Re: GCC server write access
On July 30, 2017 2:25:35 AM GMT+02:00, Jerry DeLisle wrote: >Can I get the contact info for someone who has write access to: > >ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ > >I would like to add two files there for testing of some patches to >integrate >OpenCoarrays into gfortran build. > >Help will be much appreciated. We need this to start testing. All RMs have access at least. Richard. >Regards, > >Jerry
Re: 64-bit PowerPC and small data area?
- Segher Boessenkool schrieb: > Hi! > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 02:38:45PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > So, it looks like the small data stuff is not support for ABI_ELFv2? Are > > there main issues with the small data area using ELVv2 or is this simply > > not implemented due to a lack of interested? > > It is just not implemented. ELFv2 is so far only used on Linux, and > only on LE at that (BE is not regularly tested). Ok, thank you for the clarification. > Will this buy you anything though? Small data already ends up in the > TOC. Do you / should you use -mcmodel=small? Yes, we use statically linked applications together with the operating system (< 32MiB). So, we don't need this fancy stuff for the dynamic libraries. Is there a 64-bit ABI with ready to use support for the small data area? -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
Re: 64-bit PowerPC and small data area?
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 02:03:43PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > So, it looks like the small data stuff is not support for ABI_ELFv2? Are > > > there main issues with the small data area using ELVv2 or is this simply > > > not implemented due to a lack of interested? > > > > It is just not implemented. ELFv2 is so far only used on Linux, and > > only on LE at that (BE is not regularly tested). > > Ok, thank you for the clarification. > > > Will this buy you anything though? Small data already ends up in the > > TOC. Do you / should you use -mcmodel=small? > > Yes, we use statically linked applications together with the operating system > (< 32MiB). So, we don't need this fancy stuff for the dynamic libraries. Is > there a 64-bit ABI with ready to use support for the small data area? Not that I know. Segher
gcc-8-20170730 is now available
Snapshot gcc-8-20170730 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20170730/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision 250721 You'll find: gcc-8-20170730.tar.xzComplete GCC SHA256=5da661782bbdfe1227dd6d8abe0b2304f866ecb20006425e46cbb7d9d9cd281a SHA1=f2cb3773b35e52fe70924f72a0e85254e4a42e7a Diffs from 8-20170723 are available in the diffs/ subdirectory. When a particular snapshot is ready for public consumption the LATEST-8 link is updated and a message is sent to the gcc list. Please do not use a snapshot before it has been announced that way.
