gcc-4.10-20140629 is now available
Snapshot gcc-4.10-20140629 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.10-20140629/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.10 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision 212128 You'll find: gcc-4.10-20140629.tar.bz2Complete GCC MD5=4071bd3029832dcf5664d242367ff4d3 SHA1=fcea984275a743b421f10c199f564c25cf688b63 Diffs from 4.10-20140622 are available in the diffs/ subdirectory. When a particular snapshot is ready for public consumption the LATEST-4.10 link is updated and a message is sent to the gcc list. Please do not use a snapshot before it has been announced that way.
RE: broken links?
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: > you are right - must be a Firefox problem; I had no problem using wget, IE8 > works as well > Firefox is still redirected to https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ > though Does it work for you know? We made a number of changes in the last two weeks, and Firefox 30 on GNU/Linux works for me just fine. Gerald
Re: broken links?
Am 30.06.2014 um 01:12 schrieb Gerald Pfeifer : > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: >> you are right - must be a Firefox problem; I had no problem using wget, IE8 >> works as well >> Firefox is still redirected to https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ >> though > > Does it work for you know? We made a number of changes in the last > two weeks, and Firefox 30 on GNU/Linux works for me just fine. > > Gerald Two browsers plus wget working whilst another does not work? This smells like browser cache. Clear that, and try again. Kind regards, Ingwie
RE: broken links?
Could our firewall (plus proxy) be the reason? I still get "page no found" for both Firefox 25 and IE Michael -Original Message- From: Ingwie Phoenix [mailto:ingwie2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 5:15 PM To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Hebenstreit, Michael; Jonathan Wakely; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: broken links? Am 30.06.2014 um 01:12 schrieb Gerald Pfeifer : > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: >> you are right - must be a Firefox problem; I had no problem using >> wget, IE8 works as well Firefox is still redirected to >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ though > > Does it work for you know? We made a number of changes in the last > two weeks, and Firefox 30 on GNU/Linux works for me just fine. > > Gerald Two browsers plus wget working whilst another does not work? This smells like browser cache. Clear that, and try again. Kind regards, Ingwie
Re: broken links?
Am 30.06.2014 um 01:43 schrieb Hebenstreit, Michael : > Could our firewall (plus proxy) be the reason? I still get "page no found" > for both Firefox 25 and IE > > Michael Does the proxy have a cache? Some proxys have something similar to a browser cache - in fact, more compareable with what CloudFlare does. It probably saved a copy of the URL’s result and deals it out upon request. So you might wish to check this out too.
RE: broken links?
Unlikely I think - considering the timeframe and how many requests the cache would have to take on -Original Message- From: Ingwie Phoenix [mailto:ingwie2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:53 PM To: Hebenstreit, Michael Cc: Gerald Pfeifer; Jonathan Wakely; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: broken links? Am 30.06.2014 um 01:43 schrieb Hebenstreit, Michael : > Could our firewall (plus proxy) be the reason? I still get "page no found" > for both Firefox 25 and IE > > Michael Does the proxy have a cache? Some proxys have something similar to a browser cache - in fact, more compareable with what CloudFlare does. It probably saved a copy of the URL's result and deals it out upon request. So you might wish to check this out too.
RE: Folding a bitfield in a union
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:23 PM > > Yes - I was specifically looking for an early out to avoid wrong-code. > So, is size % BITS_PER_UNIT != 0 a working fix to avoid the wrong-code > issues with bitfields (on big-endian targets)? I'm afraid not. A bitfield of 24 bits passes this test but the folding with VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR is still wrong. Better compare size against the bitsize of type. That would eliminate all bitfields. > > I'd rather disable it for all endianesses - gives us more incentive > to fix it properly. Ok. > > Yeah (the code is already there in varasm.c:output_constructor - it > just uses a different "buffer"). Good, I'll take a look at it when I'll come back to this patch. Best regards, Thomas
RE: broken links?
I tested from home to reach https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ - same result; ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ works though. Trying ftp from behind the company FW on FF redirects me to the htpps, though on IE it works Regards Michael -Original Message- From: Ingwie Phoenix [mailto:ingwie2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:53 PM To: Hebenstreit, Michael Cc: Gerald Pfeifer; Jonathan Wakely; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: broken links? Am 30.06.2014 um 01:43 schrieb Hebenstreit, Michael : > Could our firewall (plus proxy) be the reason? I still get "page no found" > for both Firefox 25 and IE > > Michael Does the proxy have a cache? Some proxys have something similar to a browser cache - in fact, more compareable with what CloudFlare does. It probably saved a copy of the URL's result and deals it out upon request. So you might wish to check this out too.
Re: broken links?
Am 30.06.2014 um 05:22 schrieb Hebenstreit, Michael : > I tested from home to reach https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ - > same result; ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ works though. Trying > ftp from behind the company FW on FF redirects me to the htpps, though on IE > it works > > Regards > Michael So, youre actually getting protocol changed - from HTTP to HTTPS? Well, that actually has nothing to do with your internet; but Firefox itself. It is why I switched. Firefox, for some reason, attempts to go HTTPS as much as possible. Dont ask me why, it just does, from my experience...
Re: broken links?
On 30.06.2014 7:22, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: I tested from home to reach https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ - same result; ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ works though. Trying ftp from behind the company FW on FF redirects me to the htpps, though on IE it works There was a number of bug reports to Firefox about unexpected changes in the URL protocol when using autocomplete, e.g. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769348 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769994. These are marked as fixed but still get occasional comments, maybe you can describe your situation there. Best, Andrey Regards Michael -Original Message- From: Ingwie Phoenix [mailto:ingwie2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:53 PM To: Hebenstreit, Michael Cc: Gerald Pfeifer; Jonathan Wakely; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: broken links? Am 30.06.2014 um 01:43 schrieb Hebenstreit, Michael : Could our firewall (plus proxy) be the reason? I still get "page no found" for both Firefox 25 and IE Michael Does the proxy have a cache? Some proxys have something similar to a browser cache - in fact, more compareable with what CloudFlare does. It probably saved a copy of the URL's result and deals it out upon request. So you might wish to check this out too.
