บริการสินเชื่อสำหรับผู้ประกอบการทุกประเภท ไม่มีโอนก่อน ไม่มีมัดจำ
บริษัท TPL Group จำกัด สินเชื่อเพื่อคนไทย สำหรับเจ้าของธุรกิจทุกๆประเภท ที่ต้องการทุนหมุนเวียน วงเงินอนุมัติสูงสุด 50,000-10,000,000 บาท ใครไม่เชื่อ แต่สินเชื่อเราได้จริง ✔️จดเป็นรูปแบบบริษัท ใบทะเบียนพาณิชย์ ใบประกอบการ ✔️อัตราดอกเบี้ยเริ่มต้นที่ 1.3 % ✔️ลดต้น-ลดดอก ✔️ไม่เช็คเครดิต บูโร ✔️ไม่ต้องมีบุคคลค้ำประกัน ✔️ผ่านการอนุมัติรับเงินทันที ✔️ไม่มีโอนก่อน ไม่มีมัดจำ ติดต่อ เบอร์โทร : 0842341132(คุณบี) Line id : tpl1999
GCC 15.0.0 Status Report (2024-11-18), Stage 3 in effect NOW
Status == The GCC development branch which will become GCC 15 is now in stage3, open for general bugfixing. Quality Data Priority # Change from last report --- --- P1 26- 5 P2 636+ 15 P3 220+ 49 P4 202- 4 P5 25- 2 --- --- Total P1-P3 882+ 59 Total 1109+ 53 Previous Report === https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2024-October/244947.html
Re: [committed] c: Default to -std=gnu23
* Joseph Myers: > Change the default language version for C compilation from -std=gnu17 > to -std=gnu23. A few tests are updated to remove local definitions of > bool, true and false (where making such an unconditional test change > seemed to make more sense than changing the test conditionally earlier > or building it with -std=gnu17); most test issues were already > addressed in previous patches. In the case of > ctf-function-pointers-2.c, it was agreed in bug 117289 that it would > be OK to put -std=gnu17 in the test and leave more optimal BTF / CTF > output for this test as a potential future improvement. > > Since the original test fixes, more such fixes have become necessary > and so are included in this patch. More noinline attributes are added > to simulate-thread tests where () meaning a prototype affected test > results, while gcc.dg/torture/pr117496-1.c (a test declaring a > function with () then calling it with arguments) gets -std=gnu17 > added. > > Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Has anyone performed experiments to determine the impact of this change on typical free software distributions? Thanks, Florian
Re: [committed] c: Default to -std=gnu23
* Sam James: >> Has anyone performed experiments to determine the impact of this change >> on typical free software distributions? > > I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR117298 for an issue Joseph noticed in one > of the GCC tests (that is actually an improvement, but a missed opt for > older standards). I haven't done any sort of testing but am curious > about it as well. > > I could do such a test for code size en-masse (and perhaps maybe even > check where the image changed at all). Runtime performance is far harder > for me to do at scale though. We can use significant code size changes > as a proxy for interesting candidates to investigate though. > > What are you thinking of? Mostly compatibility with older configure scripts. There are the new keywords bool/true/false, and the -Werror=deprecated-non-prototype default that could alter configure test outcomes. Maybe there's something else I'm missing? Some estimate of the build failure would also be helpful. Is it the same as, e.g. the GCC 12 to GCC 13 update, or is it igher? Thanks, Florian
