DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44275] - isapi_redirect.dll denies access to URI's with META-INF / WEB-INF anywere in the URI

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44275





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-23 00:24 ---
HI;

With Netbeans 6 and maybe 5.x this is very serious. Every JSF Webapplication
wont work when run over the isapi_redirector. I would suggest to either enhence
the config to explizit List those pathes or provide a switch to deaktivate this
filter. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44283] New: - JVM crashes unexpectedly when using APR

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44283

   Summary: JVM crashes unexpectedly when using APR
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P2
 Component: Native:Integration
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Tomcat 6.0.14 crashes unexpectedly on production server when using APR connector
with SSLEnabled. 
Please look at Java HotSpot Log in attachment

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44283] - JVM crashes unexpectedly when using APR

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44283





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-23 02:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=21415)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21415&action=view)
Java HotSpot 1


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44283] - JVM crashes unexpectedly when using APR

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44283





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-23 02:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=21416)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21416&action=view)
Java HotSpot log 2


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r614517 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common: jk_status.c jk_uri_worker_map.c

2008-01-23 Thread rjung
Author: rjung
Date: Wed Jan 23 04:17:04 2008
New Revision: 614517

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=614517&view=rev
Log:
Fix unmount with worker '*':
- don't parse extension attributes for unmount rules
- include '*' unmounts in status worker rule map display
Fix provided by Eiji Takahashi (mashmk02 gmail com).

Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_status.c
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c

Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_status.c
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_status.c?rev=614517&r1=614516&r2=614517&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_status.c (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_status.c Wed Jan 23 04:17:04 
2008
@@ -1358,7 +1358,8 @@
 if (uw_map) {
 for (i = 0; i < uw_map->size[uw_map->index]; i++) {
 uri_worker_record_t *uwr = uw_map->maps[uw_map->index][i];
-if (strcmp(uwr->worker_name, worker)) {
+if (strcmp(uwr->worker_name, worker) &&
+strcmp(uwr->worker_name, "*")) {
 continue;
 }
 count++;
@@ -1409,7 +1410,8 @@
 for (i = 0; i < uw_map->size[uw_map->index]; i++) {
 uri_worker_record_t *uwr = uw_map->maps[uw_map->index][i];
 
-if (strcmp(uwr->worker_name, worker)) {
+if (strcmp(uwr->worker_name, worker) &&
+strcmp(uwr->worker_name, "*")) {
 continue;
 }
 (*count_ptr)++;

Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c?rev=614517&r1=614516&r2=614517&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c Wed Jan 23 
04:17:04 2008
@@ -468,7 +468,16 @@
 
 for (i = 0; i < IND_NEXT(uw_map->size); i++) {
 uri_worker_record_t *uwr = IND_NEXT(uw_map->maps)[i];
-jk_worker_t *jw = wc_get_worker_for_name(uwr->worker_name, l);
+jk_worker_t *jw;
+if(uwr->match_type & MATCH_TYPE_NO_MATCH)
+continue;
+jw = wc_get_worker_for_name(uwr->worker_name, l);
+if(!jw) {
+jk_log(l, JK_LOG_ERROR,
+   "Could not find worker with name '%s' in uri map post 
processing.",
+   uwr->worker_name);
+continue;
+}
 if (JK_IS_DEBUG_LEVEL(l))
 jk_log(l, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
"Checking extension for worker %d: %s of type %s (%d)",
@@ -854,7 +863,8 @@
 (uwr->match_type & MATCH_TYPE_DISABLED))
 continue;
 /* Check only matching workers */
-if (*uwr->worker_name != '*' && strcmp(uwr->worker_name, worker))
+if (strcmp(uwr->worker_name, worker) &&
+strcmp(uwr->worker_name, "*"))
 continue;
 if (uwr->match_type & MATCH_TYPE_WILDCHAR_PATH) {
 /* Map is already sorted by context_len */



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44281] - apache doesn't start when worker name is "*" in exclusion rule.

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44281


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-23 04:18 ---
Fix committed slightly changed a r614517.
Will be part of 1.2.27.
Thank you very much for testing (again)!


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44284] New: - Support java.lang.Iterable in c:forEach tag

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44284

   Summary: Support java.lang.Iterable in c:forEach tag
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Keywords: PatchAvailable
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P2
 Component: Jasper
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
apache-tomcat-6.0.10-src/java/org/apache/jasper/tagplugins/jstl/core/ForEach.java
  Tue Feb 13 05:04:52 2007
+++ webapp/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/jasper/tagplugins/jstl/core/ForEach.java 
Fri Mar  2 09:07:07 2007
@@ -137,9 +137,9 @@
 ctxt.generateJavaSource("else if (" + itemsV + " instanceof 
double[])");
 ctxt.generateJavaSource(iterV + "=toIterator((double[])" + itemsV + 
");");
 
-// Collection
-ctxt.generateJavaSource("else if (" + itemsV + " instanceof 
Collection)");
-ctxt.generateJavaSource(iterV + "=((Collection)" + itemsV +
").iterator();");
+// Iterable
+ctxt.generateJavaSource("else if (" + itemsV + " instanceof 
Iterable)");
+ctxt.generateJavaSource(iterV + "=((Iterable)" + itemsV + 
").iterator();");
 
 // Iterator
 ctxt.generateJavaSource("else if (" + itemsV + " instanceof 
Iterator)");





---
jakarta-taglibs/standard/src/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/core/ForEachSupport.java
   Tue Aug 29 01:13:06 2006
+++
webapp/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/core/ForEachSupport.java
 Fri Mar  2 09:21:06 2007
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
 package org.apache.taglibs.standard.tag.common.core;
 
 import java.util.Arrays;
-import java.util.Collection;
 import java.util.Enumeration;
 import java.util.Iterator;
 import java.util.Map;
@@ -201,8 +200,8 @@
 items = toForEachIterator((float[]) o);
 else if (o instanceof double[])
 items = toForEachIterator((double[]) o);
-else if (o instanceof Collection)
-items = toForEachIterator((Collection) o);
+else if (o instanceof Iterable)
+items = toForEachIterator((Iterable) o);
 else if (o instanceof Iterator)
 items = toForEachIterator((Iterator) o);
 else if (o instanceof Enumeration)
@@ -324,8 +323,8 @@
 return new SimpleForEachIterator(Arrays.asList(wrapped).iterator());
 }
 
-// retrieves an iterator from a Collection
-protected ForEachIterator toForEachIterator(Collection c) {
+// retrieves an iterator from a Iterable
+protected ForEachIterator toForEachIterator(Iterable c) {
 return new SimpleForEachIterator(c.iterator());
 }

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44285] New: - ssl.SessionId Cache Control

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44285

   Summary: ssl.SessionId Cache Control
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: unspecified
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: Connectors
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


There is no way to control the ssl.SessionId cache size.
The default Sun JVM behavior is too keep a SoftReference cache that grows as 
much as it can. This has 
a performance impact since the GC works harder because of the heap size.

The result is that with a system that has a lot of https clients, the memory 
grows to a very large size:
We have 700K of SessionIds in memory consuming a little over 800MB !!!

I think the connector should have attributes that let me control the max time 
and size ssl.sessionid are 
kept (for reference, websphere let's you do that).

Another useful feature would be to let me explicitly invalidate a ssl.sessionid 
(during the request life 
cycle).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44238] - Tomcat NIO SSL connector can't handle large file

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44238


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-23 10:58 ---
marked as fixed, based on user feedback

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "TomcatFAQ" by MichaelBurton

2008-01-23 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by MichaelBurton:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatFAQ

--
  
   *  '''Q: How to solve problems involving Custom``Tags and Tag``Pooling?'''
   *  A: various apache links:
-*  http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16001 - bug report 
discussing the problem
+*  http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16001 - bug report 
discussing the problem
 *  http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/guidelines.html - nice description of 
the life cycle
  
   *  '''Q: How can I increase the max memory usage of Tomcat running as a 
Windows Service?'''

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44288] New: - Windows Service Installer and XML issues

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44288

   Summary: Windows Service Installer and XML issues
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I am having issues with XSLT files depending on which download option of Tomcat
6.0.14 that I choose.  If I download the ZIP file under Core, my XSLT files
transform with no problems.  However if I download and use the Windows Service
Installer instead, I am getting the following errors in my Tomcat log:

 ERROR:  'unknown protocol: c'
FATAL ERROR:  'Could not compile stylesheet'

javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException: Could not compile
stylesheet [http-8080-1]

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44288] - Windows Service Installer and XML issues

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44288


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-23 14:06 ---
You need to give your posting on the users list a chance before reporting a bug.
This issue can be re-opened if that thread concludes there is a bug to fix.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44288] - Windows Service Installer and XML issues

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44288





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-23 15:06 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> You need to give your posting on the users list a chance before reporting a 
> bug.
> This issue can be re-opened if that thread concludes there is a bug to fix.

I apologize, I received the following e-mail from a member of the users list:

I think you found a bug
I just tried installing Windows Service and see these errors
[2008-01-23 16:16:21] [info] Procrun (2.0.3.0) started
[2008-01-23 16:16:21] [info] Service Tomcat6 name Apache Tomcat
[2008-01-23 16:16:21] [420  service.c] [error] The name is already in use as
either a service name or a service display name.
[2008-01-23 16:16:21] [606  prunsrv.c] [error] Failed installing Tomcat6
service
[2008-01-23 16:16:21] [info] Procrun finished.

Since your tomcat bug was found first and is a 'cannot execute or go
further' bug I'll give you the honours
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Tomcat%205

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r614738 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-01-23 Thread jim
Author: jim
Date: Wed Jan 23 15:46:02 2008
New Revision: 614738

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=614738&view=rev
Log:
code-review vote

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=614738&r1=614737&r2=614738&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Wed Jan 23 15:46:02 2008
@@ -72,5 +72,5 @@
 * Fix regression to removal of connection specific comet timeout
   http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/comet-timeout.patch
   Would like for 6.0.16, trivial fix
-  +1: fhanik
+  +1: fhanik, jim (by inspection)
   -1:



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44275] - isapi_redirect.dll denies access to URI's with META-INF / WEB-INF anywere in the URI

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44275





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-23 21:41 ---
Why does isapi_redirector filter it ?  I thought TC itself would receive the
request, calculate the meaning of the request is referencing a toplevel path
within a context and return a 403/404/whatever.

isapi_redirect surely can be transparent in this regard ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44275] - isapi_redirect.dll denies access to URI's with META-INF / WEB-INF anywere in the URI

2008-01-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44275





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-23 23:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Why does isapi_redirector filter it ?  I thought TC itself would receive the
> request, calculate the meaning of the request is referencing a toplevel path
> within a context and return a 403/404/whatever.
> 
> isapi_redirect surely can be transparent in this regard ?

See Bug ID39614 for a explanation. The rediretor does some (redundant)
additional filtering independent of tomcat (jk_isapi_plugin.c / uri_is_web_inf :
looks for uri *containing* meta-inf / web-inf). 

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]