Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[Remy Maucherat]

Mark Thomas wrote:

Jim Jagielski wrote:

   [X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
   as well as the problems which started this whole
   thing.
   [ ]  0. Whatever.
   [ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:



With the following caveats:

- There is only one dev branch. I am -1 for creating separate dev
branches for 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x and 5.5.x on the grounds it is too much
overhead for branches that are in maintenance mode where 99% of the
patches will be ported from 6.x

- Where a patch for 3, 4 or 5 is required that just doesn't make sense
in the dev branch then the patch is applied using RTC.

- We review this process in 3 months time to see if it is providing the
expected benefits without excessive overheads.

- We improve the "Which version?" web page to make clear which branches
are supported and at what level. I'll start a wiki page as a draft of this.

- The "Get involved" pages are updated to document this process


Some points of my own:
- I think my proposed process was more adapted to the Tomcat situation
- The way Jim rushed his vote seems to shortcut any possibility of me to 
present a vote at the moment (which is fairly annoying as I spent weeks 
discussing details and integrating changes)
- I am not aware of any ASF rule specifying that a project cannot define 
its own release process


Since it does most of what I suggested and there was no "this will not 
be changeable through further discussions and votes", I did vote in 
favor of it. I would be willing to revisit it later since I doubt it is 
well suited to the size of the Tomcat community and the way it works.


Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[jean-frederic clere]

+1

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
>[ ] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
>as well as the problems which started this whole
>thing.
>[ ]  0. Whatever.
>[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:
> 
> The vote will run for 96 hours instead of the normal 72 because of
> the weekend. Only binding votes will be counted, but non-binding
> votes will be used to address wider concern/acceptance of
> the proposal.
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[jean-frederic clere]

Mark Thomas wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
>>as well as the problems which started this whole
>>thing.
>>[ ]  0. Whatever.
>>[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:
>>
> 
> With the following caveats:
> 
> - There is only one dev branch. I am -1 for creating separate dev
> branches for 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x and 5.5.x on the grounds it is too much
> overhead for branches that are in maintenance mode where 99% of the
> patches will be ported from 6.x

Apache httpd works that way. In case a patch can't fit in mail use
people.apache.org to store the patch to review.

Note that tomcat/tc6.0.x/ is a released branche and it should be RTC too.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
> - Where a patch for 3, 4 or 5 is required that just doesn't make sense
> in the dev branch then the patch is applied using RTC.
> 
> - We review this process in 3 months time to see if it is providing the
> expected benefits without excessive overheads.
> 
> - We improve the "Which version?" web page to make clear which branches
> are supported and at what level. I'll start a wiki page as a draft of this.
> 
> - The "Get involved" pages are updated to document this process
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[Jim Jagielski]

Mladen Turk wrote:
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
> >as well as the problems which started this whole
> >thing.
> >[ ]  0. Whatever.
> >[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:
> > 
> 
> If voted (and it looks it will) we should put them somewhere
> for easier future reference.
> I already proposed
> http://tomcat.apache.org/getinvolved.html or
> http://tomcat.apache.org/svn.html
> 

++1

> Regards,
> Mladen
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-- 
===
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[Jim Jagielski]

Mark Thomas wrote:
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
> >as well as the problems which started this whole
> >thing.
> >[ ]  0. Whatever.
> >[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:
> > 
> 
> With the following caveats:
> 
> - There is only one dev branch. I am -1 for creating separate dev
> branches for 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x and 5.5.x on the grounds it is too much
> overhead for branches that are in maintenance mode where 99% of the
> patches will be ported from 6.x
> 
> - Where a patch for 3, 4 or 5 is required that just doesn't make sense
> in the dev branch then the patch is applied using RTC.
> 
> - We review this process in 3 months time to see if it is providing the
> expected benefits without excessive overheads.
> 
> - We improve the "Which version?" web page to make clear which branches
> are supported and at what level. I'll start a wiki page as a draft of this.
> 
> - The "Get involved" pages are updated to document this process

FWIW, under httpd there is not a 1.3 dev/release branch pair, nor
is there "really" one for 2.0. So No, I don't think that such a pair
is required for any codebase which is in maint mode, just for those
undergoing active development.
-- 
===
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[Rainer Jung]

Jim Jagielski schrieb:
>[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
>as well as the problems which started this whole
>thing.
>[ ]  0. Whatever.
>[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Could two tomcat have mutual authentication?

[quanxin zhu]

I setup a tomcat server 1 using client authentication, and deployed a
webservice on it.
So, when invoke the webservice, a certification is needed.
In server 2 , I want a servlet to invoke the webservice in server 1.
could server 2 automatically provide its certification to tomcat 1 when
invoke webservice?

Re: Could two tomcat have mutual authentication?

[Mark Thomas]

quanxin zhu wrote:
> I setup a tomcat server 1 using client authentication, and deployed a
> webservice on it.
> So, when invoke the webservice, a certification is needed.
> In server 2 , I want a servlet to invoke the webservice in server 1.
> could server 2 automatically provide its certification to tomcat 1 when
> invoke webservice?
> 

This list is for questions relating to the development of Tomcat. For
questions on how to use or configure Tomcat, please use the users list.

Mark

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[Peter Rossbach]

   [X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
   as well as the problems which started this whole
   thing.
   [ ]  0. Whatever.
   [ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:


I agree with Remy: We must find a process that really work normally   
quick and

can handle conflicts fair.

Peter


Am 23.09.2007 um 11:09 schrieb Remy Maucherat:


Mark Thomas wrote:

Jim Jagielski wrote:




With the following caveats:
- There is only one dev branch. I am -1 for creating separate dev
branches for 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x and 5.5.x on the grounds it is  
too much

overhead for branches that are in maintenance mode where 99% of the
patches will be ported from 6.x
- Where a patch for 3, 4 or 5 is required that just doesn't make  
sense

in the dev branch then the patch is applied using RTC.
- We review this process in 3 months time to see if it is  
providing the

expected benefits without excessive overheads.
- We improve the "Which version?" web page to make clear which  
branches
are supported and at what level. I'll start a wiki page as a draft  
of this.

- The "Get involved" pages are updated to document this process


Some points of my own:
- I think my proposed process was more adapted to the Tomcat situation
- The way Jim rushed his vote seems to shortcut any possibility of  
me to present a vote at the moment (which is fairly annoying as I  
spent weeks discussing details and integrating changes)
- I am not aware of any ASF rule specifying that a project cannot  
define its own release process


Since it does most of what I suggested and there was no "this will  
not be changeable through further discussions and votes", I did  
vote in favor of it. I would be willing to revisit it later since I  
doubt it is well suited to the size of the Tomcat community and the  
way it works.


Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[Henri Gomez]

+1

2007/9/23, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
> >>>as well as the problems which started this whole
> >>>thing.
> >>>[ ]  0. Whatever.
> >>>[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:
>
> I agree with Remy: We must find a process that really work normally
> quick and
> can handle conflicts fair.
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 23.09.2007 um 11:09 schrieb Remy Maucherat:
>
> > Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >> With the following caveats:
> >> - There is only one dev branch. I am -1 for creating separate dev
> >> branches for 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x and 5.5.x on the grounds it is
> >> too much
> >> overhead for branches that are in maintenance mode where 99% of the
> >> patches will be ported from 6.x
> >> - Where a patch for 3, 4 or 5 is required that just doesn't make
> >> sense
> >> in the dev branch then the patch is applied using RTC.
> >> - We review this process in 3 months time to see if it is
> >> providing the
> >> expected benefits without excessive overheads.
> >> - We improve the "Which version?" web page to make clear which
> >> branches
> >> are supported and at what level. I'll start a wiki page as a draft
> >> of this.
> >> - The "Get involved" pages are updated to document this process
> >
> > Some points of my own:
> > - I think my proposed process was more adapted to the Tomcat situation
> > - The way Jim rushed his vote seems to shortcut any possibility of
> > me to present a vote at the moment (which is fairly annoying as I
> > spent weeks discussing details and integrating changes)
> > - I am not aware of any ASF rule specifying that a project cannot
> > define its own release process
> >
> > Since it does most of what I suggested and there was no "this will
> > not be changeable through further discussions and votes", I did
> > vote in favor of it. I would be willing to revisit it later since I
> > doubt it is well suited to the size of the Tomcat community and the
> > way it works.
> >
> > Rémy
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> - There is only one dev branch. I am -1 for creating separate dev
>> branches for 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x and 5.5.x on the grounds it is too much
>> overhead for branches that are in maintenance mode where 99% of the
>> patches will be ported from 6.x
> 
> Apache httpd works that way. In case a patch can't fit in mail use
> people.apache.org to store the patch to review.

What we typically do at httpd;

 1. Patch trunk (CTR).
 2. Prepare patches to desired release branches to which the trunk commit
diff wouldn't apply cleanly, with a minimum of fuzz.
 3. Propose a backport to current release branch(es) (e.g. to version n.n,
n.n-1, n.n-2 etc).  This happens in each released branches' STATUS file.
 4. Wait to collect 3+1's.  Compensate for any objections in the meantime.
Sometimes, withdraw the backport proposal and jump back to step 1. above
and proceed with a fresh patch.

How far back that goes depends on how broad the bug was, if it represents
a fix or new feature, how ABI neutral the change is, etc.

There is one especially nice side effect.  Rather than waiting for the
release of the next version to review; the trunk changes which are proposed
for backport get extra scrutiny while they are fresh in the contributors'
mind.  (How many of us have had to reconstruct why we choose to do something
in a specific manner, months or years later, before +1'ing a suggested change
to the code we wrote?)




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43453] New: - ClassCastException at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(int)

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43453

   Summary: ClassCastException at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(
int)
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: 6.0.14
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


StandardContext.java reads

public String findStatusPage(int status) {
return ((String) statusPages.get(new Integer(status)));
}

This is wrong and it should be

public String findStatusPage(int status) {
return ((ErrorPage) statusPages.get(new Integer(status))).getLocation();
}

Regards,
  lg

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r578610 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/FunctionMapperImpl.java

[funkman]

Author: funkman
Date: Sun Sep 23 16:33:56 2007
New Revision: 578610

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578610&view=rev
Log:
bug 41797: CNFE/NPE thrown from function mapper when externalizing
Patch by Tuomas Kiviaho- tuomas.kiviahos at ikis fi
(submit part2 of the patch as seem in comment #3)

(Format police - help!!! I did my best)


Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/FunctionMapperImpl.java

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/FunctionMapperImpl.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/FunctionMapperImpl.java?rev=578610&r1=578609&r2=578610&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/FunctionMapperImpl.java 
(original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/FunctionMapperImpl.java Sun 
Sep 23 16:33:56 2007
@@ -120,9 +120,16 @@
 public void writeExternal(ObjectOutput out) throws IOException {
 out.writeUTF((this.prefix != null) ? this.prefix : "");
 out.writeUTF(this.localName);
-out.writeUTF(this.m.getDeclaringClass().getName());
-out.writeUTF(this.m.getName());
-
out.writeObject(ReflectionUtil.toTypeNameArray(this.m.getParameterTypes()));
+out.writeUTF((this.owner != null) ? 
+ this.owner : 
+ this.m.getDeclaringClass().getName());
+out.writeUTF((this.name != null) ? 
+ this.name : 
+ this.m.getName());
+out.writeObject((this.types != null) ? 
+ this.types : 
+ 
ReflectionUtil.toTypeNameArray(this.m.getParameterTypes()));
+
 }
 
 /*



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41797] - CNFE/NPE thrown from function mapper when externalizing

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41797


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-23 16:34 ---
Applied the other patch too  - Thanks!

Committed revision 578610.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r578613 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

[funkman]

Author: funkman
Date: Sun Sep 23 16:53:05 2007
New Revision: 578613

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578613&view=rev
Log:
bug 43453: ClassCastException at  
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(int)

In reality - I don't see anywhere that calls findStatusPage(). Is there a 
chance (in the future)
to drop this method from StandardContext as well as the Context interface? 



Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Modified: 
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java?rev=578613&r1=578612&r2=578613&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java 
(original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java Sun 
Sep 23 16:53:05 2007
@@ -2938,7 +2938,11 @@
  */
 public String findStatusPage(int status) {
 
-return ((String) statusPages.get(new Integer(status)));
+ErrorPage errorPage = (ErrorPage)statusPages.get(new Integer(status));
+if (errorPage!=null) {
+return errorPage.getLocation();
+}
+return null;
 
 }
 

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml?rev=578613&r1=578612&r2=578613&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Sun Sep 23 16:53:05 2007
@@ -100,7 +100,12 @@
   
   
 41797: CNFE/NPE thrown from function mapper when 
externalizing
-Patch by Tuomas Kiviaho- tuomas.kiviahos at ikis fi
+Patch by Tuomas Kiviaho- tuomas.kiviahos at ikis fi (funkman)
+  
+  
+43453: ClassCastException at 
+org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(int)
+ (funkman)
   
 
   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43453] - ClassCastException at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(int)

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43453


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-23 16:57 ---
Ironically the suggested fix also yeilds a ClassCastException ( but would have 
been caught at compile time)

Fixed with alternative patch. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43453] - ClassCastException at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(int)

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43453





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-23 20:45 ---
Sorry that the patch was not 100% correct, and thanks for fixing it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "TomcatVersions" by markt

[Apache Wiki]

Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by markt:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions

The comment on the change is:
Add remaining versions. List TBDs specifically.

--
  = Draft =
- To Do
-  - Add new 6.x branches / releases
-  - Resolve TBDs
+ Need to resolve TBDs. Specifically:
+  * Do we want to continue to provide support (currently only security fixes) 
for 3.3.x?
+  * If yes, who is release manager for 3.3.x?
+  * If no, do we want to remove 3.3.x from the main download page?
+  * Do we want to continue to provide support (currently only security fixes) 
for 5.0.x?
+  * If yes, who is release manager for 5.0.x?
+  * If no, do we want to remove 5.0.x from the main download page?
+  * What level of support do we want to provide for 5.5.x?
+  * Once we have a stable release of 6.2.x, what support do we want to provide 
for 6.0.x?
+  * What features/API changes do we want to include in 6.2.x
+  * What features/API changes do we want to put in 6.3.x for future inclusion 
in 6.4.x and/or 7.0.x?
  
+ = Tomcat 3.0.x to 3.2.x =
- = Template =
- For each version provide the following information:
- ||Spec versions:||Servlet X.X, JSP Y.Y||
+ ||Spec versions:||Servlet 2.2, JSP 1.1||
- ||Stable:||Yes/No||
+ ||Stable:||Yes||
- ||Enhancements:||Yes/No||
+ ||Enhancements:||No||
- ||Bug Fixes:||Yes/No||
+ ||Bug Fixes:||No||
- ||Security Fixes:||Yes/No||
+ ||Security Fixes:||No||
+ ||Process:||N/A||
- ||Listed on download pages||Yes/No||
+ ||Listed on download pages||No||
  ||Release Manager:||None||
+ 
+ = Tomcat 3.3.x =
+ ||Spec versions:||Servlet 2.2, JSP 1.1||
+ ||Stable:||Yes||
+ ||Enhancements:||No||
+ ||Bug Fixes:||No||
+ ||Security Fixes:||TBD - currently yes||
+ ||Process:||RTC||
+ ||Listed on download pages||Yes||
+ ||Release Manager:||???||
  
  = Tomcat 4.0.x =
  ||Spec versions:||Servlet 2.3, JSP 1.2||
@@ -21, +39 @@

  ||Enhancements:||No||
  ||Bug Fixes:||No||
  ||Security Fixes:||No||
+ ||Process:||N/A||
  ||Listed on download pages||No||
  ||Release Manager:||None||
  
@@ -28, +47 @@

  ||Spec versions:||Servlet 2.3, JSP 1.2||
  ||Stable:||Yes||
  ||Enhancements:||No||
- ||Bug Fixes:||No||
+ ||Bug Fixes:||Yes||
  ||Security Fixes:||Yes||
+ ||Process:||RTC||
  ||Listed on download pages||Yes||
  ||Release Manager:||Mark Thomas (markt)||
  
@@ -39, +59 @@

  ||Enhancements:||No||
  ||Bug Fixes:||No||
  ||Security Fixes:||TBD - currently Yes||
+ ||Process:||RTC||
  ||Listed on download pages||TBD - currently Yes||
  ||Release Manager:||TBD||
  
@@ -48, +69 @@

  ||Enhancements:||TBD - currently ???||
  ||Bug Fixes:||Yes||
  ||Security Fixes:||Yes||
+ ||Process:||RTC||
  ||Listed on download pages||Yes||
  ||Release Manager:||Filip Hanik (fhanik)||
  
@@ -55, +77 @@

  ||Spec versions:||Servlet 2.5, JSP 2.1||
  ||Stable:||Yes||
  ||Enhancements:||TBD - currently Yes||
- ||Bug Fixes:||Yes||
+ ||Bug Fixes:||TBD - currently Yes||
- ||Security Fixes:||Yes||
+ ||Security Fixes:||TBD - currently Yes||
+ ||Process:||RTC||
  ||Listed on download pages||Yes||
  ||Release Manager:||Remy Maucherat (remm)||
  
+ = Tomcat 6.2.x =
+ ||Spec versions:||Servlet 2.5, JSP 2.1||
+ ||Stable:||Yes||
+ ||Enhancements:||Yes||
+ ||Bug Fixes:||Yes||
+ ||Security Fixes:||Yes||
+ ||Process:||RTC||
+ ||Listed on download pages||Yes||
+ ||Release Manager:||TBD||
+ Features:
+  * 6.0.x plus
+  * Geronimo API changes
+  * TBD
+ 
+ = Tomcat 6.3.x =
+ ||Spec versions:||Servlet 2.5, JSP 2.1||
+ ||Stable:||No||
+ ||Enhancements:||Yes||
+ ||Bug Fixes:||Yes||
+ ||Security Fixes:||Yes||
+ ||Process:||CTR||
+ ||Listed on download pages||Yes||
+ ||Release Manager:||TBD||
+ Features:
+  * 6.2.x plus
+  * TBD
+ 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "WikiDiscussion" by markt

[Apache Wiki]

Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by markt:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/WikiDiscussion

The comment on the change is:
Orphaned page. Suggestion already implemented.

--
+ deleted
- '''Discussion about this wiki and improving it...'''
- 
  
- I wonder whether this wiki would get more traffic if it were more prominently 
featured. Especially, would it be possible to link it in the sidebar of 
http://tomcat.apache.org/ under the "Documentation" or "Get involved" headings? 
-- JürgenHermann [[DateTime(2005-10-19T19:20:57Z)]]
- 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "TomcatWeb/Jk2Generic" by markt

[Apache Wiki]

Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by markt:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatWeb/Jk2Generic

The comment on the change is:
Orphaned page. jk2 is deprecated.

--
+ deleted
- {{{  --   
-   '''STEP 1''' 
-   Build "mod_jk2.so" and "jkjni.so" - do whatever needs to be done 
  
-   --   
-   '''STEP 2'''   
-   Place mod_jk2.so and jkjni.so with other Apache modules. In case of  
-   Mandrake 9.1, it was in /usr/lib/apache2-extramodules 
-
-   --   
-   '''STEP 3''' 
-   Setup your Apache virtual host. Although you can run without it, I  
-   prefer going the "right way". In my case: 
-
-   /etc/httpd/conf.d/75_mod_jk2.conf 
-   # 
-   # Sample Apache configuration file for mod_jk2. 
-   # Include this in your httpd.conf. 
-   # 
-
-
-   LoadModule  jk2_module extramodules/mod_jk2.so 
-
-
-
-
-   # 
-   # Restrict access to JK status handler 
-   # 
-
-   Order Deny,Allow 
-   Deny from all 
-   Allow from 127.0.0.1 
-   Allow from 192.168.61.110 
-
-
-
-   /etc/httpd/2.0/conf/vhosts/External.ev.co.yu 
-
-   ServerName  External.ev.co.yu 
-   ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-   DocumentRoot/home/www/public_html 
-   ErrorLog/home/www/logs/error.log 
-   CustomLog   /home/www/logs/access.log common 
-
-   ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/home/www/cgi-bin/" 
-
-
-   AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes 
-   Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch IncludesNoExec 
-
-   Order allow,deny 
-   Allow from all 
-
-
-   Order deny,allow 
-   Deny from all 
-
-
-
-   AllowOverride None 
-   Options FollowSymLinks 
-   Order allow,deny 
-   Allow from all 
-
-
-
-   --   
-   '''STEP 4'''   
-   Setup virtual host on Tomcat. 
-
-   /etc/tomcat/server.xml 
-
-  
-  
-  
-
-  
-
-
-   --   
-   '''STEP 5''' 
-   Setup JK2 on Tomcat side. 
-
-   /etc/tomcat4/jk2.properties 
-   # Set the desired handler list 
-   # handler.list=apr,request,channelJni 
-   handler.list=apr,request,channelUnix 
-   # 
-   apr.NativeSo=/usr/lib/apache2-extramodules/jkjni.so 
-
-   request.tomcatAuthentication=false 
-
-   channelUnix.file=${jkHome}/work/tomcat.sock 
-
-   --   
-   '''STEP 6''' !!! 
-
-   Ensure that jkjni.so picks up "serverConf" value from environment! The  
-   easiest way for me was to edit /etc/tomcat/tomcat4.conf and add: 
-
-   serverRoot=/etc/httpd/2.0 
-   export serverRoot 
-
-   If you're not using RPM version, just make sure that *that* variable is  
-   defined in the script starting tomcat. This is needed by jkjni.so, so it  
-   can locate workers2.properties. And if you're wondering, jkjni.so is needed 
 
-   to talk to UNIX domain socket. Tomcat can open it without using "handler 
apr"  
-   and jkjni.so, but refuses to communicate over it. 
-
-   --   
-   '''STEP 7'''   
-   Setup your Apache side of JK2. Edit ${serverConf}/worker2.properties file.  
-   You must define socket channel, ajp13 worker and at least one URI mapping  
-   to your virtual host. Needless to say, VHost definitions on Tomcat and  
-   Apache must (should?) match. 
-
-   /etc/httpd/2.0/conf/workers2.properties 
-  ["logger"] 
-   level=DEBUG 
-
-   [config:] 
-   debug=0 
-   debugEnv=0 
-
-   [uriMap:] 
-   info=Maps the requests. Options: debug 
-   debug=0 
-
-   # Alternate file logger 
-   [logger.file:0] 
-   level=DEBUG 
-   file=/var/log/httpd/mod_jk2.log 
-
-   [workerEnv:] 
-   info=Global server options 
-   timing=1 
-   debug=0 
-
-   [channel.un:unixsock] 
-   info=Main socket to Tomcat engine 
-   file=/var/tomcat4/work/tomcat.sock 
-
-   [status:] 
-   info=Status worker, displays runtime informations 
-
-   [ajp13:unixsock] 
-   info=Default AJP 1.3 worker 
-   channel=channel.un:unixsock 
-
-   [uri:/jkstatus/*] 
-   info=Display status information and checks the config file for changes. 
-   group=status: 
-
-   [uri:external.ev.co.yu/bill] 
-   info=Consumers bill 
-   group=ajp13:unixsock 
-
-   --   
-   '''STEP 8'''   
-   Restart Tomcat and then Apache.  }}}
- 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "AxisProjectPages/Tomcat" by markt

[Apache Wiki]

Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by markt:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/AxisProjectPages/Tomcat

The comment on the change is:
Orphaned page. Very out of date.

--
- '''Installation help for Axis on [http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/index.html 
Apache Tomcat]'''
+ deleted
  
- Tomcat is widely documented in Axis's own install docs.
- 
- One common problem is related to XML parsers; A full Tomcat install, not an 
LE download, is better. 
- 
- '''Also keep Tomcat up to date -Axis is only tested on the latest versions.'''
- 
- If you want to switch the security manager on when running Tomcat ("catalina 
run/start -security") then you need to edit your catalina.policy file and add 
the following section (You will need to adjust the directory path)
- 
- {{{ 
- grant codeBase "file:${catalina.home}/webapps/axis/WEB-INF/lib/-" {
- {{{  permission java.security.AllPermission;   }}}
- };
-  }}}
- 
- '''Note: Tomcat 5.x is still in alpha testing.  As such, testing by the 
development community is very limited.  We recommend you use the latest Tomcat 
4.x release to minimize installation difficulties.'''
- 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2007/09/23]

[bugzilla]

+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID   |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
| |   +-+
| |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| |   |   MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal  ENH=Enhancement   |
| |   |   +-+
| |   |   | Date Posted |
| |   |   |  +--+
| |   |   |  | Description  |
| |   |   |  |  |
| 2350|Ver|Nor|2001-06-27|ServletConfig.getInitParameter() requires url-patt|
| 5331|Ass|Nor|2001-12-09|getPathInfo vs URL normalization  |
| 6027|Inf|Maj|2002-01-25|Tomcat  Automatically shuts down as service   |
| 6488|Ver|Maj|2002-02-15|Error: 304. Apparent bug in default ErrorHandler c|
| 7785|Inf|Blk|2002-04-06|tomcat bug in context reloading   |
| 7863|Inf|Maj|2002-04-09|I have a problem when running Tomcat with IIS |
| 8187|Inf|Cri|2002-04-17|Errors when Tomcat used with MS Access database   |
| 9737|Ver|Nor|2002-06-10|ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when sending just p|
|10047|Ass|Cri|2002-06-20|IllegalStateException |
|10406|Ass|Cri|2002-07-02|IllegalStateException |
|11087|Inf|Blk|2002-07-23|IllegalStateException |
|12156|Inf|Cri|2002-08-29|Apache and Tomcat 3.3.1 Interworking problem  |
|16363|Ass|Cri|2003-01-23|Stack Overflow accessing compiled JSP - Tomcat 3.2|
|39250|Inf|Cri|2006-04-07|Tomcat 3.2.1 + JDK 1.4|
+-+---+---+--+--+
| Total   14 bugs   |
+---+

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug report for Watchdog [2007/09/23]

[bugzilla]

+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID   |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
| |   +-+
| |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| |   |   MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal  ENH=Enhancement   |
| |   |   +-+
| |   |   | Date Posted |
| |   |   |  +--+
| |   |   |  | Description  |
| |   |   |  |  |
|  278|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Bug in GetParameterValuesTestServlet.java file Bug|
|  279|Unc|Nor|2000-12-04|Logical Error in GetParameterValuesTestServlet Bug|
|  469|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|in example-taglib.tld "urn" should be "uri" BugRat|
|  470|Unc|Nor|2001-01-17|FAIL positiveForward.jsp and positiveInclude.jsp B|
| 9634|New|Enh|2002-06-05|No tests exist for ServletContext.getResourcePaths|
|10703|New|Enh|2002-07-11|Need to test getRequestURI after RequestDispatcher|
|11336|New|Enh|2002-07-31|Test wrapped path methods with RD.foward()|
|11663|New|Maj|2002-08-13|JSP precompile tests rely on Jasper specific behav|
|11664|New|Maj|2002-08-13|A sweep is needed of all Watchdog 4.0 tag librarie|
|11665|New|Maj|2002-08-13|ServletToJSPErrorPageTest and ServletToServletErro|
|11666|New|Maj|2002-08-13|SetBufferSize_1TestServlet is invalid.|
|14004|New|Maj|2002-10-28|Incorrent behaviour of all attribute-related lifec|
|15504|New|Nor|2002-12-18|JSP positiveGetValues test relies on order preserv|
|24649|New|Nor|2003-11-12|getRemoteHost fails when agent has uppercase chara|
|29398|New|Nor|2004-06-04|Update site and note current status   |
+-+---+---+--+--+
| Total   15 bugs   |
+---+

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2007/09/23]

[bugzilla]

+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID   |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
| |   +-+
| |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| |   |   MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal  ENH=Enhancement   |
| |   |   +-+
| |   |   | Date Posted |
| |   |   |  +--+
| |   |   |  | Description  |
| |   |   |  |  |
|27122|Opn|Enh|2004-02-20|IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat|
|28039|Opn|Enh|2004-03-30|Cluster Support for SingleSignOn  |
|29160|Ver|Enh|2004-05-23|precompile problem: _jspx_meth_* (javax.servlet.js|
|29494|Inf|Enh|2004-06-10|No way to set PATH when running as a service on Wi|
|30241|Ver|Enh|2004-07-21|Enhance build script to use branch argument when c|
|33262|Inf|Enh|2005-01-27|Service Manager autostart should check for adminis|
|33453|Opn|Enh|2005-02-08|Jasper should recompile JSP files whose datestamps|
|33650|Inf|Enh|2005-02-19|Jasper performance for multiple files processing  |
|33671|Opn|Enh|2005-02-21|Manual Windows service installation with custom na|
|34801|New|Enh|2005-05-08|PATCH: CGIServlet does not terminate child after a|
|34805|Ass|Enh|2005-05-08|warn about invalid security constraint url pattern|
|34868|Ass|Enh|2005-05-11|allow to register a trust store for a session that|
|35054|Inf|Enh|2005-05-25|warn if appBase is not existing as a File or direc|
|35869|Inf|Enh|2005-07-26|Can't run as a service on Windows Server 2003 64-B|
|36133|Inf|Enh|2005-08-10|Support JSS SSL implementation|
|36169|New|Enh|2005-08-12|[PATCH] Enable chunked encoding for requests in II|
|36362|New|Enh|2005-08-25|missing check for Java reserved keywords in tag fi|
|36569|Inf|Enh|2005-09-09|Redirects produce illegal URL's   |
|36837|Inf|Enh|2005-09-28|Looking for ProxyHandler implementation of Http re|
|36922|Inf|Enh|2005-10-04|setup.sh file mis-advertised and missing  |
|36923|New|Nor|2005-10-05|Deactivated EL expressions are not parsed for jsp |
|37018|Ass|Enh|2005-10-11|Document how to use tomcat-SSL with a pkcs11 token|
|37072|Ass|Nor|2005-10-13|Encoding mismatch in error condition  |
|37084|Opn|   |2005-10-14|JspC from ant fails on JSPs that use custom taglib|
|37334|Inf|Enh|2005-11-02|Realm digest property not aligned with the adminis|
|37449|Opn|Enh|2005-11-10|Two UserDatabaseRealm break manager user  |
|37485|Inf|Enh|2005-11-14|I'd like to run init SQL after JDBC Connection cre|
|37498|Inf|Nor|2005-11-14|[PATCH] NPE in org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerB|
|37515|Inf|Nor|2005-11-15|smap not generated by JspC when used from Ant for |
|37627|Opn|Nor|2005-11-24|Slow and incomplete dynamic content generation aft|
|37785|Inf|Nor|2005-12-05|Changing startup type via Tomcat Monitor does not |
|37794|Opn|Nor|2005-12-05|getParameter() fails on POST with transfer-encodin|
|37797|Inf|Maj|2005-12-05|Configure Tomcat utility truncates classpath to 96|
|37822|Opn|Nor|2005-12-07|WebappClassLoader interfering with Catalina core c|
|37847|Ass|Enh|2005-12-09|Allow User To Optionally Specify Catalina Output F|
|37869|Opn|Nor|2005-12-12|Cannot obtain client certificate with SSL / client|
|37918|Inf|Nor|2005-12-15|EL cannot find valid getter from object when using|
|37984|New|Nor|2005-12-21|JNDIRealm.java not able to handle MD5 password|
|38001|Inf|Nor|2005-12-22|TruncatedClassFile when loadind applets   |
|38046|Ass|   |2005-12-27|apache-tomcat-5.5.14-deployer doesn't work (Illega|
|38131|New|Enh|2006-01-05|WatchedResource does not work if app is outside "w|
|38216|Inf|Enh|2006-01-10|Extend Jmxproxy to allow call of MBean Operations |
|38268|Inf|Enh|2006-01-13|User friendly: Need submit button on adding/deleti|
|38290|Inf|Nor|2006-01-16|No SESSION_DESTROYED_EVENT sent for existing webap|
|38291|Inf|Nor|2006-01-16|Form actions hanging in UDecoder.convert  |
|38352|Inf|Nor|2006-01-22|Additional Entries for Default catalina.policy fil|
|38360|Inf|Enh|2006-01-24|Domain for session cookies|
|38367|Inf|Nor|2006-01-24|Executing any Catalina Ant task results in an exce|
|38372|Inf|Cri|2006-01-25|tcnative-1.dll response overflow corruption, parti|
|38427|Inf|Nor|2006-01-27|ServletContextListener Notified Multiple Times Whe|
|38483|Inf|Nor|2006-02-01|access log valve uses simpledateformat in tread-un|
|38484|

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2007/09/23]

[bugzilla]

+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID   |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
| |   +-+
| |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| |   |   MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal  ENH=Enhancement   |
| |   |   +-+
| |   |   | Date Posted |
| |   |   |  +--+
| |   |   |  | Description  |
| |   |   |  |  |
| 3839|Opn|Enh|2001-09-26|Problem bookmarking login page|
| 4227|Opn|Enh|2001-10-17|Invalid CGI path  |
| 5329|New|Enh|2001-12-08|NT Service exits startup before Tomcat is finished|
| 5795|New|Enh|2002-01-10|Catalina Shutdown relies on localhost causing prob|
| 5829|New|Enh|2002-01-13|StandardManager needs to cope with sessions throwi|
| 5985|New|Enh|2002-01-23|Tomcat should perform a more restrictive validatio|
| 6600|Opn|Enh|2002-02-20|enodeURL adds 'jsession' when 'isRequestedSessionI|
| 6614|New|Enh|2002-02-21|Have Bootstrap and StandardClassLoader use the sam|
| 6671|New|Enh|2002-02-25|Simple custom tag example uses old declaration sty|
| 7043|New|Enh|2002-03-12|database user and password for JDBC Based Store   |
| 7374|New|Enh|2002-03-22|Apache Tomcat/4.0.1 message on standard output|
| 7676|New|Enh|2002-04-02|Allow name property to use match experssions in  without className in server.xml produces N|
|11069|Opn|Enh|2002-07-23|Tomcat not flag error if tld is outside of /WEB-IN|
|11129|New|Enh|2002-07-24|New valve for putting the sessionIDs in the reques|
|11248|New|Enh|2002-07-29|DefaultServlet doesn't send expires header|
|11754|Opn|Enh|2002-08-15|Synchronous shutdown script - shutdown.sh should w|
|12069|New|Enh|2002-08-27|Creation of more HttpSession objects for one previ|
|12428|Opn|Enh|2002-09-09|request.getUserPrincipal(): Misinterpretation of s|
|12658|New|Enh|2002-09-15|a proxy host and port at the  element level |
|12766|New|Enh|2002-09-18|Tomcat should use tld files in /WEB-INF/ over vers|
|13309|Opn|Enh|2002-10-04|Catalina calls System.exit()  |
|13634|New|Enh|2002-10-15|Allowing system properties to be substituted in co|
|13689|Opn|Enh|2002-10-16|Classloader paths for 'Common' classes and librari|
|13731|New|Enh|2002-10-17|Final request, response, session and other variabl|
|13941|New|Enh|2002-10-24|reload is VERY slow   |
|13965|New|Enh|2002-10-25|Catalina.sh correction request for Tru64 Unix |
|14097|New|Enh|2002-10-30|hardcoded registry value for vm lets tomcat servic|
|14416|New|Enh|2002-11-10|blank tag name in TLD cause NullPointerException  |
|14635|New|Enh|2002-11-18|Should be possible not to have -MM-DD in log f|
|14766|New|Enh|2002-11-22|Redirect Vavle|
|14993|New|Enh|2002-12-02|Possible obselete synchronized declaration|
|15115|New|Enh|2002-12-05|correct docs... XML parser *cannot* be overridden |
|15417|Opn|Enh|2002-12-16|Add port for forced compilation of JSP pages  |
|15688|New|Enh|2002-12-27|full-qualified names instead of imports   |
|15941|New|Enh|2003-01-10|Expose rootCause exceptions at deeper levels  |
|16294|New|Enh|2003-01-21|Configurable URL Decoding.|
|16357|New|Enh|2003-01-23|"connection timeout reached"  |
|16531|New|Enh|2003-01-29|Updating already deployed ".war" files in a single|
|16579|New|Enh|2003-01-30|documentation page layout/style breaks wrapping to|
|16596|New|Enh|2003-01-30|option for disabling log rotation |
|17070|New|Enh|2003-02-14|The Catalina Ant tasks do not allow for 'reusable'|
|17146|New|Enh|2003-02-18|Simplify build.xml using