Re: Solr 9.4.1
Sure; thanks.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:29 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Should we include this bugfix?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16203
> I'm merging to branch_9x now...
>
> Jan
>
> > 5. jan. 2024 kl. 17:14 skrev David Smiley :
> >
> > 9.4.1 is unblocked; bug fixes are now on the release branch. I plan to
> > pursue a RC soon (today/tomorrow). This is my first time.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:53 AM Jan Høydahl
> wrote:
> >
> >> SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on
> track
> >> again. Normally it only files new PRs on Sundays, but I'm triggering
> that
> >> manually now to consider what other upgrades from the past month that we
> >> should put into 9.4.1.
> >>
> >> Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/solr/pulls/solrbot and
> >> consider which ones should be merged and backported.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 8. des. 2023 kl. 14:59 skrev David Smiley :
> >>>
> >>> I renamed that job to add "(Crave)"
> >>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x%20(Crave)/
> and
> >>> disabled it. I then I created a new job copied from the
> >> "Solr-check-main"
> >>> but branch_9x. Builds are hourly so we'll see how it goes.
> >>>
> >>> ~ David
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jan Høydahl
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is also
> >> not
> running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave..
>
> Jan
>
> > 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley >:
> >
> > I've been working with Uv on these glitches.
> > ~ David
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl
> wrote:
> >
> >> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number
> of
> >> known CVEs down.
> >>
> >> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but
> >> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests:
> >>
> >>> Run cd
> >>
>
> >>
> /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr
> >>> Selecting project Solr (id:39)
> >>> Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <
> david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will
> happen
> as
> >>> there are a couple security matters we're looking at.
> >>> ~ David
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh <
> >> ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the
> >> bin/solr
> >> post
> command.
>
> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c
> tech
> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url
> >> parameter.
> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c
> >> parameter,
> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date.
>
> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change.
>
> > On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <
> >> gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most
> >> sense
> > there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got
> thoughts!
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <
> jan@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients?
> >> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the
> binary
> >> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them
> >> "internal"
> only
> >> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only
> >> dog-fooding?
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <
> gerlowsk...@gmail.com
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new
> >> Python
> >> and
> >>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the
> release,
> or
> >>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing
> the
> new
> >>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and
> I'd
> >> hate
> to
> >>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are
> likely
> >> to
> crop
> >> up.
> >>>
> >>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish
> >> timeframe?
> >>>
> >>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in
> >> the
> >> way
> >> of
> >>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a
> 9.4.1
> even
> >> with
> >>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving facto
Re: [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, January 2024
Happy New Year everyone. I can volunteer for January. Sent from iPhone On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 7:49 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > Hey all, > > After missing December, It's time once again to start thinking ahead to our > first Virtual Meetup in the New Year! As always, there's two main > questions to answer in terms of planning: > > 1. Any volunteers to organize? Organizer duties are pretty light and are > summarized here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Meeting+notes. > Volunteers > get some discretion in terms of picking a meeting time/day that works for > them. If there are no volunteers by the end of the week, I'm more than > happy to set things up for this month. > > 2. When should we meet? I've started the discussion early this month, so > we've got plenty of days to choose from. If you have any opinions, please > discuss. > > Best, > > Jason >
Re: Solr 9.4.1
Hi David,
I think we should include SOLR-17112 as well. On some systems, the bin/solr
script doesn't work properly.
Regards,
Ishan
On Sun, 7 Jan, 2024, 11:33 am David Smiley, wrote:
> Sure; thanks.
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:29 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> > Should we include this bugfix?
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16203
> > I'm merging to branch_9x now...
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > > 5. jan. 2024 kl. 17:14 skrev David Smiley :
> > >
> > > 9.4.1 is unblocked; bug fixes are now on the release branch. I plan to
> > > pursue a RC soon (today/tomorrow). This is my first time.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:53 AM Jan Høydahl
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on
> > track
> > >> again. Normally it only files new PRs on Sundays, but I'm triggering
> > that
> > >> manually now to consider what other upgrades from the past month that
> we
> > >> should put into 9.4.1.
> > >>
> > >> Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/solr/pulls/solrbot
> and
> > >> consider which ones should be merged and backported.
> > >>
> > >> Jan
> > >>
> > >>> 8. des. 2023 kl. 14:59 skrev David Smiley >:
> > >>>
> > >>> I renamed that job to add "(Crave)"
> > >>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x%20(Crave)/
> > and
> > >>> disabled it. I then I created a new job copied from the
> > >> "Solr-check-main"
> > >>> but branch_9x. Builds are hourly so we'll see how it goes.
> > >>>
> > >>> ~ David
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jan Høydahl
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is
> also
> > >> not
> > running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave..
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > > 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley <
> david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >
> > > I've been working with Uv on these glitches.
> > > ~ David
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the
> number
> > of
> > >> known CVEs down.
> > >>
> > >> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but
> > >> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests:
> > >>
> > >>> Run cd
> > >>
> >
> > >>
> > /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr
> > >>> Selecting project Solr (id:39)
> > >>> Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
> > >>
> > >> Jan
> > >>
> > >>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <
> > david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> > >>> :
> > >>>
> > >>> Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will
> > happen
> > as
> > >>> there are a couple security matters we're looking at.
> > >>> ~ David
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh <
> > >> ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the
> > >> bin/solr
> > >> post
> > command.
> >
> > Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c
> > tech
> > products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url
> > >> parameter.
> > I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c
> > >> parameter,
> > and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date.
> >
> > This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change.
> >
> > > On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <
> > >> gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most
> > >> sense
> > > there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got
> > thoughts!
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <
> > jan@cominvent.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients?
> > >> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in
> the
> > binary
> > >> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them
> > >> "internal"
> > only
> > >> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only
> > >> dog-fooding?
> > >>
> > >> Jan
> > >>
> > >>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <
> > gerlowsk...@gmail.com
> > >>> :
> > >>>
> > >>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our
> new
> > >> Python
> > >> and
> > >>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the
> > release,
> > or
> > >>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing
> > the
> > new
> > >>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and
> > I'd
> > >> hate
> >
