Re: [PATCH] [RTEMS] Update RTEMS thread model

2015-09-14 Thread Sebastian Huber



On 11/09/15 16:21, Aurelio Remonda wrote:

The test runners are in "sim-scripts" make sure a "realview_pbx_a9_qemu
>-i ticker.exe" produces the expected output.

Hi, silly question here, running ticker gave me the elapsed times
but not in 'real time'. It prints 09:00:00, 09:00:04,..., 09:00:34 immediately. 
Is this a normal behaviour for this test in this BSP?


Yes, in case the fast idle is enabled (default). This helps to speed up 
test suite runs.


--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


About cache enabling in LWIP port of BBB in RTEMS

2015-09-14 Thread Marcos Díaz
Hi Ragu,
I wanted to know if you were able to see something else about the problem
we had in the BBB when using LWIP and enabling cache ( the program freezes).
I can tell you that here we were using BBB rev. A5C and had this problem,
but now we could test this with a BBB Rev C, and it successfully works with
cache enabled (using the same sdcard in both boards, one works and the
other doesn't).
Greetings

-- 

__




Marcos Díaz

Software Engineer


San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5

Córdoba, Argentina


Phone: +54 351 4217888 / +54 351 4218211/ +54 351 7617452

Skype: markdiaz22
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH] [RTEMS] Update RTEMS thread model

2015-09-14 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Sebastian Huber
 wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/15 16:21, Aurelio Remonda wrote:
>>>
>>> The test runners are in "sim-scripts" make sure a "realview_pbx_a9_qemu
>>> >-i ticker.exe" produces the expected output.
>>
>> Hi, silly question here, running ticker gave me the elapsed times
>> but not in 'real time'. It prints 09:00:00, 09:00:04,..., 09:00:34
>> immediately. Is this a normal behaviour for this test in this BSP?
>
>
> Yes, in case the fast idle is enabled (default). This helps to speed up test
> suite runs.
>
Any clue why the test is rounding off a second? It should give
09:00:00, 09:00:05, ..., 09:00:35

> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
> PGP : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH] [RTEMS] Update RTEMS thread model

2015-09-14 Thread Aurelio Remonda
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Joel Sherrill 
wrote:

>
>
> On 9/11/2015 9:21 AM, Aurelio Remonda wrote:
>
>> The test runners are in "sim-scripts" make sure a "realview_pbx_a9_qemu
>>> -i ticker.exe" produces the expected output.
>>>
>>
>> Hi, silly question here, running ticker gave me the elapsed times
>> but not in 'real time'. It prints 09:00:00, 09:00:04,..., 09:00:34
>> immediately. Is this a norma behaviour for this test in this BSP?
>>
>
> It is printing the "real time" but the time is set to a date early
> in the RTEMS development history. Look at the year. That's about the
> time the test was initially written.
>
> It is likely running faster than "real time" because it is a simulator.
> The numbers not ending in "5" is a bit unusual. The test consists of
> four tasks:
>
> + one runs every 5 seconds
> + one every 10
> + one every 15
> + IDLE
>
> It exits when one notices it has gone over 30 seconds.
>
>
Thank you Joel! I have another question if you don't mind where i can find
the realview_pbx_a9_qemu.exp file?
I can't find it in dejagnu/boards directory

-- 

Aurelio Remonda

Software Engineer
San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5
Córdoba, Argentina
*Phone:* +54-351-4217888 / 4218211
 
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH v3] ARMv7M: Fix exception handler for supporting FPU

2015-09-14 Thread Martin Galvan
Hi everyone! Just checking in, was Sudarshan's patch commited?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Gedare Bloom  wrote:
> Martin's ticket works, and his commit can  #close it.
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:22 PM, sudarshan.rajagopalan
>  wrote:
>> On 2015-08-31 13:39, Daniel Gutson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gedare Bloom  wrote:

 I'd approve 2 patches in case you want to give credit. First patch
 with Sudarshan's fix, and Martin's improvement second.
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel