Re: GCC 9.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 2020-03-05 14:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The first release candidate for GCC 9.3 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.3.0-RC-20200305/ ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.3.0-RC-20200305/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit r9-8351-ge50627ff8cd54c3983614b34727323b333b9374d. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well, I'd like to release 9.3 on Thursday, March 12th. I bootstrapped and tested on power 7 and 8 BE and power 8 and 9 LE and saw nothing untoward. -- -Bill Seurer
Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets
Is there some way using deja-gnu to have a single test case run multiple
times using different sets of compiler options? I didn't see anything
in the documentation and didn't see any examples when I searched the
existing test cases (though of course I wasn't exactly sure what to look
for).
For example, something like this if I wanted to compile the test case
once with -Dfoo and once with -Dbar.
/* { dg-options "-Dfoo" } */
/* { dg-options "-Dbar" } */
That actually just uses the second set of options as-is.
Thanks!
--
-Bill Seurer
Re: Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets
On 04/01/16 10:48, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Bill Seurer wrote: Is there some way using deja-gnu to have a single test case run multiple times using different sets of compiler options? I didn't see anything in the documentation and didn't see any examples when I searched the existing test cases (though of course I wasn't exactly sure what to look for). What most folks do is have two .c files; one that includes the other. So something like... #define foo #include "real-test-case.c" #undef foo #define bar #include "real-test-case.c" -- -Bill Seurer
Re: Please block seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com from gcc-regression
On 04/19/16 04:56, Joseph Myers wrote: In the past few days, seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com has sent half a gigabyte of huge messages such as <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2016-04/msg03559.html> to gcc-regression, those messages containing no actual useful information about regressions caused by GCC commits. Overseers, could you block that address from posting to gcc-regression until we have confirmation that the process sending those messages to gcc-regression has stopped and will not be restarted and that there are no more such messages waiting in a mail queue somewhere (all the messages seem to be dated Sunday, but they are still coming through)? I apologize about that. I activated gcc 6 on our tester Sunday but failed to prime the source first. That caused the tester scripts to loop trying to get the source and failing. I updated the scripts yesterday to prevent this from happening in the future. -- -Bill Seurer
Problem with 447.dealII in spec2006 because of r240707
parameter_handler.cc: In member function 'double ParameterHandler::get_double(const string&) const': parameter_handler.cc:777:28: error: ISO C++ forbids comparison between pointer and integer [-fpermissive] AssertThrow ((s.c_str()!='\0') || (*endptr == '\0'), ^ With the recent revision r240707 comparing a pointer with \0 became an error. Unfortunately this is used in several spots in the test case 447.dealII in spec2006 (one example above). There doesn't appear to be a way to disable this error check and we're not supposed to change the spec test cases. Any ideas on how to work around this? -- -Bill Seurer
Re: Problem with 447.dealII in spec2006 because of r240707
On 10/04/16 10:38, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Bill Seurer wrote: parameter_handler.cc: In member function 'double ParameterHandler::get_double(const string&) const': parameter_handler.cc:777:28: error: ISO C++ forbids comparison between pointer and integer [-fpermissive] AssertThrow ((s.c_str()!='\0') || (*endptr == '\0'), ^ With the recent revision r240707 comparing a pointer with \0 became an error. Unfortunately this is used in several spots in the test case 447.dealII in spec2006 (one example above). There doesn't appear to be a way to disable this error check and we're not supposed to change the spec test cases. Any ideas on how to work around this? Did you try -fpermissive ? Because that seems like it was listed ... That affects more than just this specific error. I reported it to spec via our company rep. Not sure how long their turnaround is on stuff like this. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 6.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 10/19/18 04:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The first release candidate for GCC 6.5 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6.5.0-RC-20181019/ ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6.5.0-RC-20181019/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 265300. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well, I'd like to release 6.5 on Friday, October 26th. I bootstrapped and tested on power 7, power 8, and power 9 both BE and LE and saw no unexpected issues. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 7.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 11/29/18 04:24, Richard Biener wrote: A release candidate for GCC 7.4 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7.4.0-RC-20181129/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 266611. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well I'd like to release GCC 7.4 at the end of next week. I bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu and powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu and all went well. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 8.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 02/15/19 10:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The first release candidate for GCC 8.3 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.3.0-RC-20190215/ ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.3.0-RC-20190215/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 268935. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well, I'd like to release 8.3 on Friday, February 22nd. I bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64. power 7 BE, power 8 BE, power 8 LE, and power 9 LE all went well. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 9.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 4/26/19 11:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The first release candidate for GCC 9.1 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.0.1-RC-20190426/ ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.0.1-RC-20190426 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 270601. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well, I'd like to release 9.1 on Friday, May 3rd. I tested on powerpc64 on power 7 and power 8 BE and power 8 and power 9 LE and all went well. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: Second GCC 9.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 4/30/19 8:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The second release candidate for GCC 9.1 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.0.1-RC-20190430/ ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.0.1-RC-20190430 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 270689. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well, I'd like to release 9.1 on Friday, May 3rd. All looks good on powerpc64. Bootstrap built and tested on powerpc64 power 7 and power 8 BE and power 8 and power 9 LE. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 9.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 8/5/19 8:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The first release candidate for GCC 9.2 is available from https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.2.0-RC-20190805/ ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.2.0-RC-20190805 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 274111. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well, I'd like to release 9.2 on Monday, August 12th. I bootstrapped and tested powerpc64 BE on power 7 and power 8 and powerpc64 LE on power 8 and power 9 and all looks well. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: svn unavailable since more than an hour
On 10/30/19 1:29 PM, Rainer Emrich wrote: svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk' svn: E210002: Network connection closed unexpectedly I can ping gcc.gnu.org but if I tracert/traceroute to it I get: 24 server1.sourceware.org (209.132.180.131) 82.745 ms !X 82.740 ms !X 82.292 ms !X The !X means "communication administratively prohibited" apparently. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 7.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 11/5/19 6:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 7.5 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7.5.0-RC-20191105/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 277823.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
{x86_64,i586,ppc64le,s390x,aarch64}-linux. Please test it
and report any issues to bugzilla.
If all goes well, I'd like to release 7.5 on Thursday, November 14th.
I bootstrapped this on BE powerpc64 on power 7 and 8 and on LE powerpc64
on power 8 and 9 and nothing untoward was seen.
--
-Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 6.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 06/28/2017 05:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote: A release candidate for GCC 6.4 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6.4.0-RC-20170628/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 249715. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well I'd like to release 6.4 on Tuesday, July 4th. I bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64 BE and LE (powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu) and there were no problems. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: Building on gcc112 is stuck in msgfmt
On 08/28/2017 02:16 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
I've just repeatedly seen stuck in build process:
make[5]: Entering directory
`/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/objdir/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/po'
msgfmt -o de.mo ../../../../libstdc++-v3/po/de.po
49__asm volatile ("sc; mfcr %0"
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install
gettext-0.18.2.1-4.el7.ppc64le
(gdb) bt
#0 0x3fff85d8bac8 in sys_futex0 (val=-1, op=128, addr=0x3fff85db0520
) at ../../../libgomp/config/linux/powerpc/futex.h:49
#1 futex_wait (val=-1, addr=0x3fff85db0520 ) at
../../../libgomp/config/linux/powerpc/futex.h:62
#2 do_wait (val=-1, addr=) at
../../../libgomp/config/linux/wait.h:67
#3 gomp_mutex_lock_slow (mutex=0x3fff85db0520 ,
oldval=) at ../../../libgomp/config/linux/mutex.c:63
#4 0x3fff85d98b04 in gomp_mutex_lock (mutex=0x3fff85db0520
) at ../../../libgomp/config/linux/mutex.h:57
#5 goacc_register (disp=0x3fff85db0090 ) at
../../../libgomp/oacc-init.c:74
#6 0x3fff85d983fc in goacc_host_init () at ../../../libgomp/oacc-host.c:265
#7 0x3fff85d99c88 in goacc_runtime_initialize () at
../../../libgomp/oacc-init.c:657
#8 0x3fff85d7882c in initialize_env () at ../../../libgomp/env.c:1340
#9 0x3fff86525c74 in _dl_init_internal () from /lib64/ld64.so.2
#10 0x3fff865119cc in _dl_start_user () from /lib64/ld64.so.2
$ msgfmt --version
msgfmt (GNU gettext-tools) 0.18.2
Is it a known issue, has anybody spotted that as well?
Thanks,
Martin
I just did a build/test of current trunk (all languages, r251389) on a
powerpc64le RHEL 7.3 system that has the same version of msgfmt and it
went fine.
--
-Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 7.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 01/17/2018 10:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote: A release candidate for GCC 7.3 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/gcc-7.3.0-RC-20180117/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 256792. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well I'd like to release 7.3 on Wednesday, January 24th. Everything looks good with this for powerpc64. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 8.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 04/25/2018 05:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.0.1-RC-20180425/ The first release candidate for GCC 8.1 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.0.1-RC-20180425 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 259636. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well, I'd like to release 8.1 on Wednesday, May 2nd. I bootstrapped and tested it on powerpc64 both LE (power 8 and power 9) and BE (power 8 and power 7) and it looks good. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: Second GCC 8.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 04/27/18 16:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The second release candidate for GCC 8.1 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.0.1-RC-20180427 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 259731. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well, I'd like to release 8.1 on Wednesday, May 2nd. I bootstrapped and tested it on powerpc64 BE and LE on power8 and power9 (LE) and power 8 and power 7 (BE) and saw no problems. -- -Bill Seurer
Re: GCC 8.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 07/19/18 07:28, Richard Biener wrote: A release candidate for GCC 8.2 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.2.0-RC-20180719/ and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 262876. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla. If all goes well I'd like to release 8.2 on Thursday, July 26th. I bootstrapped and tested this on power 7 and power 8 big endian and power 8 and power 9 little endian and saw no problems. -- -Bill Seurer
