Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-24 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 08:41:37PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I have created the GCC 4.2 branch.

I don't understand yet how the next steps for 4.2 will look like; will
there be further snapshots (ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/) of the
4.2 branch, or will the next snapshots be only for 4.3? We would like to
re-test our ARM, PowerPC and MIPS trees with the latest compilers
against well known revisions, in order to have a chance to submit
further bugs and/or patches before the release - or shall we better test
against svn?

Btw, the timeline on http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html doesn't list the
4.2 branch yet.

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9



Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1

2007-01-30 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 07:06:36PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> GCC 4.1.2 RC1 is now on ftp://gcc.gnu.org and its mirrors.  The
> canonical location is:
> 
>   ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.1.2-20070128
> 
> As with all prereleases, the issue of most concern to me is packaging.
> Therefore, please test the actual pre-release tarballs, rather than
> sources from SVN.  Beyond packaging problems, I'm most concerned about
> regression from previous 4.1.x releases, since the primary purpose of
> 4.1.2 is to provide an upgrade path from previous 4.1.x releases,
> incorporating the bug fixes since 4.1.1.
> 
> If you do encounter problems, please file a Bugzilla PR, and add me to
> the CC: list for the issue.  Please do not send me reports without first
> filing a PR, as I am unable to keep track of all the issues if they are
> not in the database.
> 
> We'll do either the final GCC 4.1.2 release (if all goes well), or RC2
> (if it doesn't) in about a week.

What about PR28516, would it be acceptable for 4.1.2?

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9



Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1

2007-01-30 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 07:06:36PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> If you do encounter problems, please file a Bugzilla PR, and add me to
> the CC: list for the issue.  Please do not send me reports without first
> filing a PR, as I am unable to keep track of all the issues if they are
> not in the database.

It looks like http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28675 is fixed
in 4.2, because in our autobuild runs we don't see the ICE any more.
However, the bugzilla entry doesn't mention a fix for the problem. Paul,
have you done something in 4.2 which might be backported to 4.1?

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9



Re: Contributing to cross-compiling

2008-02-01 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:46:41PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
> 2008/1/31, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Nonetheless, if someone decided to go through the hassle of collecting
> > tutorials and hints for various cross-compiling configurations in the
> > wiki, I think many users will appreciate it. It is still considered by
> > many to be a "dark art"[*].
>
> The crosstool project http://kegel.com/crosstool is a humungous shell
> script with configuration files that has collected a lot of the
> "community wisdom" over the years about the necessary runes to build
> cross-compilers for different scenarios and with different
> target-cpu/gcc/glibc/OS combinations.
>
> There is also a menu-driven spin-off project, crosstool-ng, which is
> less mature but embodies the same set of knowledge.

And there is OSELAS.Toolchain:

http://www.pengutronix.de/oselas/toolchain/download/

Mature for the supported compilers, patches are welcome for anything
else :-)

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9