Re: Adding HTTPOnly support to Tomcat

2008-03-10 Thread Mark Thomas

Jim Manico wrote:

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.


If you add your patch (in diff -u format) to the bugzilla enhancement 
request you created then there is a much better chance it won't get forgotten.


Mark

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Adding HTTPOnly support to Tomcat

2008-03-10 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 19:56 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> haven't forgotten about you, it's still on the todo list.

I am against adding support for IE only hacks ?

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Re:Reorder the http header generated by tomcat

2008-03-10 Thread Hanks Wang (hanwan)
Hi Filip & all,
 
Thanks for your reply, I'm trying to reorder the header to make another
Network management SW handle http response easier.
Now I use another way to resolve the problem(change some code in the
NMS) since I don't know how reorder it yet..
 
B.R
Han
 
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
 
George Sexton wrote:
 
I agree. I just said that if HIS app requires a specific order,
HE should write code to do it. 
 
that wont help you IF there is a proxy between server and user agent
that reorders it.
 
the user-agent is what needs to be fixed
 
Filip
 
I was working on the assumption that he's writing his own user agent and
for whatever reason it simplifies his code if the headers are in a
specific order.
 
As I wrote in my original message, sometimes if you can get things in a
specific order it makes things easier. The example I gave was an iCal
parser. It turns out to be 10 times easier to write an iCal parser if
you can get the fields in a specific order. I.E. have the DTSTART come
before the RRULE every time. So, my iCal parser has a sort routine that
puts the various parts of an iCal entry in a specific order BEFORE I try
to use them. So, there are valid cases where when parsing data (e.g.
header data) getting things in a specific order is desirable.
 
I wholly agree that anyone that expects headers coming from a server to
be in a specific order needs their head examined.
 
--
George Sexton
MH Software, Inc.
Voice: +1 303 438 9585
URL:   http://www.mhsoftware.com/
 
 
B.R
Hanks
 


svn commit: r635539 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-10 Thread remm
Author: remm
Date: Mon Mar 10 05:11:58 2008
New Revision: 635539

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635539&view=rev
Log:
- Votes.

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=635539&r1=635538&r2=635539&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Mon Mar 10 05:11:58 2008
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
 * Allow to specify the random device to use. (/dev/urandom is faster).
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=602114
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=601795
-  +1: jfclere, fhanik
+  +1: jfclere, fhanik, remm
   +0: markt, jim - should really be added to the docs as well
   -1:
 
@@ -83,9 +83,11 @@
   -1: markt This patch removes a method from a public API. With that issue 
fixed
 I would vote -0 until I can look at this further as explained in
 http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=120457882215329&w=2
-  -0: remm The newer code looks cleaner to me, so I propose this patch 
(bb.getLength() is equal to the
-   value used as the result of available in the other proposed patch, 
and thez are thus using
-   the same limit for reading data):
+  -0: remm The newer code looks cleaner to me
+  
+* As an alternate fix to 44494, I propose this patch (bb.getLength() is equal 
to the
+  value used as the result of available in the other proposed patch, and both  
+  patches are thus using the same limit for reading data):
   Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java
 ===
 --- java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java(revision 
633279)
@@ -99,11 +101,14 @@
  bb.setOffset(bb.getEnd());
  
  return cb.getLength();
-  
+
+  +1 : remm
+
 * Cookie addition - due to how inconsistent browsers are we will only quote 
the value
   for v0 cookies.
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=634513
   +1: fhanik
+  +0: remm
   -0: markt If the current code thinks the path needs quoting then you
 are in very uncertain territory for v0 cookies anyway and
 the chances are that something is going to break. I would
@@ -115,15 +120,15 @@
 * Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44562
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635294&view=rev (prior code clean up)
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635297&view=rev (the actual fix)
-  +1: markt
+  +1: markt, remm
   -1:
 
 * Fix minor HttpServlet bug. Use localised error message.
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635298&view=rev
-  +1: markt
+  +1: markt, remm
   -1:
 
 * Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44558
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635304&view=rev
-  +1: markt
+  +1: markt, remm
   -1:



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Adding HTTPOnly support to Tomcat

2008-03-10 Thread Jim Manico

Rely,

This is not a ms hack, but a security enhancement supported by all  
browsers. Do some research and get back to us.


Jim

On Mar 10, 2008, at 5:33 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 19:56 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

haven't forgotten about you, it's still on the todo list.


I am against adding support for IE only hacks ?

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Adding HTTPOnly support to Tomcat

2008-03-10 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:16 -0400, Jim Manico wrote:
> Rely,
> 
> This is not a ms hack, but a security enhancement supported by all  
> browsers. Do some research and get back to us.

This feature does not have good browser support, and I think it's a
hack. Well, at least you know how I will vote if your patch is proposed
[of course, it could still go in if many people support it] :)

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41912] JSF datatable does not work on tomcat 6.0.9

2008-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41912


Rangel Preis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Comment #5 from Rangel Preis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-03-10 06:00:12 PST 
---
Using tomcat 6.0.16 anda JSF 1.2-b20-FCS i get the same error:

The method setVar(String) in the type DataTableTag is not applicable for the
arguments (JspValueExpression) when i change to jsf 1.1 it´s works fine.

Tomcat 6.0.16 have a bug too?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44571] New: Limits busy per worker to a threshold

2008-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44571

   Summary: Limits busy per worker to a threshold
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: unspecified
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P2
 Component: Connectors
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On a high load tomcat server, If a lot of requests is received suddenly, it
will take a lot of time to serve the requests, but apache still send more
requests to the tomcat, then tomcat become slower and slower. Since the server
takes no response, some web clients may send the request again, make tomcat
server more slower. It is something like congestion.

I write a patch to limit busy per worker to a threshold. Define the threshold
in worker.properties. If all workers reach the threshold, further request will
get a 503 response. And sticky session parameter is ignored if the worker
reaches the threshold.

It is very simple to configure, just add the busylimit to the worker. default
is 0, which means no limit. eg.

worker.test-1.port = 8009
worker.test-1.host = localhost
worker.test-1.type = ajp13
worker.test-1.busylimit = 10


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44571] Limits busy per worker to a threshold

2008-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44571





--- Comment #1 from Zealot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-03-10 06:28:02 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=21648)
 --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21648)
busy limit patch


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44502] NIO connector under heavy load drops incoming requests

2008-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44502


Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Comment #6 from Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-03-10 09:03:43 PST ---
Yes it does make sense, that is how the regular connector works. when it hits
max threads, it shuts down its connections to be able to handle other incoming
connections. 

I suspect that something else is simply dropping connections, and when we close
old connections you leave room to handle new ones.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Adding HTTPOnly support to Tomcat

2008-03-10 Thread Jim Manico

Remy,

I recommend more careful research on this topic.

IE 6+ supports HttpOnly
FireFox 2.0.0.6+ support HttpOnly
Opera 9.5+ has promised HttpOnly support
Safari is still considering

On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:16 -0400, Jim Manico wrote:
  

Rely,

This is not a ms hack, but a security enhancement supported by all  
browsers. Do some research and get back to us.



This feature does not have good browser support, and I think it's a
hack. Well, at least you know how I will vote if your patch is proposed
[of course, it could still go in if many people support it] :)

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  




svn commit: r635680 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-10 Thread markt
Author: markt
Date: Mon Mar 10 13:28:32 2008
New Revision: 635680

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635680&view=rev
Log:
Propose adding systemprops doc

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=635680&r1=635679&r2=635680&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Mon Mar 10 13:28:32 2008
@@ -132,3 +132,9 @@
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635304&view=rev
   +1: markt, remm
   -1:
+
+* Add system property docs
+  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=620335&view=rev
+  
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/systemprops.xml?r1=627743&r2=627742&pathrev=627743
+  +1: markt
+  -1:



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r635704 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

2008-03-10 Thread markt
Author: markt
Date: Mon Mar 10 14:34:56 2008
New Revision: 635704

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635704&view=rev
Log:
Add a couple of proposals.

Modified:
tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt?rev=635704&r1=635703&r2=635704&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Mon Mar 10 14:34:56 2008
@@ -69,3 +69,13 @@
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635298&view=rev
   +1: markt
   -1:
+
+* Add system properties docs
+  http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-03-10-sys-props.patch
+  +1: markt
+  -1:
+
+* Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44556
+  http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-03-10-bug44556.patch
+  +1: markt
+  -1:



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44556] Filename for commons-logging-api changed, but config files doesn't changed.

2008-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44556


Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|blocker |normal




--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-03-10 14:34:29 PST ---
A patch has been proposed for the next release.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r635718 - /tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt

2008-03-10 Thread markt
Author: markt
Date: Mon Mar 10 15:04:05 2008
New Revision: 635718

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635718&view=rev
Log:
Propose back port of security related fix. CVE-2008-0128.

Modified:
tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt

Modified: tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt?rev=635718&r1=635717&r2=635718&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt Mon Mar 10 15:04:05 2008
@@ -30,4 +30,9 @@
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635297&view=rev (the actual fix)
   +1: markt
   -1:
-  
\ No newline at end of file
+
+* Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41217
+  This is CVE-2008-0128.
+  http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2008-03-10-bug41217-tc4.patch
+  +1: markt
+  -1:



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r635720 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/security-4.html docs/security-5.html docs/security-6.html xdocs/security-4.xml xdocs/security-5.xml xdocs/security-6.xml

2008-03-10 Thread markt
Author: markt
Date: Mon Mar 10 15:05:18 2008
New Revision: 635720

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635720&view=rev
Log:
Add CVE-2008-0128 which was missing.

Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-6.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-4.xml
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-5.xml
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-6.xml

Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html?rev=635720&r1=635719&r2=635720&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html (original)
+++ tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html Mon Mar 10 15:05:18 2008
@@ -3,19 +3,19 @@
 
 
 Apache Tomcat - Apache Tomcat 4.x vulnerabilities
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
 
-
-
+
+
 
 
 
 
 http://tomcat.apache.org/";>
-
+
 
 
 
@@ -26,28 +26,28 @@
 
 
 http://www.apache.org/";>
-http://www.apache.org/images/asf-logo.gif"; />
+http://www.apache.org/images/asf-logo.gif"; align="right" alt="Apache 
Logo" border="0"/>
 
 
 
 
 
-http://www.google.com/search";>
-
-
-
+http://www.google.com/search"; method="get">
+
+
+
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
 
-
+
 
 Apache Tomcat
 
@@ -182,11 +182,11 @@
 
 
 
-
-
+
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Apache Tomcat 4.x vulnerabilities
 
@@ -219,14 +219,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Will not be fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.x
 
@@ -259,14 +259,51 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
+
+Not fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.x
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+moderate: Session hi-jacking
+   http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-0128";>
+   CVE-2008-0128
+
+
+When using the SingleSignOn Valve via https the Cookie JSESSIONIDSSO is
+   transmitted without the "secure" attribute, resulting in it being
+   transmitted to any content that is - by purpose or error - requested via
+   http from the same server. 
+
+Affects: 4.1.0-4.1.37
+
+  
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.37
 
@@ -406,14 +443,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.36
 
@@ -503,14 +540,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.32
 
@@ -595,14 +632,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.29
 
@@ -633,14 +670,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.13, 4.0.6
 
@@ -685,14 +722,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.12, 4.0.5
 
@@ -719,14 +756,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.3
 
@@ -755,14 +792,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0
 
@@ -802,14 +839,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.0.2
 
@@ -840,14 +877,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 4.0.0
 
@@ -875,14 +912,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Unverified
 
@@ -899,7 +936,7 @@
CVE-2005-4703, 
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2002-2008";>
CVE-2002-2008
-
+
 
 
 This issue only affects Windows operating systems. It can not be
@@ -915,7 +952,7 @@
 important: Denial of service
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2002-1895";>
CVE-2002-1895
-
+
 
 
 This issue only affects configurations that use IIS in conjunction with
@@ -931,14 +968,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Not a vulnerability in Tomcat
 
@@ -967,7 +1004,7 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
@@ -976,14 +1013,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
 
 
 
-
+
 
 Copyright © 1999-2007, The Apache Software Foundation
 

Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.html?rev=635720&r1=635719&r2=635720&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.html (original)
+++ tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.html Mon Mar 10 15:05:18 2008
@@ -3,19 +3,19 @@
 
 
 Apache Tomcat - Apache Tomcat 5.x vulnerabilities
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
 
-
-
+
+
 
 
 
 
 http://tomcat.apache.org/";>
-
+
 
 
 
@@ -26,28 +26,28 @@
 
 
 http://www.apache.org/";>
-http://www.apache.org/images/asf-logo.gif"; />
+http://www.apache.org/images/asf-logo.gif"; align="right" alt="Apache 
Logo" border="0"/>
 
 
 
 
 
-http://www.google.com/search";>
-
-
-
+http://www.google.com/search"; method="get">
+
+
+
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
 
-
+
 
 Apache Tomcat
 
@@ -182,11 +182,11 @@
 
 
 
-
-
+
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Apache Tomcat 5.x vulnerabilities
 
@@ -220,14 +220,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 5.5.26
 
@@ -295,14 +295,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 5.5.25, 5.0.SVN
 
@@ -384,14 +384,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 5.5.24, 5.0.SVN
 
@@ -421,14 +421,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 5.5.23, 5.0.SVN
 
@@ -463,14 +463,14 @@
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
 
-
+
 
 
-
+
 
 Fixed in Apache Tomcat 5.5.22, 5.0.SVN
 
@@ -524,1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44554] Null Pointer exception deploying WAR

2008-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554


Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-03-10 16:52:25 PST ---
Your war file is malformed. I get this error if I use 7zip to create the war
but if I use the jar command line tool and set URIEncoding="UTF-8" in the
connector then it works correctly.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44571] Limits busy per worker to a threshold

2008-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44571


Zealot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Connectors  |Native:JK




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44047] Provide a way for Tomcat to serve up error pages when too busy

2008-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44047


Zealot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Catalina|Native:JK




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]