GCC MELT group on googlegroups
Hello All,
I just created the gcc-melt@ group on googlegroups.
https://groups.google.com/group/gcc-melt
And I just canceled the gcc-melt-french@ group and added all its subscribers to
gcc-melt@
Since MELT have several persons interested who are non-French speakers, I
removed the previous group and created this one.
In case you did not heard about MELT http://gcc-melt.org/ it is a domain
specific language (available as a GCC plugin, and as a GCC branch) to ease the
coding of GCC extensions. MELT has a lispy syntax and provides powerful
high-level features (notably pattern matching, functional/object/reflective
programming, ad hoc interface to GCC API).
MELT is available as a GCC plugin and as a GCC branch. It is free software,
GPLv3+ licensed, FSF copyrighted.
Cheers
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mine, sont seulement les miennes} ***
C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
All, As of a couple of months, I perform a bootstrap-with-C++ (--enable-build-with-cxx) daily on my machine between 18:10 and 20:10 UTC. I see that the build by a C++ compiler has been the subject of the GCC Gathering at Google: C++ style and migration crowlwriting and using C++ in gcc It is not quite clear what the outcome of this discussion was. Is there still interest in daily builds like mine ? Kind regards, -- Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Toon Moene wrote: > Is there still interest in daily builds like mine ? Yes. I am wondering why you have to ask the question :-) -- Gaby
RE: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
> As of a couple of months, I perform a bootstrap-with-C++ > (--enable-build-with-cxx) daily on my machine between 18:10 and 20:10 UTC. > Is there still interest in daily builds like mine ? Absolutely! Especially if you do a profiled-bootstrap and/or LTO bootstrap in that mode. Hopefully this is feasible given the recent improvements in trunk that allowed Mozilla to be built this way. Even without those things, it's quite useful to make sure it stays working. So, thanks and keep it up :)
gcc-4.7-20110709 is now available
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20110709 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20110709/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision 176109 You'll find: gcc-4.7-20110709.tar.bz2 Complete GCC MD5=b316ddda3b3a6da8b600e4d9ed1b3b7f SHA1=105374c0d8e65c6ce86595810034d83c4aeffd90 Diffs from 4.7-20110702 are available in the diffs/ subdirectory. When a particular snapshot is ready for public consumption the LATEST-4.7 link is updated and a message is sent to the gcc list. Please do not use a snapshot before it has been announced that way.
Re: C++ bootstrap of GCC - still useful ?
Toon Moene writes: > As of a couple of months, I perform a bootstrap-with-C++ > (--enable-build-with-cxx) daily on my machine between 18:10 and 20:10 > UTC. > > I see that the build by a C++ compiler has been the subject of the GCC > Gathering at Google: > > C++ style and migration crowlwriting and using C++ in gcc > > It is not quite clear what the outcome of this discussion was. > > Is there still interest in daily builds like mine ? Yes, it's definitely useful. The immediate blocker to using C++ in gcc is the Ada frontend. --enable-build-with-cxx and --enable-languages=ada do not work together. Ian
