Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

[Jean-Frederic]

Something like:
+++
[[#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SOCKETVAR_H
# include 
#endif
]])
AC_CHECK_HEADERS([sys/select.h], [], [],
[[#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H
# include 
#endif
]])
+++
helps for sys/socketvar.h

Should we have macros for that?

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 18:36 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
> I can't test on HP-UX, but maybe you (jfc) could try:
> Index: configure.in
> ===
> --- configure.in(revision 502659)
> +++ configure.in(working copy)
> @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@
>   dnl check for filio.h used on Solaris to define FIONREAD ioctl.
>   AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/filio.h)
> 
> +dnl check for socketvar.h and select.h not used on HPUX11
> +AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/socketvar.h)
> +AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/select.h)
> +
>   AC_DEFUN([JK_CHECK_SETSOCKOPT], [
>   AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether to use $1 with setsockopt())
>   AC_TRY_RUN([
> Index: common/jk_global.h
> ===
> --- common/jk_global.h  (revision 502659)
> +++ common/jk_global.h  (working copy)
> @@ -142,10 +142,10 @@
>   #include 
>   #include 
>   #include 
> -#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN) && 
> !defined(HPUX11)
> +#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN) && 
> !defined(HAVE_SYS_SOCKETVAR_H)
>   #include 
>   #endif
> -#if !defined(HPUX11) && !defined(AS400)
> +#if !defined(HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H) && !defined(AS400)
>   #include 
>   #endif
>   #endif
> 
> Of course you would need to rebuild configure via buildconf.sh after 
> changing configure.in.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rainer
> 
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Don't we also have a HPUX11 specific check like
> > the 2nd line after this one? Seems consistent to me :/
> > 
> > On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Jean-Frederic,
> >>
> >> shouldn't we be able to find out about the necessity to include it via 
> >> configure? At least HP-UX should be able to use the configure 
> >> mechanism. I think we mostly use the hard coded defines for the 
> >> platforms, where we can't use the configure mechanism.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Rainer
> >>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Author: jfclere
> >>> Date: Fri Feb  2 08:27:53 2007
> >>> New Revision: 502649
> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502649
> >>> Log:
> >>> Otherwise it doesn't compile with gcc on HPUX.
> >>> Modified:
> >>> tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h
> >>> Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h
> >>> URL: 
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h?view=diff&rev=502649&r1=502648&r2=502649
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>> ==
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>> --- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h (original)
> >>> +++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h Fri Feb  2 
> >>> 08:27:53 2007
> >>> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
> >>>  #include 
> >>>  #include 
> >>>  #include 
> >>> -#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN)
> >>> +#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN) && 
> >>> !defined(HPUX11)
> >>>  #include 
> >>>  #endif
> >>>  #if !defined(HPUX11) && !defined(AS400)
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> --kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
> >> Bornheimer Str. 33a
> >> 53111 Bonn
> >>
> >> Tel.: 0228/98549-0
> >> Fax:  0228/98549-50
> >> www.kippdata.de
> >> ===
> >> kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
> >> Bornheimer Str. 33a
> >> D-53111 Bonn
> >>
> >> Tel.: +49/0228/98549-0
> >> Fax:  +49/0228/98549-50
> >> www.kippdata.de
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> -- 
> kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
> Bornheimer Str. 33a
> 53111 Bonn
> 
> Tel.: 0228/98549-0
> Fax:  0228/98549-50
> www.kippdata.de
> ===
> kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
> Bornheimer Str. 33a
> D-53111 Bonn
> 
> Tel.: +49/0228/98549-0
> Fax:  +49/0228/98549-50
> www.kippdata.de
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41538] New: - Unable to run Tomcat as a Windows service under JDK 1.6

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41538

   Summary: Unable to run Tomcat as a Windows service under JDK 1.6
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.20
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
  Severity: blocker
  Priority: P2
 Component: Unknown
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Under jdk1.6.0 and on some machines only, I'm not able to run tomcat as a
(Windows) service. When I try to start the service (installation goes all right)
I get the following error in jakarta_service:

[2007-02-05 10:45:06] [info] Debugging Service...
[2007-02-05 10:45:06] [info] Starting service...
[2007-02-05 10:45:06] [173  javajni.c] [error] Impossibile trovare il modulo
specificato.
[2007-02-05 10:45:06] [924  prunsrv.c] [error] Failed creating java
C:\IRIS_PROGRAMMI\jdk1.6.0\jre\bin\server\jvm.dll
[2007-02-05 10:45:06] [1179 prunsrv.c] [error] ServiceStart returned 1
[2007-02-05 10:45:06] [info] Debug service finished.
[2007-02-05 10:45:06] [info] Procrun finished.

If I start Tomcat with start.bat everything goes well. If I use jdk1.5
everything goes well.

Thanks in advance

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41539] New: - NullPointerException during Embedded tomcat restart

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41539

   Summary: NullPointerException during Embedded tomcat restart
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.17
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: blocker
  Priority: P1
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.naming.resources.WARDirContext.treeLookup(WARDirContext.java:792)
at
org.apache.naming.resources.WARDirContext.getAttributes(WARDirContext.java:443)
at
org.apache.naming.resources.WARDirContext.getAttributes(WARDirContext.java:424)
at
org.apache.naming.resources.BaseDirContext.getAttributes(BaseDirContext.java:724)
at
org.apache.naming.resources.ProxyDirContext.cacheLoad(ProxyDirContext.java:1525)
at
org.apache.naming.resources.ProxyDirContext.cacheLookup(ProxyDirContext.java:1448)
at
org.apache.naming.resources.ProxyDirContext.lookup(ProxyDirContext.java:282)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.http.mapper.Mapper.internalMapWrapper(Mapper.java:781)
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.http.mapper.Mapper.internalMap(Mapper.java:625)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.http.mapper.Mapper.map(Mapper.java:515)
at
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.postParseRequest(CoyoteAdapter.java:272)
at
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:146)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

-

Occurs when restarting an instance of org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded

Single WAR context (DocBase points directly to WAR file).  Restart is issued by
stop(), then destroy(), followed by standard start-up process.  Application runs
successfully until restart.

Various combinations of stop() vs. destroy() have been used.  No change in 
result.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

[Tim Funk]

+1

-Tim

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Hi,

I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:

1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on 
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6

2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
3. wait 2-3 days for testing
4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build
5. 3 +1's later publish previously created tarball and binaries to 
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6

6. wait 2-3 days for voting to complete and/or for more testing
7. announce release after sync of the website




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41540] New: - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41540

   Summary: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [],
[], [], [], [], [], []
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.0.0
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Unknown
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi,

I am  calling a stored proc in java ,code is below:

try 
{
//cstmt = con.prepareCall("BEGIN 
DE_PORTAL.EXEC_PRC_GET_MONTHLY_DATA; END;");
cstmt = con.prepareCall("{ call 
DE_PORTAL.EXEC_PRC_GET_MONTHLY_DATA() }");


}
catch (Exception e) 
{
 
e.printStackTrace();
}
ResultSet rs = cstmt.executeQuery();
System.out.println("Query Executed");
System.out.println("ResultSet :" +rs );
int count = 0;
while(rs.next())
{
System.out.println("Count : "+count);
count++;
}

I am getting this error.any idea what can be the reason and how can i resolve 
this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41541] New: - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41541

   Summary: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [],
[], [], [], [], [], []
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.0.0
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Unknown
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi,

I am  calling a stored proc in java ,code is below:

try 
{
//cstmt = con.prepareCall("BEGIN 
DE_PORTAL.EXEC_PRC_GET_MONTHLY_DATA; END;");
cstmt = con.prepareCall("{ call 
DE_PORTAL.EXEC_PRC_GET_MONTHLY_DATA() }");


}
catch (Exception e) 
{
 
e.printStackTrace();
}
ResultSet rs = cstmt.executeQuery();
System.out.println("Query Executed");
System.out.println("ResultSet :" +rs );
int count = 0;
while(rs.next())
{
System.out.println("Count : "+count);
count++;
}

I am getting this error.any idea what can be the reason and how can i resolve 
this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

[Jim Jagielski]

On Feb 3, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Ted Husted wrote:


Or,

1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6
2. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build
3. wait 72 hours
4. if 3 +1's and more +1s than -1s, publish previously created tarball
and binaries to www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6, else wait longer
5. announce release after sync of the website

Of course, if a PMC member needed more time at 3, the RM could just
leave the vote open longer.



+1

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

[Martin Dubuc]

+1

On 2/4/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:

1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6
2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
3. wait 2-3 days for testing
4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build
5. 3 +1's later publish previously created tarball and binaries to
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6
6. wait 2-3 days for voting to complete and/or for more testing
7. announce release after sync of the website

Votes ?

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

[Jim Jagielski]

It sounds as though the problem is that even though the
header exists under HPUX, it is unusable.

So we may still need to explicit HPUX test... I'll
review the autoconf stuff to see if we can
force undef'ing the HAVE_* for HPUX.

On Feb 5, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Jean-Frederic wrote:


Hi,

I have tested, AC_CHECK_HEADERS() does not help:
+++
checking sys/socketvar.h usability... no
checking sys/socketvar.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: sys/socketvar.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: sys/socketvar.h: check for missing  
prerequisite

headers?
configure: WARNING: sys/socketvar.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: sys/socketvar.h: section "Present But  
Cannot Be

Compiled"
configure: WARNING: sys/socketvar.h: proceeding with the  
preprocessor's

result
configure: WARNING: sys/socketvar.h: in the future, the compiler will
take precedence
checking for sys/socketvar.h... yes
+++
And in common/portable.h:
+++
/* Define to 1 if you have the  header file. */
#define HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H 1

/* Define to 1 if you have the  header file. */
#define HAVE_SYS_SOCKETVAR_H 1
+++

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 18:36 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:

I can't test on HP-UX, but maybe you (jfc) could try:
Index: configure.in
===
--- configure.in(revision 502659)
+++ configure.in(working copy)
@@ -139,6 +139,10 @@
  dnl check for filio.h used on Solaris to define FIONREAD ioctl.
  AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/filio.h)

+dnl check for socketvar.h and select.h not used on HPUX11
+AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/socketvar.h)
+AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/select.h)
+
  AC_DEFUN([JK_CHECK_SETSOCKOPT], [
  AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether to use $1 with setsockopt())
  AC_TRY_RUN([
Index: common/jk_global.h
===
--- common/jk_global.h  (revision 502659)
+++ common/jk_global.h  (working copy)
@@ -142,10 +142,10 @@
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
-#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN) &&
!defined(HPUX11)
+#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN) &&
!defined(HAVE_SYS_SOCKETVAR_H)
  #include 
  #endif
-#if !defined(HPUX11) && !defined(AS400)
+#if !defined(HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H) && !defined(AS400)
  #include 
  #endif
  #endif

Of course you would need to rebuild configure via buildconf.sh after
changing configure.in.

Regards,

Rainer


Jim Jagielski wrote:

Don't we also have a HPUX11 specific check like
the 2nd line after this one? Seems consistent to me :/

On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:


Hi Jean-Frederic,

shouldn't we be able to find out about the necessity to include  
it via

configure? At least HP-UX should be able to use the configure
mechanism. I think we mostly use the hard coded defines for the
platforms, where we can't use the configure mechanism.

Regards,

Rainer

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Author: jfclere
Date: Fri Feb  2 08:27:53 2007
New Revision: 502649
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502649
Log:
Otherwise it doesn't compile with gcc on HPUX.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/ 
common/jk_global.h?view=diff&rev=502649&r1=502648&r2=502649


== 



--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h  
(original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h Fri  
Feb  2

08:27:53 2007
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
-#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN)
+#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined 
(CYGWIN) &&

!defined(HPUX11)
 #include 
 #endif
 #if !defined(HPUX11) && !defined(AS400)
-- 
---

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
Bornheimer Str. 33a
53111 Bonn

Tel.: 0228/98549-0
Fax:  0228/98549-50
www.kippdata.de
===
kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
Bornheimer Str. 33a
D-53111 Bonn

Tel.: +49/0228/98549-0
Fax:  +49/0228/98549-50
www.kippdata.de

--- 
--

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 
-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
Bornheimer Str. 33a
53111 Bonn

Tel.: 0228/98549-0
Fax:  0228/98549-50
www.kippdata.de
===
kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
Bornheimer Str. 33a
D-53111 Bonn

Tel.: +49/0228/98549-0
Fax:  +49/0228/98549-50
www.kippdata.de

--

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

[Jim Jagielski]

On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:41 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:


Hi,

I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:

1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on  
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6

2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
3. wait 2-3 days for testing
4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build
5. 3 +1's later publish previously created tarball and binaries to  
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6

6. wait 2-3 days for voting to complete and/or for more testing
7. announce release after sync of the website

Votes ?



+1


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

[Yoav Shapira]

Hola,

On 2/4/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:

1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6
2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
3. wait 2-3 days for testing
4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build
5. 3 +1's later publish previously created tarball and binaries to
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6
6. wait 2-3 days for voting to complete and/or for more testing
7. announce release after sync of the website

Votes ?


+1.

Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tagging 5.5.21

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists]

Tuesday Feb 6th, 10am CST

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists]

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Hi,

I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:

1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on 
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6

2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
3. wait 2-3 days for testing
4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build
5. 3 +1's later publish previously created tarball and binaries to 
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6

6. wait 2-3 days for voting to complete and/or for more testing
7. announce release after sync of the website

Votes ?

yo,
in step one, the source code is tagged right?


Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

[Jeanfrancois Arcand]

+1

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Hi,

I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:

1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on 
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6

2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
3. wait 2-3 days for testing
4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build
5. 3 +1's later publish previously created tarball and binaries to 
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6

6. wait 2-3 days for voting to complete and/or for more testing
7. announce release after sync of the website

Votes ?

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41540] - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41540


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-05 07:42 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41541 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41541] - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41541





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-05 07:42 ---
*** Bug 41540 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41541] - ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12259], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41541


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-05 07:43 ---
This is not a tomcat specific question so I can't even recommend asking the 
tomcat-user list for help to fix this.

Please use Google or Oracle for support on this manner.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 6.0.x release process update

[Rainer Jung]

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Hi,

I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:

1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on 
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6

2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
3. wait 2-3 days for testing
4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote on build
5. 3 +1's later publish previously created tarball and binaries to 
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6

6. wait 2-3 days for voting to complete and/or for more testing
7. announce release after sync of the website

Votes ?


+1


Rémy


Rainer

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

May Chun Chew/FEA/PEC is out of the office.

[May Chun Chew]

I will be out of the office starting  02/06/2007 and will not return until
02/07/2007.

Contactable at (65)97876648.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[VOTE] Release build 6.0.9

[Remy Maucherat]

Candidate binaries are available here: 
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/


According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.9 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r503957 - in /tomcat: connectors/trunk/http11/ connectors/trunk/jk/ connectors/trunk/util/ container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/ container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/ container/branches/tc4.1

[markt]

Author: markt
Date: Mon Feb  5 18:18:14 2007
New Revision: 503957

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=503957
Log:
Make connectors build for TC4 with a 1.3 JDK. Some bits will be excluded from 
the build but it will then run on a 1.3 JDK.

Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml
tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/build.xml
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/build.xml
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml

Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml?view=diff&rev=503957&r1=503956&r2=503957
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/build.xml Mon Feb  5 18:18:14 2007
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@
 
 
 
+
   
 
 
@@ -167,6 +168,7 @@
  debug="${compile.debug}"
deprecation="${compile.deprecation}"
   optimize="${compile.optimize}">
+  
   
 
 

Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml?view=diff&rev=503957&r1=503956&r2=503957
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/build.xml Mon Feb  5 18:18:14 2007
@@ -92,16 +92,17 @@
   
 
 
-
+
 
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
 
-
+
+
 
 
 
@@ -144,6 +145,7 @@

 -->
 
+
 
 
 
@@ -204,6 +206,8 @@
verbose="off" >
 
 
+
+   




Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml?view=diff&rev=503957&r1=503956&r2=503957
==
--- tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/build.xml Mon Feb  5 18:18:14 2007
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 
 
 
+

 
 
@@ -62,6 +63,7 @@
 
 
 
+
 
 
 
@@ -84,6 +86,7 @@
 
 
 
+
 
 


Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/build.xml?view=diff&rev=503957&r1=503956&r2=503957
==
--- tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/build.xml Mon Feb  5 18:18:14 
2007
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@
 
 
   
-  
+  
 
 


Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/build.xml?view=diff&rev=503957&r1=503956&r2=503957
==
--- tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/build.xml Mon Feb  5 18:18:14 2007
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
   
 
 
+
 
 
 
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@
 
   
 
-  
+  
 
   
 

Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml?view=diff&rev=503957&r1=503956&r2=503957
==
--- tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/manager/build.xml Mon Feb  5 
18:18:14 2007
@@ -36,26 +36,7 @@
 
 
   
-  
-
-
-
-  
-  
-  
-
-
-
-
-  
-
-  
-
+  
 
 

svn commit: r503958 - in /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x: BUILDING.txt RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt RUNNING.txt build.properties.default build.xml

[markt]

Author: markt
Date: Mon Feb  5 18:21:15 2007
New Revision: 503958

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=503958
Log:
Update libraries to latest available versions.
Update release notes to make JDK 1.3 requirement clear. This has been the case 
for several versions, it just wasn't clearly stated.

Modified:
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/BUILDING.txt
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RUNNING.txt
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml

Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/BUILDING.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/BUILDING.txt?view=diff&rev=503958&r1=503957&r2=503958
==
--- tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/BUILDING.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/BUILDING.txt Mon Feb  5 18:21:15 2007
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@
 This subproject contains the source code Tomcat 4.1, a server that implements
 the Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2 Specifications.  In order to build a binary
 distribution version of the container from a source distribution, you must
-have a Java Development Kit (JDK) for version 1.3 (or later) downloaded
+have a Java Development Kit (JDK) for version 1.4 (or later) downloaded
 and installed and do the following:
 
 
 (0) Download and Install a Java Development Kit
 
-* Download a Java Development Kit (JDK) release (version 1.3 or later) from:
+* Download a Java Development Kit (JDK) release (version 1.4 or later) from:
 
 http://java.sun.com/j2se/
 
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@
 * Set an environment variable JAVA_HOME to the pathname of the directory
   into which you installed the JDK release.
 
+* Tomcat 4.1 may be built using a 1.3 JDK but this will not create a full
+  binary distribution. The documentation web application is one of the
+  components that will be excluded when building with a 1.3 JDK
+
 
 (1) Download and Install the Ant Binary Distribution
 
@@ -31,14 +35,14 @@
 http://ant.apache.org/bindownload.cgi
 
   On a Windows platform, you will need:
-apache-ant-1.6.5-bin.zip
+apache-ant-1.7.0-bin.zip
 
   On a Unix platform, you will need:
-apache-ant-1.6.5-bin.tar.gz
+apache-ant-1.7.0-bin.tar.gz
 
 * Unpack the binary distribution into a convenient location so that the
   Ant release resides in its own directory (conventionally named
-  "apache-ant-1.6.5").  For the purposes of the remainder of this document,
+  "apache-ant-1.7.0").  For the purposes of the remainder of this document,
   the symbolic name "${ant.home}" is used to refer to the full pathname of
   the release directory.
 
@@ -90,7 +94,7 @@
 
   http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/download.cgi
 
-  (Tomcat was tested with "Xerces-J-bin.2.7.1.zip")
+  (Tomcat was tested with "Xerces-J-bin.2.9.0.zip")
 
 * Unpack the binary distribution into a convenient location so that the
   distribution resides in its own directory (conventionally named
@@ -211,7 +215,7 @@
 
 (11) Download and Install the Commons Logging Binary Distribution
 
-* Download a binary distribution Version 1.0.1 or later from:
+* Download a binary distribution Version 1.1 or later from:
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_commons-logging.cgi
 
@@ -337,15 +341,15 @@
 
 (21) Download and Install the Struts Binary Distribution
 
-* Download a binary distribution of Struts 1.0.1, 1.0.2 or 1.1 from:
+* Download a binary distribution of Struts 1.2.4 or later from:
 
 http://archive.apache.org/dist/struts/
 
   On a Windows platform, you will need:
-jakarta-struts-1.1.zip
+jakarta-struts-X.Y.Z.zip
 
   On a Unix platform, you will need:
-jakarta-struts-1.1.tar.gz
+jakarta-struts-X.Y.Z.tar.gz
 
 * Unpack the binary distribution into a convenient location so that the
   distribution resides in its own directory.
@@ -511,9 +515,9 @@
 
 (30) Steps (31) to (33) Build the Windows Installer Distribution - OPTIONAL
 
-(31) NSISant installer
+(31) NSIS installer
 
-* Download the NSIS Installer version 2.14 from:
+* Download the NSIS Installer version 2.14 or later from:
 
 http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/nsis/nsis-2.14-setup.exe?download
 

Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt?view=diff&rev=503958&r1=503957&r2=503958
==
--- tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Mon Feb  5 18:21:15 
2007
@@ -161,6 +161,30 @@
 [4.1.34] Commons Logging
  Upgrade to 1.1
 
+[4.1.35] Commons Digetster
+ Upgrade to 1.8
+
+[4.1.35] Commons IO
+ Upgrade to 1.2
+
+[4.1.35] Commons Modeler
+ Upgrade to 2.0
+
+[4.1.35] Xerces
+ Upgrade to 2.9.0
+
+

svn commit: r503965 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java

[markt]

Author: markt
Date: Mon Feb  5 18:51:30 2007
New Revision: 503965

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=503965
Log:
Fix what looks like a copy and paste error

Modified:

tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java

Modified: 
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java?view=diff&rev=503965&r1=503964&r2=503965
==
--- 
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java
 (original)
+++ 
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationFilterChain.java
 Mon Feb  5 18:51:30 2007
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
 void release() {
 
 this.filters.clear();
-this.iterator = iterator;
+this.iterator = null;
 this.servlet = null;
 
 }



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing result of mod_jk for Apache2.0.x is unexpected, differs from the one for Apache1.3.x.

[Taka J.S.]

Hi,
I'm using Apache2.0.59, mod_jk1.2.20 and Tomcat5.0.28.
The resources are located in the area where is protected by Tomcat's
BASIC authentication.
When I send a request via HEAD method without account nor password,
the values of response headers are not recorded into the Apache2's
access log file.
In the following case of log related parameters for Apache2:

LogFormat "\"%{WWW-Authenticate}o\"" combined
CustomLog /var/log/httpd/access_log combined

Despite the response includes a WWW-Authenticate header that are not
empty values,
the log is set as "-" value.

This phenomenon does not happen at the case of neither Apache1.3.37
nor the combination of Apache2.2.4 and mod_proxy_ajp.

I guess that the return value from jk_handler's function causes this
unexpected result.
Since the generation of Apache2,
the value of 'sent_bodyct' has not been set as '1' when the
'header_only' value is '1'
（see httpd-2.0.59/modules/http/http_protocol.c L1765）.
As a result, the condition at
tomcat-connectors-1.2.20-src/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c L2118
  /* If tomcat returned no body and the status is not OK,
 let apache handle the error code */
  if (!r->sent_bodyct && r->status >= HTTP_BAD_REQUEST) {
  jk_log(xconf->log, JK_LOG_INFO, "No body with status=%d"
 " for worker=%s",
 r->status, worker_name);
  JK_TRACE_EXIT(xconf->log);
  return r->status;
  -- snip --
  return OK;  /* NOT r->status, even if it has changed. */
is always true, and jk_handler returns the "NOT OK" value.
Finnaly, the contents of headers table for Apache2 are all cleared.

I suggest to mend the 'if'-condition clause as below:
  if (!r->header_only && !r->sent_bodyct && r->status >=
HTTP_BAD_REQUEST) {

What do you think about this, bug or not?
I would like to resolve this probelm.

Regards,

Taka J.S.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9

[Jacob Hookom]

It'd be good to get a public update out there to run the new JSF 
releases as part of JEE 5 (I realize this is at the bottom of most 
other's priorities).


Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here: 
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/


According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.9 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]