Re: 8.11.3 release
I think everything that needs to be backported for 8.11.3, has been backported. We should try to get this out as soon as possible. - Houston On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 9:58 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Uwe. > > Just an update on the release: there is a security issue that we are > discussing in private which the release is blocked on. Once that is > addressed, we'll have the release (hopefully, shortly). > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 15:21, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I activated the 8.11 builds on Policeman Jenkins, too. Let's see what > > happens. It should basically pass as we have all historic JVMs > > available, but we never know if some legacy download locations of > > Restlet & co changed. > > > > Uwe > > > > Am 31.10.2023 um 11:49 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya: > > > Had to BadApple these tests: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17061 > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 20:30, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> There were a few tests that were failing on PRS seeds. Noble and I > fixed > > >> them over the weekend. > > >> > > >> There are some intermittent failures on a variety of tests in the > > branch, > > >> and I'm finding it hard to get a full test run done in order to build > > the > > >> artifacts. At the moment, none of them look serious or suspicious. > > >> I think I might have to bad-apple a few of those tests, in order to > get > > a > > >> release out. I shall update here on that. > > >> > > >> Thanks everyone for your patience. > > >> > > >> On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 00:55, Jan Høydahl > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> I also enabled the smoketest job, and it passes: > > >>> > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.11/lastSuccessfulBuild/ > > >>> ! > > >>> > > >>> The Lucene-Solr-Tests-8.11 has failed a few times, but on different > > >>> tests, so things are looking good. > > >>> > > >>> Jan > > >>> > > 27. okt. 2023 kl. 13:55 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>: > > Thanks Jan. Some tests are failing; Noble and I are looking into > them. > > >>> If > > all goes well, I'm planning to spin the RC1 by this weekend. > > > > On Fri, 27 Oct, 2023, 2:45 pm Jan Høydahl, > > >>> wrote: > > > Thanks Kevin, Ishan for doing the prep work here. > > > > > > I re-enabled the jenkins job > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-8.11/ > > to > > > get a feel for the current status. We also have a smokeTest job > that > > >>> should > > > be enabled when release is approaching. > > > > > > Jan > > > > > >> 12. okt. 2023 kl. 19:38 skrev Kevin Risden : > > >> > > >> I've pushed a few things to branch_8_11 recently > > >> * > > >> > > >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/e491400d961b771f146c6e12a7f8ed89eafe128f > > >> * > > >> > > >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e545e8f2154698e9bfeee92c40f8541fd7d0152 > > >> * > > >> > > >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/e7560cd2ab024d4315933cd3965aab2961bba994 > > >> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2681 is in draft and > > >>> updated > > > a > > >> bunch of relatively low risk dependencies. There might be others > we > > >>> want > > > to > > >> upgrade, but figured it was a decent start. > > >> > > >> Kevin Risden > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 4:27 AM Pierre Salagnac < > > > pierre.salag...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> I just opened a pull request. > > >>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2679 > > >>> Details are in the PR. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks ! > > >>> > > >>> Le lun. 2 oct. 2023 à 20:25, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > >>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> > > >>> a écrit : > > >>> > > Thanks Pierre, I'll have it included in 8.11 once you are able > to > > >>> have > > > a > > >>> PR > > for this. Thanks! > > > > On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 22:22, Pierre Salagnac < > > > pierre.salag...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Ishan, > > > Sorry for the late chime in. > > > > > > Some time ago I filled a Jira for a Solr 8 specific bug: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16843 > > > > > > At that time, I wasn't expecting more 8.x releases, so I did > not > > >>> open > > > a > > PR > > > for it. > > > I can work on a fix if we have a few days more before the > > release. > > >>> I > > think > > > it is worth to have it in solr 8 (that's not a backport) > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 29 sept. 2023 à 23:24, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit : >
Re: Solr 9.4.1
Release notes:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNotes9_4_1
I made some small structural adjustments to the release notes. I prefer to
put the CHANGES link last so that you start reading the highlights and then
end with the CHANGES link for further details.
Since this is a patch release, I chose not to get into much details in the
release highlights. People can read CHANGES.txt for the details.
Ishan, SOLR-17112 had no PR so nothing to merge, so it will miss this
release unless you are super fast or there is another RC.
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 2:23 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Done
>
> Jan
>
> > 7. jan. 2024 kl. 07:03 skrev David Smiley :
> >
> > Sure; thanks.
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:29 PM Jan Høydahl
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Should we include this bugfix?
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16203
> >> I'm merging to branch_9x now...
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> 5. jan. 2024 kl. 17:14 skrev David Smiley :
> >>>
> >>> 9.4.1 is unblocked; bug fixes are now on the release branch. I plan to
> >>> pursue a RC soon (today/tomorrow). This is my first time.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:53 AM Jan Høydahl
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on
> >> track
> again. Normally it only files new PRs on Sundays, but I'm triggering
> >> that
> manually now to consider what other upgrades from the past month that
> we
> should put into 9.4.1.
>
> Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/solr/pulls/solrbot
> and
> consider which ones should be merged and backported.
>
> Jan
>
> > 8. des. 2023 kl. 14:59 skrev David Smiley >:
> >
> > I renamed that job to add "(Crave)"
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x%20(Crave)/
> >> and
> > disabled it. I then I created a new job copied from the
> "Solr-check-main"
> > but branch_9x. Builds are hourly so we'll see how it goes.
> >
> > ~ David
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jan Høydahl
> wrote:
> >
> >> PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is
> also
> not
> >> running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave..
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley <
> david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> I've been working with Uv on these glitches.
> >>> ~ David
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the
> number
> >> of
> known CVEs down.
>
> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but
> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests:
>
> > Run cd
>
> >>
>
> >>
> /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr
> > Selecting project Solr (id:39)
> > Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
>
> Jan
>
> > 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <
> >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> > :
> >
> > Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will
> >> happen
> >> as
> > there are a couple security matters we're looking at.
> > ~ David
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh <
> ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the
> bin/solr
> post
> >> command.
> >>
> >> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c
> >> tech
> >> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url
> parameter.
> >> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c
> parameter,
> >> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date.
> >>
> >> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change.
> >>
> >>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <
> gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most
> sense
> >>> there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got
> >> thoughts!
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <
> >> jan@cominvent.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients?
> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in
> the
> >> binary
> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them
> "internal"
> >> only
> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only
> dog-fooding?
>
> Jan
>
> > 6. des. 2023 kl. 15
Re: [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, January 2024
Hello everyone So far, 1/18 is the most voted date. I’ll announce in meetup and slack channels, also create a meeting notes page. Please reply to this thread with any agenda/ presentation that you want to discuss. Thanks Raghavan Sent from iPhone On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:42 PM Marcus Eagan wrote: > On the 18th, I'll be available to join. > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 7:06 PM David Smiley wrote: > > > 18th > > or probably any > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:15 AM raghavan m > > wrote: > > > > > Hey everyone, > > > Please vote for one of the following days > > > > > >- 1/15 > > >- 1/16 > > >- 1/17 > > >- 1/18 > > >- 1/19 > > >- 1/22 > > > > > > Time: 9 am pacific time. > > > Thanks > > > Raghavan > > > > > > Sent from iPhone > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 5:27 AM Jason Gerlowski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Awesome, thanks for volunteering Raghavan! > > > > > > > > Anyone have thoughts on scheduling? Absent other strong opinions, > > maybe > > > we > > > > could aim for the week of Monday the 15th through Friday the 19th and > > > pick > > > > a day/time in that range? > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 1:27 AM raghavan m > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Happy New Year everyone. I can volunteer for January. > > > > > > > > > > Sent from iPhone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 7:49 AM Jason Gerlowski < > > gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > > > After missing December, It's time once again to start thinking > > ahead > > > to > > > > > our > > > > > > first Virtual Meetup in the New Year! As always, there's two > main > > > > > > questions to answer in terms of planning: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Any volunteers to organize? Organizer duties are pretty light > > and > > > > are > > > > > > summarized here: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Meeting+notes. > > > > > > Volunteers > > > > > > get some discretion in terms of picking a meeting time/day that > > works > > > > for > > > > > > them. If there are no volunteers by the end of the week, I'm > more > > > than > > > > > > happy to set things up for this month. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. When should we meet? I've started the discussion early this > > > month, > > > > so > > > > > > we've got plenty of days to choose from. If you have any > opinions, > > > > > please > > > > > > discuss. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Marcus Eagan >
