Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote:

> 2. I have not regenerated {gcc,cpplib}.pot, or sent them off to the
> translation project.  Joseph, would you please do that, at your convenience?

Regeneration done.  I'll submit the next 4.2 snapshot to the TP.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

[Joseph S. Myers]

All the bugs with "4.2" in their summaries ("[4.1/4.2 Regression]" etc.) 
need to have it changed to "4.2/4.3".  I don't know the procedure for 
this, but perhaps it needs adding to the branching checklist.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

[Andrew Pinski]

On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 12:58 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> All the bugs with "4.2" in their summaries ("[4.1/4.2 Regression]" etc.) 
> need to have it changed to "4.2/4.3".  I don't know the procedure for 
> this, but perhaps it needs adding to the branching checklist.

As I understand it, it involves editing the mysql database by hand (well
by a script) instead of doing it inside bugzilla.  Daniel Berlin has
done that the last couple of releases.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski 

how to disable multilib for libffi and libjava only?

[Jack Howarth]

   On Darwin PPC and intel, we don't have proper libffi and
libjava support at 64-bit. However we would still like to build
the other compilers with multilib support. I noticed that RedHat
was building their gcc 4.1.1 with the following

# Hack to avoid building multilib libjava
perl -pi -e 's/^all: all-redirect/ifeq (\$(MULTISUBDIR),)\nall: 
all-redirect\nelse\nall:\n\techo Multilib libjava build disabled\nendif/' 
libjava/Makefile.in
perl -pi -e 's/^install: install-redirect/ifeq (\$(MULTISUBDIR),)\ninstall: 
install-redirect\nelse\ninstall:\n\techo Multilib libjava install 
disabled\nendif/' libjava/Makefile.in
perl -pi -e 's/^check: check-redirect/ifeq (\$(MULTISUBDIR),)\ncheck: 
check-redirect\nelse\ncheck:\n\techo Multilib libjava check disabled\nendif/' 
libjava/Makefile.in
perl -pi -e 's/^all: all-recursive/ifeq (\$(MULTISUBDIR),)\nall: 
all-recursive\nelse\nall:\n\techo Multilib libjava build disabled\nendif/' 
libjava/Makefile.in
perl -pi -e 's/^install: install-recursive/ifeq (\$(MULTISUBDIR),)\ninstall: 
install-recursive\nelse\ninstall:\n\techo Multilib libjava install 
disabled\nendif/' libjava/Makefile.in
perl -pi -e 's/^check: check-recursive/ifeq (\$(MULTISUBDIR),)\ncheck: 
check-recursive\nelse\ncheck:\n\techo Multilib libjava check disabled\nendif/' 
libjava/Makefile.in

gcc41-java-nomulti.patch
--- libjava/configure.ac.jj 2004-08-16 21:13:29.0 +0200
+++ libjava/configure.ac2004-08-21 11:44:59.020755542 +0200
@@ -367,6 +367,10 @@ use_gtk_awt=""
 TOOLKIT=
 AC_SUBST(TOOLKIT)
 
+if test -n "${with_multisubdir}"; then
+  peerlibs=no
+fi
+
 for peer in $peerlibs ; do
   case $peer in
 xlib)
--- libjava/configure.jj2004-08-16 21:22:14.0 +0200
+++ libjava/configure   2004-08-21 11:45:16.260738060 +0200
@@ -4118,6 +4118,9 @@ use_gtk_awt=""
 # The default toolkit to use is the first one specified.
 TOOLKIT=
 
+if test -n "${with_multisubdir}"; then
+  peerlibs=no
+fi
 
 for peer in $peerlibs ; do
   case $peer in

Is there a better way then this to try to disable the multilib build in
gcc 4.2 for just libffi and libjava?
  Thanks in advance for any advice.
Jack

is this a good time to commit a patch on builtin_function?

[Rafael Espíndola]

I have an approved  patch that factors code that is common to all
builtin_function implementations
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00195.html,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg01499.html).

I have just updated and tested it. Is this a good time to commit?

Best Regards,
Rafael