[Bug general/29767] New: run-backtrace-native-core{,-biarch}.sh Tests Fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767
Bug ID: 29767
Summary: run-backtrace-native-core{,-biarch}.sh Tests Fail
Product: elfutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: general
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: shahab.vahedi at gmail dot com
CC: elfutils-devel at sourceware dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 14440
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14440&action=edit
The config.log resulting from the configure command
OS: Void Linux
platform: x86_64
glibc:2.32
elfutils: 88bab837 -- debuginfod-client.c: Don't treat 0 as an error code.
--
The following tests fail on my system when running "make check":
FAIL: run-backtrace-native-core.sh
FAIL: run-backtrace-native-core-biarch.sh
Please find the relevant files attached. These are the steps that I took:
$ autoreconf --install # see note [1] below
$ autoconf
$ mkdir bld
$ cdbld
$ ../configure --disable-debuginfod\
--disable-libdebuginfod \
--prefix=/usr \
--enable-maintainer-mode
[ see attached config.log for the features enabled on my system ]
$ make
$ make check
[1]
I had to use "autoreconf --install", because a mere "autoconf" would fail with:
---8<---
configure.ac:1: error: possibly undefined macro: dnl
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
configure.ac:52: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
configure.ac:53: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
configure.ac:55: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_SILENT_RULES
configure.ac:84: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONDITIONAL
configure.ac:646: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNU_GETTEXT
configure.ac:648: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION
configure.ac:649: error: possibly undefined macro:
AM_GNU_GETTEXT_REQUIRE_VERSION
--->8---
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug general/29767] run-backtrace-native-core{,-biarch}.sh Tests Fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767 --- Comment #1 from Shahab --- Created attachment 14441 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14441&action=edit The test log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug general/29767] run-backtrace-native-core{,-biarch}.sh Tests Fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767 --- Comment #2 from Shahab --- Created attachment 14442 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14442&action=edit native core log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug general/29767] run-backtrace-native-core{,-biarch}.sh Tests Fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767 Shahab changed: What|Removed |Added Build||x86_64 Target||x86_64 Host||x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug general/29767] run-backtrace-native-core{,-biarch}.sh Tests Fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767 --- Comment #3 from Shahab --- Created attachment 14443 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14443&action=edit native core trs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug general/29767] run-backtrace-native-core{,-biarch}.sh Tests Fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767 --- Comment #4 from Shahab --- Created attachment 1 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1&action=edit native core biarch log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug general/29767] run-backtrace-native-core{,-biarch}.sh Tests Fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767 --- Comment #5 from Shahab --- Created attachment 14445 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14445&action=edit native core biarch trs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: [PATCH] Add support for ARCv2
Hi Mark, On 11/1/22 22:01, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 02:54:33PM +, Shahab Vahedi via Elfutils-devel > wrote: >> To be clear, these are the test results on a build without the patch AND >> with the patch. I'm not sure why it happens even without the patch on >> my system. If you want, I can file a bug report with more details. > > Aha, sorry, I missed this was on x86_64. That is indeed odd. If you > could file a bug report with your environment where this fails that > would be good. It has been filed [1]. [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767 -- Shahab
