[Bug 55735] Additional quote entity in html element attribute evaluated in tagx if attribute contains EL expression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
--- Comment #1 from azuo@sohu.com ---
Um... it seems JSP spec doesn't clarify the behavior at all...
But XSLT does. If we "borrow" rules from XSLT, then some correct examples could
be (text="2 > 1"):
tagx/jspx: ABCD
output: ABCD
tagx/jspx: "
output: " 2 > 1"
But XSLT doesn't allow expressions in template text, thus, what can be the
correct result generated by the following example?
tagx/jspx: "${text}"
Should it be
output: "2 > 1"
or
output: "2 > 1"
or
output: "2 > 1"
or
output: "2 > 1"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 55735] Additional quote entity in html element attribute evaluated in tagx if attribute contains EL expression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735 --- Comment #2 from azuo@sohu.com --- Conclusion: 1. If you use jspx or tagx, then never use any EL expressions within attribute values, and always use JSTL tag to output expression values within template content -- unless you know the expression value must not contain any XML reserved characters; 2. Do not use jspx or tagx at all, use jsp and tag files instead -- whose behaviors are relatively determined. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 52323] Cobertura test code coverage support for build.xml and build.properties.default
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52323 --- Comment #3 from Violeta Georgieva --- Created attachment 30996 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30996&action=edit updated patch Hi, I touched the script here and there and also updated the version to 2.0.3. I think it is working now. Can you check? I tested on Windows. The NPE was because the cobertura instrumented our ClassLoaderLogManager and in the same time tried to initialize a static Logger field. [1] Regards Violeta [1] https://github.com/cobertura/cobertura/blob/master/cobertura/src/main/java/net/sourceforge/cobertura/coveragedata/TouchCollector.java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 52323] Cobertura test code coverage support for build.xml and build.properties.default
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52323 --- Comment #4 from Violeta Georgieva --- The patch is against trunk (Tomcat 8) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 55734] Manager using absolute URLs
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #11 from Christopher Schultz --- (In reply to Milo Hyson from comment #10) > I came across that same article when I Googled the issue. The problem is it > seems to be describing generally bad practices that are not specific to the > use of relative URLs. I'm sorry for launching a discussion in BZ. This really belongs on the users' list. I'd be happy to expand upon my assertions there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 55737] New: JVM crash with GzipOutputFilter
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737 Bug ID: 55737 Summary: JVM crash with GzipOutputFilter Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.47 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: Connectors Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org Reporter: wojteksoluti...@gmail.com Tomcat (with NIO connector) crashes suddenly: #0 0x7f72302a0425 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x7f72302a3b8b in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 0x7f722fc18155 in os::abort(bool) () from jdk1.7.0_45/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so #3 0x7f722fd97087 in VMError::report_and_die() () from jdk1.7.0_45/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so #4 0x7f722fc1cadf in JVM_handle_linux_signal () from jdk1.7.0_45/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so #5 #6 0x7f722e078099 in deflate_slow () from jdk1.7.0_45/jre/lib/amd64/libzip.so #7 0x7f722e077433 in deflate () from jdk1.7.0_45/jre/lib/amd64/libzip.so #8 0x7f722e073049 in Java_java_util_zip_Deflater_deflateBytes () from jdk1.7.0_45/jre/lib/amd64/libzip.so #9 0x7f7225012738 in ?? () #10 0x7f71 in ?? () #11 0x7f72250061d4 in ?? () #12 0x in ?? () -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
