Re: Looking for final review of SOLR-16842

[Eric Pugh]

Thanks Jason, I’m happy to stall till end of day on Monday to click “merge”!   
Thanks.


> On Jun 21, 2024, at 12:33 PM, Jason Gerlowski  wrote:
> 
> Hey Eric,
> 
> Sorry for the delay - I am hoping to review that PR.  I'll try to have
> a review done by Monday (if not today).  That should leave a week or
> so for any followups prior to your big trip!  (Safe travels!)
> 
> If Monday isn't early enough and you need to merge on Saturday, IMO
> that's fine.  The PR's been open for nearly a year and you've been
> more than patient at this point.  In that case I'll just review
> post-merge and we can handle any follow ups as needed.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Jason
> 
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 12:07 PM Eric Pugh
>  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all, I’m planning on merging https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1768, 
>> SOLR-16824: Adopt Linux Command line tool pattern of -- for long option 
>> commands tomorrow (Saturday).
>> 
>> I’m going to be traveling (Spain!) for three weeks starting June 29th, and 
>> I’d like to make sure this fairly big change has plenty time for any panicky 
>> follow up fixes that turn out to be needed when it goes into main and 
>> branch_9x.
>> 
>> Eric
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com  
>> | My Free/Busy 
>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed 
>> 
>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of 
>> whether attachments are marked as such.
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> 

___
Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
http://www.opensourceconnections.com  | 
My Free/Busy   
Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed 


This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether 
attachments are marked as such.

Re: Integration test failures on Jenkins

[Eric Pugh]

Houston, did you make any progress on this?  

If this keeps happening, do we need to make our bats tests more robust in 
"checking" to see if a port is available first?

On 2024/06/12 05:45:08 David Smiley wrote:
> Thanks for investigating. The nature of the failure would never occur in a
> contained infrastructure. It’s sad to see having to deal with this. Do you
> know if it’s even an option to run a particular job in a container?
> Anyway, reach infra on Slack #askinfra
> 
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 6:42 PM Houston Putman  wrote:
> 
> > Currently the integration tests have been failing on Jenkins since around
> > May 29th. It looks like there is a rogue process that has Auth enabled that
> > is causing this problem. (Port 38603)
> >
> > For some reason a lot of the bin/solr commands choose to connect to this
> > process instead of the SOLR_PORT that is in use by the integration tests at
> > that point. I have a PR for making all commands in bin/solr use the same
> > port defaulting, but that can really only land in 10.0.
> >
> > In the meantime we should see if infra can stop that rogue process so that
> > the tests can start passing.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org