DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43687] New: - after repeated authentication tomcat again sends page with login form instead of protected static resource

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43687

   Summary: after repeated authentication tomcat again sends page
with login form instead of protected static resource
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Connectors
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Steps to replicate problem:

   1) clear firefox cache
   2) load url "http://localhost:8080/aaa/index.html";
   3) fill in auth form
   4) on index.html page click logout link to logout.jsp (invalidate session and
redirect to index.html)
   5) fill in auth form
   6) you will get form page again (!)
   7) click "reload" button
   8) you will get index.html


Conversation with server:

firefox:  GET /aaa/index.html HTTP/1.1
 tomcat:  HTTP/1.1 200 OK
  ETag: W/"478-119321682"
  Last-Modified: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:07:00 GMT

  

firefox:  POST /aaa/j_security_check HTTP/1.1
 tomcat:  HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
  Location: http://localhost:8080/aaa/index.html

firefox:  GET /aaa/index.html HTTP/1.1
  If-Modified-Since: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:07:00 GMT
  If-None-Match: W/"478-119321682"
 tomcat:  HTTP/1.1 200 OK
  ETag: W/"316-1193222364000"
  Last-Modified: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:39:24 GMT
  
  

firefox:  GET /aaa/logout.jsp HTTP/1.1
 tomcat:  HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
  Location: http://localhost:8080/aaa/index.html

firefox:  GET /aaa/index.html HTTP/1.1
  If-Modified-Since: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:39:24 GMT
  If-None-Match: W/"316-1193222364000"
 tomcat:  HTTP/1.1 200 OK
  ETag: W/"478-119321682"
  Last-Modified: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:07:00 GMT
  

firefox:  POST /aaa/j_security_check HTTP/1.1
 tomcat:  HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
  Location: http://localhost:8080/aaa/index.html

firefox:  GET /aaa/index.html HTTP/1.1
  If-Modified-Since: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:07:00 GMT
  If-None-Match: W/"478-119321682"
 tomcat:  HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified
  ETag: W/"316-1193222364000"

firefox:  GET /aaa/index.html HTTP/1.1
  If-Modified-Since: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:07:00 GMT
  If-None-Match: W/"478-119321682"
  Cache-Control: max-age=0
 tomcat:  HTTP/1.1 200 OK
  ETag: W/"316-1193222364000"
  Last-Modified: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:39:24 GMT

  

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43687] - after repeated authentication tomcat again sends page with login form instead of protected static resource

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43687





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-24 04:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=21032)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21032&action=view)
web app with form-based authentication

war to reproduce described behaviour

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43687] - after repeated authentication tomcat again sends page with login form instead of protected static resource

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43687





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-24 04:09 ---
(From update of attachment 21032)
war to reproduce described behaviour.

You need also configured user with role "aaa". It is my
$CATALINA_HOME/conf/tomcat-users.xml:
  
  
  
   



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Delays in mod_jk

[Larry Reisler]

We are running JBOSS 4.21GA(Tomcat 6.0.10) with mod_jk 1.25 on Apache 2.2.x, 
and have run into something of a performance issue.  

We have the system setup so that threads on mod_jk and tomcat timeout after 10 
minutes (an heuristic which has been discussed in some of the documentation) 
using the properties on the mod_jk side:
worker.node1.connection_pool_timeout=600,and on the Tomcat side 
connectionTimeout="60".

We have noticed that some transactions to the apache server were running slow.  
After looking at the logs, the mod_jk logs indicated that the transaction 
executed relatively quickly (eg. < .03 seconds) whereas the apache access logs 
indicated that the transaction took something more like 2.040 seconds.  After 
enabling trace logs on mod_jk, it became clear that sometimes before executing 
a transaction, mod_jk would call the maintain function, which in turn would 
close sockets that had exceeded the time limit of 10 minutes using 
jk_shutdown_socket.   As per the code message in jk_shutdown_socket, the socket 
would take two seconds to shut down, causing a delay (sometimes it would shut 
down two or three sockets, resulting in a delay of 2,4, or 6 seconds).  The 
time spent doing the maintenance was before the real work of sending the data 
to Tomcat, so the mod_jk.log did not reflect that in its timing.  Nevertheless, 
the transactions are being delayed.

I found that the number of delays was directly related to the 
connection_pool_timeout: a higher timeout meant fewer delays – this is what I 
would have expected given my understanding of the problem.

I tried setting worker.maintain on the mod_jk side to 10 seconds, but the 
problem still occurs.  

A couple of questions come out of this:
1.  Should the thread processing the request be running maintain at all?  My 
understanding is that there is a separate maintenance thread that is running by 
default every 60 seconds.  Can’t that thread perform the maintenance 
exclusively?
2.  If the processing thread does have to run the maintain function, then maybe 
it could simply place the expired sockets on a queue for later processing by 
the maintain thread, or perhaps send the FIN packet and then place them on a 
queue.
3.  Is there some reason that Tomcat would not be sending the FIN packet to 
mod_jk immediately?

Thanks
Larry Reisler





Come meet Vringo at the following events...


October 16-17 Symbian Smartphone Show, London UK

October 22-24 CTIA San Francisco, CA

October 24-25 Media and Tech Roundtable Beijing, China

October 30-31 VON Boston, MA

Nov 4-6 Rutberg Wireless Influencers, Laguna Niguel, CA

 

Would be delighted to see you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43690] New: - SSL Problem

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690

   Summary: SSL Problem
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.2
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P1
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


C:\Documents and Settings\Rajan>%JAVA_HOME%\bin\keytool -genkey -alias tomcat -k
eyalg RSA
Enter keystore password:
keytool error: java.io.IOException: Keystore was tampered with, or password was
incorrect

first time when i ran the above command i gave some password instead 
of 'changeit'.But I forgot that password also.So now i ran the above command it 
is giving the above error.

How can i reset the password? or any other way to make my application into SSL 
secure(https://...)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43690] - SSL Problem

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-24 05:37 ---
Bugzilla is not a support forum.
Post your question on the tomcat-users mailing list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Catalina Ant JMX?

[Peter Rossbach]

Hi Paul,

please open a bug!

Peter




Am 23.10.2007 um 15:46 schrieb Paul Shemansky:


While browsing the project, I noticed that there is an unused
separation of Catalina Ant JMX resources.  If this was unintended, a
possible cleanup patch is attached.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43692] New: - Catalina Ant JMX is currently unused, and seems unnecessary.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43692

   Summary: Catalina Ant JMX is currently unused, and seems
unnecessary.
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: trivial
  Priority: P2
 Component: Documentation
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


As per Peter Rossbach's request, I am filing this as a bug :

While browsing the project, I noticed that there is an unused
separation of Catalina Ant JMX resources.  If this was unintended, I will attach
the patch momentarily.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43692] - Catalina Ant JMX is currently unused, and seems unnecessary.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43692





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-24 08:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=21035)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21035&action=view)
Removes the unused Catalina ant JMX references.

This should clean things up.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43588


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #20989|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-24 08:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=21036)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21036&action=view)
Revised patch.  Please review / vote.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43588





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-24 12:13 ---
I think this patch is invalid,
for the end points, if I bind to an interface, then I can't unlock the accept by
doing ("localhost",port), since the port wont be bound to localhost at all.

granted, that the problem I'm describing is already existing, and not related to
the localhost bug

Filip

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43588





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-24 12:14 ---
ignore my previous comment, I'm a retard, didn't look into it enough

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43588] - Tomcat uses hardcoded 127.0.0.1 for localhost

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43588


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #21036|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-24 12:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=21039)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21039&action=view)
Incl. Nio

Added NIO connector to patch

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r588000 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[fhanik]

Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Oct 24 13:10:18 2007
New Revision: 588000

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588000&view=rev
Log:
added in proposal

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=588000&r1=587999&r2=588000&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Wed Oct 24 13:10:18 2007
@@ -54,3 +54,8 @@
 * Harmonize with HTTP java.io code. Otherwise the socket is not closed. 
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/patches/AjpPro.patch
   +1: jfclere, fhanik, remm
   -1:
+
+* Fix BZ 43588 - hard coded 127.0.0.1 for localhost
+  http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21039&action=view
+  +1: 
+  -1: 
\ No newline at end of file



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38131] - WatchedResource does not work if app is outside "webapps"

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38131





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-24 15:28 ---
I would like to experiment with this patch. Do you think you can post it here
for others to review and test?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r588000 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[Lucas Galfaso]

Hi all,
  I do not know what each of you actually thinks about this bug, but I
would hardly consider this a must have, nor a show stopper (thing that
I thought was the case for the next tomcat 6.0.x tag.)
  If every known bug with a patch is been considered, then I would
like to propose
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20975
  that fixes
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42565
  This is a small bug in the jjtree EL grammar.

Thanks,
  lg

On 10/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Wed Oct 24 13:10:18 2007
> New Revision: 588000
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588000&view=rev
> Log:
> added in proposal
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
>
> Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=588000&r1=587999&r2=588000&view=diff
> ==
> --- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
> +++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Wed Oct 24 13:10:18 2007
> @@ -54,3 +54,8 @@
>  * Harmonize with HTTP java.io code. Otherwise the socket is not closed. 
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/patches/AjpPro.patch
>+1: jfclere, fhanik, remm
>-1:
> +
> +* Fix BZ 43588 - hard coded 127.0.0.1 for localhost
> +  http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21039&action=view
> +  +1:
> +  -1:
> \ No newline at end of file
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r588000 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[Rémy Maucherat]

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 20:39 -0300, Lucas Galfaso wrote:
> Hi all,
>   I do not know what each of you actually thinks about this bug, but I
> would hardly consider this a must have, nor a show stopper (thing that
> I thought was the case for the next tomcat 6.0.x tag.)

I feel a bit like you. I was about to state that I would not consider
any patch that was not already in the STATUS file for the 6.0.15 tag.

>   If every known bug with a patch is been considered, then I would
> like to propose
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20975
>   that fixes
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42565
>   This is a small bug in the jjtree EL grammar.

Rémy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r588095 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[funkman]

Author: funkman
Date: Wed Oct 24 17:46:02 2007
New Revision: 588095

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588095&view=rev
Log:
some votes

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=588095&r1=588094&r2=588095&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Wed Oct 24 17:46:02 2007
@@ -29,26 +29,26 @@
   Fixes the 100 Continue response, that got reversed through byte buffer 
manipulation
   last patch before tag, promise :)
   http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/bz-43653-complimentary.patch
-  +1: fhanik
+  +1: fhanik, funkman
   -1: 
 
 * Fix possible DoS condition for the experimental NIO/AJP module (reported by 
William Leung via email)
   http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43621
-  +1: billbarker,fhanik
+  +1: billbarker,fhanik,funkman
   -1:
 
 * Fix problem on a Forward when the outer most wrapper isn't a 
HttpServletRequest/ResponseWrapper.
   http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43668
-  +1: billbarker, remm
+  +1: billbarker, remm, funkman
   -1: 
 
 * Tests for unit tests for the cookie issues. 
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/patches/CookiesTest.patch
-  +1: fhanik
+  +1: fhanik, funkman
   -1:
 
 * Guess java location from the PATH environment. 
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/patches/setclasspath.sh.patch
   And improve fix for 37284.
-  +1: fhanik, remm
+  +1: fhanik, remm, funkman
   -1:
 
 * Harmonize with HTTP java.io code. Otherwise the socket is not closed. 
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/patches/AjpPro.patch
@@ -58,4 +58,6 @@
 * Fix BZ 43588 - hard coded 127.0.0.1 for localhost
   http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21039&action=view
   +1: 
-  -1: 
\ No newline at end of file
+  -1: funkman InetAddress.getLocalHost() != localhost - it should be
+InetAddress.getByName("localhost").getHostAddress()
+



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r588152 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

[pero]

Author: pero
Date: Wed Oct 24 23:36:24 2007
New Revision: 588152

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588152&view=rev
Log:
add my votes

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=588152&r1=588151&r2=588152&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Wed Oct 24 23:36:24 2007
@@ -34,25 +34,25 @@
 
 * Fix possible DoS condition for the experimental NIO/AJP module (reported by 
William Leung via email)
   http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43621
-  +1: billbarker,fhanik,funkman
+  +1: billbarker,fhanik,funkman, pero
   -1:
 
 * Fix problem on a Forward when the outer most wrapper isn't a 
HttpServletRequest/ResponseWrapper.
   http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43668
-  +1: billbarker, remm, funkman
+  +1: billbarker, remm, funkman, pero
   -1: 
 
 * Tests for unit tests for the cookie issues. 
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/patches/CookiesTest.patch
-  +1: fhanik, funkman
+  +1: fhanik, funkman, pero
   -1:
 
 * Guess java location from the PATH environment. 
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/patches/setclasspath.sh.patch
   And improve fix for 37284.
-  +1: fhanik, remm, funkman
+  +1: fhanik, remm, funkman, pero
   -1:
 
 * Harmonize with HTTP java.io code. Otherwise the socket is not closed. 
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/patches/AjpPro.patch
-  +1: jfclere, fhanik, remm
+  +1: jfclere, fhanik, remm, pero
   -1:
 
 * Fix BZ 43588 - hard coded 127.0.0.1 for localhost



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]