[PATCH 1/1] Updated Hello World
From: Prakhar
---
hello.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hello.c b/hello.c
index f0b662c..72d1dd4 100644
--- a/hello.c
+++ b/hello.c
@@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ rtems_task Init(
rtems_task_argument ignored
)
{
- printf( "\nHello RTEMS from India!\n" );
+ printf( "\nHello World\n" );
exit( 0 );
}
--
2.25.1
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[PATCH 1] Changed Hello World
From: Prakhar
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 13:43:09 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] updated hello.c
---
hello.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hello.c b/hello.c
index 72d1dd4..a3c40ae 100644
--- a/hello.c
+++ b/hello.c
@@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ rtems_task Init(
rtems_task_argument ignored
)
{
- printf( "\nHello World\n" );
+ printf( "\nHello RTEMS from Prakhar!\n" );
exit( 0 );
}
--
2.25.1
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Jetson Nano BSP
Hello, Does the current RTEMS version support the Jetson nano board, if not, do you think It will be a good project for gsoc2023? something like porting RTEMS to Jetson nano or jetson AGX orin maybe? Looking forward to your response. Best Regards Prakhar ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ticket #4272 BSP executable conversion project
Hello, My name is Prakhar Agrawal and I am interested in contributing to RTEMS as a gsoc this year. While going through the list of open projects, the BSP executable conversion project caught my interest. I have completed the hello world task for gsoc and now looking to start contributing to the projects. Can you please guide me in the right direction with the correct resources and a list of tasks, which I can follow to learn more about the above project and also start contributing to the same? Looking forward to the responses. Best Regards Prakhar ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Jetson Nano BSP
I completely agree with all your points, but my rationale for introducing the jetson nano or jetson AGX orin was because of their GPU power. In the case of large hobby projects or maybe the initial days of a startup(seed ones), a real-time system that can work with boards having good GPU can do wonders. For example, for an autonomous vehicle L2, L3 autonomy can be achieved using a 60W Jetson AGX orin, hence if RTEMS support is added to the board, it might help create an awesome system to handle all the critical time constraints necessary for the vehicle and give it the ability to coordinate a large number of concurrent activities. One other use case I can think of is an autonomous space shuttle, which can use AI to detect debris and space junk around it and steer itself through them or maybe an AI-powered drone etc. > Honestly I'd rather see a new BSP for a decent RISC-V board. I was reading about RISC-V and their comparison with ARM SBC and in one blog I read this - "ARM processors have benefited from a lot more research, funding, and development than RISC-V. This means that it can be argued that RISC-V is being left behind" Looking forward to your opinions. -- Prakhar ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
