Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as release manager you will be voting +1. However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do that before you send it there. Ralph > On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Same here. I can review over the weekend. > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers > wrote: >> >> I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until >> Saturday. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton wrote: >>> >>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually >>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of >>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote. >>> >>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures >>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development. >>> >>> -Robert Middleton >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl >>> wrote: Hi all It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1 I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working? @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ): Thanks -d >>
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Hi Ralph Yes, I'll release as soon as I get a gap. I replied to the signing request too - not sure what happened to 2.0.14, but every other release is signed. The signing attribute was missing - I must have accidentally deleted it - I've added a test to check that it's in place and checked that the RC artifact assemblies are signed (that's the mystery: they are signed, even though I just added the signing attribute back 🤔. Oh well, now there's a test for it and tests are run as part of the release artifact generation, so if it happens again, at least I'll know). -e On 03 August 2022 22:00:34 Ralph Goers wrote: Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as release manager you will be voting +1. However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do that before you send it there. Ralph On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: Same here. I can review over the weekend. On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers wrote: I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday. Ralph On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton wrote: The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of course only happen after the release is done via this vote. I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures are good, as I know nothing about .net development. -Robert Middleton On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl wrote: Hi all It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1 I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working? @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ): Thanks -d
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Hi all Thanks for the votes, 2.0.15 is now live. -d On Aug 4 2022, at 5:14 am, Davyd McColl wrote: > > Hi Ralph > Yes, I'll release as soon as I get a gap. I replied to the signing request > too - not sure what happened to 2.0.14, but every other release is signed. > The signing attribute was missing - I must have accidentally deleted it - > I've added a test to check that it's in place and checked that the RC > artifact assemblies are signed (that's the mystery: they are signed, even > though I just added the signing attribute back 🤔. Oh well, now there's a test > for it and tests are run as part of the release artifact generation, so if it > happens again, at least I'll know). > -e > > On 03 August 2022 22:00:34 Ralph Goers wrote: > > Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as > > release manager you will be voting +1. > > However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do > > that before you send it there. > > Ralph > > > On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > Same here. I can review over the weekend. > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it > > > > until Saturday. > > > > Ralph > > > > > On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton > > > > > wrote: > > > > > The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org > > > > > (http://downloads.apache.org) until actually > > > > > released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of > > > > > course only happen after the release is done via this vote. > > > > > > > > > > I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures > > > > > are good, as I know nothing about .net development. > > > > > > > > > > -Robert Middleton > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a > > > > > > 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1 > > > > > > I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however > > > > > > I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at > > > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net > > > > > > > > > > > > This is probably why download links from > > > > > > https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html > > > > > > aren't working? > > > > > > @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing > > > > > > something obvious ): > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -d > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
