DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43409] - Error location wrongly despatched to servlet

2007-09-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43409


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-29 02:20 ---
Of course a static file has no mapping in the deployment descriptor, but it is
part of the web application. It is a web resource. SRV.9.9.2 says:

"If the sendError method is called on the response, the container consults the
list of error page declarations for the Web application that use the status-code
syntax and attempts a match. If there is a match, the container returns the
resource as indicated by the location entry."

If the error page exists as a static resource it must be returned. The above
paragraph doesn't say the resource should be dynamic.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43515] New: - Small bug in org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet

2007-09-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43515

   Summary: Small bug in
org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Patch attached.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43515] - Small bug in org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet

2007-09-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43515





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-29 08:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=20898)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20898&action=view)
Patch


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43409] - Error location wrongly despatched to servlet

2007-09-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43409


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-29 10:09 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> If the error page exists as a static resource it must be returned.

The spec does not say this. It says that if the error matches one of your error
page declarations, then the corresponding resource should be returned. Resources
are always provided by servlets, even static content. The mapping of resources
to servlets is defined by SRV.11.

> The above paragraph doesn't say the resource should be dynamic.

No it doesn't, but it *can* be dynamic - hence SRV.11 applies (which also
applies to static resources which are normally served by the default servlet.

Bugzilla is not the place to have discussions like this. Please use the users 
list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43516] New: - mod_jk memory leak (apache reload)

2007-09-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43516

   Summary: mod_jk memory leak (apache reload)
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: Unknown
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P1
 Component: Native:JK
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


if i reload apache (graceful) the apache prozesses consumes additional 8kB for
each VirtualHost-Definition! this is independant if i define workers or not.
With 1000 VirtualHost for example, each apache process consumes on every reload
additional 8MB memory

if i remove "LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so" everything is ok again.

i have installed apache 2.0.58 and tried with mod_jk 1.2.22/23 and 25 , but all
have same problem

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43516] - mod_jk memory leak (apache reload)

2007-09-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43516





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-29 13:23 ---
Could you please tell us your platform?
Did you also try with httpd 2.2?
It's likely the bug doesn't depend on these details, but one never knows.

Thanks for reporting this!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43516] - mod_jk memory leak (apache reload)

2007-09-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43516





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-29 13:53 ---
no, i have not tried with apache 2.2
platform is Gentoo 4.1.2(In reply to comment #1)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43516] - mod_jk memory leak (apache reload)

2007-09-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43516





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-29 16:06 ---
I could not really reproduce this. I tried with httpd 2.2 on Solaris.
I can see a memory leak after each restart, but even without mod_jk.
Could you please post your test config (OK if httpd 2.0)? Maybe you are able to
produce a "minimal" config.

How do you measure the leak? Are you looking at the memory map in the proc
filesystem entry of an httpd child process?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43516] - mod_jk memory leak (apache reload)

2007-09-29 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43516





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-29 16:20 ---
Aha, can reproduce now. My httpd config leaks some memory even without mod_jk,
but it's only a small amount and it doesn't go up with the number of virtual
servers.

I tried again with 200 vhosts, and now I can see the mod_jk specific problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]