getting bugzilla access for my account
seeing as how i have commit access to the gcc tree, could i have my bugzilla privs extended as well ? atm i only have normal ones which means i only get to edit my own bugs ... can't dupe/update other ones people have filed. couldn't seem to find docs for how to request this, so spamming this list. my account on gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla is "vap...@gentoo.org". -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: getting bugzilla access for my account
On 2016.01.02 at 03:49 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > seeing as how i have commit access to the gcc tree, could i have > my bugzilla privs extended as well ? atm i only have normal ones > which means i only get to edit my own bugs ... can't dupe/update > other ones people have filed. couldn't seem to find docs for how > to request this, so spamming this list. Just log in with your gcc email address... -- Markus
Re: getting bugzilla access for my account
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote: seeing as how i have commit access to the gcc tree, could i have my bugzilla privs extended as well ? atm i only have normal ones which means i only get to edit my own bugs ... can't dupe/update other ones people have filed. couldn't seem to find docs for how to request this, so spamming this list. my account on gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla is "vap...@gentoo.org". Permissions are automatic for @gcc addresses, you should create a new account with that one (you can make it follow the old account, etc). -- Marc Glisse
Re: Strange C++ function pointer test
On 31 December 2015 at 18:49, James Dennett wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely > wrote: >> >> On 31 December 2015 at 11:54, Dominik Vogt wrote: >> > Is there a requirement for a certain minimum Glibc version for >> > this to work? >> >> It doesn't work with any glibc, because it doesn't declare the C++ >> overloads. >> >> Libstdc++ has an include/c_compatibility/math.h header that would >> include (which declares the C++ overloads) and then pull them >> into the global namespace, but that isn't used on GNU/Linux, and would >> create other problems. >> > > What other problems? > > It's something of an assumption of the C++ Standard that it's practical for > C++ implementations to provide such wrappers to add overloads for C++. If > that's causing some fundamental problem then we should document it (and > ideally address it). Not fundamental problems in the standard, just with the implementation of that header. It won't work as is and would need changes, but I don't think doing it that way is the right fix for GNU/Linux anyway. If we fix it in glibc we don't need that header. >> This is already in Bugzilla: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 > > > I don't see much information on that bug, beyond an assertion that this > needs coordination with the underlying C library. There's a reference to an > e-mail thread, but there's little more information in the thread. Is that a question? :-) The point is just it's a known bug, not that Bugzilla contains all the background. > p.s. a tentatively ready DR indicates that the C++ headers should stop > splitting the overloads for std::abs/::abs up, so that if you include either > cmath or cstdlib (or the deprecated/C compatibility headers) you get the > full overload set. That seems the only way, short of a warning like > Clang's, to ensure that people write correct code when they use abs(). Yup.
Re: getting bugzilla access for my account
On 02 Jan 2016 09:53, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > seeing as how i have commit access to the gcc tree, could i have > > my bugzilla privs extended as well ? atm i only have normal ones > > which means i only get to edit my own bugs ... can't dupe/update > > other ones people have filed. couldn't seem to find docs for how > > to request this, so spamming this list. > > > > my account on gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla is "vap...@gentoo.org". > > Permissions are automatic for @gcc addresses, you should create a new > account with that one (you can make it follow the old account, etc). i completely forgot i had that e-mail address :). i thought i remembered seeing people make changes w/out @gcc.gnu.org accounts, but perhaps i'm misremembering. i updated my existing account to use the @gcc.gnu.org e-mail and seems to be working. thanks for the clue bat ! -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: getting bugzilla access for my account
On 2 January 2016 at 14:04, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i completely forgot i had that e-mail address :). i thought i remembered > seeing people make changes w/out @gcc.gnu.org accounts, but perhaps i'm > misremembering. Bug reporters can make certain changes to their own bugs without a gcc.gnu.org address.
