strange problem on i5

[Henri Gomez]

Hi to all,

While using with the 1.2.21-dev on i5 (iSeries) I saw a strange
problem when doing SOAP works.

In SOAP, a Fault Exception is sent by Tomcat as an HTTP 500 error (in
header) and the fault code in body.

On Linux and Windows, mod_jk see the header and body :

[Thu Mar 29 12:26:18 2007] [7732:8768] [debug] do_shm_open::jk_shm.c
(284): Shared memory is already open [Thu Mar 29 12:26:18 2007]
[7732:8768] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (2588): Attached
shm:/var/log/apache2/jk.shm [Thu Mar 29 12:26:18 2007] [7732:8768]
[debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (2598): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.21-dev
[Thu Mar 29 12:26:26 2007] [7690:8768] [debug]
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (1043): received from
ajp13 pos=0 len=60 max=8192
[Thu Mar 29 12:26:26 2007] [7690:8768] [debug]
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (1043): 04 01
F4 00 19 45 72 72 65 75 72 20 49 6E 74 65  - .Erreur.Inte
[Thu Mar 29 12:26:26 2007] [7690:8768] [debug]
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (1043): 001072 6E
65 20 64 65 20 53 65 72 76 6C 65 74 00 00  - rne.de.Servlet..
[Thu Mar 29 12:26:26 2007] [7690:8768] [debug]
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (1043): 002001 A0
01 00 16 74 65 78 74 2F 78 6D 6C 3B 63 68  - .text/xml;ch
[Thu Mar 29 12:26:26 2007] [7690:8768] [debug]
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (1043): 003061 72
73 65 74 3D 75 74 66 2D 38 00 00 00 00 00  - arset=utf-8.
[Thu Mar 29 12:26:26 2007] [7690:8768] [debug]
ajp_unmarshal_response::jk_ajp_common.c (603): status = 500 [Thu Mar
29 12:26:26 2007] [7690:8768] [debug]
ajp_unmarshal_response::jk_ajp_common.c (610): Number of headers is =
1 [Thu Mar 29 12:26:26 2007] [7690:8768] [debug]
ajp_unmarshal_response::jk_ajp_common.c (666): Header[0]
[Content-Type] = [text/xml;charset=utf-8] [Thu Mar 29 12:26:26 2007]
[7690:8768] [debug] ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c
(1043): received from ajp13 pos=0 len=456 max=8192
[Thu Mar 29 12:26:26 2007] [7690:8768] [debug]
ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (1043): 03 01
C4 3C 3F 78 6D 6C 20 76 65 72 73 69 6F 6E  - ...

Tagging TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_9

[Mladen Turk]

Hi,

I'll tag the tcnative to 1.1.9.
It fixes the JVM core in case the acceptor breaks when
we are inside the Socket.accept, and adds OpenBSD platform detection.

--
Regards,
Mladen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41684] - Some URIs need to be adapted to the changed layout of the stock webapps, some files are missing

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41684





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 05:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=19838)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19838&action=view)
patch for issues excluding "missing files: 2"

I made a patch for above issues.

But I couldn't decided whether to add the txt2html ant task for missing files:
2.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41981] New: - Compression seems to work only for certain files under ~48k

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41981

   Summary: Compression seems to work only for certain files under
~48k
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.23
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Connector:HTTP
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I'm trying to compress JS files on my Tomcat server.  It seems to work fine 
with the following configuration:




This compresses the html, js, and css files nicely.  I noticed a problem when 
the JS files were larger than ~48k.  If it was, it would skip compression of 
them all together.  If i deleted lines from the JS file to make it under that 
48k threshold, it would be compressed properly.  I tried making dummy js files 
full of just comments and it has the same behavior.  

The JS files are server properly with the text/javascript content-type.  
This is the same behavior if i access the JS files via 

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41981] - Compression seems to work only for certain files under ~48k

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41981





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 05:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19839)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19839&action=view)
Sample JS that compresses


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41981] - Compression seems to work only for certain files under ~48k

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41981





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 05:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19840)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19840&action=view)
JS files that doesn't work


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41981] - Compression seems to work only for certain files under ~48k

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41981


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #19840|JS files that doesn't work  |Sample JS that does not
description||compress




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41557] - build.xml uses a different (from the documentation) variable to enable proxying

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41557


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|trivial |minor




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 05:50 ---
IMHO, this issue is a real bug to build Tomcat. So I think the severity should
be "minor".

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tagging TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_9

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists]

cool, yes, lets get this done before 6.0.11

Filip

Mladen Turk wrote:

Hi,

I'll tag the tcnative to 1.1.9.
It fixes the JVM core in case the acceptor breaks when
we are inside the Socket.accept, and adds OpenBSD platform detection.

--
Regards,
Mladen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

mktemp didn't exist on i5

[Henri Gomez]

While rebuild trunk from mod_jk I got an error on iSeries about
missing mktemp in iSeries.

   if (!jk_shmem.lockname) {
   if (shm_lock_reopen) {
   int i;
   jk_shmem.fd_lock = -1;
   mode_t mask = umask(0);
   for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
   strcpy(flkname, "/tmp/jkshmlock.XX");
   if (mktemp(flkname)) {
   jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(flkname,
O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666);
   if (jk_shmem.fd_lock >= 0)
   break;
   }
   }
   umask(mask);
   }


How could we avoid this call ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r523717 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/confinstall: server_1.xml server_2.xml

[remm]

Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 29 07:02:08 2007
New Revision: 523717

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523717
Log:
- Default configuration updates.

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/confinstall/server_1.xml
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/confinstall/server_2.xml

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/confinstall/server_1.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/confinstall/server_1.xml?view=diff&rev=523717&r1=523716&r2=523717
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/confinstall/server_1.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/res/confinstall/server_1.xml Thu Mar 29 07:02:08 2007
@@ -32,7 +32,14 @@
Documentation at /docs/config/service.html
-->
   
-
+  
+
+
+
+
 
+   
 
 
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41973] - IPv6 APR Connectors assumes IPv4-mapped IPv6 address support

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41973





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 07:15 ---
Making APR 2 transparently handle dual stacks sounds great. As a long term goal
that's the ideal solution. Also from a security standpoint, not using IPv4
mapped addresses for all OS's (even those that support it) would be a good idea,
IMO.

While tcnative is aligned with APR 1 could the proposed change be added? I
wasn't sure from your reply if it was. For the BSD's it is particularly needed
since our native jvm doesn't support IPv6. So what happens is that a working
server.xml stops working when tcnative is installed (due to the IPv4 to IPv6
shift when address is null).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tagging TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_9

[William L. Thomson Jr.]

On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:22 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'll tag the tcnative to 1.1.9.
> It fixes the JVM core in case the acceptor breaks when
> we are inside the Socket.accept, and adds OpenBSD platform detection.

I never got a chance to make patch since I am not to familiar with
configure. But would be nice for tcnative, to know during configure that
it needs >=apr-1.x. If a check can't be added less a patch. I will get
with another Gentoo dev, and get a patch made and to you all.

Thanks

-- 
William L. Thomson Jr.
Gentoo/Java


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Tagging TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_9

[Mladen Turk]

William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:


I never got a chance to make patch since I am not to familiar with
configure. But would be nice for tcnative, to know during configure that
it needs >=apr-1.x. If a check can't be added less a patch. I will get
with another Gentoo dev, and get a patch made and to you all.



That would be a nice feature.

Regards,
Mladen.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tagging TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_9

[Mladen Turk]

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

cool, yes, lets get this done before 6.0.11



Right, that is the idea, because of .tar.gz and
binary dependencies.

Regards,
Mladen.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41983] New: - JSP compilation is too slow compared to 5.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41983

   Summary: JSP compilation is too slow compared to 5.0
   Product: Tomcat 6
   Version: unspecified
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Jasper
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I cannot upgrade to 6.0 because of the performance penalty of using the JDT
compiler to compile JSPs.  Even cached compiled pages are taking forever to
render.  I have the same code base running in 5.0 and its just fine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mktemp didn't exist on i5

[Ian Darwin]

Henri Gomez wrote:

While rebuild trunk from mod_jk I got an error on iSeries about
missing mktemp in iSeries.

   if (!jk_shmem.lockname) {
   if (shm_lock_reopen) {
   int i;
   jk_shmem.fd_lock = -1;
   mode_t mask = umask(0);
   for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
   strcpy(flkname, "/tmp/jkshmlock.XX");
   if (mktemp(flkname)) {
   jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(flkname,
O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666);
   if (jk_shmem.fd_lock >= 0)
   break;
   }
   }
   umask(mask);
   }


How could we avoid this call ?


Wrong question. mktemp has been in UNIX for a dog's age and in POSIX/SUS 
for a decade or more. See 
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/mktemp.html which is 
the 1997 version of the SUS.


The general approach to making C programs portable to broken systems 
that are missing libraries is to provide a default version, usually 
wrapped in an #ifdef.


IANA(ASF)L but we should be able to incorporate the mktemp 
implementation from anything BSD licensed, like OpenBSD, for this purpose.


Ian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40809] - Tomcat 5.5.20 fails to load ServletContextListener in tld!

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40809


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mktemp didn't exist on i5

[Henri Gomez]

Well I5, also known as iSeries or AS/400, run on i5/OS which is not
Unix but IBM proprietary (called OS/400 previously)

2007/3/29, Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Henri Gomez wrote:
> While rebuild trunk from mod_jk I got an error on iSeries about
> missing mktemp in iSeries.
>
>if (!jk_shmem.lockname) {
>if (shm_lock_reopen) {
>int i;
>jk_shmem.fd_lock = -1;
>mode_t mask = umask(0);
>for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>strcpy(flkname, "/tmp/jkshmlock.XX");
>if (mktemp(flkname)) {
>jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(flkname,
> O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666);
>if (jk_shmem.fd_lock >= 0)
>break;
>}
>}
>umask(mask);
>}
>
>
> How could we avoid this call ?

Wrong question. mktemp has been in UNIX for a dog's age and in POSIX/SUS
for a decade or more. See
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/mktemp.html which is
the 1997 version of the SUS.

The general approach to making C programs portable to broken systems
that are missing libraries is to provide a default version, usually
wrapped in an #ifdef.

IANA(ASF)L but we should be able to incorporate the mktemp
implementation from anything BSD licensed, like OpenBSD, for this purpose.

Ian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41983] - JSP compilation is too slow compared to 5.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41983


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 08:57 ---
FYI, the Eclipse JDT-based compilation was introduced and made the default in
Tomcat 5.5, not 6.0.  Can you please provide:

- Your benchmarks showing the slowdown,
- A test WAR and accompanying scripts we can use to reproduce the behavior
you're seeing?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mktemp didn't exist on i5

[Ian Darwin]

Henri Gomez wrote:

Well I5, also known as iSeries or AS/400, run on i5/OS which is not
Unix but IBM proprietary (called OS/400 previously)


Oh well, it's been broken longer :-)   I stand by my suggestion on how 
to fix it.


Ian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40809] - Tomcat 5.5.20 fails to load ServletContextListener in tld!

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40809


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mktemp didn't exist on i5

[Mladen Turk]

Henri Gomez wrote:

While rebuild trunk from mod_jk I got an error on iSeries about
missing mktemp in iSeries.

   if (!jk_shmem.lockname) {


#ifnedef WHATEVER


   if (shm_lock_reopen) {
   int i;
   jk_shmem.fd_lock = -1;
   mode_t mask = umask(0);
   for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
   strcpy(flkname, "/tmp/jkshmlock.XX");
   if (mktemp(flkname)) {
   jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(flkname,
O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666);
   if (jk_shmem.fd_lock >= 0)
   break;
   }
   }
   umask(mask);
   }



#endif


The shm_lock_reopen is compile time anyhow.

Regards,
Mladen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39850] - Need a way to invalidate SSL-session from web application

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39850





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 12:48 ---
I'm not sure I understand, wouldnt simply 
response.getInputStream().close() take care of it? javax.ssl doesn't cache
session ids

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30434] - Findbugs find 'Non-transient non-serializable instance field in serializable class' in java code generated from JSPs

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30434





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 13:42 ---
I've been hit by this bug, I don't think it is a theoretical issue:

ADVERTENCIA: No puedo serializar atributo de sesión 1175200206072-spiderMonitor
para sesión BB2887F736CDECA5CD408CC4AFA67D45
java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.jasper.runtime.TagHandlerPool
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1156)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1474)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1392)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1150)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:326)
at
org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession.writeObject(StandardSession.java:1462)
at
org.apache.catalina.session.StandardSession.writeObjectData(StandardSession.java:938)
at 
org.apache.catalina.session.StandardManager.doUnload(StandardManager.java:516)
at 
org.apache.catalina.session.StandardManager.unload(StandardManager.java:462)
at 
org.apache.catalina.session.StandardManager.stop(StandardManager.java:666)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.stop(StandardContext.java:4345)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.stop(ContainerBase.java:1066)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.stop(ContainerBase.java:1066)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.stop(StandardEngine.java:447)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.stop(StandardService.java:512)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.stop(StandardServer.java:743)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.stop(Catalina.java:601)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:576)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:294)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:432)

Using Tomcat 5.5.17

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30434] - Findbugs find 'Non-transient non-serializable instance field in serializable class' in java code generated from JSPs

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30434


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|5.0.27  |5.5.17




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41983] - JSP compilation is too slow compared to 5.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41983


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 14:33 ---
Some facts:
- you can still use Ant/javac if you want to
- using a design which would rely on ever changing JSPs is broken: JSP is not a
template system (and even template systems perform much better if you allow them
to cache or "compile" the pages)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mktemp didn't exist on i5

[Henri Gomez]

Good thanks

2007/3/29, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Henri Gomez wrote:
> While rebuild trunk from mod_jk I got an error on iSeries about
> missing mktemp in iSeries.
>
>if (!jk_shmem.lockname) {

#ifnedef WHATEVER

>if (shm_lock_reopen) {
>int i;
>jk_shmem.fd_lock = -1;
>mode_t mask = umask(0);
>for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>strcpy(flkname, "/tmp/jkshmlock.XX");
>if (mktemp(flkname)) {
>jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(flkname,
> O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666);
>if (jk_shmem.fd_lock >= 0)
>break;
>}
>}
>umask(mask);
>}
>

#endif


The shm_lock_reopen is compile time anyhow.

Regards,
Mladen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r523879 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/security-4.html xdocs/security-4.xml

[markt]

Author: markt
Date: Thu Mar 29 16:41:17 2007
New Revision: 523879

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523879
Log:
Fix typo

Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-4.xml

Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html?view=diff&rev=523879&r1=523878&r2=523879
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html (original)
+++ tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html Thu Mar 29 16:41:17 2007
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@
 
 Denial of service vulnerability
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2002-0936";>
-   CVE-2002-0639
+   CVE-2002-0936
 
 The issue described requires an attacker to be able to plant a JSP page
on the Tomcat server. If an attacker can do this then the server is

Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-4.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-4.xml?view=diff&rev=523879&r1=523878&r2=523879
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-4.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-4.xml Thu Mar 29 16:41:17 2007
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@
   
 Denial of service vulnerability
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2002-0936";>
-   CVE-2002-0639
+   CVE-2002-0936
 The issue described requires an attacker to be able to plant a JSP page
on the Tomcat server. If an attacker can do this then the server is
already compromised. In this case an attacker could just as easily add a



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41990] New: - wmv mime type missing from

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41990

   Summary: wmv mime type missing from
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.23
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Connector:HTTP
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


conf/web.xml

please add:


wmv
video/x-ms-wmv


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41990] - wmv mime type missing from conf/web.xml

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41990


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|wmv mime type missing from  |wmv mime type missing from
   ||conf/web.xml




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41990] - several mime types missing from conf/web.xml

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41990


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|wmv mime type missing from  |several mime types missing
   |conf/web.xml|from conf/web.xml




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 18:00 ---
It seems several mime types are missing... here is another one...


mp4
video/mp4


Here is a nice list to compare against...

http://www.feedforall.com/mime-types.htm

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30434] - Findbugs find 'Non-transient non-serializable instance field in serializable class' in java code generated from JSPs

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30434


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-29 22:34 ---
Now the report is more specific, as requested in comment #1, reopening.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r523964 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_shm.c

[mturk]

Author: mturk
Date: Thu Mar 29 23:58:38 2007
New Revision: 523964

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523964
Log:
Put the entire code that is JK_SHM_LOCK_REOPEN dependent inside #ifdef

Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_shm.c

Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_shm.c
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_shm.c?view=diff&rev=523964&r1=523963&r2=523964
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_shm.c (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_shm.c Thu Mar 29 23:58:38 2007
@@ -237,21 +237,18 @@
 #define MAP_FILE(0)
 #endif
 
-#ifdef JK_SHM_LOCK_REOPEN
-static int shm_lock_reopen = 1;
-#else
-static int shm_lock_reopen = 0;
-#endif
-
 static int do_shm_open_lock(const char *fname, int attached, jk_logger_t *l)
 {
 int rc;
 char flkname[256];
 JK_TRACE_ENTER(l);
 
-if (attached) {
-if (shm_lock_reopen)
-jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(jk_shmem.lockname, O_RDWR, 0666);
+if (attached && jk_shmem.lockname) {
+#ifdef JK_SHM_LOCK_REOPEN
+jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(jk_shmem.lockname, O_RDWR, 0666);
+#else
+errno = EINVAL;
+#endif
 if (jk_shmem.fd_lock == -1) {
 rc = errno;
 JK_TRACE_EXIT(l);
@@ -265,25 +262,24 @@
 }
 
 if (!jk_shmem.lockname) {
-if (shm_lock_reopen) {
-int i;
-jk_shmem.fd_lock = -1;
-mode_t mask = umask(0);
-for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
-strcpy(flkname, "/tmp/jkshmlock.XX");
-if (mktemp(flkname)) {
-jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(flkname, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 
0666);
-if (jk_shmem.fd_lock >= 0)
-break;
-}
+#ifdef JK_SHM_LOCK_REOPEN
+int i;
+jk_shmem.fd_lock = -1;
+mode_t mask = umask(0);
+for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
+strcpy(flkname, "/tmp/jkshmlock.XX");
+if (mktemp(flkname)) {
+jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(flkname, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666);
+if (jk_shmem.fd_lock >= 0)
+break;
 }
-umask(mask);
-}
-else {
-strcpy(flkname, fname);
-strcat(flkname, ".lock");
-jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(flkname, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666);
 }
+umask(mask);
+#else
+strcpy(flkname, fname);
+strcat(flkname, ".lock");
+jk_shmem.fd_lock = open(flkname, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666);
+#endif
 if (jk_shmem.fd_lock == -1) {
 rc = errno;
 JK_TRACE_EXIT(l);
@@ -470,12 +466,12 @@
 if (jk_shmem.hdr) {
 --jk_shmem.hdr->h.data.childs;
 
+#ifdef JK_SHM_LOCK_REOPEN
 if (jk_shmem.fd_lock >= 0) {
-if (shm_lock_reopen) {
-close(jk_shmem.fd_lock);
-jk_shmem.fd_lock = -1;
-}
+close(jk_shmem.fd_lock);
+jk_shmem.fd_lock = -1;
 }
+#endif
 JK_DELETE_CS(&(jk_shmem.cs), rc);
 if (jk_shmem.attached) {
 int p = (int)getpid();



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mktemp didn't exist on i5

[Mladen Turk]

Henri Gomez wrote:

Good thanks



Check now. I put that inside #ifdef JK_SHM_LOCK_REOPEN,
like before, but now, the entire code is compile
time dependent instead just using a var.


Regards,
Mladen.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]