Re: [PATCH 1/2] RTEMS: Adjust layout of struct _Thread_queue_Queue

2016-05-05 Thread Gedare Bloom
This should be fine. It's an "internal" API so we just need to ensure
consistency in our kernel code.

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Johnston  wrote:
> Do you have consensus with the RTEMS group for this change which breaks API 
> introduced
> last year?  Otherwise, I will leave it up to the RTEMS maintainers to comment.
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
> - Original Message -
>> Move _Thread_queue_Queue::_Lock to begin of the structure.  On RTEMS,
>> the presence of a lock component in the thread queue structures actually
>> depends on the build-time RTEMS_SMP configuration option.  A move of
>> this part to the begin of the structure allows an implementation re-use
>> for the other parts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Huber 
>> ---
>>  newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/lock.h | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/lock.h
>> b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/lock.h
>> index d2a7fb1..002064f 100644
>> --- a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/lock.h
>> +++ b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/lock.h
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>  /*
>> - * Copyright (c) 2015 embedded brains GmbH.  All rights reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2015, 2016 embedded brains GmbH.  All rights reserved.
>>   *
>>   * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>>   * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
>> @@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ struct _Ticket_lock_Control {
>>  };
>>
>>  struct _Thread_queue_Queue {
>> - struct _Thread_queue_Heads *_heads;
>>   struct _Ticket_lock_Control _Lock;
>> + struct _Thread_queue_Heads *_heads;
>>  };
>>
>>  struct _Mutex_Control {
>> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct _Futex_Control {
>>   struct _Thread_queue_Queue _Queue;
>>  };
>>
>> -#define _THREAD_QUEUE_INITIALIZER { 0, { 0, 0 } }
>> +#define _THREAD_QUEUE_INITIALIZER { { 0, 0 }, 0 }
>>
>>  #define _MUTEX_INITIALIZER { _THREAD_QUEUE_INITIALIZER, 0 }
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.4.5
>>
>>
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: PWM driver tested in RTEMS with RGB

2016-05-05 Thread punit vara
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Chris Johns  wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 11:53, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I added Ti licence at last patch. Do I need to add any other licence ?
>>
>> Whenever you copy/paste code, you need to know/observe what the
>> license is and keep track of that. So, the question of whether you
>> need to add another license depends on whether you copied code from
>> somewhere that has a different license.

I copied the code from 2 files. Both files have same licence . So the
licence I added is enough according to me.

>
> Where did the TI code from, for example a public tarball, a public TI git
> repo, or a TI SDK?

I have referred code from sourceforge.

https://sourceforge.net/p/starterwarefree/code/ci/master/tree/

@Martin you can clone this code and keep it handy while reviewing my
code. SW code is cloned from following link.

git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/starterwarefree/code starterwarefree-code

This repo represents 2.0.x variant of SW by TI.

@Martin For further communication should I communicate here or should
I create new thread in user@rtems. I am asking because Gedare told to
introduce project on user@rtems mail list but you mostly prefer
devel@rtems.

If I add code from anywhere else I will inform community. Thanks for
the support.

Regards,
Punit Vara
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: PWM driver tested in RTEMS with RGB

2016-05-05 Thread Chris Johns

On 05/05/2016 22:25, punit vara wrote:


I have referred code from sourceforge.

https://sourceforge.net/p/starterwarefree/code/ci/master/tree/



I am sorry but I am not comfortable with this repo at the moment and I 
would like to have origin of the code verified before any code from it 
enters RTEMS. The repo does not have a LICENSE file at the top and the 
AM335X_SoftwareManifest.pdf has "Ti Confidential" on every page yet it 
is public. If this code have been placed in a public repo after someone 
acknowledged an EULA then we need to be careful.


Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel