Re: Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase

2011-12-09 Thread Joseph Tennies
I must say that I would personally LOVE to see this in 1.4 as some sort of 
"preview" (akin to __future__) to give people a chance to get their packages up 
and running on Python 3. This would also allow people to document the porting 
process properly.

Obviously, this is dependent on the code passing 



-- Sent from my Palm Pixi
On Dec 9, 2011 2:26 PM, Ram Rachum  wrote: 

In which Django release are we hoping to release this port? 1.4 or 1.5?

Ram.




-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/Y8-2tS9lth4J.
 
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.


For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.



Re: Proposal: drop Python 2.5 support in Django 1.5

2011-12-11 Thread Joseph Tennies
While I agree it should be dropped, I was discussing this with the Twisted guys. They pointed out that it will actually receive security updates through 2013. This is thanks to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS. I'm sure Canonical could tap into someone like Barry to fix it if serious enough.-- Sent from my HP TouchPadOn Dec 11, 2011 11:31 PM, Paul McMillan  wrote: > 2.5 is EOL and no longer receiving security patches even, it is
> *irresponsible* of us to support it (I claim).  ANyways +1

This. +1 from me. We do everything else in our power to encourage
secure behavior from our users, this is yet another appropriate step.

-Paul

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.




Re: Django 1.4 alpha on December 22nd

2011-12-15 Thread Joseph Tennies
Perhaps something in the release notes pointing to the branch would be good. 
Unfortunately there's probably at least a month of code reviews. Not to mention 
it has been discussed that the port only needs to support 2.6 as support is 
being dropped, so it'll get much simpler.

That being said, Django still needs the full py3 support module in case someone 
else's module straddles Django versions.



-- Sent from my Palm Pixi
On Dec 15, 2011 6:00 PM, Kiril Vladimirov  wrote: 

While I'm reading all topics, listed below I'm thinking... is it too early to 
announce *experimental* Python 3.2 support in Django 1.4?
Python 3 port - all tests now pass on 2.5.4, 2.6.2, 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the 
same codebase Python 3 port - all MySQL tests now pass on 2.6.7 and 3.2.2 
with the same codebase Python 3 port - all PostgreSQL tests now pass on 
2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase Python 3 port - all Oracle tests 
(bar one) now pass on 2.7.2 and 3.2.2 with the same codebase 
May be something like a light bulb that should go over the head of all django 
users(as in web developers using django) and plugin maintainers about python 3 
support could facilitate a future 2 to 3 migration.
What do you think?





-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/nQT-3UYcO8IJ.
 
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.


For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.