada tests hanging during make check
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:22 --- Are these tests still hanging on a more recent GCC version ? AFAIK, these tests should be compiled properly now (assuming Ada builds successfully). Arno -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17666
[Bug ada/15803] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.3(19)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15803
[Bug ada/15804] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.8.1(2)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15804
[Bug ada/15805] Illegal program not detected, allows writing through access to constant
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
[Bug ada/15808] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.3(10)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15808
[Bug ada/15840] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.7(14)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15840
[Bug target/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-29 13:27 --- I can't compile your code, due to this: g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4.3-pre/bin/c++ main1.cc main1.cc:3:20: timing.h: No such file or directory main1.cc:9: error: `R' does not name a type main1.cc: In function `int main(int, char**)': main1.cc:20: error: `indexType' does not name a type main1.cc:21: error: `indexType' undeclared (first use this function) main1.cc:21: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) main1.cc:21: error: expected `;' before "i" [...] The file timing.h isn't in your tarball. But besides that, can you try to come up with a smaller and more obvious testcase? You may be able to merge everything into one file which would make things more obvious. Thanks W. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
[Bug ada/15841] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9(17)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:27 --- On the mainline I get: test_247015.ads:7:26: "Tag" attribute can only be applied to objects of class-wide type test_247015.ads:8:16: missing ";" Is this a correct error? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15841
[Bug ada/18085] [Ada] - C++ interoperability sample program fails, 3.4.2, Linux 2.4.20-8, Red Hat 9.0
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:28 --- I believe recent changes in Interfaces.CPP may have fixed things, if there's indeed something to fix. Could you verify ? Arno -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18085
[Bug ada/15841] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9(17)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:30 --- Note the error about the semicolon was my fault for not copying the semicolon at the end of the line but does not matter we still reject it: test_247015.ads:7:23: "Tag" attribute can only be applied to objects of class-wide type -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15841
[Bug ada/15841] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9(17)
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:31 --- Yes, error message seems fine. Closing. Arno -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15841
[Bug ada/15842] Legal program rejected
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:32 --- I get this on the mainline): cannot generate code for file test_247016.ads (package spec) to check package spec for errors, use -gnatc (I don't know gnat/Ada that much, does that mean this code is accepted?) -- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15842
[Bug ada/15843] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.7.2(2)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:33 --- I do get a warning on the mainline: test_247017.adb:8:18: warning: "x" is never assigned a value -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15843
[Bug ada/15842] Legal program rejected
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:34 --- If that's the only error you are getting, and compiling the spec with -gnatc gives no error, then indeed the problem is fixed. Arno -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15842
[Bug ada/15845] Illegal program not detected, circular renames
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15845
[Bug ada/15846] Illegal program not detected, self renames
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15846
[Bug ada/15847] Legal program rejected, RM 3.10.2(32)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15847
[Bug ada/15915] Illegal program not detected, RM 13.11(15)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15915
[Bug ada/15916] Illegal program not detected, RM 12.4(7)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15916
[Bug ada/15604] Ambiguous aggregate -- Accepts invalid
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15604
[Bug ada/15605] invalid program not detected, RM 8.3(22)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15605
[Bug ada/15611] Invalid program not detected, RM 3.7(11)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
[Bug ada/15613] Accepts named parameters not last
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15613
[Bug ada/13370] 'constant String' with 'pragma Machine_Attribute' triggers ICE
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:49 --- An attribute name is NULL. -- What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2003-12-10 08:00:37 |2004-10-29 13:49:38 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13370
[Bug libfortran/17999] libfortran: uses some C99 functions (snprintf)
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:54 --- This affects Solaris 2.5.1 (once the library is built). -- What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17999
[Bug ada/12959] Range checking code bug/optimizations
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:57 --- Fixed on the mainline by the tree optimizators. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12959
[Bug c/18219] New: gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%
Hi,
this little function shows an increase in codesize by 31% or 13 byte.
void cdt (int *limit, int *base, int minLen, int maxLen)
{
int i;
for (i = minLen + 1; i <= maxLen; i++)
base[i] = ((limit[i-1] + 1) << 1) - base[i];
}
Size Version Flags
41 3.4.2 -Os
54 4.0.0 -Os -fno-ivopts
63 4.0.0 -Os
3.4.2 disassembly code
:
0: 55 push %ebp
1: 89 e5 mov%esp,%ebp
3: 8b 4d 14mov0x14(%ebp),%ecx
6: 56 push %esi
7: 8b 55 10mov0x10(%ebp),%edx
a: 8b 75 08mov0x8(%ebp),%esi
d: 53 push %ebx
e: 8b 5d 0cmov0xc(%ebp),%ebx
11: 42 inc%edx
12: 39 ca cmp%ecx,%edx
14: 7f 0f jg 25
16: 8b 44 96 fc mov0xfffc(%esi,%edx,4),%eax
1a: 40 inc%eax
1b: 01 c0 add%eax,%eax
1d: 2b 04 93sub(%ebx,%edx,4),%eax
20: 89 04 93mov%eax,(%ebx,%edx,4)
23: eb ec jmp11
25: 5b pop%ebx
26: 5e pop%esi
27: 5d pop%ebp
28: c3 ret
4.0.0-20041028 disassembly code
:
0: 55 push %ebp
1: 89 e5 mov%esp,%ebp
3: 8b 4d 10mov0x10(%ebp),%ecx
6: 57 push %edi
7: 8b 7d 08mov0x8(%ebp),%edi
a: 56 push %esi
b: 8b 75 14mov0x14(%ebp),%esi
e: 53 push %ebx
f: 8b 5d 0cmov0xc(%ebp),%ebx
12: 41 inc%ecx
13: 8d 14 8d 00 00 00 00lea0x0(,%ecx,4),%edx
1a: eb 11 jmp2d
1c: 8b 44 3a fc mov0xfffc(%edx,%edi,1),%eax
20: 41 inc%ecx
21: 40 inc%eax
22: 01 c0 add%eax,%eax
24: 2b 04 1asub(%edx,%ebx,1),%eax
27: 89 04 1amov%eax,(%edx,%ebx,1)
2a: 83 c2 04add$0x4,%edx
2d: 39 f1 cmp%esi,%ecx
2f: 7e eb jle1c
31: 5b pop%ebx
32: 5e pop%esi
33: 5f pop%edi
34: 5d pop%ebp
35: c3 ret
This PR may be related to PR17549, but it's much smaller and
hopefully easier to analyse!
--
Summary: gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: miguel55angel at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i386-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||17549 nThis|| Component|c |tree-optimization Keywords||missed-optimization Summary|gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%|[4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 ||bloats code by 31% Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
[Bug middle-end/12966] x86 array comparison optimization
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:05 --- Well Ada does not build a memcmp but the middle-end does and we don't optimize memcmp well in the middle-end/back-end that well. -- What|Removed |Added Component|ada |middle-end Last reconfirmed|2004-10-11 13:51:30 |2004-10-29 14:05:26 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12966
[Bug java/18212] nativ compilation with multiple jars fails / gives internal compiler error
--- Additional Comments From bojan at antonovic dot com 2004-10-29 14:19 --- Subject: Re: nativ compilation with multiple jars fails / gives internal compiler error pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:08 >--- >This is most likely the same as PR 7. > >Could you attach all three jar files? > > > You have them in the attachment. Because they're renamed, the real compilation calls for the classes of X are: working: gcj --classpath=A.jar:B.jar:. --main=ProcessorOptimizer.Main ProcessorOptimizer/*.class ProcessorOptimizer/*/*.class A.jar B.jar crashing: gcj -o x.exec --classpath=A.jar:B.jar:. --main=ProcessorOptimizer.Main ProcessorOptimizer/*.class ProcessorOptimizer/*/*.class A.jar B.jar crashing: gcj -o x.exec --classpath=A.jar:B.jar:X.jar:. --main=ProcessorOptimizer.Main ProcessorOptimizer/*.class ProcessorOptimizer/*/*.class A.jar B.jar The last crashing one is new. working: gcj --classpath=A.jar:B.jar:. --main=ProcessorOptimizer.Main X.jar A.jar B.jar failing: gcj -o x.exec --classpath=A.jar:B.jar:. --main=ProcessorOptimizer.Main X.jar A.jar B.jar failing: gcj -o x.exec --classpath=B.jar:A.jar:. --main=ProcessorOptimizer.Main X.jar A.jar B.jar The last failing one is new. I have tested this calls. I hope _I_ made no bug in the bug report! :) Bojan --- Additional Comments From bojan at antonovic dot com 2004-10-29 14:20 --- Created an attachment (id=7428) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7428&action=view) --- Additional Comments From bojan at antonovic dot com 2004-10-29 14:20 --- Created an attachment (id=7429) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7429&action=view) --- Additional Comments From bojan at antonovic dot com 2004-10-29 14:20 --- Created an attachment (id=7430) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7430&action=view) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18212
[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:30 --- Confirmed, on PPC, IV-OPTS causes a code bloat also, 7 new instructions but note 4.0.0 with IV-OPTS on PPC is only one instruction more than 3.3. (on PPC every instruction is the same length). -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:30:12 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
[Bug ada/16079] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.2(9)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:33 --- Fixed on the mainline: test_247573.ads:20:29: "x" is not a visible entity of "new_pak1" test_247573.ads:21:18: "T1" is not a visible entity of "new_pak1" -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16079
[Bug ada/16081] Illegal program not detected, ambiguous call to "="
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16081
[Bug ada/16083] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.2(13)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083
[Bug ada/16084] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.10.2(24)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16084
[Bug ada/16086] Legal program rejected, procedure of protected object should be visible
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:36 --- Fixed on the mainline: test_248172.ads:7:30: expect valid subprogram name as default -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086
[Bug ada/16086] Legal program rejected, procedure of protected object should be visible
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:36 --- Woops read the bug wrong. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Known to fail||4.0.0 Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086
[Bug ada/16087] Legal program rejected, RM 7.3(13)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16087
[Bug ada/16094] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.4.1(5)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16094
[Bug ada/16095] Illegal program not detected, X'Access of wrong type
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095
[Bug ada/16096] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.5.4(5)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16096
[Bug ada/16097] Illegal program not detected, RM 6.3.1(9), RM 8.5.4(5)
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16097
[Bug ada/15843] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.7.2(2)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:44:57 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15843
[Bug ada/16084] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.10.2(24)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:44:58 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16084
[Bug ada/15808] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.3(10)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:44:59 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15808
[Bug ada/16087] Legal program rejected, RM 7.3(13)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:44:59 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16087
[Bug ada/15916] Illegal program not detected, RM 12.4(7)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:00 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15916
[Bug ada/15805] Illegal program not detected, allows writing through access to constant
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:01 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
[Bug ada/15613] Accepts named parameters not last
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:02 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15613
[Bug ada/16083] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.9.2(13)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:04 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083
[Bug ada/16095] Illegal program not detected, X'Access of wrong type
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:05 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16095
[Bug ada/15915] Illegal program not detected, RM 13.11(15)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:07 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15915
[Bug ada/15605] invalid program not detected, RM 8.3(22)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:06 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15605
[Bug ada/15840] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.7(14)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:08 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15840
[Bug ada/15611] Invalid program not detected, RM 3.7(11)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:13 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
[Bug ada/16081] Illegal program not detected, ambiguous call to "="
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:14 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16081
[Bug ada/15845] Illegal program not detected, circular renames
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:15 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15845
[Bug ada/15847] Legal program rejected, RM 3.10.2(32)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:16 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15847
[Bug ada/15803] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.3(19)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:17 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15803
[Bug ada/15799] Legal program rejected, using 'Base
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:18 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15799
[Bug ada/16094] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.4.1(5)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:20 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16094
[Bug ada/15604] Ambiguous aggregate -- Accepts invalid
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:21 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15604
[Bug ada/16097] Illegal program not detected, RM 6.3.1(9), RM 8.5.4(5)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:25 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16097
[Bug ada/16086] Legal program rejected, procedure of protected object should be visible
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:22 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16086
[Bug ada/16096] Illegal program not detected, RM 8.5.4(5)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:26 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16096
[Bug ada/15804] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.8.1(2)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:29 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15804
[Bug ada/15846] Illegal program not detected, self renames
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 14:45 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 14:45:32 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15846
[Bug c++/15172] [3.3/3.4 regression] Copy constructor optimization in aggregate initialization
--- Additional Comments From TazForEver at dlfp dot org 2004-10-29 15:15 --- and ppc32 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15172
[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-29 15:43 --- Zdenek, this is another PR about ivopts and -Os. The test case is very very simple, so if you could give a look it would be great. -- What|Removed |Added CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot ||org, giovannibajo at libero ||dot it http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
Problems with -mregparm=2 and unsigned long long
This program
int main()
{
unsigned long high = 0x0013ABC;
unsigned long low = 0xB388B94A;
unsigned long long time1 = (((unsigned long long)high << 32L) + low);
unsigned long long time = time1 / 450;
return time == 0;
}
will return different values depending on the -mregparm compiler
option. With a value of zero or one it will compute the correct
result, but with a value of two or three the value of `time' will be
zero and the return code will be one:
$ for i in 0 1 2 3 ; do gcc34 rdtsc2.c -o rdtsc2 -mregparm=$i; ./rdtsc2 ; echo
$? ; done;
0
0
1
1
This may be because the compiler generates calls to __udivdi3
uses parameter passing in register, but linking is done with libraries
that use stack parameter passing.
Extracting __udivdi3 from glibc and including it in the source code
will solve the problem.
This problem is present in both gcc 3.3.3 and gcc 3.4 on Fedora
Core 2. I have not tried later versions of gcc.
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.3.3/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking
--disable-libunwind-exceptions --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
--host=i386-redhat-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3.3 20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7)
This problem surfaced when I tried using `unsigned long long' in a Linux
kernel driver. The kernel is compiled with a high value for -mregparm.
rdtsc2.i
Description: Binary data
Regards
/Lars
---
Lars Hamrén Tel...: +46(46)189090
Svensk Datorutveckling e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vadmöllan 211WWW...: www.sdu.se
S-225 94 Lund
Sweden
[Bug target/17063] internal compiler error: in arm_print_operand, at config/arm/arm.c:9816
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 15:54
---
Fixed in 4.0. Not intending to fix for 3.4 or earlier, since not a regression.
int f (int x, int y)
{
__asm__("rorw $8, %w0" : "=r"(x): "0" (y) : "cc");
return x;
}
test.c: In function 'f':
test.c:3: error: invalid `asm': invalid operand for code 'w'
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17063
[Bug rtl-optimization/15342] [arm-linux] internal compiler error: in verify_local_live_at_start
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 16:43 --- I think the key to what has failed here is that the reg-rename pass has missed the equivalence between start->index and a member of the copied structure. In pseudo code, the output from the previous pass has the following instructions r2 := [ip+8]/4 cc := cmp r2, #0 ne(cc): r0, r1, r2 := [r0]/12 ne(cc): [ip]/12 := r0, r1, r2 // Note [ip+8]/4 set to new r2 ... cc := cmp r2, #1// ...so no need to reload it here gt(cc): r3 := #0 gt(cc): [ip+8]/4 := r3 return Note that r2 is updated by the first conditional instruction (a conditional ldm on ARM). The conditional move code on ARM uses hard registers, but CSE has clearly noticed this equivalence at some point and merged the two uses to avoid a redundant re-load of start->index. Unfortunately, rename_registers has missed this and split the two uses up again. This creates a use of r2 when it isn't correctly initialized. r1 := [ip+8]/4 cc := cmp r1, #0 ne(cc): r0, r1, r2 := [r0]/12 ne(cc): [ip]/12 := r0, r1, r2 cc := cmp r2, #1// r2 incorrect if previous insn not exec gt(cc): r3 := #0 gt(cc): [ip+8]/4 := r3 return -- What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15342
[Bug java/18220] New: Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available
libjava.lang/Process_3.java should be changed to do something other than hang forever if "sed" is not available on the target test platform. -- Summary: Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: java AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: green at redhat dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18220
[Bug ada/18221] New: Illegal program not detected, access to invisible type RM 8.2(9)
Debian bug #278831: package Test_128 is package inner is private type T1; type T2 is null record; end inner; type T1_ptr is access inner.T1; -- line 9 ERROR: gnat mistakenly accepts type T2_ptr is access inner.T2; -- line 10 ERROR: gnat correctly rejects end Test_128; The output from the compiler is: test_128.ads:10:31: "T2" is not a visible entity of "inner" gnatmake: "test_128.ads" compilation error As can be seen, the error at line 9 is not diagnosed. -- Summary: Illegal program not detected, access to invisible type RM 8.2(9) Product: gcc Version: 3.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ludovic dot brenta at insalien dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18221
[Bug ada/18221] Illegal program not detected, access to invisible type RM 8.2(9)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 17:05 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||accepts-invalid Known to fail||4.0.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-29 17:05:02 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18221
