Re: [RFC] md reorg plans for 4.6?

2009-10-31 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Saturday, October 31, 2009, Ian Lance Taylor  wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini  writes:
>> - there's also M68HC11 and SH... well, I doubt there will be volunteers.
>
> But note that, e.g., bt-load.c looks like a generic file but is
> actually SH specific, so moving it into config/sh will be an
> improvement for everybody.

Actually bt-load or something similar would be useful for at least one
other target, ia64.

Ciao,
Steven


Joker Board Commercal 3 (������ �����)_||||

2009-10-31 Thread joker
Joker Board Commercal 3 - лучший скрипт доски объявлений 2009 года!


Re: Library ABI seriously broken!!

2009-10-31 Thread Jason Merrill

On 10/30/2009 06:27 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Thanks. So I went ahead and reapplied the patch with the +1 fixed, after
having double checked that the testsuites are now fine.


The lengths do still need to be different on the two code paths, though. 
 You added back the NULL for the normal case, but the '*' path still 
lacks it.  I'll fix this.


Jason


Re: Library ABI seriously broken!!

2009-10-31 Thread Paolo Carlini
Jason Merrill wrote:
> The lengths do still need to be different on the two code paths,
> though.  You added back the NULL for the normal case, but the '*' path
> still lacks it.  I'll fix this.
Ah, ok, thanks.

Paolo.


Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!)

2009-10-31 Thread John David Anglin
> Please test this MPC package and report back the results of running
> "make check" along with your target triplet, the compiler version you
> used, and the versions of gmp/mpfr used to compile it.  You do not
> necessarily need to bootstrap mainline GCC with this MPC, but if you
> have the spare time and cycles it would be nice too.

All 57 tests passed on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin  dave.ang...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada  (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)


Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964

2009-10-31 Thread Jason Merrill

Here's the fix I'm checking in for the * path.

Jason
commit 16463ef55164d4668d6f1eeb150974452e1dbe58
Author: Jason Merrill 
Date:   Sat Oct 31 18:10:17 2009 -0400

	* rtti.c (tinfo_name): Fix lengths for private case.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/rtti.c b/gcc/cp/rtti.c
index 2926f97..c7af74a 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/rtti.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/rtti.c
@@ -364,10 +364,10 @@ tinfo_name (tree type, bool mark_private)
   if (mark_private)
 {
   /* Inject '*' at beginning of name to force pointer comparison.  */
-  char* buf = (char*) XALLOCAVEC (char, length + 1);
+  char* buf = (char*) XALLOCAVEC (char, length + 2);
   buf[0] = '*';
-  memcpy (buf + 1, name, length);
-  name_string = build_string (length + 1, buf);
+  memcpy (buf + 1, name, length + 1);
+  name_string = build_string (length + 2, buf);
 }
   else
 name_string = build_string (length + 1, name);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid9.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid9.C
new file mode 100644
index 000..381252d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid9.C
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// Test that the typeid name for a local class is properly null-terminated.
+// { dg-do run }
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+int f()
+{
+  struct A {}; struct B {};
+  const std::type_info &ti = typeid(A);
+  const std::type_info &ti2 = typeid(B);
+  puts (ti.name());
+  puts (ti2.name());
+  return strcmp (ti.name(), "Z1fvE1A") || strcmp (ti2.name(), "Z1fvE1B");
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+  return f();
+}