RE: svn commit: r371765 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java

[Final Draft Info]

Could you please remove us from this email distribution list?

Thanks.

Final Draft Support

-Original Message-
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 11:32 AM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: svn commit: r371765 - 
/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java

 

> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:02 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r371765 - 
> /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catali
> na/connector/Response.java
> 
> Bill Barker wrote:
> > Yes, RFC 2616 does specify iso-latin-1 as the default for 
> HTTP/1.1 clients. 
> > However, section 3.4.1 is also relevant for HTTP/1.0 
> clients (like, say, the 
> > TCK :).  In any case, it doesn't matter since section 5.4 
> of the servlet 
> > spec says "must".  Complaints go to the expert group;  here 
> we just develop 
> > Tomcat.
> 
> Ok, so I asked the expert group, and many people interpret the 
> specification as I do (and is logical to do): if the 
> application uses a 
> writer, and never specifies the charset in any way, the 
> container has no 
> business rewriting the content-type header to include 
> ";charset=ISO-8859-1".
> 

Then they should make the language in the spec clearer ;-).

If I'm misunderstanding the spec, then I don't have a valid reason for my
veto.  Consider the veto withdrawn.

> Rémy
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 




This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the 
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of 
this message and any attachments.



In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through 
the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, 
such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification 
numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34107] - session already invalidated before valueUnbound() called

[Final Draft Info]

Could you please remove us from the distribution list? 

Final Draft Support.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:36 AM
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34107] - session already invalidated before
valueUnbound() called

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG*
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND*
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34107





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-02-02
19:35 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Well re-reading the spec, it finally seems that this the way the 2.4

servlet 
> > is interpreted, but honestly I don't get the interest of it.
> Don't worry, I don't see it either.

That's fun, I've since found a lot of threads about it :
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36994
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/CACHE-229

Someone even told to complain to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , and 
apparently "they" kept it in 2.4 and even in 2.5.

Do you think it may change anything to complain ? Cause I really agree
with 
developers taking part of the discussion, this "simple" change will
break a 
lot of framework, and I really really don't get the interest of the 
sessionListener anymore :))

-- 
Configure bugmail:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]