[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development] Build for ARM host
Hi, I would like to use relay compiler to build for ARM host. The target device is also ARM. for X86 **(target="llvm")** I can easily use `export_library(lib_export_path)` I get a .so which can be loaded by runtime to create an executor factory. For ARM, I build with **target="llvm -mtriple=aarch64-linux-gnu"**, I can then export to a tar file, where I have 2 object files. **I get a linker (ld) error when trying to export to .so though.** do I need to do something like this:(?) `cross_compile = 'aarch64-linux-gnu-c++' ` `lib.export_library(lib_export_path, cc=cross_compile)` I did not check since I don't have the ARM toolchain installed so it would fail. I assumed that it should work since llvm compiled to ops to ARM object files. Thanks for the help --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/build-for-arm-host/12152/1) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/f78428224ffb21840f95129a39a52c87cf918fede78465360e3f86477c0f91bf).
[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [RFC] Remove CODEOWNERS
@comaniac thanks for your comments! [quote="comaniac, post:5, topic:12095"] Improve the PR template to guide the contributors about how to improve the PR visibility. We actually have this already but seems not effective. Pro: it is a simple change. Con: it may be ignored by most contributors. [/quote] I agree we have this, I'm not sure it scans very well (for example, the links are in Markdown so someone isn't going to mentally parse those and render them in their head). Perhaps we can improve the template and make it a bit more organized. [quote="comaniac, post:5, topic:12095"] Improve the cc-bot to do more. For example, if the cc-bot finds no @ in the PR body, it replies the PR saying that it is encouraged to cc someone from the community for visibility and here is the code owner list. Pro: this will definitely get the attention by PR author. Con: it needs more changes to the cc-bot. [/quote] I really like this idea. @driazati do you think this would be a big change? seems like it's pretty related to the PR ping bot. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/7) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/c34515e16950fa1a60ee5564d024e1281797005282231aef59ecafcc70137bc2).
[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [RFC] Remove CODEOWNERS
[quote="areusch, post:7, topic:12095"] I agree we have this, I’m not sure it scans very well (for example, the links are in Markdown so someone isn’t going to mentally parse those and render them in their head). Perhaps we can improve the template and make it a bit more organized. [/quote] While our docs could use some consolidation, we already link to our contributing guide in the existing [PR template](https://github.com/apache/tvm/blob/main/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md). I don't think we shouldn't expect new contributors to read through a docs just to find who to tag in their PRs, we should have a constant rotation of committers monitoring new PRs and sending them to the relevant people. The process could look like: * Check https://github.com/apache/tvm/pulls for PRs with a `triaged` label (and auto-mark PRs from contributors `triaged`) * Briefly inspect the PR topic / changes and assign reviewers directly / tag people via `@`-ing them * Add the `triaged` label [quote="areusch, post:7, topic:12095"] I really like this idea. @driazati do you think this would be a big change? seems like it’s pretty related to the PR ping bot. [/quote] It would be simple to have the PR ping bot tag some people if there has been no activity on a PR and the author is new after a quiet period of a day. [quote="junrushao1994, post:4, topic:12095"] Github teams is definitely a good idea [/quote] I [filed an issue with ASF Infra](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22864) to see if we can get them through GitHub teams but it looks like we will end up having to re-create it ourselves --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/8) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/404de7502835dce060a064e124707118990c208c81f656840645bb9f0829f02e).
Re: [apache/tvm] [RFC] [VTA] [TSIM] Enabling Cycle-Accurate Hardware Simulation for VTA #3009 (#3010)
> the build command is: verilator build included the "VTASimDPI.v" >  I have the same problem. Do you have any solution? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/3010#issuecomment-1049546671 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:
