Re: new mirror greece
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Konstantinos Draziotis via Gcc wrote: > I'd like to let you know that I have successfully set up a mirror > (http/https server) in Greece for gcc. Thank you, Konstantinos! > Location : Thessaloniki / Greece > Admin Name : K. A. Draziotis > Admin Email : drazi...@gmail.com > Sponsor Name: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki > Sponsor URL : https://auth.gr > HTTP/HTTPS URL: fosszone.csd.auth.gr/gnu/gcc I was going to add this to https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html, alas fosszone.csd.auth.gr/gnu/gcc responds neither to http nor https in my tests? Can you please advise? (Maybe you can suggest a patch against that page?) Gerald
Re: new mirror greece
Hi, I wanted to inform you that the mirror is defective from 1st August, likely due to an issue with its storage system. We are currently unsure when this problem will be resolved. If it cannot be fixed, I will notify all administrators to remove it from their listings. Thank you for your understanding. Kostas Στις Δευ 5 Αυγ 2024 στις 11:08 μ.μ., ο/η Gerald Pfeifer έγραψε: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Konstantinos Draziotis via Gcc wrote: > > I'd like to let you know that I have successfully set up a mirror > > (http/https server) in Greece for gcc. > > Thank you, Konstantinos! > > > Location : Thessaloniki / Greece > > Admin Name : K. A. Draziotis > > Admin Email : drazi...@gmail.com > > Sponsor Name: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki > > Sponsor URL : https://auth.gr > > HTTP/HTTPS URL: fosszone.csd.auth.gr/gnu/gcc > > I was going to add this to https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html, alas > fosszone.csd.auth.gr/gnu/gcc > responds neither to http nor https in my tests? > > Can you please advise? > > (Maybe you can suggest a patch against that page?) > > Gerald >
Re: RISC-V Pioneer Box for builder.sourceware.org gcc CI
Hi, On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 11:07:20PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Thanks to RISC-V International and SOPHGO we got a Milk-V Pioneer Box > [*] for builder.sourceware.org that we can use for gcc CI. > > It is running Fedora 38 with gdb 15.1, binutils 2.42 and gcc 14.1 > installed on top. We could create containers with other setups if > useful. > > https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/gcc-full-fedora-riscv > > Even though it has 64 cores, single core performance isn't very fast, > so a gcc build and check takes ~10 hours. This is mostly because the > gcc build has a lot of parallelism bottlenecks so those 64 cores are > mostly idle during the build. > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402 > > Specifically one file takes ~6 hours to build, most of which isn't > done in parallel with anything else. > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166 The builder now applies a hack suggested in that bug that reduces the build time from ~6 hours to ~4 hours 40 minutes. > make check -j64 is very parallel though. It takes only 1.5 hours with > all cores being busy most of the time. > > Test results are recorded in bunsen: > https://builder.sourceware.org/testruns/?has_keyvalue_k=testrun.git_describe&has_keyvalue_op=glob&has_keyvalue_v=*gcc-full-fedora-riscv* > > PASS=572148 UNSUPPORTED=19063 XFAIL=4528 FAIL=584 XPASS=28 UNRESOLVED=15 > WARNING=1 > > As can be seen in the attached test summary report most failures are > in gcc.target/riscv/rvv/rvv.exp I assume that is because the SG2042 > implements rvv 0.7.1 and not rvv 1.0. Is there a better way to > configure gcc for that? Or maybe configure without rvv support at > all? It was suggested to just ignore the machine has rvv since it isn't 1.0 compliant. So it is now configured --with-arch=rv64gc --with-abi=lp64d --with-multilib-list=lp64d but that didn't really change any of the testresults since the rvv vector tests are still all run. I guess that is because this only changes for which arch the runtime libraries are compiled, not what instruction sets gcc itself will produce code for. > Configuration in in the builder repo, patches welcome: > https://sourceware.org/cgit/builder/tree/builder/master.cfg#n4070 Thanks, Mark
Re: RISC-V Pioneer Box for builder.sourceware.org gcc CI
On 8/5/24 4:23 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: It was suggested to just ignore the machine has rvv since it isn't 1.0 compliant. So it is now configured --with-arch=rv64gc --with-abi=lp64d --with-multilib-list=lp64d but that didn't really change any of the testresults since the rvv vector tests are still all run. Quite possibly because the damn thing claims it's "V", but in fact it's not compatible with the V1.0 spec. Sadly it's a common problem for these V0.7.1 systems. Jeff
