Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/100950 - ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

2021-06-10 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 23:39:45 +0200
Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches  wrote:

> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
> index c27b47aa98f..016ec259518 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
> @@ -4512,6 +4512,60 @@ gfc_simplify_leadz (gfc_expr *e)
>  }
> 
> 
> +/* Check for constant length of a substring.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +substring_has_constant_len (gfc_expr *e)
> +{
> +  ptrdiff_t istart, iend;
> +  size_t length;
> +  bool equal_length = false;
> +
> +  if (e->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER
> +  || !(e->ref && e->ref->type == REF_SUBSTRING)

iff we ever can get here with e->ref == NULL then the below will not
work too well. If so then maybe
  if (e->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER
  || ! e->ref
  || e->ref->type != REF_SUBSTRING

?

> +  || !e->ref->u.ss.start
> +  || e->ref->u.ss.start->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT
> +  || !e->ref->u.ss.end
> +  || e->ref->u.ss.end->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT
> +  || !e->ref->u.ss.length
> +  || !e->ref->u.ss.length->length
> +  || e->ref->u.ss.length->length->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT)
> +return false;
> +
> +  /* Basic checks on substring starting and ending indices.  */
> +  if (!gfc_resolve_substring (e->ref, &equal_length))
> +return false;
> +
> +  istart = gfc_mpz_get_hwi (e->ref->u.ss.start->value.integer);
> +  iend = gfc_mpz_get_hwi (e->ref->u.ss.end->value.integer);
> +  length = gfc_mpz_get_hwi (e->ref->u.ss.length->length->value.integer);
> +
> +  if (istart <= iend)
> +{
> +  if (istart < 1)
> + {
> +   gfc_error ("Substring start index (%ld) at %L below 1",
> +  (long) istart, &e->ref->u.ss.start->where);
> +   return false;
> + }
> +  if (iend > (ssize_t) length)
> + {
> +   gfc_error ("Substring end index (%ld) at %L exceeds string "
> +  "length", (long) iend, &e->ref->u.ss.end->where);
> +   return false;
> + }
> +  length = iend - istart + 1;
> +}
> +  else
> +length = 0;
> +
> +  /* Fix substring length.  */
> +  e->value.character.length = length;
> +
> +  return true;
> +}
> +
> +
>  gfc_expr *
>  gfc_simplify_len (gfc_expr *e, gfc_expr *kind)
>  {
> @@ -4547,6 +4601,13 @@ gfc_simplify_len (gfc_expr *e, gfc_expr *kind)
> of the unlimited polymorphic entity.  To get the _len component the 
> last
> _data ref needs to be stripped and a ref to the _len component added. 
>  */
>  return gfc_get_len_component (e->symtree->n.sym->assoc->target, k);
> +  else if (substring_has_constant_len (e))
> +{
> +  result = gfc_get_constant_expr (BT_INTEGER, k, &e->where);
> +  mpz_set_si (result->value.integer,
> +   e->value.character.length);

I think the mpz_set_si args above fit on one line.

btw.. there's a commentary typo in add_init_expr_to_sym():
s/skeep/skip/

thanks,

> +  return range_check (result, "LEN");
> +}
>else
>  return NULL;
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr100950.f90 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr100950.f90
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..f06db45b0b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr100950.f90
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +! { dg-do run }
> +! PR fortran/100950 - ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at 
> varasm.c:5514
> +
> +program p
> +  character(8), parameter :: u = "123"
> +  character(8):: x = "", s
> +  character(2):: w(2) = [character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]
> +  character(*), parameter :: y(*) = [character(len(u(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]
> +  character(*), parameter :: z(*) = [character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]
> +  if (len (y) /= 2) stop 1
> +  if (len (z) /= 2) stop 2
> +  if (any (w /= y)) stop 3
> +  if (len ([character(len(u(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]) /= 2)  stop 4
> +  if (len ([character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]) /= 2)  stop 5
> +  if (any ([character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]  /= y)) stop 6
> +  write(s,*) [character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]
> +  if (s /= " a b") stop 7
> +end



Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/100950 - ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

2021-06-10 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 12:24:35 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer  wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 23:39:45 +0200
> Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches  wrote:

> > +/* Check for constant length of a substring.  */
> > +
> > +static bool
> > +substring_has_constant_len (gfc_expr *e)
> > +{
> > +  ptrdiff_t istart, iend;
> > +  size_t length;
> > +  bool equal_length = false;
> > +
> > +  if (e->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER
> > +  || !(e->ref && e->ref->type == REF_SUBSTRING)  
> 
> iff we ever can get here with e->ref == NULL then the below will not
> work too well. If so then maybe
>   if (e->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER
>   || ! e->ref
>   || e->ref->type != REF_SUBSTRING
> 
> ?

Not sure what i was reading, maybe i read || instead of && in the
braced condition. Your initial version works equally well of course
although it's obviously harder to parse for at least some :)
thanks,


Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/100950 - ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

2021-06-10 Thread Harald Anlauf via Fortran
Hi Bernhard,

> > +static bool
> > +substring_has_constant_len (gfc_expr *e)
> > +{
> > +  ptrdiff_t istart, iend;
> > +  size_t length;
> > +  bool equal_length = false;
> > +
> > +  if (e->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER
> > +  || !(e->ref && e->ref->type == REF_SUBSTRING)
>
> iff we ever can get here with e->ref == NULL then the below will not
> work too well. If so then maybe
>   if (e->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER
>   || ! e->ref
>   || e->ref->type != REF_SUBSTRING
>
> ?

as you already realized, the logic was fine, but probably less
readable than your version.  I've changed the code accordingly.

> > +  else if (substring_has_constant_len (e))
> > +{
> > +  result = gfc_get_constant_expr (BT_INTEGER, k, &e->where);
> > +  mpz_set_si (result->value.integer,
> > + e->value.character.length);
>
> I think the mpz_set_si args above fit on one line.

That's true.

Since this block is exactly the same as for constant strings,
which is handled in the first condition, I've thought some more
and am convinced now that these two can be fused.  Done now.

I've also added two cornercases to the testcase, and regtested again.

> btw.. there's a commentary typo in add_init_expr_to_sym():
> s/skeep/skip/

That is a completely unrelated issue in a different file, right?

Thanks for your constructive comments!

Harald

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
index c27b47aa98f..42ddc62f3c6 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
@@ -4512,6 +4512,61 @@ gfc_simplify_leadz (gfc_expr *e)
 }


+/* Check for constant length of a substring.  */
+
+static bool
+substring_has_constant_len (gfc_expr *e)
+{
+  ptrdiff_t istart, iend;
+  size_t length;
+  bool equal_length = false;
+
+  if (e->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER
+  || !e->ref
+  || e->ref->type != REF_SUBSTRING
+  || !e->ref->u.ss.start
+  || e->ref->u.ss.start->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT
+  || !e->ref->u.ss.end
+  || e->ref->u.ss.end->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT
+  || !e->ref->u.ss.length
+  || !e->ref->u.ss.length->length
+  || e->ref->u.ss.length->length->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT)
+return false;
+
+  /* Basic checks on substring starting and ending indices.  */
+  if (!gfc_resolve_substring (e->ref, &equal_length))
+return false;
+
+  istart = gfc_mpz_get_hwi (e->ref->u.ss.start->value.integer);
+  iend = gfc_mpz_get_hwi (e->ref->u.ss.end->value.integer);
+  length = gfc_mpz_get_hwi (e->ref->u.ss.length->length->value.integer);
+
+  if (istart <= iend)
+{
+  if (istart < 1)
+	{
+	  gfc_error ("Substring start index (%ld) at %L below 1",
+		 (long) istart, &e->ref->u.ss.start->where);
+	  return false;
+	}
+  if (iend > (ssize_t) length)
+	{
+	  gfc_error ("Substring end index (%ld) at %L exceeds string "
+		 "length", (long) iend, &e->ref->u.ss.end->where);
+	  return false;
+	}
+  length = iend - istart + 1;
+}
+  else
+length = 0;
+
+  /* Fix substring length.  */
+  e->value.character.length = length;
+
+  return true;
+}
+
+
 gfc_expr *
 gfc_simplify_len (gfc_expr *e, gfc_expr *kind)
 {
@@ -4521,7 +4576,8 @@ gfc_simplify_len (gfc_expr *e, gfc_expr *kind)
   if (k == -1)
 return &gfc_bad_expr;

-  if (e->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT)
+  if (e->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT
+  || substring_has_constant_len (e))
 {
   result = gfc_get_constant_expr (BT_INTEGER, k, &e->where);
   mpz_set_si (result->value.integer, e->value.character.length);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr100950.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr100950.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000..54c459adf99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr100950.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! PR fortran/100950 - ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514
+
+program p
+  character(8), parameter :: u = "123"
+  character(8):: x = "", s
+  character(2):: w(2) = [character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]
+  character(*), parameter :: y(*) = [character(len(u(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]
+  character(*), parameter :: z(*) = [character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]
+  character(*), parameter :: t(*) = [character(len(x( :2))) :: 'a','b' ]
+  character(*), parameter :: v(*) = [character(len(x(7: ))) :: 'a','b' ]
+  if (len (y) /= 2) stop 1
+  if (len (z) /= 2) stop 2
+  if (any (w /= y)) stop 3
+  if (len ([character(len(u(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]) /= 2)  stop 4
+  if (len ([character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]) /= 2)  stop 5
+  if (any ([character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]  /= y)) stop 6
+  write(s,*) [character(len(x(3:4))) :: 'a','b' ]
+  if (s /= " a b") stop 7
+  if (len (t) /= 2) stop 8
+  if (len (v) /= 2) stop 9
+end


Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/100950 - ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

2021-06-10 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran
On 10 June 2021 20:52:12 CEST, Harald Anlauf  wrote:

>> I think the mpz_set_si args above fit on one line.
>
>That's true.
>
>Since this block is exactly the same as for constant strings,
>which is handled in the first condition, I've thought some more
>and am convinced now that these two can be fused.  Done now.

Thanks.
Btw.. I know that we cast hwi to long int often and use %ld but think there is 
a HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC format macro to print a hwi.

>I've also added two cornercases to the testcase, and regtested again.
>
>> btw.. there's a commentary typo in add_init_expr_to_sym():
>> s/skeep/skip/
>
>That is a completely unrelated issue in a different file, right?

Completely unrelated, yes.
>
>Thanks for your constructive comments!

thanks for the patch!