Re: Basic GCC testing question

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:14:09PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > >   make RUNTESTFLAGS='dg.exp --target-board=unix' check
> > 
> > Does it work better if you spell --target_board ?

> Arg, I hate it when I do something stupid like that.  It would be ince
> if runtest gave an error message when it had a bad/unknown argument, but
> if it does I didn't see it anywhere.

It is worse than that: it treats --target_bo* as --target_board, and
any other --ta* as --target.  So it's not "unknown"...

Don't typo, use scripts ;-)


Segher

Re: GCC/JIT and precise garbage collection support?

[Andrew Haley]

On 07/10/2015 07:35 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> I wonder how much overlap there is between this need and what we're 
> going to need to do for resumable functions which are being discussed in 
> the ISO C++ standards meetings.

A considerable amount, I'll be bound.

Andrew.