Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [USMP] Update RFC with constants pools (PR #81)
i have no concerns here, @manupa-arm feel free to submit this when you're ready to start -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/81#issuecomment-1182188871 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm] [release] Bump version numbers to v0.9.0 (PR #11991)
Merged #11991 into v0.9.0. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11991#event-6980196703 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Adding initial SVE implementation (#18)
@tqchen just to clarify, do we then add this to the DLPack repo or do we consider this a specialized use of lane internal to TVM? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/18#issuecomment-1182206471 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Buffer Layout Padding (PR #77)
Thank you very much on the comments, suggestions, and discussion, and I'm quite happy with how the design evolved over the course of the discussions! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/77#issuecomment-1182157349 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84)
Adding a [draft PR](https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12066) to this discussion. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/84#issuecomment-1181766176 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84)
> the purpose is not to codify it so that we can't change it, but just so that > we are all on the same page here. perhaps we can incorporate definitions like > this into the RFC text and into helper functions? I agree -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/84#issuecomment-1181697337 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Adding initial SVE implementation (#18)
Thanks folks, just to come back on this, my main comment is wrt to the data structure change, leverage the special mark so we don't break ABI of runtime type ``` DataType::kScalableVectorLaneMark = -1 ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/18#issuecomment-1181698893 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm] [ci][docker] Use RFC image tags only (PR #11938)
@driazati could you give a bit more context here? is there a bug describing what's wrong right now? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11938#issuecomment-1182050322 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Create LLVM scope class for use with LLVM libraries (PR #83)
In that case, I think it would be nice to state we handle K1, and leave ONLY serialization/deserialization out. This way we can have With style API, which indicate that we are explicit entering the scope for any processing. ```c++ auto data = LLVMTarget::ParseIR(file_name); With scope(mod_data); `` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/83#issuecomment-1181985883 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
[apache/tvm] [COMMUNITY] Add driazati key for release (PR #12076)
As per https://tvm.apache.org/docs/contribute/release_process.html#id3 You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12076 -- Commit Summary -- * [COMMUNITY] Add driazati key for release -- File Changes -- M KEYS (48) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12076.patch https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12076.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12076 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm] [COMMUNITY] Add driazati key for release (PR #12076)
Built docs for commit 765bbcc3db43c22e16e414ecfaf6249d95142f91 can be found [here](https://pr-docs.tlcpack.ai/PR-12076/1/docs/index.html). -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12076#issuecomment-1182460167 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Buffer Layout Padding (PR #77)
Thanks everyone for the discussions. We have agreed on the design principles and will continue to explore scheduling options. Let's keep the RFC open for final comments until the end of this week. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/77#issuecomment-1182544837 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
Re: [apache/tvm] [COMMUNITY] Add driazati key for release (PR #12076)
Merged #12076 into main. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12076#event-6981394712 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
