Re: The C++0x lambda branch
Esben Mose Hansen schrieb am Montag 27 April 2009 um 20:54: > Hi, > > I have very much been looking forward to the including of the lambda part > of C++0x. I have been playing around with the lambda branch of gcc, which > at least superficially works well apart from assorted bugs. > > What can I do to make lambdas part of a future release of gcc? > > Where do I report/track bugs to the lambda branch? > > Or should I contact the maintainer directly? Is there schedule for merging c++0x lambda support into mainline? -- Maik
Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared
Laurent GUERBY schrieb am Dienstag 12 Mai 2009 um 22:03: > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 21:49 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > Laurent GUERBY writes: > > > So 0.15.3 configure does not set $with_ppl variable at all. > > > > Sure it does. Look at the argument parsing loop. > > I added a dump and $with_ppl is indeed set correctly but $ppl_prefix > (which is used for -I if I follow correctly) is empty: I just had the same problem while installing under an RHEL user account. I'm not a autotools guy (cmake ftw.), but by looking at the configure.ac of ppl, I figured that AC_ARG_WITH(ppl, [AS_HELP_STRING([--with-ppl=DIR], [Prefix of Parma Polyhedral Library installation])]) has to be AC_ARG_WITH(ppl, [AS_HELP_STRING([--with-ppl=DIR], [Prefix of Parma Polyhedral Library installation])], ppl_prefix=$with_ppl) which made it work for, after running ./autogen.sh. Best, -- Maik
Re: broken svn commit logs and how to fix them
Am Dienstag 26 August 2008 schrieb Paul Koning: > I'm seeing messages on this list repeating over and over (several > minutes apart, maybe as much as 15 minutes or so). I'm not sure if > the are just messages from Manuel or also from others. > > Is it just me? It seems to be specific to this list... > >paul Manuel's Message just apears once for me, but at the libstdc++ ML Sebastian's message regarding std::equal appears ten times. -- Maik PS: I'm subscribed via gmail
