Re: [PATCH 1/5] strip: Adapt src/strip -o -f on mips

2023-05-21 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Ying,

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 02:38:45PM +0800, Ying Huang wrote:
> 在 2023/5/9 23:15, Mark Wielaard 写道:
> > On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 16:12 +0800, Ying Huang wrote:
> >> In mips64 little-endian, r_info consists of four byte fields(contains
> >> three reloc types) and a 32-bit symbol index. In order to adapt
> >> GELF_R_SYM and GELF_R_TYPE, need convert raw data to get correct symbol
> >> index and type.
> > Is there a spec that describes this?
>    
> 
>  references:
> 
>     https://www.linux-mips.org/pub/linux/mips/doc/ABI/elf64-2.4.pdf
> 
>     Page40 && Page41

Thanks. Interesting. If possible please include this URL in a comment.

> > I see you adjusted elf.h to include:
> >
> > +#define ELF64_MIPS_R_TYPE(i)   ((i) & 0xff)
> > +#define ELF64_MIPS_R_TYPE2(i)   (((i) >> 8) & 0xff)
> > +#define ELF64_MIPS_R_TYPE3(i)   (((i) >> 16) & 0xff)
> >
> > And various new relocation types for MIPS variants.
> > Our elf.h comes from the glibc project. Have you also submitted these
> > changes to libc-al...@sourceware.org ?
>     Has submitted.
> 
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-May/148026.html
> 
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-May/148112.html

Thanks. We'll sync them as soon as v3 lands.

>     Has tested on big/little endian machine with big/little endian
> ELF file, all were OK.

Could you post those ELF files somewhere?
Maybe we can add some as test files?

> > It feels like this is in the wrong place and doesn't take into account
> > whether the program itself is running on a big or little endian
> > machine.
> >
> > Maybe I am misunderstanding why this conversion is needed always. But I
> > would have expected a specific conversion function for MIPS for
> > ELF_T_REL and/or ELF_T_RELA (which are currently generic).
>
>     1.Considering that some people directly use the original data instead of 
> the interface function gelf_getrela;
> 
>     2.Because there is only one parameter, so can not modify the macro 
> ELF64_R_TYPE;
> 
>     3.If the mips interface function is added, other packages using libelf 
> will not be compatible with mips, and the place where gelf_getrela is used 
> need be modified.
> 
>     Where do you think is the most suitable place to do mips conversion?

So for the convert_data case in elf_getdata.c I would expect a special
conversion function being defined for ELF_T_REL and ELF_T_RELA. This
normally comes from __elf_xfctstom. I realize now that cannot easily
take an Elf of machine type. But I would expect to have the conversion
be done by a new function that can be assigned to fp in convert_data:

  /* Get the conversion function.  */
  fp = __elf_xfctstom[eclass - 1][type];

I still don't fully understand the need of the code in elf_update. I
assume that is needed in case the file was used with ELF_C_RDWR_MMAP?

Cheers,

Mark


Re: [PATCH 1/5] strip: Adapt src/strip -o -f on mips

2023-05-21 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Ying,

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 03:34:01PM +0800, Ying Huang wrote:
> 在 2023/5/16 14:46, Ying Huang 写道:
> > >> libelf/elf_getdata.c: Some eu-utils use read-mmap method to map file,
> > >> so we need to malloc and memcpy raw data to avoid segment fault. After
> > >> modification, the correct value are saved in the malloced memory not in
> > >> process address space.
> > > Where do these segfaults show up?
> >     The screenshot of the segment error was not uploaded successfully in 
> > the last email, upload again.

Sorry, the mailinglist seems to strip the image attachements.

> huangying@Sleepygon:~/elf/elfutils_4$ src/elflint src/nm.o
> Segmentation fault
> huangying@Sleepygon:~/elf/elfutils_4$ src/elflint src/strip.o
> Segmentation fault

When running under gdb, what is the backtrace of the crash?

Thanks,

Mark