Re: Shipping Tomcat Native from ASF site

2008-07-11 Thread Mladen Turk


Since all crypto software issues has been resolved
with US government we can ship openssl native binaries
directly instead using Irelands official mirror site.



I've put the binaries to
archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
and (1.1.14 only) to
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/

Not sure why but archive is not yet populated
(probably its some mirroring issue)

The heanet.ie site is still on and will stay there
for historic and current installers.


Regards
--
^(TM)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Shipping Tomcat Native from ASF site

2008-07-11 Thread Henri Gomez
> I've put the binaries to
> archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
> and (1.1.14 only) to
> www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
>
> Not sure why but archive is not yet populated
> (probably its some mirroring issue)
>
> The heanet.ie site is still on and will stay there
> for historic and current installers.

No binaries yet just src ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Shipping Tomcat Native from ASF site

2008-07-11 Thread Mladen Turk

Henri Gomez wrote:

I've put the binaries to
archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
and (1.1.14 only) to
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/

Not sure why but archive is not yet populated
(probably its some mirroring issue)

The heanet.ie site is still on and will stay there
for historic and current installers.


No binaries yet just src ?



The binaries should be there as well.
I presume Jean-Frederic will create them for 1.1.14
AFAICT there is win32/x86 binary, so I suppose others
will follow. If not, I'll make few of them.

Regards
--
^(TM)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Shipping Tomcat Native from ASF site

2008-07-11 Thread Henri Gomez
win32 binaries are now on site :

http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.14/binaries/win32/

Thanks

2008/7/11 Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>
>>> I've put the binaries to
>>> archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
>>> and (1.1.14 only) to
>>> www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
>>>
>>> Not sure why but archive is not yet populated
>>> (probably its some mirroring issue)
>>>
>>> The heanet.ie site is still on and will stay there
>>> for historic and current installers.
>>
>> No binaries yet just src ?
>>
>
> The binaries should be there as well.
> I presume Jean-Frederic will create them for 1.1.14
> AFAICT there is win32/x86 binary, so I suppose others
> will follow. If not, I'll make few of them.
>
> Regards
> --
> ^(TM)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Shipping Tomcat Native from ASF site

2008-07-11 Thread jean-frederic clere

Mladen Turk wrote:

Henri Gomez wrote:

I've put the binaries to
archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
and (1.1.14 only) to
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/

Not sure why but archive is not yet populated
(probably its some mirroring issue)

The heanet.ie site is still on and will stay there
for historic and current installers.


No binaries yet just src ?



The binaries should be there as well.
I presume Jean-Frederic will create them for 1.1.14
AFAICT there is win32/x86 binary, so I suppose others
will follow. If not, I'll make few of them.


I still have problems so please do it.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic



Regards



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41538] Unable to run Tomcat as a Windows service under JDK 1.6

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41538


Dan Armbrust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |




--- Comment #30 from Dan Armbrust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-07-11 06:29:40 PST 
---
(In reply to comment #29)
> As Mark points out, this is a JAVA bug.  It's contingent on the Sun Java
> installer
> to provide msvcr71.

Will, 

You are missing the important detail that sun DOES provide msvcr71.  So, in
their mind, they have done nothing wrong.

Tomcat is the provider of tomcat.exe - so Tomcat is the app provider which has
not provided the msvcr71 according to Sun's flawed logic. 

Now, tomcat shouldn't have to provide this library, because (if I understand
the issue correctly) if Sun hadn't messed up, then the jvm.dll would be able to
find the msvcr71 which sun provides.  But, Sun messed up.  So jvm.dll can't
find the msvcr71 which sun provides when you call the jvm.dll from a different
folder - the folder where tomcat.exe is located in this case.

> Please, don't waste your time and ours by reopening.

And that comment sounds an awful lot like Sun's response.  More buck passing. 
Seems pretty clear to me that if tomcat won't start as a service, and tomcat is
providing the service code, then we have a bug in tomcat.  It doesn't matter to
me as a user of tomcat where the source of the problem is - this bug should
still be open for tracking until the source of the problem is fixed, or a
workaround is put into the tomcat installer - either via the installer, or by
using a new version of commons-daemon which has a workaround.  

With the bug open, maybe then this bug would attract a developer who knows c
well enough to implement a workaround in commons-daemon to actually fix this
problem.  Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure I know even less c than Mark, so that
developer won't be me.


I have opened a bug in commons-daemon:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-110

And, I'll risk wasting your time by reopening this bug - because I strongly
feel that this bug shouldn't be closed until the DAEMON bug is resolved, if
that is the path that is taken.  At worst, maybe the churn of reopening and
closing this bug will attract another developer who has the skills necessary to
actually fix this issue for the rest of the tomcat users.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41538] Unable to run Tomcat as a Windows service under JDK 1.6

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41538


Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Comment #31 from Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-07-11 07:14:39 PST 
---
The solution is to add %JAVA_HOME%\jre\bin to the system PATH environment
variable reboot and then start the service.

I'm closing this issues as WONTFIX, but I left the DEAMON-110 issue opened.
See how it will be solvable for XP SP1+ windows versions, so it wont be fixed
for every OS we support.
There is a hack to try to preload msvcrt71.dll directly, but this might not
work because of additional dependencies. So, the only solution is to set
the path from which dependent dll's will be loaded, either via system PATH or
use version having the SetDllPath kernel32 function.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r675960 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-07-11 Thread remm
Author: remm
Date: Fri Jul 11 07:17:25 2008
New Revision: 675960

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=675960&view=rev
Log:
- Votes.

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=675960&r1=675959&r2=675960&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Fri Jul 11 07:17:25 2008
@@ -52,20 +52,20 @@
   Don't assume UTF-8 and use the correct encoding when generating
   tomcat-users.xml from the Windows installer.
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=674335&view=rev
-  +1: markt, fhanik, jfclere
+  +1: markt, fhanik, jfclere, remm
   -1: 
 
 * Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45285
   Need to look for annotations in class hierarchy
   http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-07-09-bug45285.patch
-  +1: markt, jfclere
+  +1: markt, jfclere, remm
   -1: 
 
 * Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42678
   Only ignore docBase it it really is a subdir of appBase
   Patch provided by juergen
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=675650&view=rev
-  +1: markt
+  +1: markt, remm
   -1: 
 
 * Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42565
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
   Patch provided by Lucas Galfaso
   This is just the jjt patch. There will also be changes to generated code
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=675726&view=rev
-  +1: markt
+  +1: markt, remm
   -1: 
 
 * Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42722
@@ -81,9 +81,11 @@
   Patch provided by Nils Hammar
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=675751&view=rev
   +1: markt
-  -1: 
+  -1: remm: I look at the code, and implicitly it is not the right way to 
close a stream; 
+this should be in the finally with the usual try { if(!null) } 
catch (IOE)
 
 * Fix startup failure when security is enabled
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=675796&view=rev
   +1: markt
   -1: 
+  -0: remm: Does StandardWrapper need to be preloaded now ?



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[VOTE] Release build 6.0.17

2008-07-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/

According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.17

2008-07-11 Thread Mladen Turk

Remy Maucherat wrote:

According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] Stable



Regards
--
^(TM)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45381] New: Throw UnsupportedOperationException for session replication

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381

   Summary: Throw UnsupportedOperationException for session
replication
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: Cluster
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi! 

I'm working on a cluster application and I want to make session replication
using  the attributes "useDirtyFlag=false" in server.xml file (session
replication to be made even the setAttributes is not called). The problem is :
when the manager is created in SimpleTcpCluster class it calls
cloneFromTemplate method from SimpleTcpReplicationManager class wich throws all
the time UnsupportedOperationException. 
How can I avoid this ???

Thanks !


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45382] New: Throw UnsupportedOperationException for session replication

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45382

   Summary: Throw UnsupportedOperationException for session
replication
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: Cluster
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi! 

I'm working on a cluster application and I want to make session replication
using  the attribute "useDirtyFlag=false" in server.xml file (session
replication to be made even the setAttributes is not called). The problem is :
when the manager is created in SimpleTcpCluster class it calls
cloneFromTemplate method from SimpleTcpReplicationManager class wich throws all
the time UnsupportedOperationException. 
How can I avoid this ???

Thanks !


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45382] Throw UnsupportedOperationException for session replication

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45382





--- Comment #1 from Georgiu Marius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-07-11 08:17:30 PST 
---


  
  
  
  

  

  

  



   









  

  
  

  

  
  


  
  
  

  



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45382] Throw UnsupportedOperationException for session replication

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45382





--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-07-11 10:47:54 PST ---
*** Bug 45381 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45381] Throw UnsupportedOperationException for session replication

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381


Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE




--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-07-11 10:47:54 PST ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 45382 ***


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45382] Throw UnsupportedOperationException for session replication

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45382


Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-07-11 10:49:02 PST ---
This looks like a configuration question that belongs on the users list rather
than a bug report.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



moving a web application from jakarta-tomcat-4.1.31 to apache-tomcat-6.0.16

2008-07-11 Thread kjwchu

I have an application which is running on jakarta-tomcat-4.1.31. Now I want
to move this application in  apache-tomcat-6.0.16. I wonder if anyone has
this experience or any thoughts about what areas I would need to make
changes and so on. Thanks!

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/moving-a-web-application-from-jakarta-tomcat-4.1.31-to-apache-tomcat-6.0.16-tp18411145p18411145.html
Sent from the Tomcat - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44285] ssl.SessionId Cache Control

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44285





--- Comment #2 from Chris Elving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-07-11 14:13:20 PST 
---
Created an attachment (id=22247)
 --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22247)
Add sslSessionCacheSize and sslSessionTimeout attributes to 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Denis LULLIER/Paris est absent(e).

2008-07-11 Thread dlullier


Je serai absent(e) du  11/07/2008 au 04/08/2008.

Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez
contacter Christine DUHAU ou Marc-Olivier JOUAN

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44382] Need to add support for HTTPOnly session cookie parameter

2008-07-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382


Saptarshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Comment #7 from Saptarshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-07-11 15:58:57 PST ---
All the major browsers supporting it... It is useful for the security of web
applications and can help prevent XSS (if not XST). This isn't really a big
change to the code and should be done quickly.

And if anyone is thinking its only a Microsoft hack, then today we shouldn't
have AJAX in web programming.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]