DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39344] New: - Can't run servlet examples after installation

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39344

   Summary: Can't run servlet examples after installation
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.16
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: Unknown
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi,

the reproduction is very simple:

- Have a vanilla 5.5.16 installation.
- move to localhost:YOUR_PORT.
- move down on the page, navigate to 'Servlet Examples'.

Expected: Servlet Examples index page will open.
Actual: You will get a 404.

Checking the logs revealed that a context listener got corrupted: (?)

>java.lang.ClassFormatError: Extra bytes at the end of class file 
> listeners/ContextListener 

Searching the net revealed many reports of the same kind, for instance:

http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=3440834&framed=y

SAFE WORKAROUND: Use 5.5.12, as it WORKS there.
Out of the box, that is. I really do not intend to mock with the config files, 
if .12 works OOTB.
Moreover, even when meddling into there, I wasn't able to get any of the 
samples to work on the browser. With 5.5.12, 100% of them worked well.
Back to 5.5.12!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39344] - Can't run servlet examples after installation

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39344





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 07:26 ---
Oh, I seem to need to add some more stuff.
- Using .EXE installer on Win32.
- On the Nabble link, Charles R Cardarale appears to have confirmed a 
corruption with one of the classes from the .exe installer.
So maybe I would have had a chance to use the .zip for win32? ... Well maybe.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39041] - Corrupt .class files in .exe distribution.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39041


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 07:29 ---
*** Bug 39344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39344] - Can't run servlet examples after installation

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39344


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 07:29 ---
Use 5.5.17.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39041 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Bill Barker wrote:
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Whoa :)  I don't see a vote thread?

alpha, beta, gamma, gold, it doesn't matter... any "tarball release" from 
the
Apache Software Foundation must be preceeded by a vote.  explanation>




Long established practice in Tomcat-land:  The 5.5.17 release is currently 
nothing but a tarball (and, so we call it Alpha).  Yoav will probably call a 
vote later in the week, or next.  At that point it will get a GA/Beta/Still 
Alpha rating.


Aye I understand that - I'm stating it's not valid at the ASF to push something
at Announce@ anylist until dev@ makes a (initial) decision, e.g. you could do
the first vote for alpha, second vote for beta, third vote for GA, or ballot all
three choices (choosing the 'best' rating with 3 +1 and more + than -, or what
have you).  How you vote is up to the project.  Not voting isn't a choice within
the foundation.  Essentially, the RM personally hangs their ass out to dry by
posting such an announcement, because the ASF protection ("It's -our- code, not
a specific individuals - yell at -us-, we'll duke it out in court etc") only
kicks in once the voting process is followed.

Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat 6 Bug: JspFactory.getDefaultFactory() returns null

[Remy Maucherat]

Stan Silvert wrote:

Please let me know where the bug database is and I'll open a report.


And I think I would mark it as INVALID. This factory field is 
initialized by Jasper, and at this point in time, I see no reason for 
any Jasper code to have been run.


Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38223] - ConfigurableClasspathWebappLoader

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38223





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 09:17 ---
FYI, something similar to this exists in the "DevLoader" component of the 
Sysdeo Tomcat Plugin for Eclipse.

http://www.sysdeo.com/eclipse/tomcatplugin


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Question: TomCat 3.2

[Henri Gomez]

BTW, memory leak in Tomcat 3.2 are more than likely.

The question will be, why still using deprecated and no more supported code ?

When I visit the IBM Rochester Labs, in 2001, I recommanded some IBMer
to switch to Tomcat 3.3.x, which is the Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1 RI and is
pretty fast and stable.

In 2006, even with the latest I5/OS, Tomcat 3.2.4 is still in use ;(



>2006/4/18, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Shaban Ghumri wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I would like to know based on your experience with TomCat, if there are
> > tools that I can use to debug a potential memory leak on servlet running on
> > TomCat 3.2?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
>
> This question belongs on the users list, not the dev list. Please
> review the posting guidelines available at
> http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
>
> Mark
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38472] - Autodeploy creates folders with too-wide permissions

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38472





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 10:22 ---
Thanks for the explanation - I see what you mean.  I imagine the permissions
also depend on the ownership of the initial .war file too, so perhaps the
documentation ought to mention that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38570] - if docBase path contains "webapps", a backslash is inserted

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38570


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Version|5.5.9   |5.5.17




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 10:39 ---
Found in 5.5.9, seemed to be fixed in 5.5.15, now in 5.5.17 beta the error is
here again.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tomcat 6 Bug: JspFactory.getDefaultFactory() returns null

[Stan Silvert]

> And I think I would mark it as INVALID. This factory field is
> initialized by Jasper, and at this point in time, I see no reason for
> any Jasper code to have been run.
> 
> Rémy

As I said in the original email, I need to add an ELResolver on the 
JspApplicationContext at application startup time.  This is required by the JSF 
1.2 spec section 5.6.1. 

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert

> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 5:13 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 Bug: JspFactory.getDefaultFactory() returns null
> 
> Stan Silvert wrote:
> > Please let me know where the bug database is and I'll open a report.
> 
> And I think I would mark it as INVALID. This factory field is
> initialized by Jasper, and at this point in time, I see no reason for
> any Jasper code to have been run.
> 
> Rémy
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat 6 Bug: JspFactory.getDefaultFactory() returns null

[Yoav Shapira]

BTW, when I tried to add a Tomcat-6 product to Bugzilla, I get a
duplicate entry error.  Has anyone added Tomcat-6 but left it in some
closed / weird state?  If not, I'll follow up to take care of this
with the infra folks.

Yoav

On 4/19/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And I think I would mark it as INVALID. This factory field is
> > initialized by Jasper, and at this point in time, I see no reason for
> > any Jasper code to have been run.
> >
> > Rémy
>
> As I said in the original email, I need to add an ELResolver on the 
> JspApplicationContext at application startup time.  This is required by the 
> JSF 1.2 spec section 5.6.1.
>
> Stan Silvert
> JBoss, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> callto://stansilvert
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 5:13 AM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 Bug: JspFactory.getDefaultFactory() returns null
> >
> > Stan Silvert wrote:
> > > Please let me know where the bug database is and I'll open a report.
> >
> > And I think I would mark it as INVALID. This factory field is
> > initialized by Jasper, and at this point in time, I see no reason for
> > any Jasper code to have been run.
> >
> > Rémy
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Yoav Shapira
Nimalex LLC
1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
Cambridge, MA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[Yoav Shapira]

Hola,
I don't mind changing the process, but as the other Bill noted, what
we've been doing for a while is:

- Gather consensus in public on the dev list by asking "is this an OK
time for a release."  We agree on a date and time.  It's not a formal
[VOTE] thread, but we do this practically every time and people do +1
or -1 it.  I can send archive thread references if needed.
- Cut the release in some preliminary (alpha or beta, depending on the
RM's assessment of the magnitude of changes included since the
previous release) form, announce it in order to encourage testing by
committers and non-committers alike,
- And then have a stability vote about a week later, once people have
had time to test it.

I didn't establish this process, but I've been continuing it, so I
take some responsibility if we've violated some rule.  But my
understanding is that we did have PMC consensus to make every release.
 We can codify it more formally in a VOTE thread from now on if need
be, I suppose there's no harm in that.

Yoav

On 4/19/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Barker wrote:
> > "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>Whoa :)  I don't see a vote thread?
> >>
> >>alpha, beta, gamma, gold, it doesn't matter... any "tarball release" from
> >>the
> >>Apache Software Foundation must be preceeded by a vote.   >>explanation>
> >>
> >
> > Long established practice in Tomcat-land:  The 5.5.17 release is currently
> > nothing but a tarball (and, so we call it Alpha).  Yoav will probably call a
> > vote later in the week, or next.  At that point it will get a GA/Beta/Still
> > Alpha rating.
>
> Aye I understand that - I'm stating it's not valid at the ASF to push 
> something
> at Announce@ anylist until dev@ makes a (initial) decision, e.g. you could do
> the first vote for alpha, second vote for beta, third vote for GA, or ballot 
> all
> three choices (choosing the 'best' rating with 3 +1 and more + than -, or what
> have you).  How you vote is up to the project.  Not voting isn't a choice 
> within
> the foundation.  Essentially, the RM personally hangs their ass out to dry by
> posting such an announcement, because the ASF protection ("It's -our- code, 
> not
> a specific individuals - yell at -us-, we'll duke it out in court etc") only
> kicks in once the voting process is followed.
>
> Bill
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Yoav Shapira
Nimalex LLC
1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
Cambridge, MA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[Mladen Turk]

Yoav Shapira wrote:

 We can codify it more formally in a VOTE thread from now on if need
be, I suppose there's no harm in that.



Although boring, if it's the ASF rule, there is no harm in that except
an additional "official" voting thread. Since like you said, we agree
on each release, the RM can after that unofficial thread (or few of 
them), simply ask an official alpha/beta vote.


It will not change anything in our release process. OTOH it will give
some formal meaning to it, and at the end of the day, that's no so bad.

Regards,
Mladen.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat 6 Bug: JspFactory.getDefaultFactory() returns null

[Remy Maucherat]

Stan Silvert wrote:

And I think I would mark it as INVALID. This factory field is
initialized by Jasper, and at this point in time, I see no reason for
any Jasper code to have been run.

Rémy


As I said in the original email, I need to add an ELResolver on the JspApplicationContext at application startup time.  This is required by the JSF 1.2 spec section 5.6.1. 


The only solution is to try to preload Jasper on startup in 
SecurityClassLoad or something. Bleh. I suppose I have to add an 
annotation processor too :(


Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[Remy Maucherat]

Yoav Shapira wrote:

Hola,
I don't mind changing the process, but as the other Bill noted, what
we've been doing for a while is:


The process never changed: originally, I was releasing builds (= alpha 
equivalents) that were then voted as "alpha, beta or stable" in a single 
subsequent vote. This AFAIK is compliant with the ASF releases rules.


Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39350] New: - No kerberos auth with JK1 in IIS (ticketsize)

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39350

   Summary: No kerberos auth with JK1 in IIS (ticketsize)
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: Unknown
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows Server 2003
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: Native:JK
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi,

we use JK1 in IIS6 to connect to Tomcats. The IIS does the authentication.
Our Organisation has grown and so has the group memberships of the users. The 
memberships are listed in the kerberos tickets needed for internal windows 
authentication in IIS. Now we already had to increase the max kerberos ticket 
size on our servers from 11k to 64k because of that.

Problem: lately we recognized that internal authentication doesn't work any 
more on some accounts, if the web has a JK-component. The JK debug-log shows 
this:

[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_isapi_plugin.c (845): check 
if [/nwm/menuaction.do] is points to the web-inf directory
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_isapi_plugin.c (863): 
[/nwm/menuaction.do] is a servlet url - should redirect to lb_ptomx
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_worker.c (301): Maintaining 
worker lb_ptomx
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (2203): 
recycled 0 sockets in 0 seconds
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (2203): 
recycled 0 sockets in 0 seconds
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (2203): 
recycled 0 sockets in 0 seconds
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (2203): 
recycled 0 sockets in 0 seconds
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (2203): 
recycled 0 sockets in 0 seconds
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (2203): 
recycled 0 sockets in 0 seconds
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_worker.c (111): found a 
worker lb_ptomx
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_isapi_plugin.c (1018): got a 
worker for name lb_ptomx
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_lb_worker.c (592): service 
sticky_session=1
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_lb_worker.c (564): found 
best worker (p-hh-ptom1_I2) using by request method
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (2131): 
acquired connection cache slot=0
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_lb_worker.c (612): service 
worker=p-hh-ptom1_I2 jvm_route=p-hh-ptom1_I2
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [error] jk_ajp_common.c (430): failed 
appending the header value
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [info]  jk_ajp_common.c (1662): 
Creating AJP message failed, without recovery
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_ajp_common.c (2074): 
recycling connection cache slot=0 for worker p-hh-ptom1_I2
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [info]  jk_lb_worker.c (711): 
unrecoverable error 413, request failed. Client failed in the middle of 
request, we can't recover to another instance.
[Wed Apr 19 14:24:14 2006] [5976:3224] [debug] jk_isapi_plugin.c (1031): 
service() returned OK

The "failed appending the header value" took the analysis into the jk-code. It 
seems to be related to the buffersize, but i'm not an expert in you code.
The error occours here...
 
   if (msg->len + len + 2 > msg->maxlen) {
 return JK_ERR;
 ...

...and before you set...

   msg->maxlen = buffSize;

...and before that...

   buffSize = DEF_BUFFER_SZ;

...refering to the defrined static...

   #define DEF_BUFFER_SZ (8 * 1024)

I think that means that you have a 8k buffer for the JK-Message. the Kerberos 
ticket is in the header so jk tries to add it to the message (allthough the 
auth is configured to take place on the IIS-side). And so the big header busts 
the buffer, we think.

Hopefully you can find a way to cure this problem for us. Increasing the 
buffer would be a quick workaround (If our analysis is right). But maybe a 
dynamic buffer or an intelligent handling of header data (i.e. stripping of 
info the TC doesn't use anyway) would be a more complete solution.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please add dev@tomcat.apache.org as a Bugzilla account...

[Yoav Shapira]

... so that I can assign it as the default owner for Tomcat 6
components.  The old tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org is registered
already, but I'd prefer to use the new address instead.  Trying to do
so now results in:
"You must use an existing Bugzilla account as initial owner for the
component 'Clustering'. Please press Back and try again."

Thanks,

Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33806] - Session tracking using URL rewriting fails, if client URL-encodes reserved characters ; and =

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33806


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|major   |minor
   Priority|P2  |P4




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 13:19 ---
Downgrading priority because the behavior is more lenient (i.e. works when
*maybe* it shouldn't) instead of being broken when it should work.  

Jean-Philippe, thank you for your explanation of the issue.  If you could test
this issue on 5.5.16 or 5.5.17 and inform us of your findings, that'd be great.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37054] - NoClassDefFoundError using ServletContextListener WITH CUSTOM LOADER

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37054


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|major   |normal
   Priority|P2  |P3
Summary|NoClassDefFoundError using  |NoClassDefFoundError using
   |ServletContextListener  |ServletContextListener WITH
   ||CUSTOM LOADER
Version|5.5.12  |5.5.15




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 13:20 ---
Changing summary text of this issue to indicate the key fact that you're using a
custom loader, and updating version to 5.5.15 per comment above.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39344] - Can't run servlet examples after installation

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39344





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 13:21 ---
Thanks, but not until .17 is out of beta stage.
I must deploy this externally and beta sw is not allowed to install there, 
since considered unstable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39350] - No kerberos auth with JK1 in IIS (ticketsize)

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39350


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|major   |normal
 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
   Priority|P2  |P3




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 13:21 ---
What mod_jk and Tomcat versions are you using?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39041] - Corrupt .class files in .exe distribution.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39041





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 13:25 ---
BTW, I suggest "OS" should be changed to "Windows" (XP or 2000, which you like).
.exe is Win32 only and used nowhere else.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39350] - No kerberos auth with JK1 in IIS (ticketsize)

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39350


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|Unknown |5.0.28




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 13:57 ---
JK the latest binary build for windows, 1.2.15
Tomcat still the latesat stable in the 5.0 branch, 5.0.28

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Possible Summer of Code Ideas

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists]

I'd be happy to mentor this project with you, although I am gonna 
suggest a couple other projects.


Filip


Yoav Shapira wrote:

Hi,
I've added one possible project to the proposals for SoC2006: see
http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2006.  I'd love for Filip
and/or Peter to mentor this project with me (or even instead of me
;)), since they know a lot more about the relevant code. 
Alternatively, if anyone thinks this is a bad project proposal, I

don't mind modifying or scraping it... And if you have more ideas,
cool, I'm gladly willing to mentor them -- just add to the wiki page
above.

--
Yoav Shapira
Nimalex LLC
1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
Cambridge, MA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Possible Summer of Code Ideas

[Yoav Shapira]

Excellent, thanks.

Yoav

On 4/19/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be happy to mentor this project with you, although I am gonna
> suggest a couple other projects.
>
> Filip
>
>
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've added one possible project to the proposals for SoC2006: see
> > http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2006.  I'd love for Filip
> > and/or Peter to mentor this project with me (or even instead of me
> > ;)), since they know a lot more about the relevant code.
> > Alternatively, if anyone thinks this is a bad project proposal, I
> > don't mind modifying or scraping it... And if you have more ideas,
> > cool, I'm gladly willing to mentor them -- just add to the wiki page
> > above.
> >
> > --
> > Yoav Shapira
> > Nimalex LLC
> > 1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
> > Cambridge, MA, USA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Yoav Shapira
Nimalex LLC
1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
Cambridge, MA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[Jim Jagielski]

The main idea is that once a tarball is placed in an
"official" download location, it should have the support
of the PMC behind it, and thus a vote. This is to avoid
people downloading it, using it, and considering it
as "really released" when it really isn't :)

However, 5.5.17 is noted as BETA so I'm not *that*
concerned about it :)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r395258 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache: catalina/util/AnnotationProcessor.java jasper/runtime/AnnotationProcessor.java

[remm]

Author: remm
Date: Wed Apr 19 07:51:10 2006
New Revision: 395258

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395258&view=rev
Log:
- Add annotation processor to Jasper too (tags need injection too).

Added:

tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/runtime/AnnotationProcessor.java   
(with props)
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/AnnotationProcessor.java

Modified: 
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/AnnotationProcessor.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/AnnotationProcessor.java?rev=395258&r1=395257&r2=395258&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/AnnotationProcessor.java 
(original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/AnnotationProcessor.java 
Wed Apr 19 07:51:10 2006
@@ -35,8 +35,9 @@
 /**
  * Verify the annotation and Process it.
  *
- * @authorFabien Carrion
- * @version   $Revision: 303236 $, $Date: 2006-03-09 16:46:52 -0600 (Thu, 09 
Mar 2006) $
+ * @author Fabien Carrion
+ * @author Remy Maucherat
+ * @version $Revision: 303236 $, $Date: 2006-03-09 16:46:52 -0600 (Thu, 09 Mar 
2006) $
  */
 public class AnnotationProcessor {
 
@@ -172,8 +173,11 @@
 }
 
 
+/**
+ * Inject resources in specified field.
+ */
 protected static void lookupFieldResource(javax.naming.Context context, 
-Object instance, Field f, String name)
+Object instance, Field field, String name)
 throws NamingException, IllegalAccessException {
 
 Object lookedupResource = null;
@@ -183,16 +187,19 @@
 (name.length() > 0)) {
 lookedupResource = context.lookup(name);
 } else {
-lookedupResource = context.lookup(instance.getClass().getName() + 
"/" + f.getName());
+lookedupResource = context.lookup(instance.getClass().getName() + 
"/" + field.getName());
 }
 
-accessibility = f.isAccessible();
-f.setAccessible(true);
-f.set(instance, lookedupResource);
-f.setAccessible(accessibility);
+accessibility = field.isAccessible();
+field.setAccessible(true);
+field.set(instance, lookedupResource);
+field.setAccessible(accessibility);
 }
 
 
+/**
+ * Inject resources in specified method.
+ */
 protected static void lookupMethodResource(javax.naming.Context context, 
 Object instance, Method method, String name)
 throws NamingException, IllegalAccessException, 
InvocationTargetException {

Added: 
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/runtime/AnnotationProcessor.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/runtime/AnnotationProcessor.java?rev=395258&view=auto
==
--- 
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/runtime/AnnotationProcessor.java 
(added)
+++ 
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/runtime/AnnotationProcessor.java 
Wed Apr 19 07:51:10 2006
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation.
+ * 
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ * 
+ *  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ * 
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.jasper.runtime;
+
+import java.lang.reflect.Field;
+import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
+import java.lang.reflect.Method;
+import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;
+
+import javax.annotation.EJB;
+import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
+import javax.annotation.Resource;
+import javax.naming.NamingException;
+import javax.persistence.PersistenceContext;
+import javax.persistence.PersistenceUnit;
+import javax.xml.ws.WebServiceRef;
+
+
+/**
+ * Verify the annotation and Process it.
+ *
+ * @author Fabien Carrion
+ * @author Remy Maucherat
+ * @version $Revision: 303236 $, $Date: 2006-03-09 16:46:52 -0600 (Thu, 09 Mar 
2006) $
+ */
+public class AnnotationProcessor {
+
+
+/**
+ * Call postConstruct method on the specified instance.
+ */
+public static void postConstruct(Object instance)
+throws IllegalAccessException, InvocationTargetException {
+
+Method[] methods = instance.getClass().getMethods();
+Method postConstruct = null;
+for (int i = 0; i < methods.length; i++) {
+if (methods[i].isAnnotationPresent(PostConstruct.class)) {
+if ((pos

svn commit: r395266 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/JasperListener.java

[remm]

Author: remm
Date: Wed Apr 19 08:18:53 2006
New Revision: 395266

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395266&view=rev
Log:
- Add a Jasper server listener to setup the JspFactory before any component 
related to a webapp is
  started.

Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/JasperListener.java   
(with props)

Added: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/JasperListener.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/JasperListener.java?rev=395266&view=auto
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/JasperListener.java 
(added)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/JasperListener.java Wed 
Apr 19 08:18:53 2006
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2002,2004 The Apache Software Foundation.
+ * 
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ * 
+ *  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ * 
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.catalina.core;
+
+
+import org.apache.catalina.Lifecycle;
+import org.apache.catalina.LifecycleEvent;
+import org.apache.catalina.LifecycleListener;
+import org.apache.catalina.util.StringManager;
+import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
+import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
+
+
+/**
+ * This listener is designed to initialize Jasper before any web applications 
are
+ * started.
+ *
+ * @author Remy Maucherat
+ * @version $Revision: 374878 $ $Date: 2006-02-04 16:02:39 +0100 (sam., 04 
févr. 2006) $
+ * @since 4.1
+ */
+
+public class JasperListener
+implements LifecycleListener {
+
+private static Log log = LogFactory.getLog(JasperListener.class);
+
+/**
+ * The string manager for this package.
+ */
+protected StringManager sm =
+StringManager.getManager(Constants.Package);
+
+
+// -- LifecycleListener Methods
+
+
+/**
+ * Primary entry point for startup and shutdown events.
+ *
+ * @param event The event that has occurred
+ */
+public void lifecycleEvent(LifecycleEvent event) {
+
+if (Lifecycle.INIT_EVENT.equals(event.getType())) {
+try {
+// Set JSP factory
+this.getClass().getClassLoader().loadClass
+("org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspRuntimeContext");
+} catch (Throwable t) {
+// Should not occur, obviously
+log.warn("Couldn't initialize Jasper", t);
+}
+// Another possibility is to do directly:
+// JspFactory.setDefaultFactory(new JspFactoryImpl());
+}
+
+}
+
+
+}

Propchange: 
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/JasperListener.java
--
svn:eol-style = native



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39354] New: - Problem parsing xml

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39354

   Summary: Problem parsing xml
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: Unknown
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: blocker
  Priority: P2
 Component: Webapps:Manager
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Etat HTTP 500 -



type Rapport d'exception

message

description Le serveur a rencontr une erreur interne () qui l'a empch de
satisfaire la requte.

exception

javax.servlet.ServletException: trouble parsing XML in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: The end-tag for element type "datastore" must end
with a '>' delimiter.
org.vfny.geoserver.global.GeoServerPlugIn.init(Geo ServerPlugIn.java:147)
org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.initModuleP 
lugIns(ActionServlet.java:1158)
org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.init(Action Servlet.java:473)
javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.j ava:256)
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke (ErrorReportValve.java:105)
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.servic e(CoyoteAdapter.java:148)
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(H ttp11Processor.java:869)
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11
ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProt ocol.java:664)
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.process 
Socket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527)
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThr
ead.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80)
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlR 
unnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)


cause mre

org.vfny.geoserver.global.ConfigurationException: trouble parsing XML in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: The end-tag for element type "datastore" must end
with a '>' delimiter.
org.vfny.geoserver.global.xml.ReaderUtils.loadConf ig(ReaderUtils.java:107)
org.vfny.geoserver.global.xml.XMLConfigReader.load 
Catalog(XMLConfigReader.java:265)
org.vfny.geoserver.global.xml.XMLConfigReader.load (XMLConfigReader.java:182)
org.vfny.geoserver.global.xml.XMLConfigReader.(XMLConfigReader.java:141)
org.vfny.geoserver.global.GeoServerPlugIn.init(Geo ServerPlugIn.java:89)
org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.initModuleP 
lugIns(ActionServlet.java:1158)
org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.init(Action Servlet.java:473)
javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.j ava:256)
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke (ErrorReportValve.java:105)
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.servic e(CoyoteAdapter.java:148)
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(H ttp11Processor.java:869)
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11
ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProt ocol.java:664)
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.process 
Socket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527)
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThr
ead.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80)
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlR 
unnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39354] - Problem parsing xml

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39354





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 15:33 ---
I've got  this message then i try to launch geoserver.

Thank you in advance


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39355] New: - PageContext pool not resetting pages fully before returning to pool

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39355

   Summary: PageContext pool not resetting pages fully before
returning to pool
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: Unknown
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Jasper
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I couldn't find a bugzilla for tomcat/jasper 6 so I'm posting this
here instead.

I found a bug whereby the BeanELResolver maps and caches classnames
to class instances, which in and of itself is fine, but the PageContextImpl
class also uses a pool for PageContexts, and the whole resolver hierarchy
wasn't being cleaned out when a PageContext is put back in the pool.
The reported symptom was ClassCast exceptions after a webapp was stopped
and restarted and an expression using a class from the webapp was
evaluated.

Attached is the simple test case and the patch file. Actually, looks like I
can't attach anything. I'll try putting it in as another comment.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39354] - Problem parsing xml

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39354


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 15:38 ---
This is not a Tomcat bug. Your application parse a wrong formatted config file:

look here org.vfny, is not a tomcat class

org.vfny.geoserver.global.ConfigurationException: trouble parsing XML in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: The end-tag for element type "datastore" must end
with a '>' delimiter.
org.vfny.geoserver.global.xml.ReaderUtils.loadConf ig(ReaderUtils.java:107)
org.vfny.geoserver.global.xml.XMLConfigReader.load 
Catalog(XMLConfigReader.java:265)
org.vfny.geoserver.global.xml.XMLConfigReader.load (XMLConfigReader.java:182)

Please use english at language.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39355] - PageContext pool not resetting pages fully before returning to pool

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39355





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 15:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=18136)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18136&action=view)
test case webapp

Deploy this webapp.
Hit the webapp
stop start the webapp without stopping the server
Hit the webapp
shit happens

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39355] - PageContext pool not resetting pages fully before returning to pool

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39355





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 15:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=18137)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18137&action=view)
A patch for this problem

This patch fixes the test case provided

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39355] - PageContext pool not resetting pages fully before returning to pool

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39355





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 15:46 ---
Just to be clear this is for the jasper that implements the 2.1 JSP
specification.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW: Cant find User Account Lockout feature in Tomcat-5.5.12

[Pawan Dandawate]

Hi there

 

I am in need to implement User Account Lockout for 30 minutes after 3
incorrect login attempts using Tomcat. I did achieve this (Setting
Lockout Attributes for User Accounts) in the past on BEA WebLogic
Application Server server by setting following attributes -

 

*   Lockout Enabled
*   Lockout Threshold
*   Lockout Duration
*   Lockout Reset Duration

 

Unfortunately, it appears there are no corresponding attributes in
Tomcat. Could you please point me any documentation or link or suggest
me how can I achieve this.

 

My environment is:

 

*   Windows XP
*   jdk1.5.0_06
*   Apache_2.0.54-Openssl_0.9.8
*   Tomcat-5.5.12
*   Oracle 8i

 

Hoping to get advice soon.

 

Thanks

 

Regards

Pawan



This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - 
www.blackspider.com

Re: FW: Cant find User Account Lockout feature in Tomcat-5.5.12

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists]

you could extend and implement your own realm that would take care of this.

Filip


Pawan Dandawate wrote:

Hi there

 


I am in need to implement User Account Lockout for 30 minutes after 3
incorrect login attempts using Tomcat. I did achieve this (Setting
Lockout Attributes for User Accounts) in the past on BEA WebLogic
Application Server server by setting following attributes -

 


*   Lockout Enabled
*   Lockout Threshold
*   Lockout Duration
*   Lockout Reset Duration

 


Unfortunately, it appears there are no corresponding attributes in
Tomcat. Could you please point me any documentation or link or suggest
me how can I achieve this.

 


My environment is:

 


*   Windows XP
*   jdk1.5.0_06
*   Apache_2.0.54-Openssl_0.9.8
*   Tomcat-5.5.12
*   Oracle 8i

 


Hoping to get advice soon.

 


Thanks

 


Regards

Pawan



This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - 
www.blackspider.com

  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FW: Cant find User Account Lockout feature in Tomcat-5.5.12

[Pawan Dandawate]

Hi Filip

I was wondering exactly that. I think I would need to extend
DataSourceRealm to achieve User account lockout. Not sure how to proceed
but I think extending DataSourceRealm adding more attributes will
suffice.

If you think few pointers in the right direction will help, please do
let me know to approach doing this.

Thanks and I appreciate your quick response.

Cheers
Pawan

-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 19 April 2006 17:09
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: FW: Cant find User Account Lockout feature in Tomcat-5.5.12

you could extend and implement your own realm that would take care of
this.

Filip


Pawan Dandawate wrote:
> Hi there
>
>  
>
> I am in need to implement User Account Lockout for 30 minutes after 3
> incorrect login attempts using Tomcat. I did achieve this (Setting
> Lockout Attributes for User Accounts) in the past on BEA WebLogic
> Application Server server by setting following attributes -
>
>  
>
> * Lockout Enabled
> * Lockout Threshold
> * Lockout Duration
> * Lockout Reset Duration
>
>  
>
> Unfortunately, it appears there are no corresponding attributes in
> Tomcat. Could you please point me any documentation or link or suggest
> me how can I achieve this.
>
>  
>
> My environment is:
>
>  
>
> * Windows XP
> * jdk1.5.0_06
> * Apache_2.0.54-Openssl_0.9.8
> * Tomcat-5.5.12
> * Oracle 8i
>
>  
>
> Hoping to get advice soon.
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
>  
>
> Regards
>
> Pawan
>
>
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl -
www.blackspider.com
>
>   


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39356] New: - Better logging for Catalina Startup when error parsing XML files.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39356

   Summary: Better logging for Catalina Startup when error parsing
XML files.
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.9
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P1
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Below is a stacktrace of a startup of Tomcat 5.5.9.  You will notice that the 
startup failed due to invalid XML parsing.  This is clearly a user error.  
However, the logging is very vague as to which XML file it was trying to 
parse.  Shouldn't this type of severe error (Tomcat blew out with access 
violation due to this) produce a better description of where the error 
ocurred?  There is no way to know if it was the $tomcat_home/conf/web.xml or an 
application specific web.xml.


INFO: ContextListener: contextInitialized()
Apr 19, 2006 10:58:21 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log
INFO: SessionListener: contextInitialized()
Apr 19, 2006 10:58:22 AM org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester fatalError
SEVERE: Parse Fatal Error at line 44 column 24: The element type "servlet" must 
be terminated by the matching end-tag "".
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The element type "servlet" must be terminated by 
the matching end-tag "".
at org.apache.xerces.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException
(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.fatalError(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLScanner.reportFatalError(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanEndElement
(Unknown Source)
at 
org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.
dispatch(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument
(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester.parse(Digester.java:1561)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig.applicationWebConfig
(ContextConfig.java:339)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig.start
(ContextConfig.java:1031)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig.lifecycleEvent
(ContextConfig.java:255)
at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent
(LifecycleSupport.java:119)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start
(StandardContext.java:4053)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal
(ContainerBase.java:759)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild
(ContainerBase.java:739)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:524)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDirectory
(HostConfig.java:894)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDirectories
(HostConfig.java:857)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps
(HostConfig.java:475)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.start(HostConfig.java:1102)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.lifecycleEvent
(HostConfig.java:311)
at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent
(LifecycleSupport.java:119)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1020)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:718)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1012)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start
(StandardEngine.java:442)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start
(StandardService.java:450)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start
(StandardServer.java:683)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:537)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:271)
at org.a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39356] - Better logging for Catalina Startup when error parsing XML files.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39356





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 16:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=18138)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18138&action=view)
Full stack trace


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39350] - No kerberos auth with JK1 in IIS (ticketsize)

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39350


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|tomcat- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
 Status|NEEDINFO|NEW




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39358] New: - tomcat can not support the JAASRealm definition with character "$" in the class name.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39358

   Summary: tomcat can not support the JAASRealm definition with
character "$" in the class name.
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.0.30
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


If define a Realm like this in context.xml in META-INF folder, it will read 
the class as "test.SecurityComponentImpl\InternalUserPrincipal" not the 
one "test.SecurityComponentImpl$InternalUserPrincipal". so 
JAASRealm.createPrincipal() method will always return null; then the user will 
never login into the system.



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39356] - Better logging for Catalina Startup when error parsing XML files.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39356


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 17:05 ---
Apr 19, 2006 10:58:22 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig
applicationWebConfig
-> processing web.xml
SEVERE: Context [/webdav] startup failed due to previous errors
-> you know which web application caused the problem

As for the JVM crash, you should report it to your JVM vendor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39356] - Better logging for Catalina Startup when error parsing XML files.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39356


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 17:09 ---
The web.xml file that was causing the problem was not webdav/web.xml.  That was 
just a severe warning that the context did not start up due to previous 
errors.  I know the "problem" web.xml, but I had to figure it out by reviewing 
all web.xml file(s).  I understand the VM crash needs to be sent to vendor.

Thank you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Yoav Shapira wrote:


Hola,
I don't mind changing the process, but as the other Bill noted, what
we've been doing for a while is:



The process never changed: originally, I was releasing builds (= alpha 
equivalents) that were then voted as "alpha, beta or stable" in a single 
subsequent vote. This AFAIK is compliant with the ASF releases rules.


Yes, as long as it is not announced as the release, but announced as the
candidate, tarball, what have you.  I noted specifically that Yoav sent this
to announce@ which is definately verboten, pre vote.

We vote on tarballs, fwiw, we don't vote on tree-stability.  I've been slammed
for trying to do just that by the original policy authors :)

Not trying to create waves here, but just make everyone aware (as I did about
a year ago on one of Mladen's candidates) what the policy is, for the protection
of whomever voulenteers to RM a release!

The process of voting is the action the ASF board designated for the project/ASF
to collectively assume responsibility for what goes 'out the door'.  Once those
three +1's (more +1 than -1) are collected, the project *assumes* responsibility
for the end result, and it's no longer the RM's result, it's an ASF result.

Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[Yoav Shapira]

Bill,

> Yes, as long as it is not announced as the release, but announced as the
> candidate, tarball, what have you.  I noted specifically that Yoav sent this
> to announce@ which is definately verboten, pre vote.

This might be a nitpick, but I believe I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache.org
address.  The apachenews.org site, as you know, is a sort of news site
for Apache events (not just final releases), operated by Tetsuya who's
an ASF member.  Its audience and purpose are quite different from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  I wonder if that caused some confusion?

(The rest of your message is understood, agreed)
Yoav

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38483] - access log valve uses simpledateformat in tread-unsafe way

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38483





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-19 19:13 ---
No, I cannot provide a patch.
Simple code example: (not the real format)

static final ThreadLocal DF_TL = new ThreadLocal() {
protected Object initialValue() {
return new SimpleDateFormat("-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS");
}
};

static String df(long t) {
SimpleDateFormat DF = (SimpleDateFormat)DF_TL.get();
return t<=0 ? "-" : DF.format(new Date(t));
}


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

[Abhi Karmos]

Hello all,

Sorry, could not find an answer on tomcat-users.

We run tomcat inside an embedded system and we are planning to upgrade the
tomcat version from 3.3.1 to 5.5.16. We noticed that the memory footprint of
a barebones tomcat 5.5 installation is 44 MB. Plain and simple Tomcat 3.3
used to run with 25 MB. We have limited memory on our system and the memory
usage of tomcat 5.5 is a concern for us.

The numbers above are the resident set size (RSS) on a linux system. When we
took the above numbers, both the tomcats had the same heap setting (min:
25 - max: 30 mb).

When we run our webapps, which add another 20 jars in the classpath, the
steady state memory usage is 50 MB with Tomcat 3.3 and 66 MB with Tomcat
5.5.

Has anyone else solved a similar problem before ? Can I try and tweak tomcat
5.5 to run in less memory ? Our server.xml is the minimal configuration
possible.

Regards,
Abhi.

OS: Linux / RedHat 7.3
JVM: IBM 1.4.2 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Yoav Shapira wrote:

Bill,



Yes, as long as it is not announced as the release, but announced as the
candidate, tarball, what have you.  I noted specifically that Yoav sent this
to announce@ which is definately verboten, pre vote.



This might be a nitpick, but I believe I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache.org
address.  The apachenews.org site, as you know, is a sort of news site
for Apache events (not just final releases), operated by Tetsuya who's
an ASF member.  Its audience and purpose are quite different from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  I wonder if that caused some confusion?


Yes (I misread it) and no, it must not be broadcast to users@, or any
external list, until the PMC approves it... rereading from apachenews.

April 15, 2006
15 April 2006 - Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

The Apache Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability of Tomcat 
v5.5.17-beta.


I would say the team did not announce this (there was no vote) but YS announced
this.  I know this seems like a longwinded thread over a silly nit, but there is
most definately a legal difference, and I just want to ensure all of our members
and committers protect themselves :)


(The rest of your message is understood, agreed)


 :)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Memory usage Tomcat 3.3 vs 5.5

[Henri Gomez]

We're also using TC 3.3 on our production systems and are switching to TC 5.5.

The memory penalty is real but you'll be using up to date and actively
maintained stuff with TC 5.5.

Also you could try to reduce the AJP13 / HTTP 11 threads and remove
some JMX Listeners

2006/4/19, Abhi Karmos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Sorry, could not find an answer on tomcat-users.
>
> We run tomcat inside an embedded system and we are planning to upgrade the
> tomcat version from 3.3.1 to 5.5.16. We noticed that the memory footprint of
> a barebones tomcat 5.5 installation is 44 MB. Plain and simple Tomcat 3.3
> used to run with 25 MB. We have limited memory on our system and the memory
> usage of tomcat 5.5 is a concern for us.
>
> The numbers above are the resident set size (RSS) on a linux system. When we
> took the above numbers, both the tomcats had the same heap setting (min:
> 25 - max: 30 mb).
>
> When we run our webapps, which add another 20 jars in the classpath, the
> steady state memory usage is 50 MB with Tomcat 3.3 and 66 MB with Tomcat
> 5.5.
>
> Has anyone else solved a similar problem before ? Can I try and tweak tomcat
> 5.5 to run in less memory ? Our server.xml is the minimal configuration
> possible.
>
> Regards,
> Abhi.
>
> OS: Linux / RedHat 7.3
> JVM: IBM 1.4.2
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Possible Summer of Code Ideas

[Henri Gomez]

Well working on a more sofisticated load-balancing front end (using jk
in Apache 2.x or another Tomcat 5.5) could be usefull also.

This kind of load-balancing front end should be able to get load from
the Apache clusters and send requests to the less loaded Tomcat for
example

2006/4/19, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Excellent, thanks.
>
> Yoav
>
> On 4/19/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd be happy to mentor this project with you, although I am gonna
> > suggest a couple other projects.
> >
> > Filip
> >
> >
> > Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I've added one possible project to the proposals for SoC2006: see
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2006.  I'd love for Filip
> > > and/or Peter to mentor this project with me (or even instead of me
> > > ;)), since they know a lot more about the relevant code.
> > > Alternatively, if anyone thinks this is a bad project proposal, I
> > > don't mind modifying or scraping it... And if you have more ideas,
> > > cool, I'm gladly willing to mentor them -- just add to the wiki page
> > > above.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Yoav Shapira
> > > Nimalex LLC
> > > 1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
> > > Cambridge, MA, USA
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Yoav Shapira
> Nimalex LLC
> 1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
> Cambridge, MA, USA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[Yoav Shapira]

Hi,

OK, no problem.  So what's our consensus process going forward?  Same
as before but with a formal vote to cut the release, and same
announcements but calling it a "release  candidate" instead of a
"release" ?

Yoav

On 4/19/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> >
> >>Yes, as long as it is not announced as the release, but announced as the
> >>candidate, tarball, what have you.  I noted specifically that Yoav sent this
> >>to announce@ which is definately verboten, pre vote.
> >
> >
> > This might be a nitpick, but I believe I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache.org
> > address.  The apachenews.org site, as you know, is a sort of news site
> > for Apache events (not just final releases), operated by Tetsuya who's
> > an ASF member.  Its audience and purpose are quite different from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I wonder if that caused some confusion?
>
> Yes (I misread it) and no, it must not be broadcast to users@, or any
> external list, until the PMC approves it... rereading from apachenews.
>
> April 15, 2006
> 15 April 2006 - Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available
>
> The Apache Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability of 
> Tomcat
> v5.5.17-beta.
>
> I would say the team did not announce this (there was no vote) but YS 
> announced
> this.  I know this seems like a longwinded thread over a silly nit, but there 
> is
> most definately a legal difference, and I just want to ensure all of our 
> members
> and committers protect themselves :)
>
> > (The rest of your message is understood, agreed)
>
>   :)
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Yoav Shapira
Nimalex LLC
1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
Cambridge, MA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39356] - Better logging for Catalina Startup when error parsing XML files.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39356


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat v5.5.17-beta Now Available

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Yoav Shapira wrote:

Hi,

OK, no problem.  So what's our consensus process going forward?  Same
as before but with a formal vote to cut the release, and same
announcements but calling it a "release  candidate" instead of a
"release" ?


0. usual banter asking 'suppose trunk|branch x is good to go?'

1. roll a tarball

2. post to dev voting to release the package (as alpha/beta/final if you like).

3. tally, -then- post to users, announce'es etc (calling for an upgraded
   beta/final designation if you want the public to comment, nonbinding).

4. if you like, vote as a pmc to accept the new designation (or count pmc's
   votes on the thread 3. above), choosing it's 'final designation'.

Almost exactly what you do now, but the vote preceeds the 'team announces the
release of' post.

W.r.t. 5.5.17, get the vote done, I wouldn't bother with any special handling
at this point :)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r395417 [2/2] - in /tomcat: connectors/trunk/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4/ container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/conf/ container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/share/org/apac

[markt]

Modified: 
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/connector/SaveConnectorAction.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/connector/SaveConnectorAction.java?rev=395417&r1=395416&r2=395417&view=diff
==
--- 
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/connector/SaveConnectorAction.java
 (original)
+++ 
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/connector/SaveConnectorAction.java
 Wed Apr 19 15:47:14 2006
@@ -236,21 +236,21 @@
 new Attribute(attribute, new Integer(debug)));
 
 attribute = "acceptCount";
-int acceptCount = 6;
+int acceptCount = 10;
 try {
 acceptCount = Integer.parseInt(cform.getAcceptCountText());
 } catch (Throwable t) {
-acceptCount = 6;
+acceptCount = 10;
 }
 mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
 new Attribute(attribute, new Integer(acceptCount)));
 
 attribute = "connectionTimeout";
-int connectionTimeout = 0;
+int connectionTimeout = 6;
 try {
 connectionTimeout = 
Integer.parseInt(cform.getConnTimeOutText());
 } catch (Throwable t) {
-connectionTimeout = 0;
+connectionTimeout = 6;
 }
 mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
 new Attribute(attribute, new Integer(connectionTimeout)));
@@ -271,42 +271,52 @@
   new Boolean(cform.getEnableLookups(; 
   
 
 attribute = "redirectPort";
-int redirectPort = 0;
+int redirectPort = 443;
 try {
 redirectPort = Integer.parseInt(cform.getRedirectPortText());
 } catch (Throwable t) {
-redirectPort = 0;
+redirectPort = 443;
 }
 mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
 new Attribute(attribute, new Integer(redirectPort))); 
 
 attribute = "minProcessors";
-int minProcessors = 5;
+int minProcessors = 4;
 try {
 minProcessors = Integer.parseInt(cform.getMinProcessorsText());
 } catch (Throwable t) {
-minProcessors = 5;
+minProcessors = 4;
 }
 mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
 new Attribute(attribute, new Integer(minProcessors))); 
 
 attribute = "maxProcessors";
-int maxProcessors = 20;
+int maxProcessors = 200;
 try {
 maxProcessors = Integer.parseInt(cform.getMaxProcessorsText());
 } catch (Throwable t) {
-maxProcessors = 20;
+maxProcessors = 200;
 }
 mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
 new Attribute(attribute, new Integer(maxProcessors)));
 
+attribute = "maxSpareProcessors";
+int maxSpareProcessors = 50;
+try {
+maxSpareProcessors =
+Integer.parseInt(cform.getMaxSpareProcessorsText());
+} catch (Throwable t) {
+maxSpareProcessors = 50;
+}
+mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
+new Attribute(attribute, new Integer(maxSpareProcessors)));
+
 attribute = "URIEncoding";
 String uriEnc = cform.getURIEncodingText();
 if ((uriEnc != null) && (uriEnc.length()==0)) {
 uriEnc = null;
 }
-mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
-  new Attribute(attribute, uriEnc));
+mBServer.setAttribute(coname, new Attribute(attribute, uriEnc));
 
 attribute = "useBodyEncodingForURI";
 mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
@@ -318,8 +328,94 @@
 new Attribute(attribute,
 new Boolean(cform.getAllowTraceText(;
   
-// proxy name and port do not exist for AJP connector
-if (!("AJP".equalsIgnoreCase(connectorType))) {
+attribute = "compressableMimeType";  
+mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
+new Attribute(attribute, 
cform.getCompressableMimeType()));
+
+attribute = "compression";  
+mBServer.setAttribute(coname,
+new Attribute(attribute, cform.getCompression())); 
   
+
+attribute = "connectionLinger";
+int connectionLinger = -1;
+

svn commit: r395431 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default

[markt]

Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 19 16:15:11 2006
New Revision: 395431

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395431&view=rev
Log:
Update libs to latest versions

Modified:
tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default

Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default?rev=395431&r1=395430&r2=395431&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default (original)
+++ tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default Wed Apr 19 
16:15:11 2006
@@ -77,10 +77,10 @@
 
 
 # - Commons FileUpload, version 1.0 or later -
-commons-fileupload.home=${base.path}/commons-fileupload-1.0
+commons-fileupload.home=${base.path}/commons-fileupload-1.1
 commons-fileupload.lib=${commons-fileupload.home}
-commons-fileupload.jar=${commons-fileupload.lib}/commons-fileupload-1.0.jar
-commons-fileupload.loc=${base-jakarta.loc}/commons/fileupload/binaries/commons-fileupload-1.0.tar.gz
+commons-fileupload.jar=${commons-fileupload.lib}/commons-fileupload-1.1.jar
+commons-fileupload.loc=${base-jakarta.loc}/commons/fileupload/binaries/commons-fileupload-1.1.tar.gz
 
 
 # - Commons Logging, version 1.0.1 or later -
@@ -130,9 +130,9 @@
 
 # - Xerces XML Parser, version 2.0.0 or later -
 # Note: Optional with JDK 1.4+, or if Xerces 1.x is present
-xerces.home=${base.path}/xerces-2_7_1
+xerces.home=${base.path}/xerces-2_8_0
 xerces.lib=${xerces.home}
-xerces.loc=http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-j/Xerces-J-bin.2.7.1.tar.gz
+xerces.loc=http://www.apache.org/dist/xml/xerces-j/Xerces-J-bin.2.8.0.tar.gz
 xercesImpl.jar=${xerces.lib}/xercesImpl.jar
 xmlParserAPIs.jar=${xerces.lib}/xmlParserAPIs.jar
 
@@ -164,10 +164,10 @@
 
 
 # - Commons Pool, version 1.0 or later -
-commons-pool.home=${base.path}/commons-pool-1.2
+commons-pool.home=${base.path}/commons-pool-1.3
 commons-pool.lib=${commons-pool.home}
-commons-pool.jar=${commons-pool.lib}/commons-pool-1.2.jar
-commons-pool.loc=${base-jakarta.loc}/commons/pool/binaries/commons-pool-1.2.tar.gz
+commons-pool.jar=${commons-pool.lib}/commons-pool-1.3.jar
+commons-pool.loc=${base-jakarta.loc}/commons/pool/binaries/commons-pool-1.3.tar.gz
 
 
 # - Java Database Connectivity (JDBC) Optional Package, version 2.0 -
@@ -223,10 +223,10 @@
 
 
 # - Struts, version 1.2.4 or later -
-struts.home=${base.path}/struts-1.2.8-bin
+struts.home=${base.path}/struts-1.2.9-bin
 struts.lib=${struts.home}/lib
 struts.jar=${struts.lib}/struts.jar
-struts.loc=http://archive.apache.org/dist/struts/binaries/struts-1.2.8-bin.tar.gz
+struts.loc=http://archive.apache.org/dist/struts/binaries/struts-1.2.9-bin.tar.gz
 
 # - Tyrex Data Source, version 1.0 or later -
 # Now tyrex is http://tyrex.sourceforge.net/



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39358] - tomcat can not support the JAASRealm definition with character "$" in the class name.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39358





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-20 05:03 ---
Sorry, after the parsing, it will remove the character "$" not replace it 
with "\".

and I found that there is defect in  IntrospectionUtils.replaceProperties() 
method.

this method is used for replease ${NAME} with the property value, but if the 
string is like this "test.SecurityComponentImpl$InternalUserPrincipal", it 
also will remove the "$" character.

That's the reason for this defect.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39358] - tomcat can not support the JAASRealm definition with character "$" in the class name.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39358





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-20 05:25 ---
This is solved in tomcat 5.5.17,  i think.

if (pos == (value.length() - 1)) {
sb.append('$');
prev = pos + 1;
} else if (value.charAt(pos + 1) != '{') {
sb.append('$');
prev = pos + 1; // XXX
} else {
...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]