Re: django.contrib.markup and ReST

2009-09-18 Thread reg_gc

[sorry if this message appeared second time]

> This is intended behavior from docutils: if the reST document starts 
> with a header it is considered the "document header" and is 
> intentionally not a part of the fragment by default. Rather than
> using the body the correct approach would be to pass in the proper
> flag to disable "document headers" so that the opening.
But even "" headers doesn't shown. I think this default behavior is
not good as you can't insert any header into your document. Or I missed
something?


> Rather than switch to the 'html_body', it probably makes more sense
> for Django's default template tag to open up a setting to provide
> additional flags to publish_parts/docutils writer/docutils
> transformer, such as the aforementioned one to disable document
> headers, or other generally useful flags such as the ones to enable
> certain security features.
Thank you for advice, I missed this. At least it will allow me run my
site on unmodified django.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



project folder with dots

2009-10-25 Thread reg_gc

Hello, django developers!

On my server every project has it's own folder which name is the same
as project hostname(ex. /home/testsite.com). Bug django don't allow
dots in "project name".

I think we can fix it. For example by avoiding starting import with
project name.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: project folder with dots

2009-10-27 Thread reg_gc

> IMHO the project namespace is a useful one to keep around.  If you
> lose the project name space, then you risk polluting your python path
> with a lot of generic 'urls' modules, among other things.

I don't understand why in tutorial all imports contain project name.
I think this is wrong position. In my case I've got one project named
"engine" and three sites using it. If I used import containig "engine"
I would place every site into the folder with the same name, but it's
inconvenient(I think).

My idea is to view site as a number of apps. Each app separated from
others and keeps anything it needs in its own namespace.

What do you think about it?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: project folder with dots

2009-10-27 Thread reg_gc

> To fix the code is easy enough. But to update all of the relevant
> documentation and to require all existing Django deployments to have
> to migrate their project structures (or change all of their imports)
> to upgrade is a much bigger issue to tackle.
Thank you for answer.

Do you think it's a good change of django(for ex. for very future
versions) or better leave as it is?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: How do I tap into admin.py to generate data from models?

2009-12-04 Thread reg_gc
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:42:23 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Kramer  wrote:

> 
> I am currently modeling the SQL creation code in sql.py and
> creation.py, as well as the field type code in fields.py.  So I'm on a
> good track - now where should I look to hook into admin.py?

Override save_model in ModelAdmin or create a custom model's
save() method.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.




Re: Running unit tests when you can't create a new database

2009-12-09 Thread reg_gc
> Django allows you to define a custom test runner. Copy
> django.tests.simple.run_tests() into your own code, removing the calls
> to create and destroy the test database. Then set TEST_RUNNER in your
> settings file to point at the new runner.
Hello!
I see many similar bugreports and wishes which was closed with this
proposal.

Unfortunately this will not work with recent django versions.
Errors like AttributeError: 'Settings' object has no attribute
'DATABASE_SUPPORTS_TRANSACTIONS'

Please help solving this issue.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.




Re: Django 1.2 progress assessment

2009-12-09 Thread reg_gc
> So the question is: given what we've got done, and guess at what we
> will get done, is the current timeline still feasible, or should we
> push the timeline?

As I understood logging support for django is complete now. Or not?

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.




Re: Templates by app

2010-03-20 Thread reg_gc
You can use both schemes.

> Is there any reason to have a global directory with all templates
> instead of to have the templates for each application:
> 
> project/
> \___ apps/
>   \___ templates/
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.



Re: Decision required: PostgreSQL minimum versions

2010-06-10 Thread reg_gc
For old postgress we have old django. So, do not hesitate kicking off
old code. Even 8.2 version is very-very old so it's okay to depend on
8.2+.

> While we support PostgreSQL, our documentation doesn't actually
> specify a minimum supported version. We have a couple of features that
> are no-ops for versions prior to 8.2 (savepoints and database
> autocommit), but we don't actually document a minimum required
> version.

--
wbr
Alexandre Kandalintsev

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.



Re: ModelView

2010-07-12 Thread reg_gc
> Anybody likes the idea?
Sounds good. Unfortunately I didn't read long-long thread about
class-based views :(

> - I'm no fan of 'class Meta' myself, but I've chosen it here to be
> compatible with ModelForm
I'm too

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.