DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37491] - isapi 1.2.15 connector when configured on IIS5.0(W2000) with "isapi_redirect.properties" shows an error "The parameter is incorrect"

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37491


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37491] - isapi 1.2.15 connector when configured on IIS5.0(W2000) with "isapi_redirect.properties" shows an error "The parameter is incorrect"

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37491





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 10:11 ---
The latest isapi_redirect.dll of November 8th 2005 build has resolved this 
problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37523] - Virtual Host ROOT context ignores docBase value

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37523


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 11:15 ---
Well, sorry, this is as expected. If the webapp is inside the host's appBase,
then docBase is fixed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37524] New: - find mindepth and maxdepth Parameters in relink Script

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37524

   Summary: find mindepth and maxdepth Parameters in relink Script
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.0.30
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Native:Integration
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I have installed version 5.0.30-8jpp of the Tomcat 5 RPM from JPackage.org on
Fedora Core 4.

When I start the tomcat5 service, I get the following warnings from find (RPM
version 4.2.20-1):

find: warning: you have specified the -mindepth option after a non-option
argument -type, but options are not positional (-mindepth affects tests
specified before it as well as those specified after it).  Please specify
options before other arguments.

find: warning: you have specified the -maxdepth option after a non-option
argument -type, but options are not positional (-maxdepth affects tests
specified before it as well as those specified after it).  Please specify
options before other arguments.

These are caused by /usr/share/tomcat5/bin/relink. Changing the find invocation 
from

find /var/lib/tomcat5/webapps -type d -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 2

to

find /var/lib/tomcat5/webapps -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 2 -type d

fixes this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33453] - Jasper should recompile JSP files whose datestamps change in either direction (not just newer)

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 15:42 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Created an attachment (id=16599)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16599&action=view) 
[edit]
> rebuilt jasper-compiler.jar
> 
> Here is a rebuilt jasper-compiler.jar that incorporates my proposed patch.  
> For
> anyone who needs a fix and doesn't want to download, patch, and rebuild.

Hello Jonathan,

i've tried tu use your jasper-compiler.jar into TC 5.5.12, because we have a
problem to make Tomcat reload and compile modified JSPs on fly, but an exception
is thrown when Jasper try to compile the JSP.

i haven't try to patch an rebuilt yet.

Here is the root cause of the stack trace, it seem like an import from an
Eclipse library :

java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.env.NameEnvironmentAnswer.(Lorg/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/env/IBinaryType;)V
org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler$1.findType(JDTCompiler.java:214)
org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler$1.findType(JDTCompiler.java:183)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.LookupEnvironment.askForType(LookupEnvironment.java:119)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.PackageBinding.getTypeOrPackage(PackageBinding.java:178)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.Scope.getPackage(Scope.java:2111)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.QualifiedTypeReference.getTypeBinding(QualifiedTypeReference.java:62)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.TypeReference.resolveType(TypeReference.java:141)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.TypeReference.resolveSuperType(TypeReference.java:104)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ClassScope.findSupertype(ClassScope.java:1088)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ClassScope.connectSuperclass(ClassScope.java:755)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ClassScope.connectTypeHierarchy(ClassScope.java:927)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.CompilationUnitScope.connectTypeHierarchy(CompilationUnitScope.java:254)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.LookupEnvironment.completeTypeBindings(LookupEnvironment.java:195)

org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.Compiler.beginToCompile(Compiler.java:301)
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:315)

org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler.generateClass(JDTCompiler.java:387)
org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:288)
org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:267)
org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:255)

org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java:557)

org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:293)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:291)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37491] - isapi 1.2.15 connector when configured on IIS5.0(W2000) with "isapi_redirect.properties" shows an error "The parameter is incorrect"

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37491


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|WORKSFORME  |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 16:12 ---
The issue persists when trying to configure isapi 1.2.15 connector 
with "isapi_redirect.properties" overriding the registry entries 
under "//SOFTWARE//Apache Software Foundation//1.0"

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37491] - isapi 1.2.15 connector when configured on IIS5.0(W2000) with "isapi_redirect.properties" shows an error "The parameter is incorrect"

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37491





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 16:17 ---
The registry entries were actually under "SOFTWARE//Apache Software 
Foundation//Jakarta Isapi Redirector//1.0"

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33453] - Jasper should recompile JSP files whose datestamps change in either direction (not just newer)

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 17:05 ---
Fabien,

The jasper-compiler.jar I built was against 5.5.9, I think that's the problem. 
It should work just fine if you patch and rebuild.

-Jonathan

(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #28)
> > Created an attachment (id=16599)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16599&action=view) 
[edit] [edit]
> > rebuilt jasper-compiler.jar
> > 
> > Here is a rebuilt jasper-compiler.jar that incorporates my proposed patch.  
> > For
> > anyone who needs a fix and doesn't want to download, patch, and rebuild.
> 
> Hello Jonathan,
> 
> i've tried tu use your jasper-compiler.jar into TC 5.5.12, because we have a
> problem to make Tomcat reload and compile modified JSPs on fly, but an 
> exception
> is thrown when Jasper try to compile the JSP.
> 
> i haven't try to patch an rebuilt yet.
> 
> Here is the root cause of the stack trace, it seem like an import from an
> Eclipse library :
> 
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.env.NameEnvironmentAnswer.(Lorg/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/env/IBinaryType;)V
>   org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler$1.findType(JDTCompiler.java:214)
>   org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler$1.findType(JDTCompiler.java:183)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.LookupEnvironment.askForType(LookupEnvironment.java:119)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.PackageBinding.getTypeOrPackage(PackageBinding.java:178)
>   
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.Scope.getPackage(Scope.java:2111)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.QualifiedTypeReference.getTypeBinding(QualifiedTypeReference.java:62)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.TypeReference.resolveType(TypeReference.java:141)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.TypeReference.resolveSuperType(TypeReference.java:104)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ClassScope.findSupertype(ClassScope.java:1088)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ClassScope.connectSuperclass(ClassScope.java:755)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ClassScope.connectTypeHierarchy(ClassScope.java:927)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.CompilationUnitScope.connectTypeHierarchy(CompilationUnitScope.java:254)
> 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.LookupEnvironment.completeTypeBindings(LookupEnvironment.java:195)
>   
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.Compiler.beginToCompile(Compiler.java:301)
>   org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:315)
>   
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler.generateClass(JDTCompiler.java:387)
>   org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:288)
>   org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:267)
>   org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:255)
>   
> org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java:557)
>   
> org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:293)
>   org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:291)
>   org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241)
>   javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

bug #36852

2005-11-16 Thread Matt Brinkley 
Hey there,
 Back in September, I entered a bug (36852) concerning incorrect behavior
when a  element is nested inside a  element. I spent a fair
bit of time tracing through the tomcat source code, and included a proposed
fix that is very minimal (two or three lines of code.) I have been running
with this fix in my environment for a couple months now, and it works just
great.
 The bug is still in the NEW state, and I am very eager to get my fix
incorporated into Tomcat proper so I can use the latest official builds
rather than my one-off build. I think the fix is very straightforward ... is
there some reason why it hasn't been applied yet, or is there any way that
it can be applied in an upcoming minor release?
 Thanks so much, and thanks for maintaing such a great product!
--matt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37529] New: - Tomcat take a long time to stop when configured for clustering

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37529

   Summary: Tomcat take a long time to stop when configured for
clustering
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.12
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Catalina:Cluster
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On my Linux system (Fedore Core 3) running Java 1.4.2_06, when I configure
tomcat to use SimpleTcpCluster, then when I try to shutdown tomcat, the shutdown
take a long time to complete and finally stops with an error as show in this log
excerpt:

2005-11-15 13:48:44,202 INFO  Pausing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-
2005-11-15 13:48:44,202 INFO  Pausing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8444
2005-11-15 13:48:45,205 INFO  Stopping service Catalina
2005-11-15 13:48:45,206 INFO  Manager [/flexnet] expiring sessions upon shutdown
2005-11-15 13:48:45,781 INFO  Stopped ClusterSender at cluster
Catalina:type=Cluster,host=localhost with name
Catalina:type=ClusterSender,host=localhost
2005-11-15 13:50:50,440 INFO  Stopping Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-
2005-11-15 13:50:50,440 INFO  Stopping Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8444
2005-11-15 13:50:50,448 ERROR Unable to process request in ReplicationListener
java.nio.channels.ClosedSelectorException
at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:55)
at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:70)
at
org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ReplicationListener.listen(ReplicationListener.java:130)
at
org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ClusterReceiverBase.run(ClusterReceiverBase.java:394)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
2005-11-15 13:50:50,472 ERROR Unable to start cluster listener.
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ReplicationListener.listen(ReplicationListener.java:182)
at
org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ClusterReceiverBase.run(ClusterReceiverBase.java:394)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

Notice the long delay between stopping the ClusterSender and stopping Coyote.

This is apparently caused by a bug in Java 1.4.2 with closing a Selector when
there are selects active on it.

There is a simple fix to
org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ReplicationListener.stopListening:

--- ReplicationListener.java2005-11-16 09:02:50.055300180 -0800
+++ ReplicationListener.java.fix2005-11-16 09:02:45.017605588 -0800
@@ -187,8 +187,11 @@
  * @see org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ClusterReceiverBase#stopListening()
 */
 protected void stopListening(){
+doListen = false;
 if ( selector != null ) {
 try {
+for ( int i = 0; i < getTcpThreadCount(); i++ )
+selector.wakeup();
 selector.close();
 } catch ( Exception x ) {
 log.error("Unable to close cluster receiver selector.",x);
@@ -196,7 +199,6 @@
 selector = null;
 }
 }
-doListen = false;
}

Basically move the 'doListen = false' to the top of the method to avoid a race
condition that causes the Exceptions (selector.listen may be called while the
close is in progress and the selector may be set to null while the listener
threads are still looping.  The loop to call selector.wakeup() once for each
thread before calling selector.close() works around the Java bug with closing
while selects are in progress.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37530] New: - IOException on startup when a "keyAlias" attribute is specified

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37530

   Summary: IOException on startup when a "keyAlias" attribute is
specified
   Product: Tomcat 5
   Version: 5.5.9
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Keywords: ErrorMessage
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: Connector:HTTP
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Using this connector definition




Tomcat throws this exception upon startup.

Nov 16, 2005 9:07:18 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
SEVERE: Catalina.start: 
LifecycleException:  Protocol handler start failed: java.io.IOException: Alias n
ame certificate.qa does not identify a key entry
at org.apache.catalina.connector.Connector.start(Connector.java:1003)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:4
59)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:683
)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:537)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
sorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:271)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:409)

Yet a keytool -list shows that the alias specified is, indeed, valid

Keystore type: jks
Keystore provider: SUN

Your keystore contains 6 entries

   certificate, Nov 1, 2005, keyEntry,
   Certificate fingerprint (MD5): 
65:5B:79:54:E5:83:D0:81:9D:AD:F9:C1:5C:65:BF:3D
   ipgrootca, Nov 1, 2005, trustedCertEntry,
   Certificate fingerprint (MD5): 
49:5A:FC:06:6B:04:7C:F7:96:6F:90:1C:E1:91:79:77
   certificate.prod, Nov 11, 2005, keyEntry,
   Certificate fingerprint (MD5): 
3C:9E:3D:30:B0:7E:65:B1:A2:0E:8C:0A:22:E4:FA:69
   certificate.dev, Nov 1, 2005, keyEntry,
   Certificate fingerprint (MD5): 
84:31:D2:DF:1C:28:D6:81:43:1A:D9:57:47:6E:67:AB
   zap2itlabsca, Nov 1, 2005, trustedCertEntry,
   Certificate fingerprint (MD5): 
C3:E3:EE:9D:6C:5C:DF:E3:F9:94:8B:9B:5E:C5:58:16
>> certificate.qa, Nov 11, 2005, keyEntry,
>> Certificate fingerprint (MD5): 
>> 8A:EF:CF:2C:B6:D8:B5:4D:AB:40:0A:C6:9B:9F:E6:FC


The problem is at line 142 of the file JSSE14SocketFactory.java:

if (keyAlias != null && !ks.isKeyEntry(keyAlias)) {
throw new IOException(sm.getString("jsse.alias_no_key_entry", 
keyAlias));
}

I don't believe that isKeyEntry() is correct test in this case. I changed line 
142 to read

if (keyAlias != null && !ks.containsAlias(keyAlias)) {
throw new IOException(sm.getString("jsse.alias_no_key_entry", 
keyAlias));
}

And compiled a new tomcat-util.jar. My tomcat instance started and selected the 
proper
certificate.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36852] - Custom Webapp loaders don't correctly honor context's privileged="true" attribute

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36852


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 19:35 ---
Matt's tested this fix for a few weeks now, said it looks fine in a message on
the dev list.  It seems reasonable to be as well, will apply.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r345090 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/ContextRuleSet.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2005-11-16 Thread yoavs 
Author: yoavs
Date: Wed Nov 16 10:51:09 2005
New Revision: 345090

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345090&view=rev
Log:
Bugzilla 36852: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36852

Modified:

tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/ContextRuleSet.java
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Modified: 
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/ContextRuleSet.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/ContextRuleSet.java?rev=345090&r1=345089&r2=345090&view=diff
==
--- 
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/ContextRuleSet.java
 (original)
+++ 
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/ContextRuleSet.java
 Wed Nov 16 10:51:09 2005
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /*
- * Copyright 1999-2001,2004 The Apache Software Foundation.
+ * Copyright 1999-2001,2004-2005 The Apache Software Foundation.
  * 
  * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
  * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
@@ -251,6 +251,12 @@
 Object ojb = digester.peek();
 if (ojb instanceof Container) {
 parentClassLoader = ((Container)ojb).getParentClassLoader();
+}
+
+// Bugzilla 36852: 
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36852
+if((ojb instanceof org.apache.catalina.Context) &&
+   (((org.apache.catalina.Context) ojb).getPrivileged())) {
+parentClassLoader = ojb.getClass().getClassLoader();
 }
 
 // Instantiate a new Loader implementation object

Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml?rev=345090&r1=345089&r2=345090&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Wed Nov 16 10:51:09 2005
@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@
   
 Update JAF dependency to 1.0.2, JTA to 1.0.1b and JavaMail to 
1.3.3_01. (markt)
   
+  
+Added Eclipse .project, .classpath, and associated files to make 
building Tomcat from
+Eclipse significantly easier. (markt)
+  
 
   
   
@@ -71,6 +75,10 @@
   
 37319: Fix catalina.bat reference to CATALINA_BASE for 
logging.properties.  Thanks
 to Pierre-Yves Benzaken. (yoavs)
+  
+  
+36852: Custom classloaders don't honor Contet privileged 
attribute.  Thanks to
+Matt Brinkley for the analysis and patch. (yoavs)
   
 
   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36852] - Custom Webapp loaders don't correctly honor context's privileged="true" attribute

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36852


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 19:51 ---
Fixed for 5.5.13.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35827] - Problem with POST forms with jk connector/IIS/WindowsXP

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35827


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 19:54 ---
Have recent versions (1.2.15 is the latest right now) addressed this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29494] - No way to set PATH when running as a service on Windows

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29494





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 20:07 ---
My guess (just a guess) would be adding --path /your/path/to/whatever to the
relevant %EXECUTABLE% line in service.bat.  That's how all the other parameters
are passed to the service...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37248] - OutOfMemoryError does not trigger load balancer failover

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37248


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 20:12 ---
An OOME leads in general to an unspecified JVM state: OS-level stuff, like port
communications, may still work, but Tomcat will generally respond with 500-class
errors or hang.  mod_jk is not setup to detect the type of internal JVM error
and act accordingly.  If you want mod_jk to be enhanced to do this, feel free to
reopen this item as an enhancement request (not a bug), and I wouldn't suggest
holding your breath...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37470] - mod_jk doesn�t scale well with hundreds of sites - interferes with CGI handling

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37470


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 20:15 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37469 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37469] - mod_jk doesn�t scale well with hundreds of sites - interferes with CGI handling

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37469





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 20:15 ---
*** Bug 37470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37471] - Can not delete a Context from Admin Tool

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37471


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 20:16 ---
Deleting a Context is not a good idea anyways: a Context is a Web Application. 
It should be stopped and undeployed from the Manager, not deleted from the Admin
webapp.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29494] - No way to set PATH when running as a service on Windows

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29494





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 20:32 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> My guess (just a guess) would be adding --path /your/path/to/whatever to the
> relevant %EXECUTABLE% line in service.bat.  That's how all the other 
parameters
> are passed to the service...

It's supposed to be:
  --Environment 'PATH=c:\windows;c:\windows\system32;c:\wherever'

but I haven't tried using it recently.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37524] - find mindepth and maxdepth Parameters in relink Script

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37524


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 21:29 ---
This is a packaging issue. The Tomcat team has no control over this. Try
JPackage.org.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37277] - long delay in Tomcat startup

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37277





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 21:32 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Thread dump on the windows system can be achieved by typing Control+Break.

I started Tomcat using Tomcat5.exe in a command window, so that it would be
available for Ctrl+Break.
When I press Ctrl+Break, nothing happens.
When I press Ctrl+C, I get the following stack trace:

Nov 16, 2005 2:15:33 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina stopServer
SEVERE: Catalina.stop:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(Unknown Source)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(Unknown Source)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(Unknown Source)
at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(Unknown Source)
at java.net.Socket.connect(Unknown Source)
at java.net.Socket.connect(Unknown Source)
at java.net.Socket.(Unknown Source)
at java.net.Socket.(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.stopServer(Catalina.java:394)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.stopServer(Bootstrap.java:320)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:411)
- VM shutting down with the disk store for cocoon-ehcache-1 still active. The di
sk store is persistent. Calling dispose...

FWIW, the output of tomcat5.exe up to where it hung ended with:

- Ignored element 'init-param' as child of 'servlet'.
- Ignored element 'display-name' as child of 'servlet'.
- Ignored element 'init-param' as child of 'servlet'.
- ServletContext 'd:\Apache Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.5\webapps\..\..\cocoon-
2.1.7\' initialized.
- The database 'db' root directory has been set to D:\Apache Software Foundation
\cocoon-2.1.7\WEB-INF\db. Keep in mind that if a war upgrade will take place the
 database will be lost.
- Database points to D:\Apache Software Foundation\cocoon-2.1.7\WEB-INF\db
- Database 'db' successfully opened
- Xindice server successfully started
trying to register database
trying to register database
- RAMJobStore initialized.
- Quartz scheduler 'Cocoon
- Quartz scheduler version: 1.4.5
- Scheduler Cocoon_$_Wed_Nov_16_14:14:32_CST_2005 started.

The log file catalina.2005-11-16.log contained:

Nov 16, 2005 2:14:21 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init
INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-80
Nov 16, 2005 2:14:21 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load
INFO: Initialization processed in 1047 ms
Nov 16, 2005 2:14:21 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService start
INFO: Starting service Catalina
Nov 16, 2005 2:14:21 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/5.5.9
Nov 16, 2005 2:14:21 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost start
INFO: XML validation disabled
(this is where Tomcat hung)

Anyone have ideas as to why it's waiting for so long?
It sounds like it's waiting on a SocketConnect, but to where, and why?

Thanks for any help...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37491] - isapi 1.2.15 connector when configured on IIS5.0(W2000) with "isapi_redirect.properties" shows an error "The parameter is incorrect"

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37491





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 21:51 ---
Look at line 5 of your logs.
You've confused / and \.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37516] - A committed HttpServletResponse is passed to the doGet() method

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 21:59 ---
I looked at that issue in the past, and Java2D accesses the streams outside of
the service methods.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Missing MD5 and PGP

2005-11-16 Thread Mark Thomas 
The signatures for 5.5.12 embedded are missing from the download area. 
Can whoever released 5.5.12 (Yoav?) create and upload them please?


Thanks,

Mark


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Missing MD5 and PGP

2005-11-16 Thread Yoav Shapira 
Yeah, done a few minutes ago.  Main site will sync up in <1hr.  Sorry I
forgot to them earlier, although apparently only one person noticed in
several weeks ;)

Yoav Shapira
System Design and Management Fellow
MIT Sloan School of Management
Cambridge, MA USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 4:22 PM
> To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Missing MD5 and PGP
> 
> The signatures for 5.5.12 embedded are missing from the download area.
> Can whoever released 5.5.12 (Yoav?) create and upload them please?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37277] - long delay in Tomcat startup

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37277





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-16 22:58 ---
Another datapoint to consider: reloading the Cocoon webapp without restarting
Tomcat takes much less time (maybe a minute). So the problem appears to be in
Tomcat, not Cocoon.

Again, this problem occurs in our production environment but not in our test or
development environments (except when the dev envt is a laptop at home). The
production environment is in a DMZ. So could this indicate that somehow Tomcat
is trying to open a connection to a machine that it doesn't have access to, and
keeps waiting for the connection to time out?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37491] - isapi 1.2.15 connector when configured on IIS5.0(W2000) with "isapi_redirect.properties" shows an error "The parameter is incorrect"

2005-11-16 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37491


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-11-17 06:17 ---
Thanks Tim, The use of forward slash(/jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll) instead of 
backward slash(\jakarta\isapi_redirect.dll) worked fine on IIS 5.0, 
Interesting point to note is that the backward slash works on IIS 6.0 but not 
on 5.0 .

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]