Facing issue in while doing migration log4j 1.x to 2.x

2023-05-15 Thread Nishu Gupta
Hi Dev Team,

I need some information regarding log4j.

Currently I am using log4j 1.x version. I am trying to migrate from 1.x to =
2.x using bridge jar.

we are using below category in log4j1.xml


http://abc.te=
st.com:3226/>" />

" />










http://abc.te=
st.com:3226/>" />

" />

















I am trying to convert into logj2.xml and we have custom class JMSQueueAppe=
nder which extends AppenderSkeleton for logging the event.

Could you please help me out in the migration?


Thanks & regards
Nishu Gupta

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows



Re: Facing issue in while doing migration log4j 1.x to 2.x

2023-05-19 Thread Nishu Gupta
Hi Dev team,

Did you get a chance to look into the below mail?

regards,
Nishu Gupta

From: Nishu Gupta
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 10:08 AM
To: dev@logging.apache.org ; 
log4j-u...@logging.apache.org 
Subject: Facing issue in while doing migration log4j 1.x to 2.x


Hi Dev Team,

I need some information regarding log4j.

Currently I am using log4j 1.x version. I am trying to migrate from 1.x to =
2.x using bridge jar.

we are using below category in log4j1.xml


http://abc.te=
st.com:3226/>" />

" />










http://abc.te=
st.com:3226/>" />

" />

















I am trying to convert into logj2.xml and we have custom class JMSQueueAppe=
nder which extends AppenderSkeleton for logging the event.

Could you please help me out in the migration?


Thanks & regards
Nishu Gupta



Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows




Re: Facing issue in while doing migration log4j 1.x to 2.x

2023-05-24 Thread Nishu Gupta
Hi Piotr,

Thanks for the response.

Currently we are using log4j1.2.17 jar, and PFA log4j.xml used in 1.x.

For 1.x to 2.x I replace the above jar with the below jar.

Jar
log4j-1.2-api-2.20.0.jar
log4j-api-2.20.0.jar
log4j-core-2.20.0.jar
log4j-slf4j-impl-2.20.0.jar

I did the set the `log4j1.compatibility` to `true` in the custom properties.

Do I need to use the log4j.xml while using the bridge jar? or I need to convert 
to log4j2.xml as well?

Regards,
Nishu



From: Piotr P. Karwasz 
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 9:41 PM
To: dev@logging.apache.org 
Cc: Nishu Gupta 
Subject: Re: Facing issue in while doing migration log4j 1.x to 2.x

Hi Volkan,

On Fri, 19 May 2023 at 15:22, Volkan Yazıcı  wrote:
>1. As indicated in the Log4j support page
><https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/2.x/support.html>, `
>dev@logging.apache.org` mailing list is used for development-related
>discussions. In the future, please use `log4j-u...@logging.apache.org`
>instead.

Actually Nishu cross-posted his question to both mailing lists, but I
answered only on `log4j-user`.

Piotr

http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/";>
   
  
  
   
  



   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  


   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  

   
   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  

   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  


   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  































































Re: Facing issue in while doing migration log4j 1.x to 2.x

2023-05-31 Thread Nishu Gupta
Hi All,

Here is the log4j and lo4j2 xml.

I need a help for how jms call trigger?

regards,
Nishu


From: Nishu Gupta 
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:17 AM
To: Piotr P. Karwasz ; dev@logging.apache.org 

Cc: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Facing issue in while doing migration log4j 1.x to 2.x

Hi Piotr,

Thanks for the response.

Currently we are using log4j1.2.17 jar, and PFA log4j.xml used in 1.x.

For 1.x to 2.x I replace the above jar with the below jar.

Jar
log4j-1.2-api-2.20.0.jar
log4j-api-2.20.0.jar
log4j-core-2.20.0.jar
log4j-slf4j-impl-2.20.0.jar

I did the set the `log4j1.compatibility` to `true` in the custom properties.

Do I need to use the log4j.xml while using the bridge jar? or I need to convert 
to log4j2.xml as well?

Regards,
Nishu



From: Piotr P. Karwasz 
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 9:41 PM
To: dev@logging.apache.org 
Cc: Nishu Gupta 
Subject: Re: Facing issue in while doing migration log4j 1.x to 2.x

Hi Volkan,

On Fri, 19 May 2023 at 15:22, Volkan Yazıcı  wrote:
>1. As indicated in the Log4j support page
><https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/2.x/support.html>, `
>dev@logging.apache.org` mailing list is used for development-related
>discussions. In the future, please use `log4j-u...@logging.apache.org`
>instead.

Actually Nishu cross-posted his question to both mailing lists, but I
answered only on `log4j-user`.

Piotr

http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/";>
   
  
  
   
  



   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  


   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  

   
   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  

   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  


   


  
  
   
  
  
 
 
  































































  

  
  



  
  
  

  
  



  
  
  

  
  



  
  
  

  
  



  
  
  

  
  





[%d{MMM dd,  h:mm:ss:a z}] [%X{SM_USER}-%X{MS}]  [%p]  [%C]  [%m]%n