DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33117] Deep link into Bugzilla broken on ROOT/index.jsp

2010-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33117

rodriguez...@aol.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |RESOLVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33117] Deep link into Bugzilla broken on ROOT/index.jsp

2010-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33117

Konstantin Kolinko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48694] WebappClassLoader deadlock if web application uses it's own classloader

2010-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694

--- Comment #11 from aullr...@blackducksoftware.com 2010-03-13 15:44:31 UTC ---
Can't see how you'd get into this situation with the current source code.
The stack traces indicate that findClass on the WebappClassLoader would have to
be a synchronized method? Is JRebel changing the byte code of the loader by any
chance?
But maybe I'm just blind ;-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48903] ClassLoader deadlock when compiling JSP pages in 6.0.26

2010-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48903

--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko  2010-03-14 
00:31:00 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=25125)
 --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25125)
MyClassLoader.java - sample of reflectively calling JDK7 API

I just tested that the JDK7 ClassLoader methods that I mentioned in comment 2
can be reflectively called by a class compiled with JDK 6. I was afraid that
registerAsParallelCapable() will not work when called through reflection.

I am attaching a sample ClassLoader implementation that calls those methods.
On success it prints something like this:

Result: true
Lock: java.lang.obj...@1befab0

where the lock is not the classloader, but some other object.
I tested that it runs successfully with JDK7 early access milestone 5
(jre-7-ea-bin-b76-windows-i586-12_nov_2009).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48906] New: Client's context information is not updated automatically in conf/Catalina

2010-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906

   Summary: Client's context information is not updated
automatically in conf/Catalina
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.26
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: dev@tomcat.apache.org
ReportedBy: t...@let-it-out.com


Updating/deploying a client with new context information will not trigger an
update of the client context information in conf/Catalina/.xml.

I normally keep the context file in the META-INF folder inside my client (e.g
webapps//META-INF/context.xml) which contains the database
information amongst others.
eg. 

Then I run the ant script to replace and redeploy the client to the usual
webapps folder and finally start Tomcat.
Upon launch I was expecting Tomcat to reread the context file from the META-INF
and update itself but it didn't do that. I had to manually change that.

Kind Regards

Tony

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48906] Client's context information is not updated automatically in conf/Catalina

2010-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906

Konstantin Kolinko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko  2010-03-14 
03:34:05 UTC ---
Your expectations are wrong. That is a feature.
You may read the docs or ask/search on the tomcat-users mailing list for
details.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Using JIRA instead STATUS.txt

2010-03-13 Thread Mladen Turk

Hi,

I would suggest that we use JIRA instead maintaining STATUS.txt files.
Each branch can then be a separate component and each status vote
JIRA issue classified as either bug, feature, etc...
Voting is supported except that one cannot vote for the created issue,
so that would be presumed.
However there is no -1 vote, so that would have to be done like
today by entering the comment with -1.

Nice thing is that patches can be directly attached without the need to
scp to the people.a.o.

If we decide on that I'll work with IT to allow only committers
write access.

Comments?

Regards
--
^TM

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org