CometProcessor crash after employ
Hi, I'm developing an webapp using NetBeans 6.7 and for test app IDE employ my application after Tomcat (version 6.0.20) started (without restart): "... org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext reload INFO: Reloading this Context has started" After employ my app, CometProcessor only receive BEGIN event, and never receive READ, ERROR (never receive TIMEOUT sub event) or END. (tried with NIO and APR) This bug occurs only if employ in runtime. If restart apache CometProcessor work properly. I don't know a cause of problem, then i'm sending this mail like "pre bug report". Someone can try reproduce this error? Maybe is my applications: webapp, o.s., java, ide... O.S.: Windows Vista Ultimate x64 Java Version: java version "1.6.0_04" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_04-b12) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 10.0-b19, mixed mode, sharing) sry for my bad english :) []s
Re: CometProcessor crash after employ
Ops... i wrote wrong, not is "employ, is "deploy".My problem is the "reload context" with cometProcessor. 2009/7/31 Bruno Henrique > Hi, > I'm developing an webapp using NetBeans 6.7 and for test app IDE employ > my application after Tomcat (version 6.0.20) started (without restart): > > "... org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext reload > INFO: Reloading this Context has started" > > After employ my app, CometProcessor only receive BEGIN event, and never > receive READ, ERROR (never receive TIMEOUT sub event) or END. (tried with > NIO and APR) > This bug occurs only if employ in runtime. If restart apache CometProcessor > work properly. > I don't know a cause of problem, then i'm sending this mail like "pre bug > report". > > Someone can try reproduce this error? Maybe is my applications: webapp, > o.s., java, ide... > > O.S.: > Windows Vista Ultimate x64 > > Java Version: > java version "1.6.0_04" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_04-b12) > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 10.0-b19, mixed mode, sharing) > > sry for my bad english :) > []s > > >
Re: ISAPI Redirect and uriworkers.properties
On 30.07.2009 19:10, RichKi wrote: > Does anyone know if it's possible to filter by port number? > > I have an application running on port 3030 in Apache that also runs securely > on port 8443. > > Incoming connections come to IIS on ports 80 and 443 respectively and are > picked up by the ISAPI redirect filter (URL is /ufs). > > What I want to do is map the 80 connections 3030 and the 443 to 8443. At the > moment, all /ufs requests go to 3030 as I can't seem to differentiate. > > Can anyone help? It doesn't look good. If the ports were non-standard, the answer would be yes. The ISAPI plugin does two checks against uriworkermap.properties, it searches for a match using the URI path of the request, but also for a match using /HOST/path. This match is done first. So if your requests go to different HOSTs, then you can define different forwarding rules in uriworkermap.properties. So what do we use as a value for HOST? It is the SERVER_NAME, and if the port is neither 80 nor 443 we also add ":PORT" add the end. In your case, since they are the default ports, you can't distinguish using the ports. What is SERVER_NAME? You can find out the SERVER_NAME your configuration uses by setting the JK log level to debug (do not do this on a high trafic production site). Then you'll get lots of logging, and one line you can look for has the format: Service protocol=... name=... The value occuring directly behind "name=" is the SERVER_NAME we are looking for in uriworkermap.properties. Now have a look, where this name appears in your IIS configuration. You might be able to split the definition of the port 80 and port 443 web sites from each other in IIS using different SERVER_NAMEs. It would be better if we did three runs through uriworkermap.properties, - first match against host+port+path even for default ports - then match against host+path - then match against path but that's not how it works at the moment. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: ISAPI Redirect and uriworkers.properties
What I forgot: The question belongs on the users list us...@tomcat.apache.org. Please continue the discussion there. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47617] New: include time spent doing ajp_get_endpoint() in error log
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47617 Summary: include time spent doing ajp_get_endpoint() in error log Product: Tomcat Connectors Version: 1.2.28 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: mod_jk AssignedTo: dev@tomcat.apache.org ReportedBy: mt...@tivo.com Created an attachment (id=24077) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24077) more expressive warning message. Add the duration spent in ajp_get_endpoint() if we fail to get an endpoint. The old message was: "Unable to get the free endpoint for worker %s from %u slots" New message is now: "Unable to get the free endpoint for worker %s from %u slots in %ld ms" Patch provided. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47609] Failsafe EOL conversion
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47609 --- Comment #2 from Filip Hanik 2009-07-31 16:04:23 PST --- So the only safe way to do it, would be to specify an includes list instead of using an excludes. Patches welcome -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
