Re: [Patch, fortran v2] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling

2021-06-19 Thread dhumieres.dominique--- via Fortran

Le 2021-06-06 19:58, dhumieres.domini...@free.fr a écrit :

Hi José,


Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.


Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me provided the updated
PR94331.c test file replaces the original one.
Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be
backported to at least GCC11 (applied and regtested OK).

Thanks for the work,

Dominique


OK for the new version.

Dominique


Re: [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid

2021-06-19 Thread dhumieres.dominique--- via Fortran

Hi José,

The logic is now much clearer.
OK for the new version. Thanks for the work.

Dominique


Re: [Ping^2, Patch, Fortran] PR100337 Should be able to pass non-present optional arguments to CO_BROADCAST

2021-06-19 Thread Andre Vehreschild via Fortran
PING!

On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:05:18 +0200
Andre Vehreschild  wrote:

> Ping!
>
> On Fri, 21 May 2021 15:33:11 +0200
> Andre Vehreschild  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the attached patch fixes an issue when calling CO_BROADCAST in
> > -fcoarray=single mode, where the optional but non-present (in the calling
> > scope) stat variable was assigned to before checking for it being not
> > present.
> >
> > Regtests fine on x86-64-linux/f33. Ok for trunk?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andre
>
>


--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/100337
	* trans-intrinsic.c (conv_co_collective): Check stat for null ptr
	before dereferrencing.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/100337
	* gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_17.f90: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
index 4d7451479d3..03a38090051 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
@@ -11232,8 +11232,28 @@ conv_co_collective (gfc_code *code)
   if (flag_coarray == GFC_FCOARRAY_SINGLE)
 {
   if (stat != NULL_TREE)
-	gfc_add_modify (&block, stat,
-			fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (stat), integer_zero_node));
+	{
+	  /* For optional stats, check the pointer is valid before zero'ing.  */
+	  if (gfc_expr_attr (stat_expr).optional)
+	{
+	  tree tmp;
+	  stmtblock_t ass_block;
+	  gfc_start_block (&ass_block);
+	  gfc_add_modify (&ass_block, stat,
+			  fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (stat),
+	integer_zero_node));
+	  tmp = fold_build2 (NE_EXPR, logical_type_node,
+ gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, stat),
+ null_pointer_node);
+	  tmp = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, void_type_node, tmp,
+ gfc_finish_block (&ass_block),
+ build_empty_stmt (input_location));
+	  gfc_add_expr_to_block (&block, tmp);
+	}
+	  else
+	gfc_add_modify (&block, stat,
+			fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (stat), integer_zero_node));
+	}
   return gfc_finish_block (&block);
 }

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_17.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_17.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000..84a6645865e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_17.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-options "-fcoarray=single" }
+!
+! PR 100337
+! Test case inspired by code submitted by Brad Richardson
+
+program main
+implicit none
+
+integer, parameter :: MESSAGE = 42
+integer :: result
+
+call myco_broadcast(MESSAGE, result, 1)
+
+if (result /= MESSAGE) error stop 1
+contains
+subroutine myco_broadcast(m, r, source_image, stat, errmsg)
+integer, intent(in) :: m
+integer, intent(out) :: r
+integer, intent(in) :: source_image
+integer, intent(out), optional :: stat
+character(len=*), intent(inout), optional :: errmsg
+
+integer :: data_length
+
+data_length = 1
+
+call co_broadcast(data_length, source_image, stat, errmsg)
+
+if (present(stat)) then
+if (stat /= 0) return
+end if
+
+if (this_image() == source_image) then
+r = m
+end if
+
+call co_broadcast(r, source_image, stat, errmsg)
+end subroutine
+
+end program
+