[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development] How to deploy model to iOS device?
There is android_deploy and android_camera demo telling how to deploy model to android device, but there is no friendly iOS version. Could you please give me some advice? @tqchen --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/how-to-deploy-model-to-ios-device/8199/1) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/0d21783026b03d98a1f3153ebc7092d36605114494d5d98ffd4552580b7a4e89).
[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] CSE Optimization
- The user API looks like the following: ```C++ /*! * \brief Eliminate common subexpressions among \p in_args and between them and \p output . * * \param output The output tensor. * \param input_grads The gradients of input tensors. */ std::pair > CSE(const Tensor& output, const std::vector& input_grads); ``` - The tensor expression tree does not provide extra information. It is just an useful data structure for comparison purposes. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-cse-optimization/8130/3) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/edeea9caffa7d3db11d1b646104516650f61b8a389f4ce8f3e9a2034b5224d08).
[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] CSE Optimization
@tqchen @junrushao1994 how much of the work do you think we can reuse once we move to https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tensorir-a-schedulable-ir-for-tvm? --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-cse-optimization/8130/4) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/35dbe13592503605deb98de8be531ca8d8265e7c037c1ef23ea779106416d6b9).
[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] Support for large tensors
Is int64 tensor fully supported in the main branch now? --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-support-for-large-tensors/5643/29) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/d32af47fe0e505ea8776a2226fed3929b45edcd2d05602c2a881a45c222eb026).
[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] CSE Optimization
I think there are two potential ways to think about it. We can either try to do CSE in the Expr level, or we can do CSE in the TE level. I think both will bring some of the benefit, so it would be helpful to support both variants --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-cse-optimization/8130/5) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/c35a0873676265c7824cff5c4dfe746fa0b073c44c5a0b4a86dff2a9033517ec).
[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] CSE Optimization
I agree with @tqchen. CSE is not hard to implement, and CSE on both sides provides different benefits. So we can potentially support both variants. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-cse-optimization/8130/6) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/fab46ba59e22db7168bd9fa896e343d80d162e0e99fd28307de16cf7e2f9f41b).