RE: [Draconet-users] Another vote for scheduled polling (and rationale).

2003-12-13 Thread Gerarde_Albro
That is exactly what /nfb does. I read the source to verify it. 

- Jerry


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Reed
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Another vote for scheduled polling (and
rationale).


Isn't that more or less what the /nfb switch does in the Draco client
already?  By default the client forces a build, but if you don't want it
to force and only build if "necessary" throw it the /nfb.

[This commandline warrior has been wishing for a /list switch for the
Draco client for a while now because he can't remember the correct name
or case for all of his nearly 150 builds now...]



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click
___
Draconet-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/draconet-users


RE: [Draconet-users] Another vote for scheduled polling (and rationale).

2003-12-13 Thread Liam Davis-Mead
Oooh, well that's what I get for running off at the mouth before I look
into everything.  *smacks forehead*  Thanks all!

Regards,
Liam

-Original Message-
From: David Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Another vote for scheduled polling (and
rationale).

Isn't that more or less what the /nfb switch does in the Draco client
already?  By default the client forces a build, but if you don't want it
to force and only build if "necessary" throw it the /nfb.

[This commandline warrior has been wishing for a /list switch for the
Draco client for a while now because he can't remember the correct name
or case for all of his nearly 150 builds now...]


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:draconet-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Liam Davis-Mead
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Another vote for scheduled polling (and
> rationale).
> 
> Actually I like this suggestion, now that I think about it.  As Yves
> points out, the scheduling could get rather hairy if Draco tried to
please
> everybody.  If the cli had a poll/force option, I think I'd be happy
to
> schedule it as a task.  Much cleaner!  Plus the service doesn't need
to be
> restarted to refresh its config file if the schedule needs to be
modified.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Liam


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for
IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys
admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=ick
___
Draconet-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/draconet-users


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click
___
Draconet-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/draconet-users